Elsevier

Cytotherapy

Volume 20, Issue 3, March 2018, Pages 375-384
Cytotherapy

Synovial Fluid Cells
Platelet lysate enhances synovial fluid multipotential stromal cells functions: Implications for therapeutic use

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcyt.2017.12.003Get rights and content

Abstract

Background aims

Although intra-articular injection of platelet products is increasingly used for joint regenerative approaches, there are few data on their biological effects on joint-resident multipotential stromal cells (MSCs), which are directly exposed to the effects of these therapeutic strategies. Therefore, this study investigated the effect of platelet lysate (PL) on synovial fluid–derived MSCs (SF-MSCs), which in vivo have direct access to sites of cartilage injury.

Methods

SF-MSCs were obtained during knee arthroscopic procedures (N = 7). Colony forming unit–fibroblast (CFU-F), flow-cytometric phenotyping, carboxyfluorescein succinimidyl ester-based immunomodulation for T-cell and trilineage differentiation assays were performed using PL and compared with standard conditions.

Results

PL-enhanced SF-MSC (PL-MSC) proliferation as CFU-F colonies was 1.4-fold larger, and growing cultures had shorter population-doubling times. PL-MSCs and fetal calf serum (FCS)-MSCs had the same immunophenotype and similar immunomodulation activities. In chondrogenic and osteogenic differentiation assays, PL-MSCs produced 10% more sulfated-glycosaminoglycan (sGAG) and 45% less Ca++ compared with FCS-MSCs, respectively. Replacing chondrogenic medium transforming growth factor-β3 with 20% or 50% PL further increased sGAG production of PL-MSCs by 69% and 95%, respectively, compared with complete chondrogenic medium. Also, Dulbecco's Modified Eagle's Medium high glucose (HG-DMEM) plus 50% PL induced more chondrogenesis compared with HG-DMEM plus 10% FCS and was comparable to complete chondrogenic medium.

Conclusions

This is the first study to assess SF-MSC responses to PL and provides biological support to the hypothesis that PL may be capable of modulating multiple functional aspects of joint resident MSCs with direct access to injured cartilage.

Introduction

Osteoarthritis (OA) is the most common musculoskeletal disease affecting an increasing proportion of the population and is a major cause of global health care expenditures [1]. The OA process can begin in multiple locations within the joint, including the cartilage, bone, ligaments, synovium and meniscus, with eventual whole-joint failure [2]. To date, there are limited therapeutic options for the treatment of joint dysfunction in OA. For early OA emanating in cartilage or “chondrogenic” OA, symptomatic treatments with analgesics, nonsteroid medications, steroid injection and physical therapy, rather than regenerative approaches, are invariably offered [3], [4]. In more advanced disease, total knee replacement is generally considered in patients older than 65 years, and >160,000 of these are carried out annually in the United Kingdom alone (according to the National Joint Registry, 2017). However, in younger patients with small chondral lesions, regenerative therapies, including microfracture and autologous chondrocyte implantation, may be used. Although these approaches are associated with good short-term pain relief, they generally lead to formation of fibrocartilaginous tissue that is not capable of withstanding mechanical stress over time [5], [6], [7].

There is an urgent need for novel regenerative treatment options for isolated articular cartilage defects before they lead to advanced cartilage loss. One experimental strategy is the use of bone marrow–derived (BM-MSCs) [8], [9] or adipose tissue–derived (AT-MSCs) MSCs [10], [11], with pre-clinical and clinical results showed promising results. However, because of the expense and time-consuming nature of these procedures, as they require clinical grade facilities and times to expand the cells, there is an increasing interest in harnessing the power of endogenous joint resident MSCs in conjunction with scaffolds or growth factors or a combination as part of a one-stage procedure.

One potential source of endogenous MSCs that could play a role in OA joint repair is synovial fluid–derived MSCs (SF-MSCs), which are present in OA, rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and non-arthritic joint fluid [12]. Elevated SF-MSC numbers have been reported in early OA and after meniscal injury, suggesting their potential role in physiological joint repair [13], [14]. Furthermore, SF-MSCs are easy to isolate through aspiration and are thought to be derived from the adjacent synovium, which is a tissue rich in MSCs with strong chondrogenic potential [15], [16]. Finally, animal model studies showed that synovial origin MSCs facilitated cartilage repair following injection directly to the defect area with or without scaffold [17], [18]. Because both the topography and high chondrogenic potential of SF-MSCs indicate their potential role in endogenous joint repair, the question arises as to whether this process could be exploited or further enhanced.

Platelet lysate (PL) is a biological platelet derivative rich in growth factors and cytokines that encourage tissue repair, which is driven by a multitude of growth factors including basic fibroblast-derived growth factor, transforming growth factor beta (TGF-β), platelet-derived growth factor-AA, -AB and -BB [19], [20]. Increasingly, PL is being injected directly into OA knee joints with some encouraging results [21], but the mechanisms of its action remain unknown. In 2005, Doucet et al. proposed the use of PL as a substitute for fetal calf serum (FCS) for MSC expansion intended for cellular therapy. Subsequent studies have shown the capacity of PL to promote cell proliferation while maintaining immunophenotype and trilineage differentiation of BM-MSCs, AT-MSCs and umbilical cord blood MSCs [20], [22], [23], [24], [25]. The potential interactions between PL and SF-MSCs have not thus far been explored but could be key toward enhancing the endogenous MSC repair responses.

The aim of this study was therefore to evaluate the impact of PL on SF-MSC immunophenotype, proliferation, immunomodulation and trilineage differentiation compared with FCS containing standard expansion medium, with a particular focus of the capacity of PL to act as chondrogenic inducer. We studied commercial PL (Stemulate; Cook Regentec) because it has a more consistent growth factor content as it is produced in large batches to avoid lot-to-lot variation and is available off the shelf in large quantities.

Section snippets

Isolation and culture of SF-MSCs

Approval for the study was obtained from the national research ethics committee (Rec reference: 14/YH/0087). Samples were collected after informed written consent from all study participants who were undergoing elective knee diagnostic or therapeutic arthroscopy. No effusion was present at time of arthroscopy, and patients with inflamed synovium were not included because inflammation might have an impact on chondrogenesis [15]. To ensure collection of all SF-MSCs, SF was collected after an

PL maintains the SF-MSC phenotype

Flow cytometric analysis showed FCS-MSCs lacked expression of CD14, CD19, CD34 and CD45 cell surface markers and positively expressed CD73 (95.6 ± 3.0%), CD90 (96.33 ± 1.0%) and CD105 (92 ± 2.8%) (Figure 1). Similarly, PL-MSCs lacked expression of CD14, CD19, CD34 and expressed positive for CD73 (98.5 ± 1.1%), CD90 (97.6 ± 2.8%) and CD105 (89.6 ± 10%). Thus, the immunophenotype of PL-MSCs was consistent with International Society for Cell Therapy basic requirements for expanded MSCs as they

Discussion

Although it was historically thought that cartilage repair was the remit of BM-MSCs, there is increasing evidence from animal models for a pivotal or even dominant role for joint cavity MSCs, including synovial fluid MSCs in cartilage repair [17], [18], [33], [34]. Although there is a large amount of literature on the effect of PL on BM-MSCs, to the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to investigate the effect of PL on SF-MSCs, which are joint-resident MSCs that have direct access to

Acknowledgments

We thank the Orthopaedic Department at the Chapel Allerton Hospital, Leeds, United Kingdom, for their help in collecting samples. We also thank to Heather Owston for editorial assistance. Ala Altaie was funded by Cook Regentec, USA; however, the funder did not have any role in the study design, sample collection, data analysis or interpretation of this work.

Disclosure of interest: The authors have no commercial, proprietary, or financial interest in the products or companies described in this

References (50)

  • C.H. Lee et al.

    Regeneration of the articular surface of the rabbit synovial joint by cell homing: a proof of concept study

    Lancet

    (2010)
  • M. Dominici et al.

    Minimal criteria for defining multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells. The International Society for Cellular Therapy position statement

    Cytotherapy

    (2006)
  • LiC.Y. et al.

    Comparative analysis of human mesenchymal stem cells from bone marrow and adipose tissue under xeno-free conditions for cell therapy

    Stem Cell Res Ther

    (2015)
  • I.B. Copland et al.

    The effect of platelet lysate fibrinogen on the functionality of MSCs in immunotherapy

    Biomaterials

    (2013)
  • PeiM. et al.

    Synovium-derived stem cell-based chondrogenesis

    Differentiation

    (2008)
  • A.A. Worster et al.

    Chondrocytic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells sequentially exposed to transforming growth factor-beta1 in monolayer and insulin-like growth factor-I in a three-dimensional matrix

    J Orthop Res

    (2001)
  • C. Cooper et al.

    Epidemiology of osteoarthritis

    Medicographia

    (2013)
  • D. McGonagle et al.

    The anatomical basis for a novel classification of osteoarthritis and allied disorders

    J Anat

    (2010)
  • L.S. Simon

    Osteoarthritis

    Curr Rheumatol Rep

    (1999)
  • D.J. Hunter et al.

    Osteoarthritis

    BMJ

    (2006)
  • D.D. Frisbie et al.

    Early events in cartilage repair after subchondral bone microfracture

    Clin Orthop Relat Res

    (2003)
  • R.A. Oldershaw

    Cell sources for the regeneration of articular cartilage: the past, the horizon and the future

    Int J Exp Pathol

    (2012)
  • E.A. Jones et al.

    Enumeration and phenotypic characterization of synovial fluid multipotential mesenchymal progenitor cells in inflammatory and degenerative arthritis

    Arthritis Rheum

    (2004)
  • Y. Matsukura et al.

    Mesenchymal stem cells in synovial fluid increase after meniscus injury

    Clin Orthop Relat Res

    (2014)
  • E.A. Jones et al.

    Synovial fluid mesenchymal stem cells in health and early osteoarthritis: detection and functional evaluation at the single-cell level

    Arthritis Rheum

    (2008)
  • Cited by (11)

    • Regulatory-compliant conditions during cell product manufacturing enhance in vitro immunomodulatory properties of infrapatellar fat pad-derived mesenchymal stem/stromal cells

      2020, Cytotherapy
      Citation Excerpt :

      Among the bioactive molecules are those within the families of mitogenic growth factors, including platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF), epidermal growth factor (EGF), insulinlike growth factor, transforming growth factor (TGF) and fibroblast growth factor 2 [25,26]. Different positive outcomes have been assessed in MSCs obtained from various sources and processed with hPL when compared with expansion with FBS, including proliferation as colony-forming unit fibroblasts, differentiation potential, senescence, chromosomal stability and angiogenesis [27–35]. Furthermore, pilot clinical trials investigating the immunosuppressive effects of MSCs expanded in hPL to treat acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease observed no early or late adverse effects at a median follow-up of 8 months, including patients receiving up to five cell infusions [36,37].

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text