Original ArticleIn-Hospital Complications and Resource Utilization Following Lumbar Spine Surgery in Patients with Parkinson Disease: Evaluation of the National Inpatient Sample Database
Introduction
Parkinson disease (PD), a neurodegenerative disorder resulting from lesions in the basal ganglia, is increasingly prevalent in older adults and is now the second-most common degenerative neurologic disorder in the elderly population.1 With disease progression, PD results in a functional decline with reduced mobility, typified by a slow, shuffling gait and increased muscular rigidity.2, 3 Despite advances in medical treatment for PD, the natural history of the disease remains one of progressive decline.4 Patients with PD may also suffer common degenerative disorders that afflict the individuals without PD, including degenerative disorders of the joints and spine. These degenerative conditions can place an added physiological burden on patients with PD, whose mobility is already compromised.
Little data exist on patient outcomes following spine surgery in the PD population.5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 The few reports available highlight increased complication rates, increased rates of revision surgery, and increased risk of instrumentation or construct failure in patients with PD.5, 6, 7, 9, 11, 12 Early complications, including infection, have been reported at a rate of almost 20%, whereas other reports suggest a greater risk of poor postoperative outcomes following spine surgery.12, 13 Nonetheless, there remains a relative lack of published information relating to surgical complications and outcomes following spine surgery for patients with PD. In addition, previous reports surgical treatment of spinal pathologies in patients with PD have been limited by small samples.6, 7, 9, 11, 12, 13, 14 Although these previous reports contribute to the knowledge pool, larger database analysis may provide a broader picture with greater generalizability.
In the present study, we used the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database to evaluate in-hospital complication rates for patients with PD (PD group) and patients without PD (NONPD group) undergoing surgery for lumbar spine degenerative conditions. We hypothesized that compared with the NONPD group, the PD group would have a greater risk for complications following elective lumbar spine surgery.
Section snippets
Methods
The NIS, an all-payer database available by the US Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, is the largest database of its type available. Approximately 1000 hospitals across 45 states provide NIS data, representing a 20% sample of nonfederal hospitals nationwide. Approximately 8 million hospital stays are recorded annually. For each discharge, a number of clinical and nonclinical event points are recorded in addition to procedural and diagnostic codes according to the International
Results
A total of 613,522 patients met our study inclusion criteria, including 4950 patients with PD (0.7% of all lumbar procedures). Before the PSM analysis, compared with the NONPD group, the PD group was older (70.6 years vs. 58.9 years; P < 0.001) and had a greater percentage of males (59.3% vs. 46.8%; P < 0.001). There were no differences in terms of race between the 2 groups. Following PSM, all evaluated demographic variables were similar in the PD and NONPD groups for each procedure subgroup.
Discussion
Previous reports have indicated that surgical treatment of spinal pathology in patients with PD is associated with greater postoperative complication rates compared with patients without PD.6, 7, 9, 11 Little comparative data exist on acute in-hospital complications for patients with PD and those without PD. In this study, using a large national database and PSM to control for confounding demographic variables, we found that patients with PD were more likely than those without PD to have acute
Conclusion
In summary, using the largest available inpatient database, we found that the presence of PD was associated with an increased risk of in-hospital, postoperative complications, including cardiac, genitourinary, and neurologic complications; acute blood loss anemia; and the resulting need for transfusion of blood products following elective lumbar spine surgery. A multidisciplinary approach is suggested to appropriately manage patients with PD undergoing spine surgery. Future studies should
References (28)
- et al.
Epidemiology of Parkinson's disease
Neurol Clin
(1996) - et al.
Postural disorders in Parkinson's disease
Neurophysiol Clin
(2008) - et al.
Coronal plane spinal malalignment and Parkinson's disease: prevalence and associations with disease severity
Spine J
(2015) - et al.
To operate or not?: a literature review of surgical outcomes in 95 patients with Parkinson's disease undergoing spine surgery
Clin Neurol Neurosurg
(2015) - et al.
Perioperative management of patients with Parkinson's disease
Am J Med
(2014) - et al.
Coagulation-fibrinolysis abnormalities in patients receiving antiparkinsonian agents
J Neurol Sci
(2003) - et al.
Gait disorders and balance disturbances in Parkinson's disease: clinical update and pathophysiology
Curr Opin Neurol
(2008) 2015 Update on Parkinson disease
Cleve Clin J Med
(2015)- et al.
Spinal surgery in patients with Parkinson's disease: experiences with the challenges posed by sagittal imbalance and the Parkinson's spine
Eur Spine J
(2010) - et al.
Surgical outcome of lumbar fusion surgery in patients with Parkinson disease
J Spinal Disord Tech
(2012)
Thoracolumbar spinal fixation for camptocormia in Parkinson's disease
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry
Sagittal spinopelvic malalignment in Parkinson disease: prevalence and associations with disease severity
Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
Posterior spinal fusion from T2 to the sacrum for the management of major deformities in patients with Parkinson disease: a retrospective review with analysis of complications
J Spinal Disord Tech
Spinal surgery in patients with Parkinson's disease: unsatisfactory results, failure and disappointment
Open Orthop J
Cited by (19)
Association of Postoperative Delirium and Parkinson Disease After Common United States Surgical Procedures
2023, Journal of Surgical ResearchOrthopedic Care of Patients with Parkinson Disease
2020, Clinics in Geriatric MedicineCitation Excerpt :Lumbar deformities and medical complications related to the diagnosis of PD may increase complications of lumbar spinal surgeries in the PD population. A cross-sectional analysis of complications from decompression or decompression and lumbar fusion using the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) was performed through the US Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality from 2001 to 2012.12 The NIS is the largest all-payer database of US hospital admissions, composed of a stratified sample of 20% of hospitalizations in 1000 hospitals annually.
Patients with Parkinson Disease Experience Increased Perioperative Complications Following Cervical Decompression and Fusion: A Retrospective Review of the National Inpatient Sample
2019, World NeurosurgeryCitation Excerpt :Yet, the recent literature discussing putative benefits of surgery in this population is controversial. Alongside the inherent risks of anesthesia and surgery, PD may impart a heightened complication risk in the perioperative period.9-11 This complication risk may be heightened further in the setting of deformity repair.12
Does Parkinson Disease Increase the Risk of Perioperative Complications After Total Hip Arthroplasty? A Nationwide Database Study
2018, Journal of ArthroplastyCitation Excerpt :Now that this study has specified the increased inpatient complications for PD patients, further studies should use a different database, which contains this outpatient data, to analyze longer term outcomes. The findings of this study are broadly comparable to those of prior studies that have reported on the postoperative course of PD patients [20–27]. Increased rates of postoperative delirium, UTI, and overall complication in patients who had PD have been demonstrated by Oichi et al. [21] in spine surgery and by Huang et al. [24] in non-neurological surgery.
Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare that the article content was composed in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.