Review
Unicolonial ants: where do they come from, what are they and where are they going?

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2009.01.013Get rights and content

Unicolonial ant populations are the most extensive cooperative units known in nature, forming networks of interconnected nests extending sometimes hundreds of kilometers. Within such a supercolony, worker altruistic behavior might be maladaptive, because it seems to aid random members of the population instead of relatives. However, recent genetic and behavioral data show that, viewed on a sufficiently large scale, unicolonial ants do have colony boundaries that define very large kin groups. It seems likely that they are family groups that continue to express their kin-selected behavior as they grow to extreme sizes. However, at extreme sizes, kin selection theory predicts that these behaviors are maladapted and evolutionarily unstable, a prediction that is supported by their twiggy phylogenetic distribution.

Introduction

Dreamers have always sought harmony and cooperation in nature. The painter Paul Gauguin, for example, thought he could find it in untrammeled Tahiti. But nature, forged on the anvil of natural selection, tends to be selfish. Gauguin's voyage, ironically, took him away from one of the few types of natural harmonious societies, ants, because they are ill equipped to reach oceanic islands. Ants, like other social insects, have evolved cooperative societies based on kinship [1] (Box 1). But had Gauguin been able to wait longer, he would have seen Tahiti overrun with hypercooperative invasive ants such as Anoplolepis gracilipes, Pheidole megacephala, Solenopsis geminata and Wasmannia auropunctata [2]. These cooperate not just within the normal confines of a single nest and a single nuclear family but across the population as though it were a single colony. They are therefore described as unicolonial (see Glossary).

Unicolonial ants often turn their extreme cooperation into extreme ecological dominance. On Christmas Island, A. gracilipes has restructured the entire forest ecosystem [3]. Historical invasions of Caribbean islands, thought to be by S. geminata and P. megacephala, destroyed crops and made them nearly uninhabitable for a time [4]. Another such ant, Paratrechina longicornis, invaded and overwhelmed Biosphere 2, dashing its creators’ plans for a sustainable completely enclosed ecosystem (Figure 1) [5].

Gauguin was no evolutionary biologist, but the title of his 1897 masterpiece, ‘Where do we come from? What are we? Where are we going?,’ could be asked about any product of evolution, and unicolonial ants are particularly apt subjects. First, understanding what unicolonial ants are is not possible without understanding their past. Where unicolonial ants came from is a major puzzle because it is not clear how cooperation can evolve on this huge scale. Second, whereas evolutionary biology can rarely predict where any species is going, it does predict that, despite their short-term ecological success, unicolonial ants are an evolutionary dead end.

Section snippets

What are unicolonial ants?

A stereotypical ant colony is a closed family that contains a queen and her daughter workers, often in a single nest (Figure 2a). The queen lays eggs and the workers rear the brood, which mature into more workers, males that mate and die and future queens that leave the nest to independently start new colonies. The workers defend their nest against intruders, including alien conspecifics. Altruistic care of brood is restricted to close relatives, so worker traits are passed on through kin

Where do unicolonial ants come from?

As is so often the case in evolutionary biology, answering a ‘what’ question is not possible without a look to the past. The origins of supercoloniality are quite diverse. Phylogenetically, they are scattered in different parts of the ant family tree (Figure 4), with species from all over the world. Supercolony formation can be characteristic of the whole species (e.g. Monomorium pharaonis [1]) or facultative within species (Formica, Myrmica [1]). The underlying genetics are usually unknown,

Where are they going?

Explaining the emergence of low-relatedness supercolonies as a developmental process does not make all evolutionary questions about low relatedness disappear. Once large supercolonies develop, and relatedness drops to near zero, how can selection for worker altruism, or for any worker traits, continue (Box 1, Box 2)?

There are at least two possible escapes from the dilemma of zero relatedness within large colonies: viscosity and nepotism. Limited movements of individuals from their natal nest in

Conclusion

Although much work remains to be done (Box 3), a clearer picture of unicoloniality is beginning to emerge. When the kin-selected traits underlying polydomy and polygyny combine in the right environment, they can result in supercolonies where previously adaptive altruism is no longer directed toward close kin. Then, unless kin selection kicks in again and reestablishes nepotism, its absence will cause worker behavior to degrade. Unicoloniality seems analogous to asexual reproduction: short-term

Acknowledgements

For helpful comments we thank Koos Boomsma, Heike Feldhaar, Andy Gardner, Laurent Keller, Pekka Pamilo, Jes Pedersen, Ken Ross, Perttu Seppä, Andy Suarez, Neil Tsutsui and an anonymous referee. We thank Alex Wild for the use of his photos and Seán Brady for the raw file for Figure 4. This work was partially supported by the Academy of Finland (H.H., grant number 121078) and the US National Science Foundation (D.C.Q., J.E.S., EF0328455).

Glossary

Altruism
a behavior that is harmful to the lifetime fitness of the actor, to the benefit of another individual(s).
Budding
colony founding by a queen(s) that leaves the natal nest with a group of workers to found a new colony. In ants, budding happens on foot, so budding usually leads to spatial proximity of related nests. If these nests remain in contact after budding, polydomy arises.
Colony
a group of workers, and an associated queen(s), that cooperate in producing and rearing the next

References (84)

  • Ledoux, S. et al. (2006) An update of the ant fauna of Tahiti and Moorea (French Polynesia). In XV Congress...
  • D.J. O’Dowd

    Invasional ‘meltdown’ on an oceanic island

    Ecol. Lett.

    (2003)
  • E.O. Wilson

    Early ant plagues in the New World

    Nature

    (2005)
  • J.K. Wetterer

    Ecological dominance by Paratrechina longicornis (Hymenoptera: Formicidae), an invasive tramp ant, in Biosphere 2

    Fla. Entomol.

    (1999)
  • G. Debout

    Polydomy in ants: what we know, what we think we know, and what remains to be done

    Biol. J. Linn. Soc.

    (2007)
  • D.C. Queller

    Genetic relatedness in viscous populations

    Evol. Ecol.

    (1994)
  • J.J. Boomsma

    Social mutualism and social parasitism: conflict and cooperation at the family and species level

  • L. Keller

    Indiscriminate altruism: unduly nice parents and siblings

    Trends Ecol. Evol.

    (1997)
  • D.C. Queller et al.

    Kin selection and social insects

    Bioscience

    (1998)
  • S.E. Corin

    Large scale unicoloniality: the population and colony structure of the invasive Argentine ant (Linepithema humile) in New Zealand

    Insectes Soc.

    (2007)
  • M.L. Thomas

    When supercolonies collide: territorial aggression in an invasive and unicolonial social insect

    Mol. Ecol.

    (2006)
  • N.D. Tsutsui

    Reduced genetic variation and the success of an invasive species

    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.

    (2000)
  • T. Giraud

    Evolution of supercolonies: the Argentine ants of southern Europe

    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.

    (2002)
  • J.S. Pedersen

    Native supercolonies of unrelated individuals in the invasive Argentine ant

    Evolution Int. J. Org. Evolution

    (2006)
  • A.V. Suarez

    Behavioral and genetic differentiation between native and introduced populations of the Argentine ant

    Biol. Invasions

    (1999)
  • K.G. Ross

    Social evolution in a new environment: the case of introduced fire ants

    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.

    (1996)
  • B. Holzer

    Unicoloniality, recognition and genetic differentiation in a native Formica ant

    J. Evol. Biol.

    (2006)
  • K.L. Abbott

    Behaviourally and genetically distinct populations of an invasive ant provide insight into invasion history and impacts on a tropical ant community

    Biol. Invasions

    (2007)
  • J. Drescher

    Population structure and intraspecific aggression in the invasive ant species Anoplolepis gracilipes in Malaysian Borneo

    Mol. Ecol.

    (2007)
  • J. Le Breton

    Experimental evidence of large-scale unicoloniality in the tramp ant Wasmannia auropunctata (Roger)

    J. Insect Behav.

    (2004)
  • L.V. Ugelvig

    The introduction history of invasive garden ants in Europe: integrating genetic, chemical and behavioural approaches

    BMC Biol.

    (2008)
  • J.R. Garnas

    Intercolony aggression within and among local populations of the invasive ant, Myrmica rubra (Hymenoptera: Formicidae), in coastal Maine

    Environ. Entomol.

    (2007)
  • J. Jaquiery

    Multilevel genetic analyses of two European supercolonies of the Argentine ant, Linepithema humile

    Mol. Ecol

    (2005)
  • G. Buczkowski

    The diminutive supercolony: the Argentine ants of the southeastern United States

    Mol. Ecol.

    (2004)
  • N.D. Tsutsui et al.

    Population genetics and colony structure of the Argentine ant (Linepithema humile) in its native and introduced ranges

    Evolution Int. J. Org. Evolution

    (2001)
  • M. Chapuisat

    Microsatellites reveal high population viscosity and limited dispersal in the ant Formica paralugubris

    Evolution Int. J. Org. Evolution

    (1997)
  • Vogel, V. et al. Dynamics and genetic structure of Argentine ant supercolonies in their native range. Evolution...
  • L. Keller et al.

    Selfish genes: a green beard in the red fire ant

    Nature

    (1998)
  • D.A. Holway

    Effect of Argentine ant invasions on ground-dwelling arthropods in northern California riparian woodlands

    Oecologia

    (1998)
  • D.A. Holway

    The causes and consequences of ant invasions

    Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst.

    (2002)
  • A.V. Suarez

    Genetics and behavior of a colonizing species: the invasive Argentine ant

    Am. Nat.

    (2008)
  • D.A. Holway et al.

    Colony-structure variation and interspecific competitive ability in the invasive Argentine ant

    Oecologia

    (2004)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text