Elsevier

Neuroscience Letters

Volume 426, Issue 3, 22 October 2007, Pages 155-159
Neuroscience Letters

Electrophysiological analysis of a sensorimotor integration task

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2007.08.061Get rights and content

Abstract

The present experiment aimed at investigating electrophysiologic changes observed as beta band asymmetry, by Quantitative Electroencephalography (qEEG), when individuals performed a reaching motor task (catching a ball in free fall). The sample was composed of 23 healthy individuals, of both sexes, with ages varying between 25 and 40 years old. All the subjects were right handed. A two-way ANOVA was applied for the statistical analysis, to verify the interaction between task moment (i.e., 2 s before and 2 s after ball's fall) and electrode (i.e., frontal, central and temporal regions). The first analysis compared electrodes placed over the somatosensory cortex. Central sites (C3–C4) were compared with temporal regions (T3–T4). The results showed a main effect for moment and position. The second analysis was focused over the premotor cortex, which was represented by the electrodes placed on the frontal sites (F3–F4 versus F7–F8), and a main effect was observed for position. Taken together, these results show a pattern of asymmetry in the somatosensory cortex, associated with a preparatory mechanism when individuals have to catch an object during free fall. With respect to task moment, after the ball's fall, the asymmetry was reduced. Moreover, the difference in asymmetry between the observed regions were related to a supposed specialization of areas (i.e., temporal and central). The temporal region was associated with cognitive processes involved in the motor action (i.e., explicit knowledge). On the other hand, the central sites were related to the motor control mechanisms per se (i.e., implicit knowledge). The premotor cortex, represented by two frontal regions (i.e., F3–F4 versus F7–F8), showed a decrease on neural activity in the contralateral hemisphere (i.e., to the right hand). This result is in agreement with other experiments suggesting a participation of the frontal cortex in the planning of the apprehension task. This sensorimotor paradigm may contribute to the repertoire of tasks used to study clinical conditions such as depression, alzheimer and Parkinson diseases.

References (35)

Cited by (18)

  • EEG beta and low gamma power correlates with inattention in patients with major depressive disorder

    2016, Journal of Affective Disorders
    Citation Excerpt :

    In addition, Herrmann et al. (2010) and Howard et al. (2003) suggested that gamma band is involved in cognitive processes, memory and spatial/temporal integration. Velasques et al. (2007) also found that gamma activities in the frontal areas were observed due to their involvement in attention, planning, and selection of movement while performing a reaching motor task (catching a ball in free fall). Frontal lobe dysfunction has been repeatedly reported in patients with MDD (Baxter et al., 1989; Liao et al., 2013).

  • Low-frequency rTMS over the Parieto-frontal network during a sensorimotor task: The role of absolute beta power in the sensorimotor integration

    2016, Neuroscience Letters
    Citation Excerpt :

    In the current study, we seek to investigate the alterations provoked by low-frequency rTMS on the sensorimotor integration process. We utilized a task in which individuals had to identify visual stimuli and make a decision, catch a ball in free fall or maintain the hand closed; such task was already used in other studies from our laboratory, and it allowed observing the sensorimotor integration process from a visual-motor perspective [13–15]. In this context, we investigate the changes in the absolute beta power in the stimulated region and in the Frontal areas.

  • Trial-to-trial variability differentiates motor imagery during observation between low versus high responders: A functional near-infrared spectroscopy study

    2012, Behavioural Brain Research
    Citation Excerpt :

    The operating range of the sensor is about 5 m. For fNIRS recording, two sensors were placed bilaterally over the left and right hemispheres covering F3 and F4 with the compact sensor of 37.5 mm length and 25 mm width, according to the international 10–20 system [28] which has been shown to correlate with anatomical cranio-cerebral locations [29]. We choose these areas F3 and F4, as those have been previously described to cover secondary motor areas, including parts of PMC and SMA [30,31] which have been reported to be activated during both motor and imagery performance [32–34]. We are aware that the positioning of the fNIRS device is a potential limitation.

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text