Elsevier

Ophthalmology

Volume 122, Issue 2, February 2015, Pages 399-406
Ophthalmology

Original article
Optical Coherence Tomography for the Monitoring of Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration: A Systematic Review

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.07.055Get rights and content

Topic

To compare the accuracy of optical coherence tomography (OCT) with alternative tests for monitoring neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) and detecting disease activity among eyes previously treated for this condition.

Clinical Relevance

Traditionally, fundus fluorescein angiography (FFA) has been considered the reference standard to detect nAMD activity, but FFA is costly and invasive. Replacement of FFA by OCT can be justified if there is a substantial agreement between tests.

Methods

Systematic review and meta-analysis. The index test was OCT. The comparator tests were visual acuity, clinical evaluation (slit lamp), Amsler chart, color fundus photographs, infrared reflectance, red-free images and blue reflectance, fundus autofluorescence imaging, indocyanine green angiography (ICGA), preferential hyperacuity perimetry, and microperimetry. We searched the following databases: MEDLINE, MEDLINE In-Process, EMBASE, Biosis, Science Citation Index, the Cochrane Library, Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects, MEDION, and the Health Technology Assessment database. The last literature search was conducted in March 2013. We used the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 (QUADAS-2) to assess risk of bias.

Results

We included 8 studies involving more than 400 participants. Seven reported the performance of OCT (3 time-domain [TD] OCT, 3 spectral-domain [SD] OCT, 1 both types) and 1 reported the performance of ICGA in the detection of nAMD activity. We did not find studies directly comparing tests in the same population. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of TD OCT and SD OCT for detecting active nAMD was 85% (95% confidence interval [CI], 72%–93%) and 48% (95% CI, 30%–67%), respectively. One study reported ICGA with sensitivity of 75.9% and specificity of 88.0% for the detection of active nAMD. Half of the studies were considered to have a high risk of bias.

Conclusions

There is substantial disagreement between OCT and FFA findings in detecting active disease in patients with nAMD who are being monitored. Both methods may be needed to monitor patients comprehensively with nAMD.

Section snippets

Methods

The target condition was nAMD of any phenotype. Eligible participants were individuals who had been treated previously for nAMD with any type of treatment and who were monitored to detect active disease. Thus, patients could have active or stable neovascular disease.

The index test was OCT, alone or in combination with other tests; that is, we included studies that used OCT alone or associated with other test or tests to detect nAMD disease activity, including any of the following: clinical

Results

We identified 4682 titles and abstracts; for 179 of these, the full text was evaluated (Fig 1). Eight were monitoring studies involving people previously diagnosed with nAMD and undergoing follow-up12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19; 1 study, by Salinas-Alaman et al,17 reported results for both diagnosis and monitoring (Table 1). No studies evaluated the performance of OCT associated with other test(s). Of the 8 included studies, 4 were prospective15, 16, 17, 19 and 3 were retrospective,12, 13, 14

Discussion

Because of the burden of nAMD on patients and health care providers, an effective and efficient monitoring strategy to detect active disease is needed. The use of frequent (every 1 or 2 months) FFA is not recommended. Fundus fluorescein angiography is hampered by its cost, the fact that it is a relatively time-consuming invasive imaging technology, and its association with rare but possible risks. Current practice patterns preferred by the American Academy of Ophthalmology advise the use of FFA

References (26)

  • Photodynamic therapy of subfoveal choroidal neovascularization in age-related macular degeneration with verteporfin: one-year results of 2 randomized clinical trials—TAP report 1

    Arch Ophthalmol

    (1999)
  • Royal College of Ophthalmologists. AMD Guidelines Group. Age-related macular degeneration: guidelines for management....
  • Preferred Practice Pattern Guidelines: Age-Related Macular Degeneration

    (2011)
  • Cited by (58)

    • Agreement of Spectral-Domain OCT with Fluorescein Leakage in Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration: Post Hoc Analysis of the HARBOR Study

      2020, Ophthalmology Retina
      Citation Excerpt :

      However, multiple clinical trials that have used OCT-guided PRN treatment regimens achieved inferior visual acuity outcomes compared with fixed monthly regimens.3,5 It is possible that the suboptimal diagnostic accuracy of OCT to detect active CNV activity may explain these differences.14 OCT angiography is an emerging imaging method to monitor neovascular AMD.18

    • Time course of swept-source optical coherence tomography angiography findings after photodynamic therapy and aflibercept in eyes with age-related macular degeneration

      2019, American Journal of Ophthalmology Case Reports
      Citation Excerpt :

      It also is difficult to observe the detailed morphology of choroidal neovascularization (CNV) due to dye leakage.8 Optical coherence tomography (OCT) is another essential diagnostic tool for wet AMD and is indispensable for evaluating CNV activity.9 Since it is a noninvasive examination, it can be performed repeatedly.

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Financial Disclosure(s): The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.

    This article is based on broader research that was funded by the National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment (NIHR HTA) Programme (project no. 10/57/22) that will be published in full in a Health Technology Assessment. The Health Services Research Unit is core-funded by the Chief Scientist Office (CSO) of the Scottish Government Health and Social Care Directorates. The views and opinions expressed therein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the HTA programme, the NIHR, the National Health Service, the Department of Health, or the CSO.

    See Editorial on page 222.

    View full text