The nature and taxonomic composition of coral symbiomes as drivers of performance limits in scleractinian corals

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jembe.2011.07.029Get rights and content

Abstract

All plants and animals host complex communities of taxonomically diverse microbial assemblages (viruses, Archaea, Bacteria, micro-eukaryotes) that contribute to the functional attributes of the host organism. Scleractinian corals represent particularly provocative subjects for study in this context because they are morphologically complex and associate with a broad diversity of macro invertebrates and vertebrates as well as microorganisms. Representatives of all these taxonomic groupings have been shown to contribute to the function of corals through direct or indirect provisioning and cycling of nutrients, waste removal, defense, and stress tolerance, traits that influence the fitness and environmental thresholds of individual coral colonies. How the taxonomic composition, functional limits and interactive nature of members of these communities vary among and within host species, and scale up to influence community level processes that drive ecosystem structure and function through time and space is unknown; these communities are, however, taxonomically variable among individual corals. Here we draw on the published literature to discuss the ecological and functional significance of the broad and variable taxonomic symbioses found closely associated with corals. Using a comparative approach, we hypothesize that the intra-specific and inter-specific variations in response of corals to environmental disturbance is linked to differences in the specificity, nature and composition of these symbiotic assemblages and reflect variation in the architectural complexity (micro and macro) and capacity of corals to provision habitat. We describe individual coral colonies as symbiomes, unique micro-ecosystems bounded by the physical limits of the coral colony whose performance limits reflect the taxonomic range of the associates (micro and macro) found within the colony. We explicitly recognize the fact that corals represent complex ecological communities composed of organisms that have the potential to compete, as well as interact with one another and the host as commensals, mutualists and parasites, states that likely to be dynamic with nature, context and environment.

Highlights

► We describe corals as symbiomes, multispecies super-organisms. ► Symbiomes encompass all enduring associations bounded by the coral colony. ► Symbiome complexity and function reflect habitat diversity. ► Interaction states in symbiomes are dynamic over space, time and environment. ► Symbiome complexity links to environmental sensitivity.

Introduction

Coral reefs are productive and diverse tropical marine ecosystems framed by massive three-dimensional structures created by the deposition of calcium carbonate skeletons by individual coral colonies (Goreau and Goreau, 1959). These skeletons are hugely variable in form, reflecting innate characteristics of different coral species that scale with age, and are in some cases, plastic with respect to environmental conditions (Todd, 2008). The architectural complexity created by coral communities that combine to form coral reefs, provides a plethora of habitats to support an enormous diversity of organisms from all kingdoms of life. The capacity of coral reefs to host such broad biodiversity represents a defining feature of these important coastal ecosystems (Grottoli et al., 2006, Rohwer et al., 2002, Schwarz et al., 2008, Stella et al., 2010).

Like the reef, each coral colony serves as habitat for a diverse assemblage of macro- and micro-eukaryotes, Bacteria, Archaea and viruses (Rohwer et al., 2001). This biodiversity occupies a variety of niches both within coral tissues and skeletons, closely associated with the surface of the coral and the mucus layers, and in the waters within or under the branches, lobes and plates of the coral colony (Ainsworth et al., 2010, Bourne and Munn, 2005, Lampert et al., 2006, Stella et al., 2010, Sunagawa et al., 2010). Each member of these multi-species assemblages or symbioses has the potential to interact with the coral host to a lesser or greater extent, and to contribute or detract from the overall fitness and long-term survival of the coral colony (Pratchett, 2001, Rohwer et al., 2001, Stella et al., 2010), impacts that scale up to affect reef structure and ecosystem processes (Fig. 1). We use the term symbiosis here to describe close enduring associations between individuals of different species (Bouchard, 2009) recognizing that these interactions can change in time, space and environment, to be beneficial, neutral and also negative (see Table 1 for terms and definitions). For example, functional attributes of the intimate unions between corals and unicellular dinoflagellates in the genus Symbiodinium drive high rates of productivity and calcium carbonate deposition that create the structure of the reef (Yellowlees et al., 2008). The nature and taxonomic composition of these interactions are spatially and temporally variable among and within coral species, and can be dramatically influenced by changes in the abiotic environment. Differences in the taxonomy of Symbiodinium manifest in physiological variation that influences environmental thresholds, and as such, the relative abundance of specific Symbiodinium types hosted by individual coral colonies has profound implications for the persistence of an individual coral through time, and in the face of environmental disturbance (reviewed in Stat et al., 2006).

The functional underpinnings of associations between Symbiodinium and corals are by far the most comprehensively studied to date, however, Bacteria, endolithic algae, and a diversity of invertebrates and vertebrates have also been shown to contribute to the performance of the coral by provisioning and cycling of nutrients, defending the colony and increasing thermal tolerance (e.g. Cleveland et al., 2011, Fine and Loya, 2002, Holbrook et al., 2008, Stewart et al., 2006). This suggests that the complex assemblages hosted by corals confer benefits to the coral hosts and as a collective, have the potential to contribute to the functional range, environmental thresholds and resilience of corals and reefs.

Corals exhibit high intra and inter-specific variability in response to environmental disturbance, a trait that scales up to influence reef wide ecology (Loya et al., 2001). Here we develop a discussion framed by the idea that the performance of individual corals reflects physiological limits imposed upon the colony by the combined activities of the broad taxonomic diversity of organisms found in symbiosis with each coral colony. We propose (1) that each coral can be described by the term symbiome, a polygenomic super-organism or system that encompasses all enduring associations (micro and macro) bounded by the physical limits of the colony (Sapp, 20031); (2) that the nature and composition of the multispecies assemblage reflect the diversity of habitats within the symbiome as well as community level process such as competition and resource limitation; (3) that the multispecies assemblages in coral symbiomes interact with each other and the host in mutualistic, commensal, and parasitic states that are potentially dynamic over space, time and environment; and, (4) that symbiomes in branching corals are more complex than in massive corals, complexity that translates into positive fitness traits (for instance growth rates) under normal conditions, but that may also contribute to the increased sensitivity to branching corals under environmental stress.

Section snippets

Defining the functional unit in corals

The universal importance of symbiotic associations to organism (and ecosystem) function is broadly recognized (McFall-Ngai, 2008). Defining what comprises a biological individual and what contributes to its functional limits is complicated in any system, but is particularly challenging in corals because they are architecturally complex and morphologically variable, and the peripheral limits of the colony encompass a variety of compartments with very different environmental characteristics (e.g.

Architectural complexity and capacity of corals to provision habitat

The architectural complexity (micro and macro) of coral colonies creates a diversity of potentially unique habitats, a feature that will directly influence the capacity of a colony to interact with or host other species. The idea that corals represent symbiomes, or individuals whose functional attributes reflect the collective performance limits set by the multispecies assemblage they host, is provocative when one considers the implications of the level of architectural variability among and

Functional attributes associated with multispecies assemblages in corals

Research of the past decade has provided tantalizing evidence for the coral symbiome, or multispecies phenotype, to fulfill functional niches. Symbionts often provide their hosts with functional capacity that the host does not innately possess, and this extension of biological range has the potential to influence the overall success, fitness and competitive advantage of the symbiotic unit. In corals, these functional benefits include the provisioning and cycling of nutrients, defense, and

Summary

Much of the effort over the last 20 years has focused on describing patterns of diversity in a few members of the symbiotic assemblages hosted by corals across a variety of spatial scales. This work is heavily weighted to the endo- and exo-symbiotic microbial diversity in corals, with an emphasis on endosymbiotic dinoflagellates, the characterization of virus-like particles and viral sequences (Davy and Patten, 2007, Patten et al., 2008, Seymour et al., 2005), and the identification of potential

Acknowledgments

This discussion evolved while Ruth Gates was Center Fellow at the National Center for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis, a Center funded by NSF (Grant #EF-0553768), the University of California, Santa Barbara, and the State of California, and Tracy Ainsworth was supported by Australian Research Council (DP0877226). The data sources that originally stimulated this discussion were supported by funds provided by the NSF (OCE-0752604 to RDG and NSF 04–17412 in support of the Moorea Coral Reef Long

References (94)

  • R. Berkelmans et al.

    The role of zooxanthellae in the thermal tolerance of corals: a ‘nugget of hope’ for coral reefs in an era of climate change

    Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences

    (2006)
  • F.D.R. Bouchard

    Understanding colonial traits using symbiosis research and ecosystem ecology

    Biological Theory

    (2009)
  • D.G. Bourne et al.

    Diversity of bacteria associated with the coral Pocillopora damicornis from the Great Barrier Reef

    Environmental Microbiology

    (2005)
  • R.H. Burris

    Uptake and assimilation of 15NH4+ by a variety of corals

    Marine Biology

    (1983)
  • N.E. Cantin et al.

    Juvenile corals can acquire more carbon from high-performance algal symbionts

    Coral Reefs

    (2009)
  • A. Cleveland et al.

    Nutritional exchange in a tropical tripartite symbiosis: direct evidence for the transfer of nutrients from anemonefish to host anemone and zooxanthellae

    Marine Biology

    (2011)
  • L.D. Coen

    Herbivory by crabs and the control of algal epibionts on Caribbean host corals

    Oecologia

    (1988)
  • J.E. Davy et al.

    Morphological diversity of virus-like particles within the surface microlayer of scleractinian corals

    Aquatic Microbial Ecology

    (2007)
  • S.K. Davy et al.

    Viruses: agents of coral disease?

    Diseases of Aquatic Organisms

    (2006)
  • G. Diaz-Pulido et al.

    Doom and boom on a resilient reef: climate change, algal overgrowth and coral recovery

    PloS One

    (2009)
  • I.J. Domart-Coulon et al.

    A basidiomycete isolated from the skeleton of Pocillopora damicornis (Scleractinia) selectively stimulates short-term survival of coral skeletogenic cells

    Marine Biology

    (2004)
  • P.J. Edmunds et al.

    Benchmarks in organism performance and their use in comparative analyses

    Oecologia

    (2011)
  • M. Fine et al.

    Enolithic algae: an alternative source of photassimilates during coral bleaching. Proceedings of the Royal Sociert B; Biological

    Sciences

    (2002)
  • M. Fine et al.

    Endolithic algae photoacclimate to increased irradiance during coral bleaching

    Marine and Freswater Research

    (2004)
  • M. Fine et al.

    Tolerance of endolithic algae to elevated temperature and light in the coral Montipora monasteriata from the southern Great Barrier Reef

    Journal of Experimental Biology

    (2005)
  • M. Fine et al.

    Phototrophic microendoliths bloom during coral “white syndrome”

    Coral Reefs

    (2006)
  • R.D. Gates et al.

    The physiological mechanisms of acclimatization in tropical reef corals

    American Zoologist

    (1999)
  • R.D. Gates et al.

    Free amino exhibit anthozoan “host factor” activity: they induce the release of photosynthate from symbiotic dinoflagellates in vitro

    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA

    (1995)
  • T.F. Goreau et al.

    The physiology of skeleton formation in corals. II. Calcium deposition by hermatypic corals under various conditions in the reef

    The Biological Bulletin

    (1959)
  • A.G. Grottoli et al.

    Heterotrophic plasticity and resilience in bleached corals

    Nature

    (2006)
  • S. Holbrook et al.

    Effects of sheltering fish on growth of their host corals

    Marine Biology

    (2008)
  • A. Jones et al.

    Potential costs of acclimatization to a warmer climate: growth of a reef coral with heat tolerant vs. sensitive symbiont types

    PloS One

    (2010)
  • H. Kitano et al.

    Robustness trade-offs and host-microbial symbiosis in the immune system

    Molecular Systems Biology

    (2006)
  • N. Knowlton et al.

    Multispecies microbial mutualisms on coral reefs: the host as a habitat

    The American Naturalist

    (2003)
  • E.C. Kvennefors et al.

    Bacterial communities of two ubiquitous Great Barrier Reef corals reveals both site- and species-specificity of common bacterial associates

    PloS One

    (2010)
  • T.C. LaJeunesse

    “Species” radiations of symbiotic dinoflagellates in the Atlantic and Indo-Pacific since the Miocene–Pliocene transition

    Molecular Biology and Evolution

    (2004)
  • Y. Lampert et al.

    Diversity of culturable bacteria in the mucus of the Red Sea coral Fungia scutaria

    FEMS Microbiology Ecology

    (2006)
  • T. Le Campion-Alsumard et al.

    Fungi in corals – symbiosis or disease – interaction between polyps and fungi causes pearl-like skeleton biomineralization

    Marine Ecology Progress Series

    (1995)
  • M.P. Lesser et al.

    Discovery of symbiotic nitrogen-fixing cyanobacteria in corals

    Science

    (2004)
  • M.P. Lesser et al.

    Nitrogen fixation by symbiotic cyanobacteria provides a source of nitrogen for the scleractinian coral Montastraea cavernosa

    Marine Ecology Progress Series

    (2007)
  • R.E. Ley et al.

    Evolution of mammals and their gut microbes

    Science

    (2008)
  • A.F. Little et al.

    Flexibility in algal endosymbioses shapes growth in reef corals

    Science

    (2004)
  • J. Lohr et al.

    Characterization of a latent virus-like infection of symbiotic zooxanthellae

    Applied and Environmental Microbiology

    (2007)
  • Y. Loya et al.

    Coral bleaching: the winners and the losers

    Ecology Letters

    (2001)
  • J. Mao-Jones et al.

    How microbial community composition regulates coral disease development

    PLoS Biology

    (2010)
  • L.M. Marquez et al.

    A virus in a fungus in a plant: three-way symbiosis required for thermal tolerance

    Science

    (2007)
  • M.J. McFall-Ngai

    Consequences of evolving with bacterial symbionts: insights from the squid-Vibrio associations

    Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics

    (1999)
  • Cited by (57)

    • Bleaching of the world's coral reefs

      2023, Biological and Environmental Hazards, Risks, and Disasters, Second Edition
    • Fertilization by coral-dwelling fish promotes coral growth but can exacerbate bleaching response

      2022, Journal of Theoretical Biology
      Citation Excerpt :

      These results highlight the need for further research on nitrogen cycling within the holobiont (Rädecker et al., 2015) and, in the context of coral-algal DEB models, for greater consideration of the holobiont’s effects on its immediate environment (Cunning et al., 2017; Muller et al., 2009). Corals may benefit from mutualistic interactions with a diverse range of species, and these relationships play a fundamental role in the ability of coral reefs to tolerate and recover from natural and anthropogenic stressors (Gates and Ainsworth, 2011). However, mutualisms can be context-dependent (Chamberlain et al., 2014), as illustrated by the breakdown of the coral-algal symbiosis and consequential bleaching of corals (Lesser, 2011).

    • Coral Disease Causes, Consequences, and Risk within Coral Restoration

      2020, Trends in Microbiology
      Citation Excerpt :

      The reason for this differentiation between the two corallivores and their ability to be pathogenic vectors is thought to be due to their feeding styles: C. plebeius consumes the coral polyps, and therefore produces only shallow lesions, while the feeding scars of Drupella sp. are deeper. While coral disease can be vector driven, positive ecological facilitation can provide protection against disease [105]; for example, macrosymbionts of corals have been identified as critical to coral health and can decrease the risk of disease [106,107]. Interestingly, the importance of positive species interactions may be a key factor in facilitating success in coral restoration as well as preventing negative species interactions.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text