Predictors and outcomes of job search behavior: The moderating effects of gender and family situation

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2004.11.005Get rights and content

Abstract

This study explored differences in the antecedents and consequences of job search behavior depending on gender and family situation in a large, nationwide sample of the Dutch population. Using Ajzen’s (1991) theory of planned behavior (TPB), we found no gender differences in the antecedents of job seeking. However, family situation did affect the relations in the TPB, such that personal attitude was a slightly weaker, and perceived social pressure a stronger predictor of job seeking for individuals with families than for singles. Concerning the consequences, job search behavior significantly predicted the chances of finding (new) employment, but not job satisfaction in the new job and the level of agreement between the obtained and wanted job.

Introduction

In many Western countries persistent gender differences exist in the context of employment. Labor force participation among women is substantially lower than among men in both Europe (Eurostat, 2002) and the United States (Bureau of Labor Statistics, 2002). Moreover, in most European countries the unemployment levels among women continue to be higher than among men (Eurostat, 2002). Furthermore, research has often found that women are employed in a narrow range of female-dominated jobs that are generally worse in terms of pay and opportunities for training and advancement than non-female-dominated jobs (Drentea, 1998, Mau and Kopischke, 2001, Mencken and Winfield, 2000). Also in The Netherlands some evident employment-related differences exist between men and women. Unemployment levels among women, for example, are about twice as high as among men (4.7% compared to 2.5%), and the labor force participation is lower among women than among men (53.4% compared to 77.1%; Statistics Netherlands, 2002). Furthermore, the majority of employed women in The Netherlands have part-time jobs, compared to only a small minority of the employed men (Portegijs, Boelens, & Keuzenkamp, 2002).

One factor that may affect these employment-related differences between men and women is individual job search behavior. Previous research has indicated that job search behavior is an important predictor of finding employment (Kanfer, Wanberg, & Kantrowitz, 2001) and employment quality (Saks and Ashforth, 2002, Werbel, 2000). With regard to the gender differences in employment patterns, the question arises whether the relation of job search behavior with finding employment and employment quality is similar for men and women.

Most studies on gender and job seeking have focused on gender differences in the use of formal versus informal job seeking strategies (Huffman and Torres, 2001, Straits, 1998), and on the effects of using formal versus informal search strategies on employment outcomes such as earnings in the obtained job and gender typicality of the obtained job (Drentea, 1998, Huffman and Torres, 2001, Leicht and Marx, 1997, Mencken and Winfield, 2000). The first purpose of the current study was to investigate gender differences in the relation of job search behavior in a more general form with a broader range of employment outcomes, including job attainment and job satisfaction.

The second purpose related to gender differences in the predictors of job search behavior. Several studies have investigated the predictors of job search behavior in general. Kanfer et al.’s (2001) meta-analysis showed that gender has only a small direct effect on job search behavior (rcorrected = .05), indicating that men were more likely to engage in job seeking than women. A question that remains, relates to the extent to which the relations of the various predictors with job seeking are similar for men and women.

Gender differences not only exist in the context of paid employment but also in relation to household tasks and care. According to traditional gender roles, men have paid jobs while women engage in domestic activities (Eagly, 1987). These roles still persist today, for example, Bianchi, Milkie, Sayer, and Robinson (2000) reported that married women in the United States spend almost twice the amount of time on housework as compared to married men. Furthermore, women in The Netherlands spend over twice as much time on domestic activities (e.g., childrearing) as compared to men (Portegijs et al., 2002). It is likely, however, that findings like these depend on the particular family situation. We therefore suggest that in addition to gender, family situation is important with regard to job seeking and its predictors and outcomes.

Thus, the present study extends the existing literature by investigating the moderating effects of both gender and family situation on (a) the relation of job search behavior with its predictors, and (b) the relation of job search behavior with job search outcomes. In the following, we first present the general research model that was used in the current study. Second, we discuss the possible moderating effects of gender and family situation.

Section snippets

Job search predictors

In predicting the intensity of people’s job search behavior, past research found support for the usefulness of Ajzen’s (1991) theory of planned behavior (TPB; e.g., Caska, 1998, Van Ryn and Vinokur, 1992). According to the TPB, job search behavior is predicted by the amount of time and effort individuals intend to put in their job search behavior (i.e., job search intention) and one’s confidence in the ability to perform various job search activities (i.e., perceived behavioral control). As

Effects of gender and family situation on job search behavior

In the context of job search and recruitment, previous research has reported gender differences not only in the use of job search strategies (e.g., formal and informal strategies) but also in job search intensity, job mobility, and job attribute preferences (Keith and McWilliams, 1999, Nicholson and West, 1988). These differences in values, attitudes, and behavior between men and women can be explained by the influence of gender roles (i.e., shared expectations about the appropriate behaviors

Sample and procedure

The data were collected as part of a larger research project (cf. Van Hooft, Born, Taris, Van der Flier, & Blonk, 2004), using a two-wave panel design. The predictor variables (i.e., personal job search attitude, perceived social pressure, and job search self-efficacy) as well as job search intention were assessed at Time 1 of the study. Job search behavior and the outcome variables (i.e., job attainment, job satisfaction, and agreement between the obtained and wanted job) were assessed 4

Results

Table 1 presents the means, standard deviations, t-statistics for mean differences, and correlations among the study variables for men and women separately. A multivariate analysis of variance suggested mean differences between men and women on one or more of the Time 1 variables, F (8, 1691) = 22.18, p < .001. Table 1 shows that men were older, higher educated, and more often employed than women, and men reported higher levels of job search self-efficacy than women. No significant mean differences

Discussion

This study examined differences in the antecedents and consequences of job search behavior depending on gender and family situation in a large, nationwide sample of the Dutch population. The antecedents of job search behavior were investigated in the context of Ajzen’s (1991) theory of planned behavior. Consistent with previous research (Caska, 1998, Van Hooft et al., 2004, Van Ryn and Vinokur, 1992), support was found for this theory. That is, a strong relation was found between job search

References (51)

  • S.M. Bianchi et al.

    Is anyone doing the housework. Trends in the gender division of household labor

    Social Forces

    (2000)
  • M.A. Blegen et al.

    Measurement of kinship responsibility for organizational research

    Journal of Applied Psychology

    (1988)
  • J.M. Brett et al.

    On the road again: Predicting the job transfer decision

    Journal of Applied Psychology

    (1988)
  • R.D. Bretz et al.

    Job search behavior of employed managers

    Personnel Psychology

    (1994)
  • Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2002). The employment situation: October 2002. Washington, DC:...
  • B.A. Caska

    The search for employment: Motivation to engage in a coping behavior

    Journal of Applied Social Psychology

    (1998)
  • CentERdata. (2002). Retrieved November 22, 2002, from...
  • M. Conner et al.

    Extending the theory of planned behavior: A review and avenues for further research

    Journal of Applied Social Psychology

    (1998)
  • S.E. Cross et al.

    Models of the self: Self-construals and gender

    Psychological Bulletin

    (1997)
  • P. Drentea

    Consequences of women’s formal and informal job search methods for employment in female-dominated jobs

    Gender & Society

    (1998)
  • A.H. Eagly

    Sex differences in social behavior: A social-role interpretation

    (1987)
  • R.A. Ellis et al.

    Role of self-esteem within the job search process

    Journal of Applied Psychology

    (1983)
  • Eurostat (2002). Population & social conditions. Retrieved December 5, 2002, from...
  • M. Fishbein

    A theory of reasoned action: Some applications and implications

  • GLOBE-study. (2001). Country rankings for culture. Retrieved June 13, 2001, from...
  • Cited by (69)

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    An earlier version of this article was presented at the 17th Annual Conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, April 2002, Toronto, Canada. This study was supported by Tempo-Team (a Dutch employment agency) and by a grant from The Dutch Foundation of Applied Psychology (NSvP).

    View full text