Growth and magnetism of metallic thin films and multilayers by pulsed-laser deposition

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfrep.2003.10.001Get rights and content

Abstract

Pulsed-laser deposition (PLD) is a powerful method to grow thin films and multilayers of complex materials such as transition metal oxides. In this case, the most cited advantage of PLD is the simplicity of preserving the stoichiometry of the target material. Recently, there are many reports showing that PLD can significantly improve the growth of even simple metallic thin films/multilayers. Here it is the ultrahigh instantaneous deposition rate and the high kinetic energy of PLD that play the most crucial roles. The improved growth, in particular for the first several monolayers, provides great opportunities to design artificial thin film structures that have promising physical properties.

Introduction

Tailoring the properties of functional materials at atomic scale represents the ultimate goal in materials science research. The most desirable approach is to artificially fabricate structures with atomic precision, i.e. in layer-by-layer, row-by-row, or even atom-by-atom manner. For this purpose, in the past two decades, a great amount of effort has been devoted to improving growth techniques as well as growth simulations. The most noticeable reward came out of the research on two-dimensional magnetic ultrathin films and multilayers [1], [2], [3]. The ability to control thin film growth layer-by-layer has not only advanced our current understandings of two-dimensional physics, but also directly led to the observation of important and technologically relevant physical phenomena such as giant magnetoresistance (GMR) [4], [5], tunneling magnetoresistance (TMR) [6], [7], and ferromagnetism in dilute doped semiconductors [8], [9], [10]. GMR and TMR multilayers have already had a tremendous impact in magnetic data storage devices, and the magnetic semiconductors are defining a radically new avenue in spintronics [11], [12], [13].

Depending on the characteristics of materials and the cost concerns, several techniques have been employed for the growth of thin films and multilayers. These include thermal deposition (TD), sputter deposition (SD), chemical vapor deposition (CVD), and pulsed-laser deposition (PLD). Thermal deposition is the oldest and the most accessible technique to grow thin films. In its refined form, known as molecular beam epitaxy (MBE), thermal deposition is particularly useful for growing high-quality metallic and semiconductor films in a layer-by-layer manner. Typically MBE is conducted in an ultrahigh vacuum (UHV) environment, a necessary condition to keep the films free of contamination for basic science research. While MBE can also be used to grow multi-element thin films by co-deposition from multiple sources, it is much less straightforward than the congruent transfer of multi-elemental materials by sputter deposition. The CVD method, which grows films on a substrate by decomposing a chosen precursor vapor, is preferred in industrial applications for its high and spatially homogeneous growth rates. CVD is also very useful to grow certain metastable thin films such as single crystal CrO2 [14].

Compared to these growth methods, PLD has a unique capability to produce high-quality thin films of various kinds of materials (for a review, see [15]). The process of PLD involves focusing an intense laser pulse on the surface of a target, and removing target materials in the form of some volatile phases, e.g. a gas or a plasma. The distinct advantages of PLD include its simplicity of use, since the laser is totally decoupled from the growth chamber, and the ability to preserve the stoichiometry of compound materials under optimum conditions. The latter has made PLD the primary option for growing complex materials such as transition metal oxides, particularly after its first successful application in high-Tc superconductor thin films [16].

As for the growth of metallic thin films and multilayers, PLD has played a much smaller role so far. One may argue that this is partly due to its success in growing complex materials, and partly due to the maturity of other techniques such as MBE and sputter deposition in growing metallic systems. However, early experiments have shown that there are not any principle obstacles or challenges to grow metals with PLD [17], [18]. More recent work has given strong evidence showing the superiority of PLD for layer-by-layer growth [19] as well as for growing high-quality thin films of refractory metals [20], [21] and unstable alloys [22]. In particular, the successful application of PLD in magnetic ultrathin films and multilayers, which show clearly improved magnetic behavior as compared with similar MBE-grown structures [23], is making a compelling case that PLD should become a major force in the study of artificial metallic structures.

In this article, we review some recent developments in PLD growth of magnetic films and multilayers, which, in our opinion, represent the most significant impact of PLD in the fabrication of metallic systems. The readers are referred to previous review articles for some earlier work in this area [24], [25]. Whenever possible, the growth and properties of PLD grown films are compared with those of MBE-grown films, since they both can be prepared in a UHV environment to greatly limit contamination effects. The paper is organized as follows: after some general discussions on fundamental issues related to PLD growth of metallic films in Section 2, we give extensive discussions on the ability of PLD to grow metastable structured magnetic thin films and alloys, as well as their corresponding magnetic properties in Section 3. The growth and magnetism of multilayers is described in Section 4, followed by some examples of the congruent deposition of multi-element thin films in Section 5. Section 6 is devoted to summarizing the most recent and promising applications of PLD in metallic systems. In the end (Section 7), we give conclusions and outlook.

Section snippets

General features of laser ablation of metals

In pulsed-laser deposition, also known as laser MBE when the growth is controlled and monitored in a layer-by-layer manner, an intense and short laser pulse strikes the target and ablates material from the target. Once the laser pulse is absorbed in the surface region of the target, the electromagnetic energy is immediately converted into electronic excitations in the form of plasmons and unbound electrons. The excited electrons then transfer their energy to the lattice via electron–phonon

PLD growth of metastable structured films

The high instantaneous rate, and the high quenching rate in PLD means that the growth proceeds in conditions very far from equilibrium. Under optimum conditions, it is possible to grow thin films with highly metastable structures that are hard to stabilize by other deposition techniques. A good example can be found in the growth of polycrystalline AgxNi1−x solid solutions by PLD [54]. In spite of the disagreement on the maximum concentration of Ag in the solid solution [55], [56], AgxNi1−x

Magnetic multilayers by PLD

Compared with techniques such as sputter deposition and MBE, the application of PLD in growing magnetic multilayers is relatively limited [99], [100] possibly due to concerns of droplet formation and high-energy ions induced interfacial roughness. These problems, however, can be largely removed by properly controlling the laser fluence as well as the substrate–target distance. In fact, as we will show below in Section 4.1, it can be advantageous to use PLD in order to obtain desired interfaces

Congruent deposition of multicomponent magnetic alloys

Many magnetic materials with interesting properties are multicomponent alloys. To integrate magnetic materials in microelectronics, it is a necessity to grow the multicomponent alloys in thin films on, preferably, semiconductor substrates. Here, PLD holds its classical advantage of stoichiometric transfer of materials with complex composition. Even very complicated compounds such as Nd- and Cr-doped gadolinium–scandium–gallium garnet, which contains six elements and 160 atoms in a unit cell,

Femtosecond pulsed-laser deposition

As mentioned in Section 2.1, when the laser pulse duration is reduced to sub-picosecond, i.e. shorter than the time scale of the electron–phonon coupling (a few picoseconds), the ablation process can be considered as direct solid–vapor (or solid–plasma) transition. Within a few picoseconds after the laser pulse, the vapor and plasma form and expand rapidly towards the vacuum side. Because the laser pulse terminates before the energy is completely redistributed in the target materials, ultrafast

Concluding remarks and outlook

With all the examples presented in this paper, we can conclude that PLD is a highly useful technique to grow metallic thin films and multilayers. In particular, PLD has shown great strength in the following four areas of growth: (1) growing high-quality thin films in a layer-by-layer mode; (2) stabilizing highly metastable or even unstable structures in thin films; (3) congruently depositing multi-component films; (4) providing high flexibility of tuning deposition parameters during growth.

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to many of our co-workers who have been working on metallic thin films and multilayers by PLD. In particular, we would like to thank the contributions from G.A. Farnan, J.X. Ma, A.P. Baddorf, J.F. Wendelken, E.W. Plummer, H. Jenniches, P. Ohresser, M. Zheng, J. Barthel, M. Klaua, S.S. Manoharan, C.V. Mohan, O. Fruchart, X.F. Jin, W. Kuch, and C Teichert. We acknowledge the sponsorship of the Laboratory Directed Research and Development Program of Oak Ridge National Laboratory,

References (162)

  • J. Shen et al.

    Surf. Sci.

    (2002)
  • S. Bader

    Surf. Sci.

    (2002)
  • T. Miyazaki et al.

    J. Magn. Magn. Mater.

    (1995)
  • O. Fruchart et al.

    Appl. Surf. Sci.

    (1998)
  • S. Kahl et al.

    Phys. Rev. B

    (2001)
  • N. Cherief et al.

    J. Magn. Magn. Mater.

    (1993)
  • J.A. Venables

    Philos. Mag.

    (1973)
  • J.E. Prieto et al.

    Phys. Rev. B

    (2000)
  • B. Hinnemann et al.

    Phys. Rev. Lett.

    (2001)
  • Y.G. Li et al.

    Surf. Sci.

    (1994)
  • X.W. Zhou et al.

    Surf. Sci.

    (1999)
  • C.M. Gilmore et al.

    Phys. Rev. B

    (1991)
  • N. Levanov et al.

    Surf. Sci.

    (1998)
  • G. Rosenfeld et al.

    Phys. Rev. Lett.

    (1993)
  • G. Abadias et al.

    J. Cryst. Growth

    (2001)
  • T. Shima et al.

    Appl. Phys. Lett.

    (2002)
  • K. Sumiyama et al.

    J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.

    (1984)
  • J. Giergiel et al.

    Surf. Sci.

    (1994)
  • S.S. Manoharan et al.

    Phys. Rev. B

    (1998)
  • J.A.C. Bland, B. Heinrich, Ultrathin Magnetic Structures, Springer-Verlag, Berlin,...
  • M.N. Baibich et al.

    Phys. Rev. Lett.

    (1988)
  • G. Binasch et al.

    Phys. Rev. B

    (1989)
  • J.S. Moodera et al.

    Phys. Rev. Lett.

    (1995)
  • F. Matsukura et al.

    Phys. Rev. B

    (1998)
  • A. Haury et al.

    Phys. Rev. Lett.

    (1997)
  • Y.D. Park et al.

    Science

    (2002)
  • T. Dietl

    Semicond. Sci. Technol.

    (2002)
  • B. Lee et al.

    Semicond. Sci. Technol.

    (2002)
  • S.A. Wolf et al.

    Science

    (2001)
  • X.W. Li et al.

    Appl. Phys. Lett.

    (1999)
  • D.B. Chrisey, G.K. Hubler (Eds.), Pulsed Laser Deposition of Thin Films, Wiley, New York,...P.R. Willmott et al.

    Rev. Mod. Phys.

    (2000)
  • D. Dijkkamp et al.

    Appl. Phys. Lett.

    (1987)
  • H. Schwartz et al.

    J. Vac. Sci. Technol.

    (1969)
  • Yu.A. Bykovskii et al.

    Sov. Phys. Tech. Phys.

    (1978)
  • H. Jenniches et al.

    Appl. Phys. Lett.

    (1996)
  • O.F.K. McGrath et al.

    Surf. Sci.

    (1994)
  • J. Shen et al.

    Phys. Rev. Lett.

    (1998)
  • J.C.S. Kools, in: D.B. Chrisey, G.K. Hubler (Eds.), Pulsed Laser Deposition of Thin Films, Wiley, New York, 1994, pp....
  • H.U. Krebs

    Int. J. Non-Equilib. Pr.

    (1997)
  • P.P. Pronko et al.

    J. Appl. Phys.

    (1995)
  • R. Timm et al.

    J. Appl. Phys.

    (1996)
  • R.W. Dreyfus

    J. Appl. Phys.

    (1991)
  • J.C.S. Kools et al.

    Appl. Phys. B

    (1991)
  • P.E. Dyer

    Appl. Phys. Lett.

    (1989)
  • J. Lunney

    Appl. Surf. Sci.

    (1995)
  • H. Brune

    Surf. Sci. Rep.

    (1998)
  • P.-O. Jubert et al.

    Surf. Sci.

    (2003)
  • N. Combe et al.

    Phys. Rev. B

    (1998)
  • P. Jensen et al.

    Surf. Sci. Lett.

    (1997)
  • P.-M. Lam et al.

    Phys. Rev. B

    (2002)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text