Mutation Research/Genetic Toxicology and Environmental Mutagenesis
Genotoxic effects of white fluorescent light on human lymphocytes in vitro
Introduction
In addition to sunlight, light produced by other artificial sources, such as white fluorescent light, ultra-violet and solar lamps, is present in our daily life to meet the needs of the modern world (leisure, work and the treatment of certain pathologic conditions). The pioneering works carried out with non-ionizing radiation, as the one produced by fluorescent light, have already demonstrated that this kind of radiation has a mutagenic effect on bacteria and that this effect becomes more pronounced whenever the wave length comes close to that of ultra-violet and blue light [1], [2]. More recent studies using white fluorescent light have shown that this agent induces mutations in bacteria which are similar to those produced by the sun, a well-known carcinogen [3].
A number of other studies performed in the seventies also showed deleterious effects (mutagenicity and toxicity) caused by white fluorescent light in fibroblast cultures of mammalian and human cells [4]. However, the analysis of sister chromatid exchanges (SCE's) in individuals exposed in vivo to fluorescent light showed discordant results, as there was sometimes an increase in the frequency of SCE's and others no change in this parameter at all [5], [6]. In spite of the discordant data, more recent studies tend to confirm the mutagenic effect of white fluorescent light in cell systems of mammals [7], [8].
Based on the exposé above, we can see that white fluorescent light is considered by several authors as a mutagenic agent in prokaryotes and mammalian cells, however, the amount of updated information on the possible effects of fluorescent light is small, and available studies in the literature are scarce. Thus, the present work had the objective of evaluating and reaching a better understanding of the mutagenic and clastogenic action of this light source on the DNA of peripheral blood leukocytes exposed in vitro. We further aimed at identifying possible alterations in the mitotic index (MI) and in the cell cycle kinetics as a result of the exposure of these cells to WFL, in different stages of the cell cycle and for distinct times of exposure.
Section snippets
Blood samples
Blood samples (20 ml) were obtained from 20 healthy non-smokers, 10 females and 10 males, aged 20–30 years, with no recent history of exposure to mutagens. The donors gave written informed consent to participate in the study. Blood samples were kept in a refrigerator for 15 h before culturing, to permit sedimentation of the red blood cells. The supernatant (plasma rich in leukocytes) was used to perform the experiments with fluorescent light.
Experiment 1: exposure of non-stimulated cells (G0 or early G1) to white light
In this study, human peripheral lymphocytes cultured in
Results
We studied the in vitro effects of 30, 60 and 90 min exposure of human peripheral lymphocytes to WFL. Our aim was to determine the genotoxic, cytotoxic and aneugenic effects of this agent in different phases of the cell cycle (G0/early G1, S, and late G2), using different parameters (SCE, CA, PRI, MI, aneuploidy and polyploidy). However, since previous experiments showed that exposure to light for more than 30 min was incompatible with chromosome analysis due to increased cytotoxicity, only the
Discussion
SCE's have been used as a very sensitive indicator of mutagenicity in a wide variety of tests, including studies of human lymphocytes [11]. In this study, we observed an increase in SCE's in human peripheral blood lymphocytes exposed to white fluorescent light for 30 min, as compared to non-exposed control cells, regardless of the cell cycle phase (G0/early G1 or early S) or the physiological conditions of the cells (non-stimulated or stimulated). These data are in agreement with several reports
Conflicts of interest
There is no conflict of interest.
Acknowledgment
This work was supported by Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq). RRB has a PQ-2 fellowship (number 308256/2006-9) granted by CNPq.
References (26)
- et al.
Mutation spectra in Salmonella of sunlight, white fluorescent light, and light from tanning salon beds: induction of tandem mutations and role of DNA repair
Mutat. Res.
(1995) - et al.
Sister-chromatid exchange and phototherapy
Mutat. Res.
(1979) - et al.
Effect of phototherapy on sister chromatid exchange in premature infants
Lancet
(1978) - et al.
White light-mediated DNA strand breaks in lens epithelial cells
Exp. Eye Res.
(2002) - et al.
Chromosome preparations of leukocytes cultured from human peripheral blood
Exp. Cell Res.
(1960) - et al.
Genotoxic effects of potassium bromate on human peripheral lymphocytes in vitro
Mutat. Res.
(2007) - et al.
Induction of sister chromatid exchanges in human cells by fluorescent light
Mutat. Res.
(1979) - et al.
Sister chromatid exchanges in the peripheral lymphocytes of newborns with Down syndrome after in vitro exposure to blue or green light
Mutat. Res.
(1996) - et al.
Molecular mechanisms of sister-chromatid exchange
Mutat. Res.
(2007) - et al.
IPCS guidelines for the monitoring of genotoxic effects of carcinogens in humans
Mutat. Res.
(2000)
Chromosome aberrations: past, present and future
Mutat. Res.
Cell-cycle delay is induced in cells of a U937 promonocytic cell line by low-intensity light irradiation at 660 nm,
J. Photochem. Photobiol. B Biol.
Molecular mechanisms of light-induced photoreceptor apoptosis and neuroprotection for retinal degeneration
Prog. Retin. Eye Res.
Cited by (1)
Evidence that BRCA1- or BRCA2-associated cancers are not inevitable
2012, Molecular Medicine