Elsevier

Marine Pollution Bulletin

Volume 62, Issue 2, February 2011, Pages 215-226
Marine Pollution Bulletin

Viewpoint
Management of the marine environment: Integrating ecosystem services and societal benefits with the DPSIR framework in a systems approach

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2010.12.012Get rights and content

Abstract

Ever increasing and diverse use of the marine environment is leading to human-induced changes in marine life, habitats and landscapes, making necessary the development of marine policy that considers all members of the user community and addresses current, multiple, interacting uses. Taking a systems approach incorporating an understanding of The Ecosystem Approach, we integrate the DPSIR framework with ecosystem services and societal benefits, and the focus this gives allows us to create a specific framework for supporting decision making in the marine environment. Based on a linking of these three concepts, we present a set of basic postulates for the management of the marine environment and emphasise that these postulates should hold for marine management to be achieved. We illustrate these concepts using two case studies: the management of marine aggregates extraction in UK waters and the management of marine biodiversity at Flamborough Head, UK.

Research highlights

► The marine environment provides ecosystem services and societal benefits (ES&SB). ► Ecosystem services comprise both fundamental services and final services. ► We integrate ES&SB with the DPSIR framework in the context of The Ecosystem Approach. ► DPSIR framework boundary is defined by user community characteristics and the scale of ES&SB. ► A set of DPSIR–ES&SB postulates for sustainable marine management are proposed.

Introduction

Ever increasing and diverse use of the marine environment is leading to human-induced changes in marine life, habitats and landscapes, making necessary the development of marine policy that recognises and takes into consideration all members of the user community and addresses current, multiple, interacting uses. The marine environment can be perceived to be a system formed through the interconnection between natural systems on several scales (terrestrial, freshwater, estuarine, coastal and oceanic), designed systems (such as extractive industries, tourism, transportation, and power generation) and social systems (environmental activist groups, fishing communities, etc.). A holistic approach is therefore needed to gain an understanding of the connections that exist within and between these elements of the marine environment, and to support policy makers in their decision making. This is consistent with The Ecosystem Approach sensu stricto which aims to balance the needs of both the ecological and human aspects of the ecosystem (see below).

The DPSIR (DriversPressuresState ChangeImpactResponse) framework has developed as a systems-based approach which captures key relationships between society and the environment, and is regarded as a philosophy for structuring and communicating policy-relevant research about the environment. In essence, after being developed from an OECD approach which aimed to link pressures (created by human demands of the system) with the state changes and impacts, the systemic DPSIR framework encompasses Drivers, which are the key demands by society and creates Pressures, and recognises that State Changes and Impacts then require a Response by society. Fundamental to the DPSIR framework is the definition of the boundary of the system it describes, the demarcation of which depends on the particular issue of interest and its conceptualisation (Svarstad et al., 2008).

In this paper, we argue that the limits for marine management requires the coupling of the emerging concepts of DPSIR, The Ecosystem Approach and ecosystem services and the societal benefits emanating from those services. Integrating these concepts provides an opportunity to capture and evaluate, in a comprehensive way, the implications of State Change and Impact in the system. This requires the identification of the user community (be it local, regional or global) and, where possible, it also involves a scientific analytical and/or monetary evaluation of the ecosystem services and societal benefits. Thus, the scale of State Change and Impact as reflected in user communities and in their associated ecosystem services and societal benefits can be used to demarcate the boundary of the system depicted in the DPSIR framework. However, in presenting this, we note that the terminology involved in these concepts has evolved in recent years and hence we attempt to clarify it.

The integration of ecosystem services and societal benefits with the DPSIR framework in a way consistent with The Ecosystem Approach, and a consideration of the limitations of those concepts in marine management, enables us: (1) to contribute to our understanding of the three concepts, (2) to present basic postulates for the management of the marine environment which integrate the concepts, and (3) to provide a specific framework for supporting decision making in the marine environment.

By way of application, two contrasting case studies are discussed. The first study relates to the management of marine aggregates extraction in UK waters and, therefore, centres on a particular sector. The second study is non-sectoral in its focus on marine biodiversity and the maintenance of the integrity of the marine environment at Flamborough Head, UK with particular reference to its nature conservation designations. Both case studies raise issues relating to the boundary of the system described by the DPSIR framework, and provide the opportunity to explore key elements of the perspectives of the user community, and of sustainable management in these specific contexts.

Section snippets

The Ecosystem Approach

While ‘an ecosystem approach’ was initially an ecological term which referred to natural ecosystem functioning (Likens, 1992), since the early 1990s this has been adopted as ‘The Ecosystem Approach’ which aims to place human society as a central part in the ecosystem. At its most comprehensive, the concept of The Ecosystem Approach was defined by The Convention for Biological Diversity (CBD, 2000) as:

‘a strategy for the integrated management of land, water and living resources that promotes

Case studies

Although examples have been included throughout the previous description of concepts, two case studies provide further insight.

Discussion

The management of the marine environment requires an approach that recognises the complexity of the system and accommodates the full user community and their current, multiple, interacting uses. This can be provided by an integrated methodology based on the DPSIR framework and ES&SB, thereby encompassing The Ecosystem Approach. It acknowledges the need to protect and maintain the ecosystem fundamental and final services as a means of delivering societal benefits which we argue are a means to

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the support of the European Commission (contract number GOCE-CT-2003-505446) and members of the Marine Biodiversity and Ecosystem Functioning EU Network of Excellence (MarBEF), and the support of the Aggregate Levy Sustainability Fund (Ref: MEPF 09/P115) and discussions with members of the Seabed Restoration Project. This study forms part of the European projects WISER (Grant Agreement 226273, 7th Framework Programme) and TiDE (Interreg 4c). The authors also benefited

References (54)

  • L. Maxim et al.

    An analysis of risks for biodiversity under the DPSIR framework

    Ecological Economics

    (2009)
  • L.D. Mee et al.

    How good is good? Human values and Europe’s proposed Marine Strategy Directive

    Marine Pollution Bulletin

    (2008)
  • H. Österblom et al.

    Making the ecosystem approach operational – Can regime shifts in ecological- and governance systems facilitate the transition?

    Marine Policy

    (2010)
  • S.I. Rogers et al.

    A UK perspective on the development of marine ecosystem indicators

    Marine Pollution Bulletin

    (2005)
  • V. Stelzenmüller et al.

    Towards a spatially explicit risk assessment for marine management: assessing the vulnerability of fish to aggregate extraction

    Biological Conservation

    (2010)
  • H. Svarstad et al.

    Discursive biases of the environmental research framework DPSIR

    Land Use Policy

    (2008)
  • S.J. Ware et al.

    Performance of selected indicators in evaluating the consequences of dredged material relocation and marine aggregate extraction

    Ecological Indicators

    (2009)
  • Allen, J.H., 2008. Ecological Assessment of Yorkshire Coast Prohibited Trawling Areas. Institute of Estuarine and...
  • Austen, M.C., Hattam, C., Lowe, S., Mangi, S.C., Richardson, K., 2009. Quantifying and valuing the Impacts of Marine...
  • Bellew, S., Drabble, R., 2004. Marine Aggregate Site Restoration and Enhancement – Strategic Policy Overview. Report to...
  • BMAPA, 2010. British Marine Aggregate Producers Association (BMAPA) Website....
  • S.E. Boyd et al.

    The effects of marine sand and gravel extraction on the macrobenthos at a commercial dredging site (results 6 years post-dredging)

    ICES Journal of Marine Science

    (2005)
  • W. Buckley

    Sociology and Modern Systems Theory

    (1967)
  • Burdon, D., Atkins, J.P., 2007. An Initial Economic Evaluation of Marine Goods and Services at Flamborough Head, UK....
  • CBD, 2000. Convention on Biological Diversity....
  • Cooper, K.M., Ware, S.W., Vanstaen, K., Barry, J., 2010. Gravel seeding – a suitable technique for restoring the seabed...
  • G.C. Daily

    Nature’s Services: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems

    (1997)
  • Cited by (371)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text