Predictors of remission in people with axial spondyloarthritis: A systematic literature review
Introduction
The primary goal of treating patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) is to maximise long term health-related quality of life through control of symptoms and inflammation, prevention of progressive structural damage, and preservation or normalisation of function and social participation [1]. With the increasing use of biological agents in the treatment of axSpA in recent years, aiming for clinical remission is now a major treatment goal as outlined in current treat-to-target recommendations [2]. However, at present, there is no clear, universally accepted definition of remission in axSpA [3], [4], [5], [6], [7].
Two main definitions of clinical remission/inactive disease have been proposed: 1) Assessment in Spondyloarthritis International Society (ASAS) partial remission (PR) [8], defined by a value no greater than 20 on a 0-100 scale in four domains: pain represented by the visual analogue scale (VAS) score (0–100); function represented by the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI) score (0–100); inflammation represented either by the mean of the two morning stiffness-related Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) questions (item 5 or 6), [8]; and 2) Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) inactive disease (ID), defined by an ASDAS score<1.3 [9], with ASDAS C-reactive protein (CRP) or ASDAS erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) being calculated using a formula that weights five items: back pain (BASDAI question 2), peripheral joint complaints (BASDAI question 3), duration of morning stiffness (BASDAI question 6), patient global assessment, and CRP (ASDAS-CRP) or ESR level (ASDAS-ESR) [10], [11], [12].
Achievement of remission has been associated with retardation of progression of structural damage [13], [14], [15] and better health outcomes, namely improved physical function, health-related quality of life and work productivity [16,17]. Therefore, remission is a desirable outcome in axSpA, and the identification of predictors of remission may further aid in the clinical management of the disease, offering the possibility of more individualised treatment plans and allowing health care professionals to better communicate with patients regarding the course and prognosis of their condition.
This systematic literature review (SLR) aimed to identify predictors of remission in people with axSpA. This is the first SLR performed about this topic.
Section snippets
Protocol and search strategy
The SLR protocol and data extraction forms were designed in accordance with the Cochrane Handbook [18] and reported according to the “Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA)” statement [19]. The protocol was written and defined before starting the search. The only deviation from the protocol was to conduct an updated search during the review process of the manuscript to capture any articles published more recently and not included in the first version of the
Results
Our search retrieved 4592 articles. From these, we excluded 894 duplicates within and across databases. After review of the title and abstract, 34 articles were retrieved for full-text evaluation, of which we included 21 articles (18 from electronic databases and 3 from hand search), as shown in Fig. 1. The articles excluded and the reasons for exclusion are shown in Supplementary Table 3.
The study characteristics are described in Table 1 and the methodological quality assessment is provided in
Discussion
In this SLR, we compile all the available data on predictors of remission in axSpA patients, based on multivariable analyses. We report a total of 28 predictors in four categories: socio-demographic factors; comorbidities and axSpA subtype; laboratory and imaging factors; clinical scores and evaluations; and treatments.
Younger age (10 studies), HLA-B27 positivity (6 studies), lower baseline BASFI (5 studies), treatment with TNFi (4 studies), male gender (4 studies), lower baseline BASDAI (3
Authors contribution
A.S.P and B.F performed the literature search, performed the data extraction and analysis, and wrote the first draft of the manuscript. P.M.M. designed the study, supervised the work, and acted as the methodologist and 3rd reviewer. All the authors contributed to writing the manuscript, read and approved the final manuscript.
Declaration of Competing Interest
P.M.M. has received consulting/speaker's fees from Abbvie, BMS, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, Janssen, MSD, Novartis, Orphazyme, Pfizer, Roche and UCB, all unrelated to this manuscript. A.S.P: no conflicts of interest; B.F: no conflicts of interest.
Acknowledgments
We acknowledge the guidance of Kate Brunskill (Deputy Librarian of the UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology) in developing the search strategy.
Funding
A.S.P. is supported by a scientific training bursary for young fellows from EULAR. B.F. is supported by the Turkish Society for Rheumatology. PMM is supported by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR), University College London Hospitals (UCLH), Biomedical Research Centre (BRC). None of these institutions had a role in the study, including study design, collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; writing of the report; and decision to submit the paper for publication.
Ethical approval information
None or not applicable.
Data sharing statement
Data sharing not applicable as no datasets generated and/or analysed for this study. All data relevant to the study are included in the article or uploaded as supplementary information.
References (43)
- et al.
Disease activity measurements and monitoring in psoriatic arthritis and axial spondyloarthritis
Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol
(2014) - et al.
The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration
J Clin Epidemiol
(2009) - et al.
Efficacy and safety of continuing versus withdrawing adalimumab therapy in maintaining remission in patients with non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (ABILITY-3): a multicentre, randomised, double-blind study
Lancet
(2018) - et al.
Factors associated with drug-free remission at 5 year in early onset axial spondyloarthritis patients: data from the DESIR cohort
Joint Bone Spine
(2022) - et al.
2016 update of the ASAS-EULAR management recommendations for axial spondyloarthritis
Ann Rheum Dis
(2017) - et al.
Treating axial spondyloarthritis and peripheral spondyloarthritis, especially psoriatic arthritis, to target: 2017 update of recommendations by an international task force
Ann Rheum Dis
(2018) Treating to target in axial spondyloarthritis: defining the target and the arrow
Expert Rev Clin Immunol
(2015)- et al.
How to measure disease activity in axial spondyloarthritis?
Curr Opin Rheumatol
(2011) - et al.
Treat-to-target in axial spondyloarthritis: gold standard or fools' gold?
Curr Opin Rheumatol
(2019) - et al.
Challenges and advances in targeting remission in axial spondyloarthritis
J Rheumatol
(2018)
Ankylosing spondylitis assessment group preliminary definition of short-term improvement in ankylosing spondylitis
Arthritis Rheum
ASDAS, a highly discriminatory ASAS-endorsed disease activity score in patients with ankylosing spondylitis
Ann Rheum Dis
Ankylosing spondylitis disease activity score (ASDAS): defining cut-off values for disease activity states and improvement scores
Ann Rheum Dis
Calculating the ankylosing spondylitis disease activity score if the conventional c-reactive protein level is below the limit of detection or if high-sensitivity c-reactive protein is used: an analysis in the DESIR cohort
Arthritis Rheumatol
Assessment of spondyloarthritis international S. ankylosing spondylitis disease activity score (ASDAS): 2018 update of the nomenclature for disease activity states
Ann Rheum Dis
Higher disease activity leads to more structural damage in the spine in ankylosing spondylitis: 12-year longitudinal data from the OASIS cohort
Ann Rheum Dis
High disease activity according to the ankylosing spondylitis disease activity score is associated with accelerated radiographic spinal progression in patients with early axial spondyloarthritis: results from the German SPondyloarthritis Inception Cohort
Ann Rheum Dis
TNF blockers inhibit spinal radiographic progression in ankylosing spondylitis by reducing disease activity: results from the Swiss clinical quality management cohort
Ann Rheum Dis
The effect of golimumab therapy on disease activity and health-related quality of life in patients with ankylosing spondylitis: 2-year results of the GO-RAISE trial
J Rheumatol
ASAS40 and ASDAS clinical responses in the ABILITY-1 clinical trial translate to meaningful improvements in physical function, health-related quality of life and work productivity in patients with non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis
Rheumatology (Oxford)
Cited by (6)
Impact of sex and gender on axSpA diagnosis and outcomes
2023, Best Practice and Research: Clinical RheumatologyPatient-tailored dose reduction of tumor necrosis factor inhibitors in axial spondyloarthritis
2023, International ImmunopharmacologyHLA-B27 positivity in a large miscegenated population of 5,389,143 healthy blood marrow donors in Brazil
2023, Advances in Rheumatology
- 1
A.S.P. and B.F. contributed equally to this manuscript.