Elsevier

Marine Pollution Bulletin

Volume 126, January 2018, Pages 516-524
Marine Pollution Bulletin

Spatio-temporal variation of anthropogenic marine debris on Chilean beaches

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2017.11.014Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Anthropogenic marine debris (AMD) is found on all Chilean beaches but no temporal tendency of AMD densities was observed.

  • Plastics and cigarette butts presented the highest percentages of AMD in all three surveys, attributed to local sources.

  • The Antofagasta Region in northern Chile had highest AMD densities.

  • Most AMD was found at the upper stations of beaches in most of the country.

  • We suggest that socio-economic development alone cannot explain temporal trends in AMD densities.

Abstract

We examined the hypothesis that in an emerging economy such as Chile the abundances of Anthropogenic Marine Debris (AMD) on beaches are increasing over time. The citizen science program Científicos de la Basura (“Litter Scientists”) conducted three national surveys (2008, 2012 and 2016) to determine AMD composition, abundance, spatial patterns and temporal trends. AMD was found on all beaches along the entire Chilean coast. Highest percentages of AMD in all surveys were plastics and cigarette butts, which can be attributed to local sources (i.e. beach users). The Antofagasta region in northern Chile had the highest abundance of AMD compared with all other zones. Higher abundances of AMD were found at the upper stations from almost all zones. No significant tendency of increasing or decreasing AMD densities was observed during the 8 years covered by our study, which suggests that economic development alone cannot explain temporal trends in AMD densities.

Introduction

Anthropogenic marine debris (AMD), mostly composed of plastics, has been characterized as a global and persistent environmental problem that has considerably increased over the last decades (Galgani et al., 2015). The accumulation of AMD has multiple impacts that can be categorized into three types: biological, ecosystemical, and socio-economical (Kuo and Huang, 2014). Biologically, marine organisms can be affected by AMD through ingestion and entanglement (Gregory, 2009, Kühn et al., 2015), which can lead to physical and chemical damage and even death (Rochman et al., 2013, Vegter et al., 2014). In terms of ecosystems and biogeography, AMD may serve as dispersal vehicle for invasive species, which can modify local ecosystems (Amaral-Zettler et al., 2015, Kiessling et al., 2015, Thiel and Gutow, 2005). With respect to socio-economic factors, since coastal AMD is aesthetically detrimental, it can affect the perception of beach-users and eventually coastal tourism, requiring high beach cleaning costs and causing losses in revenue (Jang et al., 2014, Newman et al., 2015, Santos et al., 2005).

Marine debris can be classified according to two main source categories: ocean- and land-based debris, depending on where AMD entered the marine environment (Galgani et al., 2015). Ocean-based AMD sources include waste from shipping, fishing, oil platforms, and aquaculture (Astudillo et al., 2009, Edyvane et al., 2004, Hinojosa and Thiel, 2009, Hong et al., 2014, Sheavly and Register, 2007, Watters et al., 2010). Land-based AMD might enter the marine environment by rivers, outflow from industries, harbors, unmanaged landfills, sewage waters, extreme events (tsunamis, hurricanes), or through direct littering by beach visitors (Aguilera et al., 2016, Goto and Shibata, 2015, Green et al., 2015, Khordagui and Abu-Hilal, 1994, Rech et al., 2014). It has been estimated that > 8.4 million tons of plastic waste enter the oceans annually from land-based sources (Jambeck et al., 2015).

A major part of AMD studies have been conducted in coastal areas, because of their proximity to sources, facility of access, and due to potential aesthetic impacts (Galgani et al., 2015). These studies provide insights about dominant types of AMD, their abundance, potential origins and accumulation rates. Nevertheless, these characteristics might be highly variable, e.g. due to the influence of urban cities, coastal use, river flushing, and the geomorphology, hydrodynamics and oceanography of each coastal area (Galgani et al., 2015, Moriarty et al., 2016). Consequently, studies with standardized methods that extend over a certain region and time are needed to evaluate the spatio-temporal variability of AMD abundances and composition (Browne et al., 2015, Hong et al., 2014, Moreira et al., 2015, Thornton and Jackson, 1998).

Temporal changes of AMD have been studied over different spatial scales, but most of them have been done on a small scale, such as single beaches, bays or islands (e.g. Agustin et al., 2015, Tourinho and Fillmann, 2011), or during shorter periods of time (e.g. Madzena and Lasiak, 1997, Storrier et al., 2007). Only few studies extend over a large temporal and spatial scale (for examples see Gago et al., 2014, Nelms et al., 2016, Ribic et al., 2010, Ribic et al., 2011, Schulz et al., 2015a, Schulz et al., 2015b). The generated results are contrasting: in some cases trends of AMD densities can be identified, either increasing in Indonesia (Willoughby et al., 1997), decreasing in Australia (Edyvane et al., 2004), or being consistent over time in Canada and Scotland (Lucas, 1992, Storrier et al., 2007). But in other cases, the results are highly variable and no temporal tendencies are observed (Cheung et al., 2016, Eriksson et al., 2013, Nelms et al., 2016). Consequently, no consistent global long-term trend has been identified for AMD densities on beaches (Browne et al., 2015).

Changes of AMD abundance over time might be related to the socio-economic and educational conditions of a country; pro-environmental behavior (e.g. adequate waste disposal) is generally higher in developed countries (Morren and Grinstein, 2016). Developed economies might have educational programs to increase environmental awareness in the population, such as environmental campaigns, frequent clean-up campaigns (e.g. NOAA, Ocean Conservancy), and well-established recycling infrastructure (Borja et al., 2011, Veiga et al., 2016). On the other hand, developing countries might focus on economic growth, often at the expense of environmental care. Environmental degradation might increase as the economy grows, up to a point where economic development leads to higher environmental awareness, and amounts of AMD are likely to be lower on beaches of developed countries, with a tendency to decrease over time. For an emerging economy such as Chile we should thus expect that the amounts of AMD of beaches are high, with a tendency to increase over time.

The Chilean citizen science program Científicos de la Basura (“litter scientists”) has been studying the problem of AMD in the SE Pacific for approximately 10 years, conducting the first national survey of AMD on beaches in 2008 (for further details of the program, see Eastman et al., 2014). The mean density of AMD was by that time 1.8 items m 2 (which included wood and “others”) and the most common AMD types were plastics, cigarette butts and glass (Bravo et al., 2009). Nevertheless, these results represented only a first snapshot of the general situation, and there was no information on the spatio-temporal dynamics of beach litter in the SE Pacific. Therefore, the national AMD survey was repeated during the years 2008, 2012 and 2016 along the entire Chilean coast, in order to (1) determine composition, (2) estimate abundance and spatial patterns, and (3) explore temporal trends of AMD densities on beaches from the SE Pacific.

Section snippets

Study area

The Chilean coast covers most of the South East Pacific, extending over ~ 4500 km from 18°S up to the southern tip of the continent at 56°S. The coast is composed mainly of rocky shores and sandy beaches between 18° and 42°S, and extensive channels and archipelagos in the Patagonian region south of ~ 42°S (Miloslavich et al., 2011). In order to guarantee a representative sampling of the Chilean coast, we invited participants from specific locations that are more or less evenly distributed along

Types of AMD

Among all the surveys, the highest percentages of AMD were plastics (27.1% in 2008) and cigarette butts (38.0% in 2012, 41.8% in 2016). In 2008, there were significant differences among zones (χ2 = 94.761; p < 0.001; Fig. 2; Table S1), where cigarette butts dominated in zones 1 (33.3%) and 2 (37.5%), and plastics in zones 3 and 5 (> 31.1%). In 2012, there were also significant differences between zones (χ2 = 32.804; p = 0.008; Fig. 2; Table S1). Cigarette butts reached the highest proportions in zones 1

Composition of AMD

Plastics and cigarette butts constitute the larger part of AMD on Chilean beaches during all three surveys. These items can be attributed to local sources, since they are common products used by beach users (Andrades et al., 2016, Ivar do Sul and Costa, 2007, Liu et al., 2013, Rosevelt et al., 2013). Because of their durability, these items made from synthetic materials comprise a large proportion of AMD (Barnes et al., 2009, Moore, 2008). The persistent abundance of cigarette butts and

Acknowledgements

This study received continuous support from the outreach program of the Chilean Science Foundation EXPLORA-CONICYT. The national litter sampling in 2016 was funded by the U.S. Embassy in Chile, with additional support from the Lighthouse Foundation and the Chilean Millennium Initiative Grant NC 120030. Foremost, though, our sincerest gratitude goes to all the teachers, students and volunteer collaborators who over the years helped to gather the data presented herein. We join all of them in the

References (102)

  • S. de Juan et al.

    Integrating stakeholder perceptions and preferences on ecosystem services in the management of coastal areas

    Ocean Coast. Manag.

    (2017)
  • L.B. Eastman et al.

    Identification of self-reported user behavior, education level, and preferences to reduce littering on beaches–a survey from the SE Pacific

    Ocean Coast. Manag.

    (2013)
  • K.S. Edyvane et al.

    Long-term marine litter monitoring in the remote Great Australian Bight, South Australia

    Mar. Pollut. Bull.

    (2004)
  • M. Eriksen et al.

    Plastic pollution in the South Pacific subtropical gyre

    Mar. Pollut. Bull.

    (2013)
  • C. Eriksson et al.

    Daily accumulation rates of marine debris on sub-Antarctic island beaches

    Mar. Pollut. Bull.

    (2013)
  • S.A. González et al.

    Quality of tourist beaches of northern Chile: a first approach for ecosystem-based management

    Ocean Coast. Manag.

    (2017)
  • T. Goto et al.

    Changes in abundance and composition of anthropogenic marine debris on the continental slope off the Pacific coast of northern Japan, after the March 2011 Tohoku earthquake

    Mar. Pollut. Bull.

    (2015)
  • V. Hidalgo-Ruz et al.

    Distribution and abundance of small plastic debris on beaches in the SE Pacific (Chile): a study supported by a citizen science project

    Mar. Environ. Res.

    (2013)
  • I.A. Hinojosa et al.

    Floating marine debris in fjords, gulfs and channels of Southern Chile

    Mar. Pollut. Bull.

    (2009)
  • S. Hong et al.

    Quantities, composition, and sources of beach debris in Korea from the results of nationwide monitoring

    Mar. Pollut. Bull.

    (2014)
  • J.A. Ivar do Sul et al.

    Marine debris review for Latin America and the wider Caribbean region: from the 1970s until now, and where do we go from here?

    Mar. Pollut. Bull.

    (2007)
  • J.A. Ivar do Sul et al.

    Here, there and everywhere. Small plastic fragments and pellets on beaches of Fernando de Noronha (Equatorial Western Atlantic)

    Mar. Pollut. Bull.

    (2009)
  • H. Khordagui et al.

    Industrial plastic on the southern beaches of the Arabian Gulf and the western beaches of the Gulf of Oman

    Environ. Pollut.

    (1994)
  • T. Kiessling et al.

    Who cares about dirty beaches? Evaluating environmental awareness and action on coastal litter in Chile

    Ocean Coast. Manag.

    (2017)
  • F.J. Kuo et al.

    Strategy for mitigation of marine debris: analysis of sources and composition of marine debris in northern Taiwan

    Mar. Pollut. Bull.

    (2014)
  • L.C.M. Lebreton et al.

    Modeling the transport and accumulation floating debris generated by the 11 march 2011 Tohoku tsunami

    Mar. Pollut. Bull.

    (2013)
  • J. Lee et al.

    Relationships among the abundances of plastic debris in different size classes on beaches in South Korea

    Mar. Pollut. Bull.

    (2013)
  • A.S. Leite et al.

    Influence of proximity to an urban center in the pattern of contamination by marine debris

    Mar. Pollut. Bull.

    (2014)
  • W.C. Li et al.

    Plastic waste in the marine environment: a review of sources, occurrence and effects

    Sci. Total Environ.

    (2016)
  • T.-K. Liu et al.

    Influence of waste management policy on the characteristics of beach litter in Kaohsiung, Taiwan

    Mar. Pollut. Bull.

    (2013)
  • Z. Lucas

    Monitoring persistent litter in the marine environment on Sable Island, Nova Scotia

    Mar. Pollut. Bull.

    (1992)
  • A. Madzena et al.

    Spatial and temporal variations in beach litter on the Transkei coast of South Africa

    Mar. Pollut. Bull.

    (1997)
  • E. Martinez et al.

    Floating marine debris surface drift: convergence and accumulation toward the South Pacific subtropical gyre

    Mar. Pollut. Bull.

    (2009)
  • N. Maximenko et al.

    Pathways of marine debris derived from trajectories of Lagrangian drifters

    Mar. Pollut. Bull.

    (2012)
  • D. Miranda-Urbina et al.

    Litter and seabirds found across a longitudinal gradient in the South Pacific Ocean

    Mar. Pollut. Bull.

    (2015)
  • C.J. Moore

    Synthetic polymers in the marine environment: a rapidly increasing, long-term threat

    Environ. Res.

    (2008)
  • M. Moriarty et al.

    Spatial and temporal analysis of litter in the Celtic Sea from groundfish survey data: lessons for monitoring

    Mar. Pollut. Bull.

    (2016)
  • C. Morishige et al.

    Factors affecting marine debris deposition at French frigate shoals, northwestern Hawaiian islands marine National Monument, 1990-2006

    Mar. Pollut. Bull.

    (2007)
  • M. Morren et al.

    Explaining environmental behavior across borders: a meta-analysis

    J. Environ. Psychol.

    (2016)
  • N.C. Ory et al.

    Amberstripe scad Decapterus muroadsi (Carangidae) fish ingest blue microplastics resembling their copepod prey along the coast of Rapa Nui (Easter Island) in the South Pacific subtropical gyre

    Sci. Total Environ.

    (2017)
  • S. Rech et al.

    Rivers as a source of marine litter - a study from the SE Pacific

    Mar. Pollut. Bull.

    (2014)
  • C.A. Ribic

    Use of indicator items to monitor marine debris on a New Jersey beach from 1991 to 1996

    Mar. Pollut. Bull.

    (1998)
  • C.A. Ribic et al.

    Trends and drivers of marine debris on the Atlantic coast of the United States 1997–2007

    Mar. Pollut. Bull.

    (2010)
  • C.A. Ribic et al.

    Trends in marine debris along the U.S. Pacific coast and Hawai'i 1998-2007

    Mar. Pollut. Bull.

    (2012)
  • C. Rosevelt et al.

    Marine debris in central California: quantifying type and abundance of beach litter in Monterey Bay, CA

    Mar. Pollut. Bull.

    (2013)
  • S.S. Sadri et al.

    On the quantity and composition of floating plastic debris entering and leaving the Tamar estuary, Southwest England

    Mar. Pollut. Bull.

    (2014)
  • I.R. Santos et al.

    Influence of socio-economic characteristics of beach users on litter generation

    Ocean Coast. Manag.

    (2005)
  • M. Schulz et al.

    Statistical analyses of the results of 25 years of beach litter surveys on the south-eastern North Sea coast

    Mar. Environ. Res.

    (2015)
  • M. Schulz et al.

    Comparative analysis of time series of marine litter surveyed on beaches and the seafloor in the southeastern North Sea

    Mar. Environ. Res.

    (2015)
  • L. Silva-Iñiguez et al.

    Quantification and classification of marine litter on the municipal beach of Ensenada, Baja California, Mexico

    Mar. Pollut. Bull.

    (2003)
  • Cited by (110)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text