Original articleThe pattern of pharmacological treatment of bipolar patients discharged from psychiatric units in Poland
Introduction
Demonstrating mood-stabilizing properties of lithium [1], valproates [2] and carbamazepine [3] were milestones in the development of pharmacological management of bipolar disorder (BD). Because of the prophylactic effect of BD these drugs have been referred to as mood stabilisers (MS). The spectrum of pharmacological methods of treatment of BD has significantly increased at the end of the 20th century and the beginning of the 21st, when the efficiency of second-generation antipsychotics(SGA): aripiprazole, olanzapine, risperidone, quetiapine, asenapine and ziprasidone, as well new generation of antiepileptic drugs (lamotrigine) in the treatment of acute episodes of BD and their prevention has been established. Therefore, both SGA and lamotrigine are considered as the second generation of MS.
In 2007 three criteria have been proposed for medications to be admitted to this group: (a) efficacy in treating the acute episodes of mania, (b) efficacy in the treatment of bipolar depression as well as (c) prophylactic effect against future episodes [4]. The risk of relapse following acute episode is high in bipolar patients, therefore the selection of optimal prophylactic treatment is an important therapeutic decision. The prevailing opinion is that lithium is the closest to ideal MS [5]. For this reason, lithium is recommended as first-line monotherapy for the relapse prevention [6]. Unfortunately, lithium effectively prevents relapses only in one-third of patients who are called “excellent lithium responders” while in others the effect is not satisfactory [7]. Also, other medications seem to have a limited range of efficacy. Results of meta-analyses of randomised control trials with relapse prevention designs, which formed the basis for formulating therapeutic guidelines, revealed that olanzapine, quetiapine, risperidone (long-acting injection) and valproate are effective in the prevention of manic relapse while lamotrigine and quetiapine more effectively prevent depressive relapse [6].
The lack of “an ideal” MS encourages clinicians to consider augmentation of the ineffective or partially effective drug with the second medication. In clinical practice concomitant use of two or more drugs in the treatment of BD is common. For example, participants of the STEP-BD study, who achieved a remission of symptoms were prescribed averagely 2.05 medications [8]. Using a retrospective chart review of 230 BP patients admitted to hospital in 2010, Weinstock et al. [9] found that patients took an average of 3.31 (SD = 1.46) psychotropic medications at the time of hospitalization. Moreover, 55% of them reported taking 3 or more psychotropic medications and 36% reported taking ≥4 psychotropic medications. Data from a large European multicenter study (AMSP) showed that from 1994 to 2009, 85% of all BP patients received more than one class of psychotropic medications. Moreover, as many as 74% of patients received antidepressants, most commonly in combination therapy with lithium or valproates particularly in bipolar depression [10]. Italian Burden of Illness in Schizophrenia and BD (IBIS) study demonstrated that 69% of BP patients were treated with antipsychotics (AP) and 30.4% of them received AP polypharmacy. Moreover, 85.5% of those who were on AP polypharmacy received also mood stabiliser and/or antidepressant. In turn, 76.9% of bipolar patients who were on one AP, received concomitant treatment with MS and/or antidepressant [11]. In Taiwan, 71% of bipolar patients received two or more medications from different classes (MS + SGA). The most common combination was the concomitant use of mood stabiliser and SGA [12].
Several definitions of polypharmacy have been proposed by authors of studies published so far. One of them, commonly used says that this is the long-term use of two or more psychiatric medications in the same patient and the second that it refers to use of two or more medication of the same class to treat the same condition [13].
Treatment guidelines published in recent years recommend monotherapy, preferably with lithium, and augmentation with valproates or SGA if lithium is ineffective [6,[14], [15], [16], [17]]. In rapid cycling BD combination treatment is especially recommended [6,15]. Also, Polish standards of pharmacological treatment of BD recommend monotherapy as a first-line method of prophylaxis of recurrences [18].
The aim of this study was to assess the pattern of pharmacological treatment in patients with the diagnosis of BD discharged from psychiatric units in Poland. Furthermore, the study aimed to identify clinical and demographic factors predisposing to polypharmacy.
Section snippets
Material and methods
Pharmacotherapy of 127 consecutive patients (57 females and 70 males) with an ICD-10 diagnosis of BD at the point of discharge from five psychiatric regional hospitals/units in Poland, was evaluated by experienced psychiatrists in 2015/2016 on the basis of medical files. The effect of treatment on mental status at discharge was examined using Clinical Global Impression − Improvement scale (CGI-I).
Results
The mean age of the study group was 46.2 years (SD: ±13.8) (females 49.2 years, males 43.8 years). The mean duration of illness was 12.3 years (SD: ±9.7). The diagnosis of BP I disorder was established in 93 patients (73.2%), BP-II disorder in 27 (21.3%) patients and 7 (5.5%) patients were diagnosed with BD not otherwise specified (NOS). The majority of patients were admitted due to manic episode (n = 49, 38.6%) and depressive episode (n = 38, 29.9%), other patients due to mixed episode (n = 19,
Discussion
Our study demonstrated that 83.5% of patients discharged from five psychiatric units in Poland were prescribed two or more medications and only 16.5% patients were prescribed a monotherapy with MS (n = 8, 6.3%) or SGA/lamotrigine (12, 9.4%). These findings are similar to results obtained in Italy [11], in Taiwan [12] and in the US [19].
The drugs most commonly used among our patients were valproates (54%), quetiapine (37%), olanzapine (37%) and lamotrigine (25%). It is worth noting that in Poland
Conflicts of interest
None.
References (38)
- et al.
Prescription patterns of psychotropic medications in elderly compared with younger participants who achieved a recovered status in the systematic treatment enhancement program for bipolar disorder
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry
(2008) - et al.
Medication burden in bipolar disorder: a chart review of patients at psychiatric hospital admission
Psychiatry Res
(2014) - et al.
Maintenance therapy with second-generation antipsychotics for bipolar disorder—a systematic review and meta-analysis
J Affect Disord
(2017) - et al.
Interaction of lamotrigine with sodium valproate
Lancet
(1993) - et al.
Weight change in the acute treatment of bipolar I disorder: a naturalistic observational study of psychiatric inpatients
J Affect Disord
(2008) - et al.
Safety and efficacy of adjunctive second-generation antidepressant therapy with a mood stabiliser or an atypical antipsychotic in acute bipolar depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised placebo-controlled trials
Lancet Psychiatry
(2016) - et al.
Lithium as a prophylactic agents. Its effect against recurrent depressions and manic-depressive psychosis
Arch Gen Psychiatry
(1967) - et al.
Long-term thymoregulative action of depamide in manic-depressive psychoses [in French]
Ann Med Psychol
(1971) - et al.
A preliminary double-blind study on the efficacy of carbamazepine in prophylaxis of manic-depressive illness
Psychopharmacology (Berlin)
(1981) - et al.
What is a mood stabilizer
Psychol Med
(2007)