Elsevier

Journal of Dentistry

Volume 35, Issue 11, November 2007, Pages 819-826
Journal of Dentistry

Review
An overview of zirconia ceramics: Basic properties and clinical applications

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2007.07.008Get rights and content

Abstract

Zirconia (ZrO2) is a ceramic material with adequate mechanical properties for manufacturing of medical devices. Zirconia stabilized with Y2O3 has the best properties for these applications. When a stress occurs on a ZrO2 surface, a crystalline modification opposes the propagation of cracks. Compression resistance of ZrO2 is about 2000 MPa. Orthopedic research led to this material being proposed for the manufacture of hip head prostheses. Prior to this, zirconia biocompatibility had been studied in vivo; no adverse responses were reported following the insertion of ZrO2 samples into bone or muscle. In vitro experimentation showed absence of mutations and good viability of cells cultured on this material. Zirconia cores for fixed partial dentures (FPD) on anterior and posterior teeth and on implants are now available. Clinical evaluation of abutments and periodontal tissue must be performed prior to their use. Zirconia opacity is very useful in adverse clinical situations, for example, for masking of dischromic abutment teeth. Radiopacity can aid evaluation during radiographic controls. Zirconia frameworks are realized by using computer-aided design/manufacturing (CAD/CAM) technology. Cementation of Zr-ceramic restorations can be performed with adhesive luting. Mechanical properties of zirconium oxide FPDs have proved superior to those of other metal-free restorations. Clinical evaluations, which have been ongoing for 3 years, indicate a good success rate for zirconia FPDs. Zirconia implant abutments can also be used to improve the aesthetic outcome of implant-supported rehabilitations. Newly proposed zirconia implants seem to have good biological and mechanical properties; further studies are needed to validate their application.

Introduction

Zirconia is a crystalline dioxide of zirconium. Its mechanical properties are very similar to those of metals and its color is similar to tooth color.1 In 1975, Garvie proposed a model to rationalize the good mechanical properties of zirconia, by virtue of which it has been called “ceramic steel”.2 Zirconia crystals can be organized in three different patterns: monoclinic (M), cubic (C), and tetragonal (T). By mixing ZrO2 with other metallic oxides, such as MgO, CaO, or Y2O3, great molecular stability can be obtained.1 Yttrium-stabilized zirconia, also known as tetragonal zirconia polycrystal (TZP), is presently the most studied combination.3 The aforementioned three phases are present in a common ZrO2 crystal. Every transition between the different crystalline reticulations is due to a force on the zirconia surface, and this produces a volumetric change in the crystal where the stress is applied. When a stress occurs on a zirconia surface, cracking energy creates a T−M transition. This crystalline modification is followed by an expansion that seals the crack.4 ZrO2 stabilized with Y2O3 has better mechanical properties than other combinations; although its sintering is much more difficult, this is the principal kind of zirconia considered for current medical use.

The first proposal of the use of zirconium oxide for medical purposes was made in 1969 and concerned orthopedic application. ZrO2 was proposed as a new material for hip head replacement instead of titanium or alumina prostheses.5 They evaluated the reaction upon placing ZrO2 in a monkey femur and reported that no adverse responses arose. Orthopedic research focused on the mechanical behavior of zirconia, on its wear, and on its integration with bone and muscle. Moreover, these first studies were largely carried out in vivo because in vitro technology was not yet sufficiently advanced. Prior to 1990, many other studies were performed, in which zirconia was tested on bone and muscle without any unfavorable results.6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 Since 1990, in vitro studies have also been performed in order to obtain information about cellular behavior towards zirconia.12 In vitro evaluation confirmed that ZrO2 is not cytotoxic13, 14, 15 (Fig. 1). Uncertain results were reported in relation to zirconia powders that generated an adverse response.16, 17 This was probably due to zirconium hydroxide, which is no longer present after sintering so that solid samples can always be regarded as safe. Mutagenicity was evaluated by Silva and by Covacci, and both reported that zirconia is not able to generate mutations of the cellular genome18, 19; in particular, mutant fibroblasts found on ZrO2 were fewer than those obtained with the lowest possible oncogenic dose compatible with survival of the cells.19

Moreover, zirconium oxide creates less flogistic reaction in tissue than other restorative materials such as titanium.20 This result was also confirmed by a study about peri-implant soft tissue around zirconia healing caps in comparison with that around titanium ones.21 Inflammatory infiltrate, microvessel density, and vascular endothelial growth factor expression were found to be higher around the titanium caps than around the ZrO2 ones. Also, the level of bacterial products, measured with nitric oxide synthase, was higher on titanium than on zirconium oxide. Zirconia can up- or down-regulate expressions of some genes, so that zirconia can be regarded as a self-regulatory material that can modify turnover of the extracellular matrix.22

Zirconia has mechanical properties similar to those of stainless steel. Its resistance to traction can be as high as 900−1200 MPa and its compression resistance is about 2000 MPa.1 Cyclical stresses are also tolerated well by this material. Applying an intermittent force of 28 kN to zirconia substrates, Cales found that some 50 billion cycles were necessary to break the samples, but with a force in excess of 90 kN structural failure of the samples occurred after just 15 cycles.23 Surface treatments can modify the physical properties of zirconia. Exposure to wetness for an extended period of time can have a detrimental effect on its properties.24 This phenomenon is known as zirconia ageing. Moreover, also surface grinding can reduce toughness.25 Kosmac confirmed this observation and reported a lower mean strength and reliability of zirconium oxide after grinding.26

Section snippets

Clinical aspects

In the search for the ultimate aesthetic restorative material, many all-ceramic systems have been proposed. Dental research is nowadays directed towards metal-free prosthetic restorations in order to improve aesthetical outcome of FPD restorations. Natural look of soft tissue in contact with fixed partial dentures is influenced by two factors: mucosal thickness and typology of restorative material. Metal-free restorations allow to preserve soft tissue color more similar to the natural one than

Conclusion

Although clinical long-term evaluations are a critical requirement to conclude that zirconia has good reliability for dental use, biological, mechanical, and clinical studies published to date seem to indicate that ZrO2 restorations are both well tolerated and sufficiently resistant. Ceramic bonding, luting procedures, ageing and wear of zirconia abutment should be evaluated in order to guide adequate use of zirconia as prosthetic restorative material. Patient selection, coupled with adequate

References (78)

  • H. Luthy et al.

    Strength and reliability of four-unit all-ceramic posterior bridges

    Dental Materials

    (2005)
  • W.S. Oh et al.

    Effect of connector design on the fracture resistance of all-ceramic fixed partial dentures

    Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry

    (2002)
  • A.R. Studart et al.

    Fatigue of zirconia under cyclic loading in water and its implications for the design of dental bridges

    Dental Materials

    (2007)
  • N. Potiket et al.

    In vitro fracture strength of teeth restored with different all-ceramic crown systems

    Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry

    (2004)
  • C.J. Goodacre et al.

    Tooth preparations for complete crowns: an art form based on scientific principles

    Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry

    (2001)
  • A. Sundh et al.

    Fracture resistance of all-ceramic zirconia bridges with differing phase stabilizers and quality of sintering

    Dental Materials

    (2006)
  • M.N. Aboushelib et al.

    Effect of loading method on the fracture mechanics of two layered all-ceramic restorative systems

    Dental Materials

    (2007)
  • M.N. Aboushelib et al.

    Microtensile bond strength of different components of core veneered all-ceramic restorations. Part II: Zirconia veneering ceramics

    Dental Materials

    (2006)
  • R.P. Palacios et al.

    Retention of zirconium oxide ceramic crowns with three types of cement

    Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry

    (2006)
  • M.B. Blatz et al.

    In vitro evaluation of shear bond strengths of resin to densely-sintered high-purity zirconium-oxide ceramic after long-term storage and thermal cycling

    Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry

    (2004)
  • S.S. Atsu et al.

    Effect of zirconium-oxide ceramic surface treatments on the bond strength to adhesive resin

    Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry

    (2006)
  • M. Kern et al.

    Bonding to zirconia ceramic: adhesion methods and their durability

    Dental Materials

    (1998)
  • A. Sundh et al.

    Fracture resistance of yttrium oxide partially-stabilized zirconia all-ceramic bridges after veneering and mechanical fatigue testing

    Dental Materials

    (2005)
  • J. Chevalier

    What future for zirconia as a biomaterial?

    Biomaterials

    (2006)
  • S.W. Park et al.

    Ceramic implant abutments: cutting efficiency and resultant surface finish by diamond rotary cutting instruments

    Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry

    (2006)
  • A.J. Raigrodski et al.

    The efficacy of posterior three-unit zirconium-oxide-based ceramic fixed partial dental prostheses: a prospective clinical pilot study

    Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry

    (2006)
  • R.C. Garvie et al.

    Ceramic steel?

    Nature

    (1975)
  • T.K. Gupta et al.

    Stabilization of tetragonal phase in polycrystalline zirconia

    Journal of Materials Science

    (1978)
  • R.C. Garvie et al.

    Structure and thermodynamical properties of partially stabilized zirconia in the CaO-ZrO2 system

    Journal of American Ceramic Society

    (1972)
  • J.D. Helmer et al.

    Research on bioceramics

  • S.F. Hulbert et al.

    Tissue reaction to three ceramics of porous and non-porous structures

    Journal of Biomedical Materials Research

    (1972)
  • R.C. Garvie et al.

    Biocompatibility of magnesia partially stabilized zirconia (Mg-Psz) ceramics

    Journal of Materials Science

    (1984)
  • W. Wagner et al.

    Morphometric comparison of histologic bone reactions after implantation of mono- and polycrystalline alluminium oxide pins

  • P. Christel et al.

    Mechanical properties and short-term in-vivo evaluation of yttrium-oxide-partially-stabilized zirconia

    Biomedical Materials Research

    (1989)
  • G. Maccauro et al.

    Biological response to calcia-partially stabilised zirconia ceramics

  • A. Bukat et al.

    GSP-made Ca-PSZ for Biomedical Applications

  • I. Dion et al.

    Physico-chemistry and cytotoxicity of ceramics

    Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine

    (1994)
  • F. Greco et al.

    Risposta biologica ai materiali ceramici: risultati delle prove in vitro ed in vivo

    Minerva Ortopedica Traumatologica

    (1993)
  • V.V. Silva et al.

    Biological reactivity of zirconia-hydroxyapatite composites

    Journal of Biomedical Materials Research

    (2002)
  • Cited by (1036)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text