Elsevier

Journal of Chromatography B

Volume 997, 1 August 2015, Pages 70-74
Journal of Chromatography B

An UPLC–MS/MS method for the quantitation of vortioxetine in rat plasma: Application to a pharmacokinetic study

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchromb.2015.05.010Get rights and content

Highlights

  • First characterize the method of vortioxetine in rat plasma by UPLC–MS/MS.

  • The run time was 3 min with no carryover.

  • The method is accurate, precise and meets validation requirements by guideline.

  • The method could also be used for clinical pharmacokinetic study.

Abstract

In this work, a simple, sensitive and fast ultra performance liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC–MS/MS) method was developed and validated for the quantitative determination of vortioxetine in rat plasma. Plasma samples were processed with a protein precipitation. The separation was achieved by an Acquity UPLC BEH C18 column (2.1 mm × 50 mm, 1.7 μm) column with a gradient mobile phase consisting of 0.1% formic acid in water and acetonitrile. Detection was carried out using positive-ion electrospray tandem mass spectrometry via multiple reaction monitoring (MRM). The validated method had an excellent linearity in the range of 0.05–20 ng/mL (R2 > 0.997) with a lower limit of quantification (0.05 ng/mL). The extraction recovery was in the range of 78.3–88.4% for vortioxetine and 80.3% for carbamazepine (internal standard, IS). The intra- and inter-day precision was below 8.5% and accuracy was from −11.2% to 9.5%. No notable matrix effect and astaticism was observed for vortioxetine. The method has been successfully applied to a pharmacokinetic study of vortioxetine in rats for the first time, which provides the basis for the further development and application of vortioxetine.

Introduction

Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a leading cause of disability and is associated with significant reductions in quality of life, impaired productivity, reduced overall health and substantial economic costs [1], [2], [3]. Vortioxetine (1-[2-(2,4-dimethyl-phenylsulfanyl)-phenyl]-piperazine hydrobromide, Fig. 1) is a novel antidepressant with a multi-modal mechanism of action approved in the USA and EU for the treatment of major depressive disorder at doses of 5, 10, 15 and 20 mg [4]. It works through a combination of two pharmacological modes of action: inhibition of the serotonin transporter and direct modulation of receptor activity.

Vortioxetine reaches peak plasma concentrations of 9, 18 and 33 ng/mL within 7–11 h following the doses of 5, 10 and 20 mg/day, respectively. The absolute bioavailability for oral administration of vortioxetine was found to be 75% [5]. Vortioxetine undergoes extensive metabolism, primarily via oxidation and subsequent glucuronic acid conjugation. In vitro data suggest that several CYP isoenzymes are involved in the oxidative metabolism of vortioxetine, including CYP2D6, CYP3A4/5, CYP2C9, CYP2C19, CYP2A6, CYP2C8 and CYP2B6 [6]. Clinical drug–drug interaction studies in healthy individuals have shown that co-administration of omeprazole (a CYP2C19 substrate and inhibitor) had no effect on the pharmacokinetics of vortioxetine, co-administration of bupropion (CYP2D6 inhibitor) increased the exposure of vortioxetine approximately 2-fold and co-administration of rifampicin (a broad CYP inducer) decreased the area under the curve (AUC) of vortioxetine by 72% [7].

Recently, a reliable, stable and predictive pharmacokinetic model was developed to characterise pharmacokinetics of vortioxetine in the healthy population [4], [8], [9]. Pharmacokinetics profile of vortioxetine were researched extensively. There have several analytical methods been published for determination of vortioxetine in human plasma, including LC–MS [10] and LC–MS/MS [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17]. However, these methods were not described in enough detail (e.g. plasma extraction procedure, chromatography conditions, parameters of the method, etc.) for duplication in other laboratories. Therefore, to characterize the pharmacokinetic properties of vortioxetine, it is very necessary to develop an accurate and selective bioanalytical method for the determination of vortioxetine in plasma.

With recent advances in analysis techniques, ultra performance liquid chromatography (UPLC) with tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) has been used increasingly for biological matrix analyses [18], [19]. In our current study, we developed and validated a rapid, selective, and sensitive UPLC–MS/MS technique for quantifying vortioxetine in rat plasma. The technique was also applied in a pharmacokinetic analysis, and it demonstrated a high level of sensitivity for detecting vortioxetine in as little as 0.1 mL of rat plasma using protein precipitation. To our knowledge, this is the first report of the systematic validation of a UPLC–MS/MS method for quantifying vortioxetine in rat plasma. The UPLC–MS/MS technique is a highly sensitive, practical analytical method for applications in basic and clinical research.

Section snippets

Chemicals materials

Vortioxetine and carbamazepine (internal standard, IS) were obtained from Sigma (St. Louis, MO, USA). Acetonitrile and methanol were HPLC grade and purchased from Merck Company (Darmstadt, Germany). HPLC grade water was obtained using a Milli Q system (Millipore, Bedford, USA).

UPLC–MS/MS conditions

Liquid chromatography was performed on an Acquity ultra performance liquid chromatography (UPLC) unit (Waters Corp., Milford, MA, USA) with an Acquity BEH C18 column (2.1 mm × 50 mm, 1.7 μm particle size) and inline 0.2 μm

Method development and optimization

To obtain chromatograms with optimal resolution and symmetrical peaks, we investigated the use of different solutions of acetonitrile in water and methanol in water as mobile phases, with or without 0.1% formic acid, for binary isocratic and gradient elutions. A gradient mobile phase consisting of 0.1% formic acid in water and acetonitrile achieved good separation and symmetrical peaks. Typical chromatograms of blank plasma, plasma spiked with vortioxetine and the IS, and plasma with the IS are

Conclusions

A rapid, sensitive, and specified method was developed and validated for the quantification of vortioxetine. The method showed excellent performance as follows: low LLOQ (0.05 ng/mL), wild range (0.05–20 ng/mL), short running time (3.0 min), and simple preparation process. It was successfully applied to the pharmacokinetic study of vortioxetine in rat after oral administration.

References (20)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (27)

  • Toxicity of waterborne vortioxetine, a new antidepressant, in non-target aquatic organisms: From wonder to concern drugs?

    2022, Environmental Pollution
    Citation Excerpt :

    Water samples were collected from each aquarium immediately after (t = 0 h) and before (t = 24 h) renewal of the exposure solutions for juvenile zebrafish. Vortioxetine was extracted and quantified using a previously reported method (Gu et al., 2015). Briefly, after filtration through 0.22 μm membrane filters, water samples (n = 3 for each concentration) were analyzed using an ultra-performance liquid chromatography system coupled to a Micromass Quattro Premier XE tandem quadruple mass spectrometer (UPLC–MS/MS, Waters Corp., USA) in multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) mode.

  • UPLC-MS/MS for simultaneous quantification of vortioxetine and its metabolite Lu AA34443 in rat plasma and its application to drug interactions

    2020, Arabian Journal of Chemistry
    Citation Excerpt :

    In order to support the upcoming pharmacokinetic interaction for vortioxetine, it is important to develop an efficient bioanalytical method to detect the concentrations of vortioxetine and its metabolite Lu AA34443 in plasma simultaneously. Until now, several liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) have been characterized for the quantification of vortioxetine in biological fluids (Gu et al., 2015; Guan et al., 2018; Huang et al., 2016). All the above methods determined vortioxetine without its metabolite Lu AA34443.

  • Simultaneous determination of fluoxetine, venlafaxine, vortioxetine and their active metabolites in human plasma by LC–MS/MS using one-step sample preparation procedure

    2020, Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis
    Citation Excerpt :

    Several analytical methods have been developed for the determination of antidepressant drugs and their active metabolites mentioned above in biological fluids. Reported methods were focused on quantification of drugs separately [11–21] or in combinations [22–26] based on gas chromatography (GC) or liquid chromatography (LC) coupled with mass spectrometry (MS). These methods suffer from disadvantages like low sensitivity, long run time, required large sample volume, or laborious and time-consuming sample preparation.

  • The fabrication of a highly sensitive electrochemical sensor based on AuNPs@graphene nanocomposite: Application to the determination of antidepressant vortioxetine

    2019, Microchemical Journal
    Citation Excerpt :

    Thus, it is possible to benefit from electrochemical methods such as low cost, easy operation, fast response, high sensitivity and selectivity. To date, only a few chromatographic approaches have been developed for the determination of VOR in biological samples [17–19]. To the best of our knowledge, there is no electrochemical study in the literature using voltammetry for the determination of VOR in biological or pharmaceutical samples.

  • Simultaneous quantification of vortioxetine, carvedilol and its active metabolite 4-hydroxyphenyl carvedilol in rat plasma by UPLC–MS/MS: Application to their pharmacokinetic interaction study

    2016, Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis
    Citation Excerpt :

    It is therefore necessary to perform a study to compare the pharmacokinetics of vortioxetine and carvedilol in rats when being administered orally alone or being co-administered. To best of our knowledge, there is only one LC–MS/MS method reported for the quantification of vortioxetine in plasma [18]. Many methods for the determination of carvedilol and its active metabolite 4-hydroxyphenyl carvedilol in biological fluids by LC–MS/MS have been reported [19–21].

  • Carbon-Based Nanomaterials 4.0

    2024, International Journal of Molecular Sciences
View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text