Elsevier

Journal of Magnetic Resonance

Volume 226, January 2013, Pages 100-106
Journal of Magnetic Resonance

Solid state nuclear magnetic resonance with magic-angle spinning and dynamic nuclear polarization below 25 K

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmr.2012.11.009Get rights and content

Abstract

We describe an apparatus for solid state nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) with dynamic nuclear polarization (DNP) and magic-angle spinning (MAS) at 20–25 K and 9.4 Tesla. The MAS NMR probe uses helium to cool the sample space and nitrogen gas for MAS drive and bearings, as described earlier [1], but also includes a corrugated waveguide for transmission of microwaves from below the probe to the sample. With a 30 mW circularly polarized microwave source at 264 GHz, MAS at 6.8 kHz, and 21 K sample temperature, greater than 25-fold enhancements of cross-polarized 13C NMR signals are observed in spectra of frozen glycerol/water solutions containing the triradical dopant DOTOPA-TEMPO when microwaves are applied. As demonstrations, we present DNP-enhanced one-dimensional and two-dimensional 13C MAS NMR spectra of frozen solutions of uniformly 13C-labeled l-alanine and melittin, a 26-residue helical peptide that we have synthesized with four uniformly 13C-labeled amino acids.

Highlights

► Probe for solid state NMR with dynamic nuclear polarization (DNP) and magic-angle spinning (MAS) at 20 K and 9.4 Tesla. ► Signal enhancement greater than 25-fold (microwaves on versus microwaves off) using 30 mW of microwaves. ► 2D 13C–13C spectra for 160 nmol of the 26 residue peptide melittin in frozen solution, taken in ∼2½ h.

Introduction

Demonstrations by Griffin and coworkers [2] of large nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) signal enhancements in frozen solutions at high magnetic fields and under magic-angle spinning (MAS) through dynamic nuclear polarization (DNP) have stimulated much interest in DNP for solid state NMR studies of biological [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9] and non-biological [10], [11], [12], [13], [14] systems in recent years. A popular approach is to use continuous-wave gyrotron microwave sources, capable of producing many watts at frequencies above 200 GHz [15], [16], [17], [18], and to operate at sample temperatures in the 80–100 K range [19], [20]. In these studies, samples are typically doped with nitroxide-based biradical dopants in frozen solutions [21], [22], although other dopants have also been described [23], [24], [25].

Our laboratory has shown that double- and triple-resonance MAS NMR can be performed at sample temperatures below 30 K (which we call “ultra-low” temperatures, in contrast to more conventional low-temperature MAS NMR experiments that use liquid nitrogen for cooling) using a novel probe design in which the sample space is cooled with helium, but nitrogen gas is used for MAS drive and bearings [1]. This design permits stable, long-term operation without excessive consumption of liquid helium. As we have demonstrated, this design can also provide the radio-frequency (rf) power-handling capabilities, NMR signal detection efficiencies, NMR linewidths (i.e., field homogeneity), and MAS frequencies that are required for many common solid state NMR measurements on biomolecular systems. After developing this probe design, we decided to investigate its utility in DNP experiments, motivated by the idea that operation at very low sample temperatures might permit large absolute NMR signals to be obtained with relatively low microwave powers, principally because the partial saturation of electron spin transitions required for DNP [26] can be achieved with lower microwave fields at lower temperatures due to the smaller nitroxide electron spin–lattice relaxation rates [27]. In subsequent 1H NMR and cross-polarized 13C NMR experiments on nitroxide-doped frozen solutions without MAS [28], [29], [30], we have shown that large DNP effects can indeed be observed at temperatures below 30 K. In this paper, we describe our initial results from the combination of ultra-low-temperature MAS NMR with microwave irradiation for DNP.

Section snippets

Ultra-low-temperature MAS DNP apparatus

Fig. 1 shows the principal components of the ultra-low-temperature DNP MAS probe. As in the earlier version [1], cold helium is supplied from a pressurized liquid helium tank (typically 6–8 psi) through a vacuum-insulated stainless steel transfer line that includes a manually adjusted needle valve to control helium flow (Janis model FHT-ST). The transfer line threads into a 5 cm long Torlon fitting that inserts into the Torlon MAS housing. Within the housing, a Teflon insert encloses the sample

l-alanine

Initial tests were performed on a 48 μl frozen solution of uniformly 13C-labeled l-alanine (50 mM) in glycerol/water, using perdeuterated glycerol and partially deuterated water (25:58:17 mol% d8-glycerol:D2O:H2O) with 165 mM acetate buffer, pH 3. As the paramagnetic dopant, we use the tri-nitroxide compound DOTOPA-TEMPO described in our earlier publications about ultra-low-temperature DNP without MAS [30], at 10 mM concentration. As previously shown in experiments at higher temperatures [33],

Discussion

Experimental results presented above demonstrate the feasibility and utility of DNP MAS NMR at sample temperatures below 25 K, using the ultra-low-temperature MAS probe design described previously [1] together with a low-power microwave source. 13C NMR signal enhancement factors greater than 25 are achieved without excessively long recycle delays for DNP build-up. The system is sufficiently stable that 2D experiments lasting many hours can be performed. In frozen solutions, concentrations of 13

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Intramural Research Program of the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of Health. We thank Bernard Howder for fabricating numerous parts of our DNP MAS system.

References (49)

  • C.E. Dempsey

    The actions of melittin on membranes

    Biochim. Biophys. Acta

    (1990)
  • T.C. Terwilliger et al.

    The structure of melittin. 1. Structure determination and partial refinement

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (1982)
  • T.C. Terwilliger et al.

    The structure of melittin. 2. Interpretation of the structure

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (1982)
  • K.N. Hu et al.

    Quantitative determination of site-specific conformational distributions in an unfolded protein by solid-state nuclear magnetic resonance

    J. Mol. Biol.

    (2009)
  • D.A. Hall et al.

    Polarization-enhanced NMR spectroscopy of biomolecules in frozen solution

    Science

    (1997)
  • M.J. Bayro et al.

    Intermolecular structure determination of amyloid fibrils with magic-angle spinning and dynamic nuclear polarization NMR

    J. Am. Chem. Soc.

    (2011)
  • T. Jacso et al.

    Characterization of membrane proteins in isolated native cellular membranes by dynamic nuclear polarization solid-state NMR spectroscopy without purification and reconstitution

    Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.

    (2012)
  • L. Reggie et al.

    Dynamic nuclear polarization-enhanced solid-state NMR of a C-13-labeled signal peptide bound to lipid-reconstituted Sec Translocon

    J. Am. Chem. Soc.

    (2011)
  • M. Renault et al.

    Solid-state NMR spectroscopy on cellular preparations enhanced by dynamic nuclear polarization

    Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.

    (2012)
  • E.S. Salnikov et al.

    Developing DNP/solid-state NMR spectroscopy of oriented membranes

    Appl. Magn. Reson.

    (2012)
  • I.V. Sergeyev et al.

    Chemical shifts for the unusual DNA structure in Pf1 bacteriophage from dynamic-nuclear-polarization-enhanced solid-state NMR spectroscopy

    J. Am. Chem. Soc.

    (2011)
  • F. Horii et al.

    Development of DNP-enhanced high-resolution solid-state NMR system for the characterization of the surface structure of polymer materials

    J. Infrared Millim. Terahertz Waves

    (2012)
  • D. Shimon et al.

    Dynamic nuclear polarization in the solid state: a transition between the cross effect and the solid effect

    Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.

    (2012)
  • A.S.L. Thankamony et al.

    Solvent-free high-field dynamic nuclear polarization of mesoporous silica functionalized with TEMPO

    Appl. Magn. Reson.

    (2012)
  • Cited by (70)

    • Nitroxide-based triradical dopants for efficient low-temperature dynamic nuclear polarization in aqueous solutions over a broad pH range

      2022, Journal of Magnetic Resonance
      Citation Excerpt :

      The original demonstrations by Griffin and coworkers that biradical compounds are efficient paramagnetic dopants (also called polarizing agents) for cross-effect DNP [1–3] have led to the development of a variety of biradical compounds for various applications of DNP [4–22]. We have introduced triradical compounds for cross-effect DNP, which we find to produce a more rapid build-up of nuclear spin polarization with the same total electron spin concentration, and hence higher sensitivity for DNP-enhanced ssNMR measurements under our experimental conditions [23–33]. The fact that the dependences of DNP enhancements on microwave frequency are nearly identical for biradical and triradical dopants [32,34] is strong evidence that DNP arises primarily from the cross-effect mechanism when triradicals are used.

    • Numerical recipes for faster MAS-DNP simulations

      2021, Journal of Magnetic Resonance
    • Application of DNP-enhanced solid-state NMR to studies of amyloid-β peptide interaction with lipid membranes

      2021, Chemistry and Physics of Lipids
      Citation Excerpt :

      Currently there are several commercially available MAS DNP systems that operate at magnetic fields of 9.4–18.8 T (Rosay et al., 2016). Since DNP mechanisms become effective at cryogenic temperatures, DNP-ssNMR measurements are typically carried out at temperatures of ≲100 K that can be achieved by cooling with cold N2 or He gas (Bouleau et al., 2015; Matsuki et al., 2012; Thurber et al., 2013). The unpaired electron spins required for DNP are usually introduced in the form of biradicals or triradicals (Sauvée et al., 2013; Song et al., 2006; Thankamony et al., 2017; Thurber et al., 2010).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text