Elsevier

Midwifery

Volume 30, Issue 2, February 2014, Pages 262-268
Midwifery

‘They treat you like you are not a human being’: Maltreatment during labour and delivery in rural northern Ghana

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2013.05.006Get rights and content

Abstract

Objective

to explore community and health-care provider attitudes towards maltreatment during delivery in rural northern Ghana, and compare findings against The White Ribbon Alliance's seven fundamental rights of childbearing women.

Design

a cross-sectional qualitative study using in-depth interviews and focus groups.

Setting

the Kassena-Nankana District of rural northern Ghana between July and October 2010.

Participants

128 community members, including mothers with newborn infants, grandmothers, household heads, compound heads, traditional healers, traditional birth attendants, and community leaders, as well as 13 formally trained health-care providers.

Measurements and findings

7 focus groups and 43 individual interviews were conducted with community members, and 13 individual interviews were conducted with health-care providers. All interviews were transcribed verbatim and entered into NVivo 9.0 for analysis. Despite the majority of respondents reporting positive experiences, unprompted, maltreatment was brought up in 6 of 7 community focus groups, 14 of 43 community interviews, and 8 of 13 interviews with health-care providers. Respondents reported physical abuse, verbal abuse, neglect, and discrimination. One additional category of maltreatment identified was denial of traditional practices.

Key conclusions

maltreatment was spontaneously described by all types of interview respondents in this community, suggesting that the problem is not uncommon and may dissuade some women from seeking facility delivery.

Implications for practice

provider outreach in rural northern Ghana is necessary to address and correct the problem, ensuring that all women who arrive at a facility receive timely, professional, non-judgmental, high-quality delivery care.

Introduction

Every year in low- and middle-income countries, 275,000 women die due to pregnancy-related causes, and 3 million babies die in first 4 weeks of life (The Lancet, 2005, Oestergaard et al., 2011, WHO, UNICEF, UNFPA, World Bank, 2012). Facility-based delivery – or births that occur outside the home in any health-care setting – has been identified by the World Health Organization as a critical strategy for reducing these deaths (WHO, 2004). Nonetheless, many things prevent women from giving birth in a health facility, including logistical factors such as cost (Spangler and Bloom, 2010), distance to facilities (De Allegri et al., 2011, Gabrysch et al., 2011), and unexpected, rapid, or ill-timed onset of labour (Galaa and Daare, 2008). Social factors, such as the need to seek permission from others before going to a health facility (Mills and Bertrand, 2005, Bazzano et al., 2008, Moyer et al., 2013), can also prevent women from giving birth anywhere but at home.

One important factor that is not well-documented but can have profound effects on women's choices regarding where to give birth is maltreatment at the hands of providers at a health facility. Maltreatment has been described or alluded to as part of larger studies in Ghana (D’Ambruoso et al., 2005, Mills and Bertrand, 2005, Bazzano et al., 2008), Nigeria (Asuquo et al., 2000, Ejembi et al., 2004, Onah et al., 2006), Swaziland (Uyirwoth et al., 1996, Thwala et al., 2011), Tanzania (Kruk et al., 2009, Spangler and Bloom, 2010), and Uganda (Kyomuhendo, 2003). There is no uniform definition of maltreatment, and there is no standardised instrument to measure its prevalence. Maltreatment has been conceptualised as general abusive treatment towards women (Asuquo et al., 2000), negative or unfriendly staff attitudes (Asuquo et al., 2000, D’Ambruoso et al., 2005, Mills and Bertrand, 2005), verbal abuse (Mills and Bertrand, 2005), or sexual abuse (d’Oliveira et al., 2002). Maltreatment has also been described as encompassing neglect, detention at facilities if women are unable to pay for services, non-consented care, discrimination based on patient attributes, and health-care workers delivering services in exchange for bribes (FIDA-Kenya (Federation of Women Lawyers, Kenya), 2007, Bowser, 2010, Human Rights Watch, 2011).

The drivers of maltreatment, which is most often discussed in the context of midwife or nurse interactions with pregnant or labouring women, are not well understood. In many developing countries, nurses in the public sector are working long hours in harsh conditions, and there are extreme power differentials between them and their predominantly poor, illiterate patients (Jewkes et al., 1998). ‘In these situations nurses have been reported to employ humiliation, verbal coercion, and even physical violence to assert their authority and control patient behavior’ (Jewkes et al., 1998, p. 1781). Anecdotal reports from midwives in rural Ghana suggest that they will do whatever it takes to help a woman give birth to a healthy baby—even if that means hitting her to help her focus on pushing during delivery.

In 2011, the advocacy organisation The White Ribbon Alliance for Safe Motherhood published a charter to formally recognise seven fundamental rights of childbearing women, which map to seven categories of disrespect originally put forth by Bowser and Hill (Bowser, 2010). These include: physical abuse, non-consented care, non-confidential care, non-dignified care (including verbal abuse), discrimination based on specific patient attributes, abandonment of care, and detention in facilities (Respectful Care Advisory Council, 2011). Notably, these categories are not meant to be mutually exclusive as many types of maltreatment encompass multiple categories.

This study sought to explore the issue of maltreatment in rural northern Ghana using a broad cross-section of community respondents. The study included the following aims: (1) to determine whether maltreatment was mentioned by community members without prompting when discussing issues surrounding childbirth, (2) to determine the types of maltreatment reported to be occurring in facilities in rural northern Ghana, and (3) to compare the categories of maltreatment described in the existing literature against those identified in this region of Ghana.

Section snippets

Methods

This study grew out of the Stillbirth And Neonatal Death Study (SANDS) in northern Ghana from July through October 2010 (Aborigo et al., 2012, Engmann et al., 2012, Moyer et al., 2012, Moyer et al., 2013). This study focuses on cross-sectional interview and focus group data spanning the antenatal and perinatal period and excludes interactions solely focused on an infant’s first seven days of life. The cross-sectional nature of the study design allowed for a broad exploration of the issue of

Findings

Table 1 illustrates the number and type of respondents included in this study, including 128 community members (mothers with newborn infants, grandmothers, household heads, compound heads, traditional healers, traditional birth attendants, and community leaders) and 13 formally trained health-care providers. Seven focus groups and 43 individual interviews were conducted with community members, and 13 individual interviews were conducted with health-care providers.

Pursuant to Aim 1 (identifying

Discussion

We found that women delivering in facilities in rural northern Ghana experienced physical abuse, verbal abuse, neglect, discrimination, and denial of traditional customs. Such occurrences are not ubiquitous, and many women report receiving excellent care in facilities. Nonetheless, we found a consistent undercurrent of fear of maltreatment.

These results are consistent with the limited published research literature on maltreatment. Verbal abuse, ‘abusive treatment’, and negative and unfriendly

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflict of interest, financial or otherwise, to disclose.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to express our gratitude to the Navrongo Health Research Centre, the African Social Research Initiative and Global REACH at the University of Michigan, the Department of Pediatrics at the University of North Carolina and to the many people involved in the collection and coding of data. This includes Gideon Logonia, Gideon Affah, John Richardson, Sarah Rominski, Mira Gupta, Elizabeth Hill, and Rebecca Hess. In addition, we would like to express our thanks to the people of

References (30)

  • Bowser D,H.K., 2010. Exploring evidence for disrespect and abuse in facility-based childbirth. Report of a Landscape...
  • L. D’Ambruoso et al.

    Please understand when I cry out in pain: women’s accounts of maternity services during labour and delivery in Ghana

    BMC Public Health

    (2005)
  • C.L. Ejembi et al.

    Utilization of maternal health services by rural Hausa women in Zaria environs, northern Nigeria: has primary health care made a difference?

    Journal of Community Medicine and Primary Health Care

    (2004)
  • C. Engmann et al.

    Stillbirths and early neonatal mortality in rural northern Ghana

    Tropical Medicine & International Health

    (2012)
  • FIDA-Kenya (Federation of Women Lawyers, Kenya), 2007. Failure to Deliver: Violation of Women's Human Rights in Kenyan...
  • View full text