Models in evolutionary economics and environmental policy: Towards an evolutionary environmental economics
Introduction
It is commonly argued that technological innovation will be an important key to decrease the impact of industrial society on the environment. The understanding of environmental innovation – that is, innovation that contributes to the sustainability of the natural environment – from an economic perspective is, however, still limited. Environmental economists working in the neoclassical tradition find it difficult to incorporate technological innovation, since the outcomes of inventive activity cannot be foreseen – not even in a probabilistic sense. Therefore, the treatment of environmental innovation as a maximization problem is of limited practical relevance [1]. Ecological economists may be better able to analyse environmental innovation because they work outside the maximization framework. Yet, hitherto they have been relatively silent on environmental innovation.
With neoclassical and ecological economics having failed to develop a systematic research programme on environmental innovation, evolutionary economics emerged as an alternative and promising framework [2]. In the last 15 years or so, we witness an increasing number of contributions in environmental economics adopting an evolutionary perspective, including conceptual frameworks [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], empirical studies [8], [9], [10], [11], [12] and policy-oriented discussions [13], [14], [15], [16]. More recently, scholars have started to develop formal evolutionary models in environmental studies, both explanatory and prospective [17], [18], [19], [20], [21], [22], [23], [24], [25], [26], [27], [28], [29], [30]. These efforts reflect a further deepening of the evolutionary programme in the area of environmental studies, which opens up possibilities for application in policy-making. The goal of this paper is to provide a systematic review of the recent efforts in evolutionary modelling in environmental studies, and to assess their implications for environmental policy-making.
We apply the following structure. We first briefly discuss evolutionary theory and its application to the study of the economy (Section 2). We go on to discuss three areas in which an evolutionary approach in environmental economics has a particularly high value-added for environmental policy-making: the double externality problem, technological transitions and consumer demand (Section 3). We then take up a ‘reflexive’ approach to the role of government in environmental innovation from an innovation systems approach, exploring opportunities for making policy-making endogenous to environmental innovation (Section 4). We end with a discussion of the methodological challenges that remain (Section 5).
Section snippets
Defining properties of evolutionary dynamics
Evolution is an extremely strong concept for understanding the dynamics in the world surrounding us. After the publication of the seminal works by Charles Darwin, evolutionary theory was mainly elaborated and applied in the sphere of biology, which still leads many present-day observers to consider evolutionary theory as a biological theory. Following this view, applications of evolutionary theory outside biology are often considered ‘metaphorical’. However, various authors have pointed out
An evolutionary economic approach to environmental policy
Evolutionary environmental economics complements neoclassical and ecological approaches in its emphasis on environmental innovation. From the recent progress that is being made in applications of evolutionary economics to environmental issues, we distinguish three main areas where an evolutionary economic approach shows particular added value in environmental research: (1) the ‘double externality problem’, (2) technological transitions, and (3) consumer demand.
A co-evolutionary perspective on institutions and policy
The applications of evolutionary models for environmental policy-making are primarily in the area of ex ante assessment of static and dynamic welfare effects of environmental innovation policies. In this, evolutionary models can be used in the same way as any economic model in this area: to explore likely outcomes of different policy interventions and to evaluate the costs and benefits. However, evolutionary economics can also be used to understand the complex dynamic between institutions,
Conclusions and challenges
Uncertainty is an inherent element to social dynamics, because of the bounded rationality of agents, the unpredictability of innovation and the existence of multiple equilibria. Evolutionary economic models recognise this uncertainty and make it explicit, thus taking it out of the usual black box and showing the wide spectrum of possible futures. Socio-economic evolutionary models are particularly useful to simulate market dynamics for experimentation with ‘what if’-questions. An evolutionary
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank Peter Janssen, Jeroen van den Bergh and Leon Janssen for useful and important comments at draft versions of this work. The usual disclaimer applies.
Albert Faber works as a policy researcher for the Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency (MNP) on environmental policy and technological development. His research interests include evolutionary economics, environmental innovations, transition policy and systems of innovation. He studied environmental sciences at Wageningen Agricultural University.
References (116)
- et al.
The greening of technological progress: an evolutionary perspective
Futures
(1992) - et al.
Functions of innovation systems: a new approach for analysing technological change
Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change
(2007) The greening of technology and models of innovation
Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change
(1996)Technology and the transition to environmental sustainability: the problem of technological regime shifts
Futures
(1994)Understanding carbon lock-in
Energy Policy
(2000)- et al.
Technological trajectories and R&D for environmental innovation in UK firms
Futures
(1994) Getting round the lock-in in electricity generating systems: the example of the gas turbine
Research Policy
(1997)- et al.
Functions of Innovation Systems as a Framework to Understand Sustainable Technological Change. Empirical Evidence for Earlier Claims
Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change
(2009) Policy entrepreneurship in the co-evolution of institutions, preferences, and technology: comparing the diffusion of totally chlorine free pulp bleaching technologies in the US and Sweden
Research Policy
(2005)- et al.
Strategies for shifting technological systems: the case of the automobile system
Futures
(1994)
Escaping carbon lock-in
Energy Policy
Agent-based modeling of the diffusion of environmental innovations - an empirical approach
Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change
Graded eco-labels: a demand-oriented approach to reduce pollution
Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change
An information-based adaptive strategy for resource exploitation in competitive scenarios
Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change
An evolutionary model of recycling and product-life extension
Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change
Consumer heterogeneity and the development of environmentally friendly technologies
Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change
Environmental impact, quality, and price: consumer trade-offs and the development of environmentally friendly technologies
Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change
Technological paradigms and technological trajectories
Res. Policy
Redefining innovation–eco-innovation research and the contribution from ecological economics
Ecol. Econ.
Schumpeterian patterns of innovation are technology-specific
Res. Policy
Schumpeterian competition in alternative technological regimes
J. Econ. Behav. Organ.
Sectoral systems of environmental innovation: an application to the French automotive industry
Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change
Niches and economic competition: implications for economic efficiency, growth and diversity
Struct. Chang. Econ. Dyn.
Lead markets and regulation: a framework for analyzing the international diffusion of environmental innovations.
Ecol. Econ.
Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: a multi-level perspective and a case-study
Res. Policy
Is product life cycle theory a special case? Dominant designs and the emergence of market niches through coevolutionary learning
Struct. Chang. Econ. Dyn.
Technological diversity in an evolutionary industry model with localized learning and network externalities
Struct. Chang. Econ. Dyn.
Towards a general theory of adaptive walks on rugged landscapes
J. Theor. Biol.
A model of demand with interaction among consumers
Int. J. Ind. Organ.
A percolation model of eco-innovation diffusion: the relationship between diffusion, learning economies and subsidies
Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change
‘Libre’ software: turning fads into institutions?
Res. Policy
Network structure and the diffusion of knowledge
J. Econ. Dyn. Control
Environmental policy and technological change
Environ. Resour. Econ.
Evolutionary thinking in environmental economics
J. Evol. Econ.
R&D portfolios in environmentally friendly automotive propulsion: variety, competition and policy implications
Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change
Regime shifts to sustainability through processes of niche formation: the approach of strategic niche management
Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag.
Evolutionary economics and environmental policy
Stimulating diffusion of green products, co-evolution between firms and consumers
J. Evol. Econ.
Coevolution of economic and ecological systems
J. Evol. Econ.
Flexible transition strategies towards future well-to-wheel chains: an evolutionary modelling approach
Coevolutionary modeling for sustainable economic development
A policy approach to the environmnental impacts of technological lock-in
Ecol. Econ.
Simulating the adoption of fuel cell vehicles
J. Evol. Econ.
Coevolution of suppliers and users through an evolutionary modelling. The case of environmental innovations
Eur. J. Econ. Soc. Syst.
Structural change in the presence of network externalities: a co-evolutionary model of technological successions
J. Evol. Econ.
Evolutionary epistemology
Explaining Technical Change
The Sciences of the Artificial
Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems
Evolution and the theory of games
Cited by (0)
Albert Faber works as a policy researcher for the Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency (MNP) on environmental policy and technological development. His research interests include evolutionary economics, environmental innovations, transition policy and systems of innovation. He studied environmental sciences at Wageningen Agricultural University.
Koen Frenken studied economics at the University of Amsterdam. He holds a Ph.D. jointly awarded in 2001 by the University of Grenoble (in applied economics) and the University of Amsterdam (in social sciences). He is currently Associate Professor in Economic Geography at the Faculty of Geosciences at Utrecht University and a member of the Urban and Regional research centre Utrecht (URU). His research interests include evolutionary economics, complexity theory, science studies, innovation studies, environmental studies and economic geography.
- 1
Tel. +31 30 253 2466.