Preeclampsia and cardiovascular disease risk assessment – Do arterial stiffness and atherosclerosis uncover increased risk ten years after delivery?

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.preghy.2016.04.001Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Ten years after preeclampsia, traditional CVD risk assessment seems to be valuable.

  • Blood pressure needs to be assessed in 40-year old previously preeclamptic women.

  • Arterial stiffness and atherosclerosis markers did not uncover increased CVD risk.

Abstract

Objectives

Epidemiological studies associate preeclampsia with increased risk of premature cardiovascular disease (CVD) later in life. This study aims to make a comprehensive CVD risk assessment comparing women with previous preeclamptic pregnancies to women with previous normotensive pregnancies 10 years after index pregnancy.

Study design

A nested, matched, observational cohort study.

Main outcome measures

Markers of arterial stiffness, aortic pulse wave velocity (aPWV) and augmentation index (AIx-75), and markers of atherosclerosis, carotid intima-media thickness (cIMT) and carotid plaque presence. Traditional CVD risk factors and 10-year and 30-year Framingham CVD risk scores were also assessed.

Results

Women were included from April 2014 to October 2014 at a tertiary referral hospital in Denmark. Twenty-one exposed women with a history of preeclampsia and 21 unexposed with a history of normotensive pregnancies were included. Ten years after delivery, significantly more exposed women suffered from hypertension and received antihypertensive treatment and significantly more fulfilled the hypertension-definition at screening. Previously preeclamptic women also tended to have more unfavorable CVD risk estimates. The Framingham risk scores seemed to extend the unfavorable CVD risk. The exposed women tended to have a higher aPWV compared to unexposed women, (P = 0.057). No differences were shown in the other examined arteriosclerotic or atherosclerotic variables.

Conclusions

Ten years after delivery, we found increased risk of hypertension and trend toward unfavorable CVD risk profile in 40-year-old previously preeclamptic women. However, arterial stiffness and atherosclerosis did not uncover any additional CVD risk information at this time point.

Introduction

Preeclampsia is a syndrome defined as new-onset hypertension and proteinuria after 20 weeks of gestation [1]. Preeclampsia represents not only a maternal risk during pregnancy, but epidemiological studies also show increased risk of premature cardiovascular disease (CVD) after delivery [2], [3]. Systematic reviews support the epidemiological findings and demonstrate an approximately doubled risk of ischemic heart disease, cerebrovascular incidents and mortality of CVD after preeclampsia [4], [5].

In 2011, American Heart Association changed their recommendations regarding women’s CVD risk. Preeclampsia was included as an independent factor heralding special attention. However, American Heart Association did not specify how and when the CVD risk of previously preeclamptic women should be assessed.

Still, the association between preeclampsia and premature CVD is incompletely understood. Studies have established that preeclampsia is a vascular disease related to traditional CVD risk factors such as hypertension, dyslipidemia and obesity. Prepregnancy CVD risk factors increase the risk of subsequent preeclampsia [6], [7]. Moreover, traditional CVD risk factors are more prevalent after preeclampsia [8], [9]. If preeclampsia itself additionally affects CVD risk is more uncertain. Indicating an additional intrinsic preeclamptic effect, studies found significantly more pronounced CVD risk in the combined presence of traditional risk factors and history of preeclampsia [3], [10].

Despite the established relation to traditional risk factors and a possible intrinsic effect, the value of a traditional CVD risk assessment including markers of arterial stiffness and atherosclerosis in women 10 years after preeclampsia remains unclear.

The primary objective of our study was to elucidate if an increased CVD risk can be detected as early as 10 years after preeclampsia. Therefore, the aim was to complete a comprehensive CVD risk assessment including markers of arterial stiffness, atherosclerosis and Framingham risk scores comparing women with previous preeclamptic pregnancies to women with previous normotensive pregnancies 10 years after delivery.

Section snippets

Methods

The source population for this observational study was a cohort comprised of approximately 1600 pregnant women studied at the tertiary referral hospital, Randers, Denmark in the period 2001–4 [11].

For the present study women were excluded if they were currently pregnant, breastfeeding, or living more than 100 km away from the hospital. Exposure was defined as having one preeclamptic pregnancy 2001–4. Preeclampsia diagnosis was defined as new-onset hypertension (systolic blood pressure  140 mmHg

Results

We included 21 exposed women with previous preeclamptic pregnancies and 21 matched, unexposed women with previous normotensive pregnancies. The characteristics at follow-up and at index pregnancy are shown in Table 1. The mean age at follow-up was 40.7 years. Due to the age and time-since-delivery matched design, no differences in age and postpartum interval between the groups appeared.

At follow-up, two exposed women suffered from CVD, one from diabetes mellitus and significantly more from

Discussion

In a matched design, this study completed a comprehensive CVD risk assessment comparing women with previous preeclamptic pregnancies to women with previous normotensive pregnancies 10 years after delivery. In general, our study indicates that previously preeclamptic women had a more unfavorable CVD risk profile as early as 10 years after delivery. Two exposed women suffered from manifest CVD and one from diabetes mellitus.

We found that significantly more women with a history of preeclampsia

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Anna Larsen, Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Randers Regional Hospital, Denmark for her immense contribution to this study.

References (30)

  • P.R. Romundstad et al.

    Hypertension in pregnancy and later cardiovascular risk: common antecedents?

    Circulation

    (2010)
  • E.B. Magnussen et al.

    Hypertensive disorders in pregnancy and subsequently measured cardiovascular risk factors

    Obstet Gynecol.

    (2009)
  • J. Tooher et al.

    High blood pressure during pregnancy is associated with future cardiovascular disease: an observational cohort study

    BMJ Open

    (2013)
  • C.S. Kronborg et al.

    Longitudinal measurement of cytokines in pre-eclamptic and normotensive pregnancies

    Acta Obstet Gynecol. Scand.

    (2011)
  • C. Nishida et al.

    Body fat distribution and noncommunicable diseases in populations: overview of the 2008 WHO Expert Consultation on Waist Circumference and Waist-Hip Ratio

    Eur. J. Clin. Nutr.

    (2010)
  • Cited by (31)

    • Use of Race, Ethnicity, and National Origin in Studies Assessing Cardiovascular Risk in Women With a History of Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy

      2021, CJC Open
      Citation Excerpt :

      A total of 524 records were obtained from our second search for recently published primary studies. After excluding records that did not meet our eligibility criteria, a total of 124 primary studies3,50-172 were included for full review (Supplemental Table S6). All included primary studies were published between 1976 and 2021, with most studies (72%) published in the last 10 years.

    • Reduction of serum-induced endothelial STAT3(Y705) activation is associated with preeclampsia

      2021, Pregnancy Hypertension
      Citation Excerpt :

      We hypothesized 1) that serum from preeclamptic women has different STAT3(Y705) phosphorylation capabilities in endothelial cells compared with serum from uncomplicated pregnant women; 2) that members of the VEGF superfamily contribute to the difference in STAT3(Y705) phosphorylation; and 3) that altered serum-induced endothelial STAT3(Y705) phosphorylation differences also exist in serum from previously preeclamptic women suffering from hypertension and carotid atherosclerotic plaques eight to eighteen years after deliveries. Serum samples used in the present study originated from three different clinical studies and all included women had singleton pregnancies in the period 1998–2008 [19–21]. In general, preeclampsia diagnosis was defined as new-onset hypertension (systolic blood pressure ≥140 mmHg and/or diastolic blood pressure ≥90 mmHg) and proteinuria (≥300 mg/24 h or ≥ 30 mg/mmol albumin:creatinine random urine or ≥1+ on repeat dipstick).

    • Cerebrovascular Pathophysiology in Preeclampsia and Eclampsia

      2021, Chesley’s Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text