Elsevier

Journal of Transport Geography

Volume 56, October 2016, Pages 92-101
Journal of Transport Geography

The replication and reduction of automobility: Findings from Aotearoa New Zealand

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2016.09.005Get rights and content

Highlights

  • We empirically examine the factors that replicate or reduce automobility.

  • We find evidence of an emergent mobility culture of reduced car dependence.

  • New conceptualisations of independence and freedom contribute to this culture.

Abstract

In this paper, we examine the factors that contribute to the replication or reduction of automobility amongst young adults. Semi-structured interviews conducted in Aotearoa New Zealand, with 51 drivers and non-drivers, aged 18–35 years old, form the empirical material. The findings build upon previous research and extend understandings of how seven explanatory factors; perceptual, value and preference, social, built environment, economic, legal/policy and technological, work both to continue the current automobility paradigm, and to challenge it by adopting alternative mobilities. We use the Energy Cultures Framework as an analytical tool to explore the ways through which materialites, norms, practices, and external context can replicate or reduce participation in the hegemonic mobility paradigm. This approach offers useful insights into the interactions between what the research participants think, have and do, and how this is resulting in a reduction in automobility norms amongst some younger people. It also identifies and highlights potential opportunities to leverage upon current change trends to assist a systemic transition away from automobility towards a culture of multi-mobilities.

Introduction

Automobility is the hegemonic mobility paradigm. Since the introduction of the Ford Model T, bringing affordable private vehicles to the industrialised world, the car has represented freedom, independence and prestige (Steg, 2005, Mokhtarian et al., 2015). We now live in a world designed to accommodate, and even prioritise, private vehicle ownership and untrammelled car-based access between and within places. The system of automobility characterises a perpetual routine of car-dependence, which continues throughout generations. However, the ‘Peak Car’ phenomenon (Goodwin, 2012, Goodwin and Van Dender, 2013, Metz, 2013, Newman and Kenworthy, 2011) has reported a destabilisation in car-based travel in some industrialised countries, and this has raised questions around the underlying causes and long-term consequences of decreased car-dependence (Dennis and Urry, 2009).

Within this phenomenon is another trend that has drawn the attention of academic and policy audiences internationally; the proposition, and evidence, that young people in some industrialised countries may be developing different mobility-related aspirations and expectations than other generations (Delbosc and Currie, 2013, Institute for Mobility Research, 2013a, Kuhnimhof et al., 2011). This research has indicated a reduction in automobility norms that have previously been replicated from generation to generation, but why this is occurring is less clear. Given the rapidly changing socio-economic, cultural and technological landscape in which mobility decisions are now made, the factors that replicate or reduce automobility require examination.

In this paper, we empirically examine the factors that contribute to the replication or reduction of automobility through a qualitative study of young adults in Aotearoa New Zealand (Generation Y or ‘millennial generation’, 18–35 year olds). In doing so, we respond to 3 research questions: (1) What are the factors that contribute to the replication or reduction of automobility? (2) What are the mobility cultures of replication and reduction? and (3) How might the concept of Energy Cultures help frame these factors so as to identify ways to promote a cultural shift away from automobility?

Section snippets

Literature review

While changing travel practices have many implications, particularly in regards to infrastructure provision and geographies of mobility, these changes are critically important in light of the contribution private road-based transport makes on a global and national scale to greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Most transport GHG emissions are from Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) countries, with 80% of total global motorised passenger kilometres arising from 10% of the

Methods

A qualitative research approach was adopted to elicit in-depth, detailed perspectives on automobility. Interpretivist, qualitative studies are particularly valuable for uncovering the lived experience of the research participants (Røe, 2000), and for understanding the complex nature of travel and travel behaviour (Clifton and Handy, 2001, Handy, 2002). The empirical research involved semi-structured interviews with 18–35 year olds. The participants were not sought to be representative of either

Factors that replicate automobility norms

Using the process of analysis described above, we empirically developed and extended the modified replication and reduction table (Hopkins and Stephenson, 2014, Table 1), and present a revised table based on evidence from the interviews (Table 4).

In relation to automobility replication, we found that many of the interview participants expressed traditional conceptualisations of independence, freedom and autonomy associated with car use and learning to drive. Freedom to travel without scheduling

Factors that reduce automobility norms

From the interviews we also found evidence of factors contributing to the reduction of automobility norms. Freedom, flexibility and autonomy are traditionally associated with automobility, but in this research, some interviewees used these concepts to explain their (active or passive) non-participation in the car-dominated transport system. Independence, interviewees stated, can be gained without a private vehicle as long as the public transport network is regular and efficient. Thus for

Discussion: the mobility cultures of replication and reduction

The research reported in this paper used a qualitative approach to explore the range of factors that contribute to the replication or reduction of automobility. The sample consisted of young adults (18–35 year olds) from Aotearoa New Zealand, and included self-identified drivers (e.g. with a driver's licence) and non-drivers (e.g. without a driver's licence, or with a licence but not driving). Using the findings from the generation Y interviews, we revisited the findings from the literature

Conclusion & implications

Climate change mitigation responses demand drastic reductions in the CO₂ and other GHGs emitted into the atmosphere. Private transport represents a significant proportion of these emissions, and in some cases, there are clear low-carbon alternatives available (e.g. active and public transport). The system of automobility has locked-in car dependency in many industrialised countries, and increasingly in emerging economies. However, the research presented in this paper provides evidence of a

Acknowledgments

This research was conducted while Debbie Hopkins was a Research Fellow at the Centre for Sustainability, University of Otago (New Zealand) working on the Energy Cultures II Project, MBIE grant: PROP-42734-EMTR-UOO. The authors would like to thank the anonymous reviewers for their helpful and constructive feedback on earlier drafts of this paper.

References (42)

  • A.T. Oakil et al.

    Determinants of car ownership among young households in the Netherlands: the role of urbanisation and demographic and economic characteristics

    J. Transp. Geogr.

    (2016)
  • P.G. Røe

    Qualitative research on intra-urban travel: an alternative approach

    J. Transp. Geogr.

    (2000)
  • L. Steg

    Car use: lust and must. Instrumental, symbolic and affective motives for car use

    Transp. Res. A Policy Pract.

    (2005)
  • J. Stephenson et al.

    Energy cultures: a framework for understanding energy behaviours

    Energ. Policy

    (2010)
  • J. Stephenson et al.

    The energy cultures framework: exploring the role of norms, practices and material culture in shaping energy behaviour in New Zealand

    Energy Res. Soc. Sci.

    (2015)
  • T. Basit

    Manual or electronic? The role of coding in qualitative data analysis

    Educ. Res.

    (2003)
  • J. Cidell et al.

    Transport, Mobility and the Production of Urban Space

    (2015)
  • K.J. Clifton et al.

    Qualitative methods in travel behaviour research

  • J.M. Darley et al.

    Diffusion of energy-conserving innovations

    J. Soc. Issues

    (1981)
  • A. Delbosc et al.

    Causes of youth licensing decline: a synthesis of evidence

    Transp. Rev.

    (2013)
  • K. Dennis et al.

    After the Car

    (2009)
  • Cited by (28)

    • Exploring “automobility engagement”: A predictor of shared, automated, and electric mobility interest?

      2022, Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment
      Citation Excerpt :

      Third, we explore residential preferences as a construct related to perceived car dependence. Research indicates that individuals may have a degree of agency in accepting or avoiding being car dependent (Hopkins and Stephenson, 2016; Lucas, 2009). Research on residential self-selection explores the ways in which travel preferences influence residential location choices.

    • Energy cultures and national decarbonisation pathways

      2021, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
    • Applying the energy cultures framework to understand energy systems in the context of rural sustainability transformation

      2020, Energy Policy
      Citation Excerpt :

      Using cluster analysis to segment the population into distinct energy cultures is a prominent data analysis technique. For example, Hopkins (2016) produced quantitative clusters of mobility practices and Lawson and Williams (2012) used TwoStep cluster analysis to identify four clusters of energy consumption in households. In this study, we apply the Energy Cultures Framework to a microregion in Eastern Transylvania, Romania.

    • Japanese young people’s car ownership and usage: Research from an expenditure perspective

      2019, Transport and Energy Research: A Behavioral Perspective
    • Sustainability cultures and energy research: An actor-centred interpretation of cultural theory

      2018, Energy Research and Social Science
      Citation Excerpt :

      Research into energy and mobility cultures has used both qualitative and quantitative methods to study cultural characteristics, including focus groups [25], surveys [64] and interviews [26]. Studies have gathered data on external influences through a variety of methods including interviews [29], policy analysis [65], and expert Delphi [62]. Findings have underpinned the development of policy advice on interventions to support more sustainable energy and mobility cultures [41].

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text