Case Report
Atlantoaxial manual realignment in a patient with traumatic atlantoaxial joint disruption

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2009.09.023Get rights and content

Abstract

We report a patient with complex traumatic translatory atlantoaxial dislocation, who we treated by joint exposure and reduction of the dislocation by facet manipulation and subsequent plate and screw atlantoaxial fixation. A 28-year-old male had fallen 7.6 m (25 feet), and following the fall had severe neck pain but no neurological deficit. Investigations revealed a fracture at the base of the odontoid process and posterior displacement of the entire atlas over the axis, resulting in a translatory atlantoaxial dislocation. Head traction failed as he developed severe vertigo following its application. The patient was operated upon in a prone position. We opened the atlantoaxial joint and realigned the facets using distraction and manipulation techniques and secured the joint using a plate and screw interarticular method. The patient tolerated the treatment well and was symptom-free after 28 months. Postoperative images showed good craniovertebral alignment. Although technically challenging, direct manipulation of the facets of the atlas and axis can result in excellent craniovertebral realignment.

Introduction

Traumatic atlantoaxial dislocation can sometimes pose a therapeutic challenge due to the complexity of atlantoaxial misalignment. We report a patient who developed a translatory atlantoaxial dislocation following trauma. As the patient was neurologically intact this posed an additional therapeutic challenge.

Section snippets

Case report

A 28-year-old male fell 7.6 m (25 feet) while trekking in a mountain range. He was brought to the hospital with a cervical collar in an air ambulance. Investigations revealed a Type 2 odontoid fracture and posterior and left lateral translation of the atlas over the axis. The facets of the atlas and axis were not aligned, and their articular surfaces were no longer in direct contact with each other (Fig. 1). Aside from neck pain, the patient had no other symptoms. Neurological examination did

Discussion

We previously described a lateral mass plate and screw method of atlantoaxial fixation.1 The procedure involved directly exposing the joint, denuding its articular cartilage, packing bone graft within the joint and, subsequently, plate and screw fixation of the region by implanting screws into the lateral mass of the atlas and pars of the axis. We further modified these direct exposure and manipulation of the joint techniques to reduce basilar invagination and for irreducible atlantoaxial

References (6)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (18)

  • Traumatic Posterolateral C1-C2 Dislocation Complicated with Locked Lateral Mass and Type II Odontoid Fracture—5-Year Follow-up

    2018, World Neurosurgery
    Citation Excerpt :

    Pure traumatic atlantoaxial dislocation is an extremely rare condition. Most C1-C2 dislocations tend to happen in preexisting conditions, as in congenital abnormalities2,3 and rheumatoid arthritis.3,4 An epidemiologic study by Gleizes et al5 found 2 cases out of 116 cases of upper cervical spine injuries.

  • Atlantoaxial Fixation for Odontoid Fracture: Analysis of 124 Surgically Treated Cases

    2018, World Neurosurgery
    Citation Excerpt :

    Bone graft was harvested from the iliac crest. Small bone chips were stuffed into the articular cavity, and manual facet manipulation was done wherever necessary (in types A and B) to bring them into alignment.12 In patients with type A1 odontoid fractures, the facets of atlas and axis were distracted before insertion of bone graft within the joint cavity.

  • Cervical spine injuries

    2016, Orthopaedics and Trauma
    Citation Excerpt :

    Treatment options: traumatic atlanto-axial subluxation is rarely seen and its management mirrors much more common pathological atlanto-axial subluxation (in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, Down's syndrome etc.). Surgical management is favoured in patients with anterior or posterior subluxation,55 transverse ligament rupture57 (especially Dickman28 type I), odontoid fracture,56 neurological deficit, irreducibility and chronicity. The C1/C2 subluxation is reduced and arthodesis performed from either anterior or posterior approach.31

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text