Distributed cortical networks for focused auditory attention and distraction
Section snippets
Acknowledgements
Supported by the Academy of Finland (#202562, 207180, 201160, 211486), VA Research Service, and NIDCD DC005814.
References (34)
- et al.
Inhibition and the right inferior frontal cortex
Trends Cogn. Sci.
(2004) - et al.
The preparation and execution of self-initiated and externally-triggered movement: a study of event-related fMRI
Neuroimage
(2002) - et al.
Cortical surface-based analysis. I. Segmentation and surface reconstruction
Neuroimage
(1999) - et al.
Cortical surface-based analysis. II: Inflation, flattening, and a surface-based coordinate system
Neuroimage
(1999) - et al.
The planum temporale as a computational hub
Trends Neurosci.
(2002) - et al.
Responses of the primary auditory cortex to pitch changes in a sequence of tone pips: neuromagnetic recordings in man
Neurosci. Lett.
(1984) - et al.
Contributions of temporal-parietal junction to the human auditory P3
Brain Res.
(1989) - et al.
Differential contribution of frontal and temporal cortices to auditory change detection: fMRI and ERP results
Neuroimage
(2002) - et al.
Separate time behaviors of the temporal and frontal mismatch negativity sources
Neuroimage
(2000) - et al.
Superior temporal and inferior frontal cortices are activated by infrequent sound duration decrements: an fMRI study
Neuroimage
(2005)
Two separate mechanisms underlie auditory change detection and involuntary control of attention
Brain Res.
Left hemispheric dipole locations of the neuromagnetic mismatch negativity to frequency, intensity and duration deviants
Cogn. Brain Res.
Behavioral and electrophysiological effects of task-irrelevant sound change: a new distraction paradigm
Cogn. Brain Res.
Advances in functional and structural MR image analysis and implementation as FSL
Neuroimage
Processing of novel sounds and frequency changes in the human auditory cortex: magnetoencephalographic recordings
Psychophysiology
Bottom-up influences on working memory: behavioral and electrophysiological distraction varies with distractor strength
Exp. Psychol.
Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain
Nat. Rev. Neurosci.
Cited by (42)
Auditory cortex sensitivity to the loudness attribute of verbs
2020, Brain and LanguageTop-down controlled and bottom-up triggered orienting of auditory attention to pitch activate overlapping brain networks
2015, Brain ResearchCitation Excerpt :According to Näätänen׳s model, involuntary attention may be caught by sounds causing enhanced afferent activity in the auditory cortex (e.g., tones in silence) or by deviant events breaking regularity in an auditory input stream and eliciting the mismatch negativity (MMN) response in ERPs (see also Näätänen and Winkler, 1999; Escera et al., 2000). Numerous fMRI studies have shown that in addition to enhanced activity in the auditory cortex, such deviant events are followed by enhanced prefrontal and parietal activity presumably associated with involuntary attention to these events (Molholm et al., 2005; Opitz et al., 2002; Rinne et al., 2005; Rinne et al., 2007; Schall et al. 2003; for auditory- and frontal-cortex contributions to the MMN, see Rinne et al., 2000; Yago et al., 2001). Näätänen׳s (1990, 1992) model does not explicitly propose an overlap of brain networks for voluntary or top-down controlled and involuntary or bottom-up triggered auditory attention.
A frontal attention mechanism in the visual mismatch negativity
2015, Behavioural Brain ResearchAttention to natural auditory signals
2013, Hearing ResearchCitation Excerpt :The distinct activity patterns elicited by spatial and non-spatial attention to speech also correspond to similar “what” vs. “where” pathway activity seen in auditory discrimination tasks with non-linguistic stimuli (Alain et al., 2001; Degerman et al., 2006; Maeder et al., 2001; Paltoglou et al., 2011; Woods and Alain, 2001). Different brain regions are affected even when altering the discrimination between non-spatial auditory features, such as duration vs. pitch (Brechmann and Scheich, 2005) high vs. low frequency (Paltoglou et al., 2009), or pitch vs. loudness (Rinne et al., 2007). A similar effect is seen in bimodal selective attention studies, where subjects are presented with both visual and auditory stimuli and perform discriminations in one modality or another (Petkov et al., 2004; Johnson and Zatorre, 2005, 2006; Woods et al., 2009; Degerman et al., 2007; Salmi et al., 2007).