Fabrication of polycarbonate blends with poly(methyl methacrylate-co-phenyl methacrylate) copolymer: Miscibility and scratch resistance properties

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2016.02.005Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Polycarbonate was blended with poly(methyl methacrylate-co-phenyl methacrylate) copolymer.

  • The PC/PMPA blends were miscible at all of the compositions used in this study.

  • There was only one glass-transition temperature (Tg) for each composition and this Tg shifted systematically with the blend composition.

  • The PC/PMPA blends show a significantly improved PC scratch resistance without reducing their tensile properties.

Abstract

Poly(methyl methacrylate-co-phenyl methacrylate) (PMPA) was blended with polycarbonate (PC) to ameliorate the poor scratch resistance of pure PC. The miscibility of the PC/PMPA blends was analyzed by dynamic-mechanical thermal analysis (DMTA), differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and optical measurements. These results indicated that PC/PMPA blends are miscible at all of the compositions used in this study. Also, quantitative analysis of their miscibility was performed by using classical glass-transition temperature (Tg)-composition models (Fox equation and Gordon-Taylor equation). The PMPA effect on the tensile properties and scratch resistance of PC/PMPA blends were investigated. With increasing PMPA content, the scratch resistance of the blends was found to increase, whereas other tensile properties such as tensile strength and tensile modulus did not change due to the good miscibility between PC and PMPA.

Introduction

For many years, there has been much interest in the research of polymer blends because they can help to obtain high-performance polymers instead of synthesis of newly designed polymer when the desirous properties of each polymer are united synergistically. In other words, one may achieve useful combinations by blending the materials into a single product. Furthermore, one should infer a continuous range of the properties simply by varying the blend composition. Generally, polymers having high glass-transition temperature and transparency are attractive for industrial polymer engineering due to strong economic benefits that should come from their utilitarian applications.

Polycarbonate (PC) is an amorphous engineering thermoplastic with an excellent combination of properties such as good processability, low density, high transparency, and good strength. Transparent PC has been used to a various industrial applications such as flat-display panels for portable electronic devices, eyewear lenses, compact disks, and safety windows [1]. In spite of its great physical and optical properties, the PC has limited applications because of its poor scratch and abrasion resistance characteristics [2], [3], [4], [5]. Therefore, PC has been modified and tailored in various ways, particularly by blending with other polymers for use in demanding applications [6].

PC/Poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) blends have received many research attention [7], [8], [9] because PMMA is also one of the transparent polymers that possesses many usable properties, such as low weight, high transmittance, chemical resistance, resistance to weathering corrosion, scratch resistance, and good insulating properties [10]. Importantly, though PMMA and PC are transparent polymers, their resulting blends show heterogeneous phase morphology having bad interfacial adhesion and therefore, their final properties are poor. It has been demonstrated that various blending strategies using in-situ or out-situ modification of the blends can increase the compatibility between PC and PMMA.

To enlarge PC's property (durability) window and thereby its application field, PC needs to be scratch resistant. In this study, we tackled the poor scratch resistance problem of PC using PMMA copolymers containing compatible comonomer. We showed that PC blends with this PMMA copolymer could dramatically improve PC's scratch resistance without reducing their tensile properties.

Section snippets

Experimental

Materials. PC (Lexan 143, melt flow index ≈ 10.5 g/10 min at 300 °C and 1.2 kg load) was obtained from SABIC. Poly(methyl methacrylate-co-phenyl methacrylate) (PMPA) was supplied from Stahnek Co., Ltd., Incheon, Korea. The number-average molecular weight (Mn), weight-average molecular weight (Mw) and polydispersity index (PDI) were 18,800 g/mol, 36,500 g/mol, and 1.95, respectively. The content of phenyl methacrylate monomer in the copolymer was 29 mol%.

Preparation of blends. The melt blending was

Results and discussion

Generally, a single glass-transition temperature (Tg) is a reasonable evidence for homogeneous phase in polymeric blend systems. Thus, thermal behavior measurement was conducted to ascertain the glass transition behavior for PC/PMPA blends. Fig. 1 shows DSC thermograms for PC/PMPA blends with one Tg in all compositions. As shown in Fig. 1, only one Tg for each composition was appeared and this Tg shifted systematically with the blend composition. These results strongly indicate that the PC/PMPA

Conclusion

To improve the scratch resistance characteristics of commercial PC products, poly(methyl methacrylate-co-phenyl methacrylate) (PMPA) was selected. High miscibility for PC/PMPA blends was confirmed by the Gordon-Taylor equation. The blends were transparent in the visible light range and the optical transparency of the blends was not reduced because the blend was miscible. As the PMPA content increased, the hardness of the blends also increased. These results indicate that the relatively

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Technology Innovation Program (10031270) funded by the Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy (MOTIE), Republic of Korea and authors also thank to the financial support from GRRC program of Gyeonggi Province (GRRC Dankook 2014-B01).

References (18)

  • C. Charitidis et al.

    Superlattice. Microstruct.

    (2004)
  • J.H. Lee et al.

    Thin Solid Films

    (2003)
  • Y.B. Guo et al.

    Diam. Relat. Mater.

    (2003)
  • E.M. Woo et al.

    Polymer

    (1996)
  • Y. Agari et al.

    Polymer

    (1997)
  • R.S. Bhattacharya

    Surf. Coat. Technol.

    (1998)
  • J. Song et al.

    Polymer

    (2012)
  • D. Goutam et al.

    J. Non-Cryst. Solids

    (2001)
  • J.D. Mackenzie et al.

    J. Sol-Gel Sci. Technol.

    (2003)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (20)

  • Synthesis and structural characterization of elastin-based polypentapeptide/hydroxypropylmethylcellulose blend films: Assessment of miscibility, thermal stability and surface characteristics

    2022, Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects
    Citation Excerpt :

    Likewise, the pure HPMC also showed an explicit diffraction peak at 2θ = 20°, which specified the semicrystalline nature. The diffraction pattern of 20/80 and 40/60 poly(GVGIP)/HPMC blend ratios more broad and amorphous due to the modification to the β-sheet form of the PPP from random coil [40]. Thus, the compatibility of the blends is commanded by the semicrystalline nature of the segment with a crystalline state [48].

  • A new potential polymeric cladding material for polycarbonate fibre optic core for high temperature use

    2021, Optical Fiber Technology
    Citation Excerpt :

    For instance, incorporation of 2,2,2,-trichloroethyl methacrylate (TCEMA) with 62 wt% N-cyclohexyl maleimide (cHMI) increased its glass transition temperature from 130 to 197 °C [6]. Besides that, polymer blending could also improve other parameters; for example, mixing polycarbonate (PC) with poly(methyl methacrylate-co-phenyl methacrylate) enhanced the scratch resistance properties of the PC [7]. Specifically in optical fibre, manipulating the refractive index is vital.

  • Preparation and characterization of heat-resistant PET/bio-based polyester blends for hot-filled bottles

    2020, Polymer Testing
    Citation Excerpt :

    Such a difference in Tg is very common when measuring by these two methods because the exact Tg position depends on the technique, conditions, etc. In DSC, exact position of Tg depends on the heating rate, whereas in the DMA, Tg depends mainly on the studied frequency [34,35]. As can be seen that in both DSC and DMA, the Tg of PET/PEICT 50 blend was increased about 7 °C compared to pure PET.

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text