Elsevier

Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery

Volume 14, Issue 5, September–October 2005, Pages 485-491
Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery

Original article
Outcome of Copeland surface replacement shoulder arthroplasty

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2005.02.011Get rights and content

We report the outcome of humeral head surface replacement hemiarthroplasty performed at our institution using the Copeland prosthesis. We followed 56 shoulders (52 patients) for a mean of 34.2 months (range, 24-63 months). Two were lost to follow-up, and there were six deaths unrelated to the shoulder surgery. Preoperative diagnoses in the remainder were osteoarthritis (20), rheumatoid arthritis (26), rotator cuff tear arthropathy (1), and post-traumatic arthrosis (1). The mean age was 68 years. Constant scores for the whole group improved from a mean preoperative score of 16.4 (range, 8-36) to 54.0 (range, 20-83) at last follow-up (P < .05). Three cases underwent subsequent arthroscopic subacromial decompression for impingement symptoms. One case required revision for aseptic loosening to a stemmed implant. Contained, nonprogressive osteolysis was seen in 2 cases. One periprosthetic humeral neck fracture was managed successfully nonoperatively. These results are comparable to those obtained with a modern stemmed hemiarthroplasty and are similar to Copeland’s own series.

Section snippets

Materials and methods

Between 1996 and 2000, 56 consecutive Mark 3 Copeland humeral head surface replacement hemiarthroplasties were performed. All were included in this review. Six patients had died of other causes by the time of review, and two were lost to follow-up. This left 48 shoulders in 44 patients (4 bilateral). There were 32 female and 16 male shoulders. The mean age was 70 years (range, 34-84 years). Preoperative diagnoses are presented in Table I.

The indications for operation were primarily pain and

Results

The mean time between surgery and review for scoring in the research clinic was 34.2 months (range, 24-63 months). Nine shoulders were followed up for more than 4 years.

Constant scores for the whole group improved from a mean preoperative score of 16.4 (range, 8-36) to 54.0 (range, 20-83) at last follow-up (P < .05). Subgroup analysis according to diagnosis (rheumatoid arthritis or osteoarthritis) also yielded statistically significant differences. These data and figures for range of motion are

Discussion

We recognize potential sources of bias in the methodology of this study. Preoperative scoring was done by the same individual who went on to perform the operation. Nonetheless, measurement bias is more likely to occur during the postoperative assessment, which was performed by independent observers. Preoperative scores did not include an assessment of power; however, most patients would have scored 0 at this stage because they could not achieve the required 90° of shoulder abduction.3 Patients

References (18)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (0)

View full text