Heart rate variability is associated with psychosocial stress in distinct social domains
Introduction
As social beings, we rarely spend our time in isolation [1]. Most of our time, we are surrounded by other individuals, making it almost impossible to avoid social interactions. We have to interact with individuals that are well-known to us, like partners and friends, but also with individuals that are less known to us, like colleagues and customers. These interactions are marked by different types of challenges and opportunities, implying that we may experience different levels of stress throughout these interactions [2]. Although interacting with other individuals may help us to cope with stressful experiences [e.g., [3], [4]], these interactions may also be stressful for us [e.g., [5], [6]]. In particular negative interactions, that is, interactions with individuals that behave unexpectedly or unpredictably in potentially threatening contexts [7], are accompanied by a plethora of stress reactions [8], [9]. On the subjective level, we may experience a change in emotion and cognition, like, for example, an increase in negative feelings [e.g., [10], [11]] or an increase in attention for negative information [e.g., [12], [13]]. On the behavioral level, we may show a change in behavior, like, for example, an increase in agnostic behavior in terms of insults and attacks [e.g., [14], [15]] or an increase in affiliative behavior in terms of concessions and compromises [e.g., [16], [17]]. On the neurobiological level, we may experience a change in autonomic and endocrine reactivity, like, for example, an increase in cardiovascular activity [e.g., [18], [19]] or an increase in glucocorticoid and catecholamine activity [e.g., [20], [21]]. Although these stress reactions may help us to cope with other individuals in potentially threatening contexts, they may also put us at risk for several diseases [22]. As psychosocial stress is associated with substantial morbidity and mortality [23], there is a growing interest in biomarkers that indicate whether we show adaptive (i.e., stress-buffering and health-promoting) or maladaptive (i.e., stress-escalating and health-impairing) stress reactions in social contexts.
In recent years, heart rate variability (HRV), an index of consecutive changes in heart beat [24], has been considered as a promising biomarker for adaptive behavior during social encounters [25], [26]. Our subjective, behavioral and neurobiological responses to other individuals are orchestrated by a network of prefrontal and (para-)limbic brain regions [25], [26], [27]. Activity and connectivity changes in this network of brain regions are associated with changes in HRV [e.g., [28], [29], [30]], indicating that inter-individual differences in HRV may reflect inter-individual differences regarding the interplay between prefrontal and (para-)limbic brain regions during the regulation of social behavior. HRV measures may, thus, enable us to assess whether an individual shows adaptive or maladaptive behavior during social interactions. Adaptive behavior is generally reflected by a less efficient interplay of prefrontal and (para-)limbic brain regions that is associated with an increase in HRV, whereas maladaptive behavior is generally reflected by a less efficient interplay of prefrontal and (para-)limbic brain regions that is associated with a decrease in HRV. Individuals with high HRV are more sensitive to the emotional states of others [e.g., [31], [32], [33], [34]] and are more skilled to regulate their emotional and behavioral responses towards others [e.g., [35], [36], [37]] than individuals with low HRV. Accordingly, individuals with high HRV are more likely to initiate and maintain positive social interactions than individuals with low HRV [e.g., [38], [39]]. It may, thus, be possible that individuals with high HRV also experience less stress during social encounters than individuals with low HRV. This may explain why individuals with high HRV are less likely to suffer from stress-related diseases, like, for example, cardiovascular diseases [e.g., [40], [41]] or major depressive disorder [e.g., [42], [43]], than individuals with low HRV.
Although inter-individual differences in HRV have been suggested to reflect inter-individual differences in the experience and regulation of stress in social contexts [25], [26], [27], this has hardly been investigated yet. We, thus, further investigated whether inter-individual differences in HRV would be associated with inter-individual differences in psychosocial stress. Inter-individual differences in HRV were determined on basis of short-term recordings of heart rate (HR) under resting state conditions, whereas inter-individual differences in psychosocial stress were determined on basis of a self-report questionnaire. The self-report questionnaire assessed inter-individual differences regarding stress experiences in distinct social domains. Some domains were characterized by interactions with familiar individuals, such as family life or social life, and other domains were characterized by interactions with unfamiliar individuals, such as work or everyday life. As our stress levels are more likely to change during interactions with familiar than unfamiliar individuals [e.g., [44], [45], [46], [47], [48], [49], [50], [51]], we hypothesized that the association between inter-individual differences in HRV and inter-individual differences in psychosocial stress would be more pronounced during encounters with familiar than unfamiliar individuals. Individuals with high HRV were, thus, expected to report less stress in family and social life than individuals with low HRV. Reports of stress in everyday life and work life, on the contrary, were not expected to differ between individuals with high and low HRV. To determine the robustness of the hypothesized association between inter-individual differences in HRV and inter-individual differences in psychosocial stress, we performed a series of categorical and dimensional analyses on basis of HR recordings that were obtained during spontaneous and instructed breathing.
Section snippets
Participants
We performed an a priori power analysis to determine the number of participants that we needed to detect meaningful associations between inter-individual differences in HRV and inter-individual differences in psychosocial stress. G*Power [52] indicated that we had to recruit 82–90 participants in order to have sufficient power (1 − β = 0.80, α = 0.05) to detect medium-sized effects in our dimensional (r = 0.30) and categorical (f = 0.30) analyses. Using local advertisement, 84 community-dwelling
Stress and recordings of heart rate variability during spontaneous breathing
A series of one-way ANOVAs was performed to compare stress in different domains between participants with low and high RMSSD whose HR was recorded during spontaneous breathing (see Fig. 1). To differentiate between participants with low and high RMSSD, a median-split was used (RMSSD-SB: Mdn = 37.70 ms). Except for stress in social life [F(1,78) = 6.888, p = 0.010, ηp2 = 0.081], participants with low and high RMSSD did not differ in their stress experiences [family life: F(1,78) = 0.842, p = 0.362, ηp2 =
Discussion
In the present study, we investigated whether inter-individual differences in HRV would be associated with inter-individual differences in psychosocial stress. In accordance with our predictions, we found an association between inter-individual differences in HRV and inter-individual differences regarding stress in social life. Individuals with high HRV reported less stress in social life than individuals with low HRV, indicating a decrease in psychosocial stress with increasing HRV. Contrary
Funding and disclosure
Funding for this study was provided by a grant from the German Research Foundation to A. Lischke (DFG; LI 2517/2-1). The funding source had no further role in study design, in the collection, analysis and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; and in the decision to submit the paper for publication.
Competing interest statement
The authors have no competing interests to report.
Contributors
AL, AMM and MW designed the study. AMM and RJ collected the data. AL, MW and RP analyzed the data. AL wrote the manuscript. AOH, AMM, MW, RJ and RP contributed to writing, reviewing and editing of the manuscript. All authors approved the final version of the manuscript.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Nils Seitz for research assistance.
References (84)
Marital status and mortality: the national longitudinal mortality study
Ann. Epidemiol.
(2000)Prognostic importance of marital quality for survival of congestive heart failure
Am. J. Cardiol.
(2001)Stress at work alters serum brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) levels and plasma 3-methoxy-4-hydroxyphenylglycol (MHPG) levels in healthy volunteers: BDNF and MHPG as possible biological markers of mental stress?
Prog. Neuro-Psychopharmacol. Biol. Psychiatry
(2008)The effects of social stress and cortisol responses on the preconscious selective attention to social threat
Biol. Psychol.
(2007)- et al.
Reactions to acceptance and rejection: effects of level and sequence of relational evaluation
J. Exp. Soc. Psychol.
(2004) Trained men show lower cortisol, heart rate and psychological responses to psychosocial stress compared with untrained men
Psychoneuroendocrinology
(2007)High trait anxiety in healthy subjects is associated with low neuroendocrine activity during psychosocial stress
Prog. Neuro-Psychopharmacol. Biol. Psychiatry
(2004)Human salivary alpha-amylase reactivity in a psychosocial stress paradigm
Int. J. Psychophysiol.
(2005)The polyvagal perspective
Biol. Psychol.
(2007)- et al.
Claude Bernard and the heart-brain connection: further elaboration of a model of neurovisceral integration
Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev.
(2009)