Research ArticleQualitative Evaluation of Drivers of Eating Decisions among SNAP Participants in Mississippi
Section snippets
INTRODUCTION
Disparities in diet quality and health status among Mississippians underline the importance of effective public health strategies for reducing disease risk, with a particular focus on underserved and minority audiences. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, only 8.7% of adults met the daily fruit recommendation, and 6.2% met the daily vegetable recommendation in the state of Mississippi in 2015, compared with 12.2% and 9.3% in the US, respectively.1 In addition, 37.3% of
Study Design
Eighteen focus groups (FGs) were conducted in 12 locations across Mississippi in 2016 as a part of formative evaluation efforts to guide SNAP-Education (SNAP-Ed) programming. Focus groups were chosen to allow participants to interact with one another about food choice patterns and healthy eating ideas and strategies to improve understanding of commonalities among SNAP participants in Mississippi that could be used in developing relevant programming. Focus groups, as opposed to individual
RESULTS
Table 1 depicts that the majority of participants (n = 126) were African American women aged 26–45 years with 2 or 3 children; most participants (n = 112) were receiving SNAP benefits at the time of the survey. The sections that follow describe themes associated with each study objective: drivers of food decisions, barriers to healthy eating, strategies for healthy eating, and perceptions of healthy eating. Responses related to some of the themes illustrated positive and negative cases. For
DISCUSSION
Themes described in this study align with other research, indicating the balancing of multiple (often competing) priorities when making food-related decisions, with cost, taste preferences, habits, and family influences as primary factors. As shown in other research,10 SNAP participants in the current study readily identified food patterns that promote health, such as eating fruits and vegetables and cutting sugar and salt and were familiar with strategies for improving healthy eating, such as
IMPLICATIONS FOR RESEARCH AND PRACTICE
Health advocates cite significant potential to impact malnutrition and obesity with the $75 billion/year investment in SNAP.36 Efforts to improve healthy food availability (via incentives,33 policies and programs to bring fresh food into food deserts,37,38 increased access to farmers’ markets,39 etc.) and to improve nutrition behaviors40, 41, 42 among low-income audiences have shown progress. Making healthy eating more achievable, desirable, and perceived as normal within social groups may help
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This study was funded by the US Department of Agriculture SNAP and Mississippi State University Extension. The authors would also like to thank the participants for sharing their experiences with the research team and the Southern Research Group for assistance with data collection.
REFERENCES (42)
- et al.
Dietary quality of Americans by Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program participation status: a systematic review
Am J Prev Med
(2015) - et al.
Dietary intake and dietary quality of low-income adults in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program
Am J Clin Nutr
(2012) - et al.
Behavioral economics and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program: making the healthy choice the easy choice
Am J Prev Med
(2017) Food stamp program participation is positively related to obesity in low income women
J Nutr
(2003)Long-term food stamp program participation is positively related to simultaneous overweight in young daughters and obesity in mothers
J Nutr
(2006)- et al.
Does the Food Stamp Program cause obesity? A realist review and a call for place-based research
Health Place
(2012) - et al.
Low-income Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program participation isrelated to adiposity and metabolic risk factors
Am J Clin Nutr
(2012) - et al.
Development and validation of the Multidimensional Home Environment Scale (MHES) for adolescents and their mothers
Eat Behav
(2016) - et al.
Food insecurity, diet quality and body mass index of women participating in the Supplemental NutritionAssistance Program: the role of intrapersonal, home environment, communityand social factors
Appetite
(2018) Economic constraints on taste formation and the true cost of healthy eating
Soc Sci Med
(2016)
Measuring food environments: a historical perspective
Am J Prev Med
A qualitative study of diverse experts‘ views about barriers and strategies to improve the diets and health of Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) beneficiaries
J Acad Nutr Diet
Influencing the food choices of SNAP consumers: lessons from economics, psychology and marketing
Food Policy
An evaluation of Washington State SNAP-Ed farmers‘ market initiatives and SNAP participant behaviors
J Nutr Educ Behav
Dietary intake changes in response to a sugar-sweetened beverage reduction trial for various Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) eligibility groups
J Nutr Educ Behav
Disparities in state-specific adult fruit and vegetable consumption—United States, 2015
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep
Differences in obesity prevalence by demographic characteristics and urbanization level among adults in the United States, 2013–2016
JAMA
Cited by (0)
Conflict of Interest Disclosure: The authors have not stated any conflicts of interest.
- †
Dr Gray was affiliated with Mississippi State University Extension Service at the time this study was completed.