Elsevier

Experimental Cell Research

Volume 328, Issue 2, 1 November 2014, Pages 314-324
Experimental Cell Research

Review Article
The chick embryo chorioallantoic membrane as a model for tumor biology

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yexcr.2014.06.010Get rights and content

Highlights

  • The chick embryo CAM is a model for tumor biology and metastasis.

  • Being naturally immunodeficient, the chick embryo may receive transplantations from different tissues and species.

  • Compared with mammals models, tumor growth in the CAM is faster.

  • In contrast to standard mouse models most cancer cells complete extravasation within 24 h after injections in the CAM.

Abstract

Among the in vivo models, the chick embryo chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) has been used to implant several tumor types as well as malignant cell lines to study their growth rate, angiogenic potential and metastatic capability. This review article is focused on the major compelling literature data on the use of the CAM to investigate tumor growth and the metastatic process.

Section snippets

Development and structure of the chick chorioallantoic membrane

The chicken is a well-known experimental model to study embryonic development. Chick embryos are readily accessible for visualization in ovo and experimental manipulation. Chick embryo development lasts 21 days before hatching [63].

Three extraembryonic membranes are formed during development: the yolk sac membrane, the amnion, and the chorioallantoic membrane (CAM). The CAM (Fig. 1) is formed on day 3–4 of incubation by the fusion of the chorion and the allantois and it consists of three

Natural immunodeficiency of the developing chick

Being naturally immunodeficient, the chick embryo accepts transplantation from various tissues and species without immune response. Chickens are protected by a dual immune system composed of B and T cells, controlling the antibody and cell mediated immunity, respectively. The B cells are differentiated in the bursa of Fabricius, whereas T cells are differentiated in the thymus [63], [12], [18]. The chick immune system does not begin to develop to function until about 2 weeks into its

Historical background

The CAM has long been used to study tumor growth because the chick׳s immunocompetent system is not fully developed and the conditions for rejection have not been yet established [34]. In 1911, Rous and Murphy demonstrated the growth of the Rous 45 chicken sarcoma transplanted onto the chick embryo CAM [64]. Murphy [44] in 1913 reported that mouse and rat tumors implanted onto the CAM could be maintained by continuous passage from egg to egg and described the effects of these transplantation on

Development of blood vessels in the tumor grafts and regulation of tumor angiogenesis in the CAM assay

Different tumors and cell suspensions derived from tumors have been implanted on the CAM (Table 1, Table 2) [55]. Between 2 and 5 days after tumor cell inoculation, the tumor xenografts become visible, are supplied with vessels of CAM origin, and begin a phase of rapid growth.

Knighton et al. [28] investigated the time-course of rat Walker 256 carcinoma specimens implanted on the CAM. Tumors did not exceed a mean diameter of 0.93±0.29 mm during the pre-vascular phase (approximately 72 h). Rapid

The CAM in the study of angiogenesis and anti-angiogenesis in human multiple myeloma and neuroblastoma

Plasma cell conditioned media of active multiple myeloma patients induced an angiogenic response in the CAM, inhibited by anti- fibroblast growth factor-2 (FGF-2) antibody [75]. The time-course of the angiogenic response induced by gelatin sponges soaked with multiple myeloma plasma cells on the CAM from day 8 to day 12 of incubation demonstrated that plasma cells from patients with active multiple myeloma induce a vasoproliferative response (Fig. 4), significantly higher as compared to that

Metastasis

Tumor cell metastasis involves a complex series of events that are linked both temporally and spatially (Fig. 8). The metastasis chick embryo model, based on the grafting of human tumor cells on the CAM has provided valuable information regarding tumor cell penetration of the chorionic epithelium, invasion of the mesenchyme (Fig. 9) below and the blood vessels, survival of tumor cells in the circulation, their arrest in the vasculature, extravasation, and proliferation in the distant organs [1]

Visualization and detection of tumor cells (Table 3)

Several methods for semiquantitative analysis of metastasis in the chick embryo have been developed including morphometric quantitation of individual fluorescent-labeled metastasized cells by videomicroscopy [49], [50], [39], detection of microscopic tumor colonies [39], detection of human urokinase plasminogen activator within secondary organs of the embryo [49], [50], the use of green fluorescent protein (GFP) and in vivo videomicroscopy [26], [31]. Because the human genome is uniquely

Advantages

Being naturally immunodeficient, the chick embryo may receive transplantations from different tissues and species, without immune responses. Moreover, CAM allows a rapid vascularization, development of tumor cells or bioptic specimens placed on its surface, and allows to observe and analyze the real time changes in morphology of cancer cells in its microcirculation.

In contrast to standard mouse models most cancer cells arrested in the CAM microcirculation survive without cell damage, and a

Concluding remarks

The experiments performed in the chick CAM have resulted in important progress in elucidating the mechanisms of tumor growth and metastatic spread. The main advantages of this assay are the low cost, reproducibility and reliability. The major drawback is the pre-existence of a rich vascular network and the neovascularization secondary to tumor implant or metastatic process is hardly distinguishable from a falsely increased vascular density due to a rearrangement of existing vessels or

Competing interest

The author declare that he has no competing interest.

Acknowledgments

The research leading to these results has received funding from the European Union Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013) under Grant agreement no. 278570.

References (83)

  • A. Zijlstra et al.

    Collagenolysis-dependent angiogenesis mediated by matrix metalloproteinase-13 (collagenase-3)

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (2004)
  • A. Zijlstra et al.

    Proangiogenic role of neutrophil-like inflammatory heterophils during neovascularization induced by growth factors and human tumor cells

    Blood

    (2006)
  • P.B. Armstrong et al.

    Transepithelial invasion and intramesenchymal infiltration of the chick embryo chorioallantois by tumor cell lines

    Cancer Res.

    (1982)
  • D.H. Ausprunk et al.

    Vascularization of normal and neoplastic tissues grafted to the chick chorioallantois. Role of host and preexisting graft blood vessels

    Am. J. Pathol.

    (1975)
  • D.H. Ausprunk et al.

    Vascular injury in transplanted tissues. Fine structural changes in tumor, adult and embryonic blood vessels

    Virchow Arch. B

    (1976)
  • V. Bobek et al.

    Development of a green fluorescent protein metastatic-cancer chick-embryo drug-screen model

    Clin. Exp. Metastasis

    (2004)
  • C. Brignole et al.

    Effect of bortezomib on human neuroblastoma cell growth, apoptosis, and angiogenesis

    J. Natl. Cancer Inst.

    (2006)
  • G.M. Brodeur et al.

    Amplification of N-Myc in untreated human neuroblastoma correlates with advanced disease stage

    Science

    (1984)
  • A.F. Chambers et al.

    Early steps in hematogenous metastasis of B16F1 melanoma cells in chick embryos studied by high-resolution intravital videomicroscopy

    J. Natl. Cancer Inst.

    (1992)
  • C.-F. Cho et al.

    Evaluation of nanoparticle uptake in tumors in real time using intravital imaging

    J. Vis. Exp.

    (2011)
  • E.R. Clark

    Technique of operating on chick embryos

    Science

    (1920)
  • C.P. Dagg et al.

    Growth of transplantable human tumors in the chick embryo and hatched chick

    Cancer Res.

    (1956)
  • T.F. Davison

    The immunologists׳ debt to the chicken

    Br. Poult. Sci.

    (2003)
  • A. De Luisi et al.

    Lenalidomide restrains motility and overangiogenic potential of bone marrow endothelial cells in patients with active multiple myeloma

    Clin. Cancer Res.

    (2011)
  • E.I. Deryugina et al.

    Unexpected effect of matrix metalloproteinase down-regulation on vascular intravasation and metastasis of human fibrosarcoma cells selected in vivo for high rates of dissemination

    Cancer Res.

    (2005)
  • F. Durupt et al.

    The chicken chorioallantoic membrane tumor assay as model for qualitative testing of oncolytic adenoviruses

    Cancer Gene Ther.

    (2012)
  • I.J. Fidler

    Biological behavior of malignant melanoma cells correlated to their survival in vivo

    Cancer Res.

    (1975)
  • P.E. Funk et al.

    Current concepts in chicken B cell development

    Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol.

    (1996)
  • J.R. Gordon et al.

    Early spontaneous metastasis in the human epidermoid carcinoma HEp3/chick embryo model: contribution of incidental colonization

    Int. J. Cancer

    (1986)
  • M. Hagedorn et al.

    Accessing key steps of human tumor progression in vivo by using an avian embryo model

    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A

    (2005)
  • J.J. Harris

    The human tumor grown in the egg

    Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci.

    (1958)
  • B.D. Jankovic et al.

    Immunological capacity of the chicken embryo. I. Relationship between the maturation of lymphoid tissues and the occurrence of cell-mediated immunity in the developing chicken embryo

    Immunology

    (1975)
  • E.M. Janse et al.

    Ontogeny and function of two non-lymphoid cell populations in the chicken embryo

    Immunobiology

    (1991)
  • D.A. Karnofsky et al.

    Tumor transplantation to the chick embryo

    Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci.

    (1952)
  • N. Kaufman et al.

    Maintenance of human neoplasm on the chick chorioallantoic membrane

    Am. J. Pathol.

    (1956)
  • R. Khokha et al.

    Up-regulation of TIMP-1 expression in B16-F10 melanoma cells suppresses their metastatic ability in chick embryo

    Clin. Exp. Metastasis

    (1992)
  • D. Knighton et al.

    Avascular and vascular phases of tumour growth in the chick embryo

    Br. J. Cancer

    (1977)
  • S. Koop et al.

    Overexpression of metalloproteinase inhibitor in B16F10 cells does not affect extravasation but reduces tumor growth

    Cancer Res.

    (1994)
  • S. Koop et al.

    Fate of melanoma cells entering the microcirculation: over 80% survive and extravasate

    Cancer Res.

    (1995)
  • S. Koop et al.

    Independence of metastatic ability and extravasation: metastatic ras-transformed and control fibroblasts extravasate equally well

    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A

    (1996)
  • L. Korngold et al.

    Tissue antigens of human tumors grown in rats, hamsters, and eggs

    Cancer Res.

    (1955)
  • Cited by (175)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text