Radon surveys and real-time monitoring at Stromboli volcano: Influence of soil temperature, atmospheric pressure and tidal forces on 222Rn degassing

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2009.04.019Get rights and content

Abstract

We used a network of stations to perform systematic radon surveys at Stromboli volcano. The time series of periodic measurements show that monthly average 222Rn emissions reflect changes in volcanic activity and exhibit increasing trends prior and during the last major eruptive cycles. Maps of radon emissions indicate that diffuse degassing is operative at Stromboli volcano. Concentrated degassing essentially occurs in the summit area and within a sector proximal to the two major NE trending faults. These sites were chosen for deploying the two real-time stations that are currently operating at Stromboli. In these devices, the 222Rn electronic dosimeters are connected to a radiomodem for wireless data transfer to a receiving station at the volcano observatory. Radon activity, soil temperature and atmospheric pressure data are sampled and instantaneously transferred via web so that they can be checked remotely. Collected time series reveal an overall inverse correlation between radon emissions and seasonal temperature variations. Radon emissions in sectors of diffuse degassing are modulated by tidal forces as well. Radon activities recorded at the summit station, located along the fracture zone where the gas flux is concentrated, are positively correlated with changes in atmospheric pressure and confirm the occurrence of the “atmospheric stack effect”. We finally emphasize that real-time radon monitoring is an innovative technique that may be systematically applied in volcano surveillance.

Introduction

Stromboli volcano is a unique natural laboratory to investigate complex magmatic processes including gaseous transfer to the surface. When a magma batch is approaching the subvolcanic environment, the gas phase starts to exsolve generating a “two-phase system”. During magma ascent, gas expansion may produce variable explosive activities together with anomalous gas concentrations that may be detected and/or within the volcanic plume as a result of shallow magma degassing (e.g., Allard et al., 1994, Chiodini et al., 1996, Heiligmann et al., 1997, Ripepe et al., 2005, among others). Following the last two major eruptive cycles at Stromboli (2002–03 and 2007), a multidisciplinary effort was undertaken to integrate geophysical and geochemical data.

Among these, radon monitoring has established a basic role in recording variations in volcanic activity, as well as in detecting complex geodynamic processes associated with active tectonics. In nature, radon is mainly represented by the isotope 222Rn (with a half life of 3.82 days): it is an alpha emitting radioactive gas produced from the decay of 226Ra, in turn derived from uranium bearing materials. Marked radon anomalies may precede earthquakes (e.g., Fleischer and Mogro-Campero, 1985, Igarashi et al., 1995, Planicić et al., 2004) and volcanic eruptions (Chirkov, 1975, Connors et al., 1996, Cigolini et al., 2005, Alparone et al., 2005, Giammanco et al., 2007). In contrast to findings at Mount Etna, where a halo of magmatic CO2 has been postulated to extend over much of the cone, Williams-Jones et al. (2000) have shown that Rn, CO2 and δ13C values are higher on the lower flanks of Arenal, Poás and Galeras volcanoes, except near the fumaroles surrounding the active craters. In addition, Varley and Armienta (2001) pointed out that diffuse degassing seems to absent at Popocatépetl volcano. However, these features may derive from self-sealing processes that affect the fracture networks of the hydrothermal shells surrounding magmatic systems and may not be permanent in space and time (cf., Cigolini et al., 2001).

In recent papers, the importance of deploying radon networks to detect major radon anomalies on active volcanoes by means of periodic measurements has been stressed, thus identifying the sites of more efficient response to seismic transients and/or volcanic degassing (Cigolini et al., 2001, Cigolini et al., 2007, Pérez et al., 2008). These sites are the ones that could be successfully used in locating stations for continuous radon monitoring. Automatic alpha particle detectors play a key-role in volcano surveillance contributing to decode the interplay between seismic signals and other geochemical parameters. Indeed, these may reveal critical variations before and during the onset of volcanic eruptions. Thus, systematic time series analysis and signal processing give us the opportunity for better understanding the dynamic behaviour of volcanoes.

In this paper we summarize some of the data collected during our periodic surveys and present the recent results of “real time” radon monitoring at Stromboli volcano. We first introduce the methods for 222Rn measurements, and then discuss the time-series for radon emissions, soil temperatures, and atmospheric pressure.

Section snippets

Stromboli volcano and its last major eruptions

Stromboli is the north-eastern island of the Aeolian arc (Fig. 1). It is located on the Stromboli–Panarea alignment: a NE–SE strike-slip fault connected to the Tindari–Letojanni fault that propagates though Eastern Sicily and underlays Mount Etna. The Aeolian islands grew within the last 1.3 Ma (Gillot and Keller, 1993), and the outcropping lavas and tephra are subduction-related calcalkaline, high K-calcalkaline, shoshonitic and potassic suites (Barberi et al., 1974, Beccaluva et al., 1985).

Summary of previous radon surveys

We started our periodic radon surveys in May 2002. We deployed a network of 25 stations (Fig. 1) that have been subdivided into three groups: summit stations (around the crater area) lower stations (below 100 m a.s.l.) and other stations (intermediate in altitude between the cited groups). Measurements were first performed by track-etch detectors (LR115, finely calibrated according to Bonetti et al., 1991) exposed from 2 to 5 weeks. During our periodic surveys we also utilized E-PERM® electrets

Real time methods

Real-time stations for continuous radon monitoring were constructed by integrating the electronic radon dosimeter DOSEman (produced by Sarad GmbH, Dresden, Germany) with an electronic board that transfers the output signal to a radio modem. This communicates through a directional antenna with a receiving station at the volcano observatory. Sampling time for radon measurements (and related gaseous progeny) and environmental parameters (local soil temperature and atmospheric pressure) is 15 min.

Real-time radon monitoring

In this section we present and analyze the data collected for over a year at the Liscione station (LSC), together with a selection of some data recently acquired at the summit (named Pizzo station, PZZ), to better understand the dynamic response of the two measurements sites to changes in environmental parameters during steady-state mild Strombolian activity.

Following the previously cited surveys, automatic radon monitoring started on September 2005 at selected sites, and after the eruptive

Conclusions

Previous surveys and real-time radon monitoring indicate that monthly average 222Rn emissions may fluctuate under dynamic conditions that reflect changes in the volcanic activity as well as seasonal temperature variations. Moreover, maps obtained by plotting radon activities onto topographic DEM images support the idea that diffuse degassing is operative and efficient at Stromboli volcano.

We emphasize that real-time radon monitoring has been successfully tested at Stromboli volcano. The use of

Acknowledgments

This research has benefited from funding provided by the Italian Presidenza del Consiglio dei Ministri - Dipartimento della Protezione Civile (DPC). Scientific papers funded by DPC do not represent its official opinion and policies. We thank R. Colozza and C. Cardaci for logistic support at Stromboli. P.A. Hernández Pérez and N. Varley provided valued reviews of an earlier draft of the paper. The Stromboli topographic DEM image has been kindly provided by M.A. Marsella.

References (47)

  • VarleyN.R. et al.

    The absence of diffuse degassing at Popocatepetl volcano, Mexico

    Chem. Geol.

    (2001)
  • ZimmerM. et al.

    Continuous H2O, CO2, 222Rn and temperature measurements on Merapi Volcano, Indonesia

    J. Volcanol. Geotherm. Res.

    (2003)
  • AllardP. et al.

    Sulfur output and magma degassing budget of Stromboli volcano

    Nature

    (1994)
  • AlparoneS. et al.

    Paroxysmal summit activity at Mt. Etna (Italy) monitored through continuous soil radon measurement

    Geophys. Res. Lett.

    (2005)
  • BarberiF. et al.

    Volcanic hazard assessment at Stromboli based on review of historical data

    Acta Vulcanol.

    (1993)
  • BarberiF. et al.

    Chronology of the 2007 eruption of Stromboli and the activity of the Scientific Synthesis Group

    J. Volcanol. Geotherm. Res.

    (2008)
  • BarnetI. et al.

    Do the earth tides have an influence on short-term variations in radon concentration?

    Radiat. Prot. Dosim.

    (1997)
  • BonaccorsoA. et al.

    Dynamics of the December 2002 flank failure and tsunami at Stromboli volcano inferred by volcanological and geophysical observations

    Geophys. Res. Lett.

    (2003)
  • BonettiR. et al.

    Energy response of LR115 cellulose nitrate to α-particle beams

    Nucl. Tracks Radiat. Meas.

    (1991)
  • CalvariS. et al.

    Chronology and complex volcanic processes during the 2002–2003 flank eruption at Stromboli volcano (Italy) reconstructed from direct observations and surveys with a handheld thermal camera

    J. Geophys. Res.

    (2005)
  • CarapezzaM.L. et al.

    Geochemical precursors of Stromboli 2002–2003 eruptive events

    Geophys. Res. Lett

    (2004)
  • CarapezzaM.L. et al.

    Active egassing structures of Stromboli and variations in diffuse CO2 output related to the volcanic activity

    J. Volcanol. Geotherm. Res.

    (2008)
  • ChiodiniG. et al.

    Diffuse emission of CO2 from the Fossa crater, Vulcano Island Italy

    Bull. Volcanol.

    (1996)
  • Cited by (80)

    • Effect of atmospheric temperature on underground radon: A laboratory experiment

      2022, Journal of Environmental Radioactivity
      Citation Excerpt :

      The day-night oscillations in the outdoor/CCL temperature were slightly reflected in daily changes in the radon signal (SM, Fig. S3). The experiments, as they were subject to non-controlled outdoor conditions, provide a qualitative understanding of the impact of atmospheric temperature on the soil radon signal, in agreement with field measurements (Cigolini at el., 2009). Long stepwise experiments were conducted by artificially heating and cooling the CCL from 10 °C to 30 °C and vice versa at relatively high rates of 4–5 °C∙h−1, achieving a stable final temperature within 5 h.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text