Models in evolutionary economics and environmental policy: Towards an evolutionary environmental economics

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2008.04.009Get rights and content

Abstract

In this paper we review evolutionary economic modelling in relation to environmental policy. We discuss three areas in which evolutionary economic models have a particularly high added value for environmental policy-making: the double externality problem, technological transitions and consumer demand. We explore the possibilities to apply evolutionary economic models in environmental policy assessment, including the opportunities for making policy-making endogenous to environmental innovation. We end with a critical discussion of the challenges that remain.

Introduction

It is commonly argued that technological innovation will be an important key to decrease the impact of industrial society on the environment. The understanding of environmental innovation – that is, innovation that contributes to the sustainability of the natural environment – from an economic perspective is, however, still limited. Environmental economists working in the neoclassical tradition find it difficult to incorporate technological innovation, since the outcomes of inventive activity cannot be foreseen – not even in a probabilistic sense. Therefore, the treatment of environmental innovation as a maximization problem is of limited practical relevance [1]. Ecological economists may be better able to analyse environmental innovation because they work outside the maximization framework. Yet, hitherto they have been relatively silent on environmental innovation.

With neoclassical and ecological economics having failed to develop a systematic research programme on environmental innovation, evolutionary economics emerged as an alternative and promising framework [2]. In the last 15 years or so, we witness an increasing number of contributions in environmental economics adopting an evolutionary perspective, including conceptual frameworks [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], empirical studies [8], [9], [10], [11], [12] and policy-oriented discussions [13], [14], [15], [16]. More recently, scholars have started to develop formal evolutionary models in environmental studies, both explanatory and prospective [17], [18], [19], [20], [21], [22], [23], [24], [25], [26], [27], [28], [29], [30]. These efforts reflect a further deepening of the evolutionary programme in the area of environmental studies, which opens up possibilities for application in policy-making. The goal of this paper is to provide a systematic review of the recent efforts in evolutionary modelling in environmental studies, and to assess their implications for environmental policy-making.

We apply the following structure. We first briefly discuss evolutionary theory and its application to the study of the economy (Section 2). We go on to discuss three areas in which an evolutionary approach in environmental economics has a particularly high value-added for environmental policy-making: the double externality problem, technological transitions and consumer demand (Section 3). We then take up a ‘reflexive’ approach to the role of government in environmental innovation from an innovation systems approach, exploring opportunities for making policy-making endogenous to environmental innovation (Section 4). We end with a discussion of the methodological challenges that remain (Section 5).

Section snippets

Defining properties of evolutionary dynamics

Evolution is an extremely strong concept for understanding the dynamics in the world surrounding us. After the publication of the seminal works by Charles Darwin, evolutionary theory was mainly elaborated and applied in the sphere of biology, which still leads many present-day observers to consider evolutionary theory as a biological theory. Following this view, applications of evolutionary theory outside biology are often considered ‘metaphorical’. However, various authors have pointed out

An evolutionary economic approach to environmental policy

Evolutionary environmental economics complements neoclassical and ecological approaches in its emphasis on environmental innovation. From the recent progress that is being made in applications of evolutionary economics to environmental issues, we distinguish three main areas where an evolutionary economic approach shows particular added value in environmental research: (1) the ‘double externality problem’, (2) technological transitions, and (3) consumer demand.

A co-evolutionary perspective on institutions and policy

The applications of evolutionary models for environmental policy-making are primarily in the area of ex ante assessment of static and dynamic welfare effects of environmental innovation policies. In this, evolutionary models can be used in the same way as any economic model in this area: to explore likely outcomes of different policy interventions and to evaluate the costs and benefits. However, evolutionary economics can also be used to understand the complex dynamic between institutions,

Conclusions and challenges

Uncertainty is an inherent element to social dynamics, because of the bounded rationality of agents, the unpredictability of innovation and the existence of multiple equilibria. Evolutionary economic models recognise this uncertainty and make it explicit, thus taking it out of the usual black box and showing the wide spectrum of possible futures. Socio-economic evolutionary models are particularly useful to simulate market dynamics for experimentation with ‘what if’-questions. An evolutionary

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Peter Janssen, Jeroen van den Bergh and Leon Janssen for useful and important comments at draft versions of this work. The usual disclaimer applies.

Albert Faber works as a policy researcher for the Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency (MNP) on environmental policy and technological development. His research interests include evolutionary economics, environmental innovations, transition policy and systems of innovation. He studied environmental sciences at Wageningen Agricultural University.

References (116)

  • G.C. Unruh

    Escaping carbon lock-in

    Energy Policy

    (2002)
  • N. Schwarz et al.

    Agent-based modeling of the diffusion of environmental innovations - an empirical approach

    Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change

    (2009)
  • M. Bleda et al.

    Graded eco-labels: a demand-oriented approach to reduce pollution

    Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change

    (2009)
  • F. Boschetti et al.

    An information-based adaptive strategy for resource exploitation in competitive scenarios

    Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change

    (2009)
  • E. Brouillat

    An evolutionary model of recycling and product-life extension

    Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change

    (2009)
  • P. Windrum et al.

    Consumer heterogeneity and the development of environmentally friendly technologies

    Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change

    (2009)
  • P. Windrum et al.

    Environmental impact, quality, and price: consumer trade-offs and the development of environmentally friendly technologies

    Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change

    (2009)
  • G. Dosi

    Technological paradigms and technological trajectories

    Res. Policy

    (1982)
  • K. Rennings

    Redefining innovation–eco-innovation research and the contribution from ecological economics

    Ecol. Econ.

    (2000)
  • F. Malerba et al.

    Schumpeterian patterns of innovation are technology-specific

    Res. Policy

    (1996)
  • S.G. Winter

    Schumpeterian competition in alternative technological regimes

    J. Econ. Behav. Organ.

    (1984)
  • V. Oltra et al.

    Sectoral systems of environmental innovation: an application to the French automotive industry

    Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change

    (2009)
  • C. Tisdell et al.

    Niches and economic competition: implications for economic efficiency, growth and diversity

    Struct. Chang. Econ. Dyn.

    (2004)
  • M. Beise et al.

    Lead markets and regulation: a framework for analyzing the international diffusion of environmental innovations.

    Ecol. Econ.

    (2005)
  • F. Geels

    Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: a multi-level perspective and a case-study

    Res. Policy

    (2002)
  • P. Windrum et al.

    Is product life cycle theory a special case? Dominant designs and the emergence of market niches through coevolutionary learning

    Struct. Chang. Econ. Dyn.

    (1998)
  • N. Jonard et al.

    Technological diversity in an evolutionary industry model with localized learning and network externalities

    Struct. Chang. Econ. Dyn.

    (1998)
  • S. Kauffman et al.

    Towards a general theory of adaptive walks on rugged landscapes

    J. Theor. Biol.

    (1987)
  • R. Cowan et al.

    A model of demand with interaction among consumers

    Int. J. Ind. Organ.

    (1997)
  • S. Cantono et al.

    A percolation model of eco-innovation diffusion: the relationship between diffusion, learning economies and subsidies

    Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change

    (2009)
  • J.-M. Dalle et al.

    ‘Libre’ software: turning fads into institutions?

    Res. Policy

    (2003)
  • R. Cowan et al.

    Network structure and the diffusion of knowledge

    J. Econ. Dyn. Control

    (2004)
  • A.B. Jaffe et al.

    Environmental policy and technological change

    Environ. Resour. Econ.

    (2002)
  • J.C.J.M. van den Bergh

    Evolutionary thinking in environmental economics

    J. Evol. Econ.

    (2007)
  • K. Frenken et al.

    R&D portfolios in environmentally friendly automotive propulsion: variety, competition and policy implications

    Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change

    (2003)
  • R. Kemp et al.

    Regime shifts to sustainability through processes of niche formation: the approach of strategic niche management

    Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag.

    (1998)
  • J.C.J.M. van den Bergh et al.

    Evolutionary economics and environmental policy

  • M.A. Janssen et al.

    Stimulating diffusion of green products, co-evolution between firms and consumers

    J. Evol. Econ.

    (2002)
  • J. Noailly

    Coevolution of economic and ecological systems

    J. Evol. Econ.

    (2008)
  • M. Schwoon et al.

    Flexible transition strategies towards future well-to-wheel chains: an evolutionary modelling approach

    (2006)
  • J. Noailly

    Coevolutionary modeling for sustainable economic development

    (2003)
  • J. Carillo-Hermosilla

    A policy approach to the environmnental impacts of technological lock-in

    Ecol. Econ.

    (2006)
  • M. Schwoon

    Simulating the adoption of fuel cell vehicles

    J. Evol. Econ.

    (2006)
  • M. Saint Jean

    Coevolution of suppliers and users through an evolutionary modelling. The case of environmental innovations

    Eur. J. Econ. Soc. Syst.

    (2005)
  • N. Windrum et al.

    Structural change in the presence of network externalities: a co-evolutionary model of technological successions

    J. Evol. Econ.

    (2005)
  • D.T. Campbell

    Evolutionary epistemology

  • J. Elster

    Explaining Technical Change

    (1983)
  • H.A. Simon

    The Sciences of the Artificial

    (1969)
  • J.H. Holland

    Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems

    (1975)
  • J. Maynard Smith

    Evolution and the theory of games

    (1982)
  • Cited by (0)

    Albert Faber works as a policy researcher for the Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency (MNP) on environmental policy and technological development. His research interests include evolutionary economics, environmental innovations, transition policy and systems of innovation. He studied environmental sciences at Wageningen Agricultural University.

    Koen Frenken studied economics at the University of Amsterdam. He holds a Ph.D. jointly awarded in 2001 by the University of Grenoble (in applied economics) and the University of Amsterdam (in social sciences). He is currently Associate Professor in Economic Geography at the Faculty of Geosciences at Utrecht University and a member of the Urban and Regional research centre Utrecht (URU). His research interests include evolutionary economics, complexity theory, science studies, innovation studies, environmental studies and economic geography.

    1

    Tel. +31 30 253 2466.

    View full text