Short communication
Analysis of cyclosporin A in dried blood spots using liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchromb.2009.03.024Get rights and content

Abstract

Dried blood spot sampling is a promising and patient friendly alternative for venous sampling. A liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometer assay was developed for analyzing cyclosporin A in dried blood spots. Linearity ranged from 25 to 1440 μg/L. Within and between run accuracy and precision were within limits. The developed assay has a negligible matrix-effect and a recovery of 97%. The dried blood spots were stable during a period of at least 17 days in the refrigerator. The developed assay is suitable for analyzing cyclosporin A in dried blood spots.

Introduction

Cyclosporin A (CsA) (Fig. 1) is an immunosuppressant drug which specifically and reversibly inhibits the proliferation of T-lymphocytes. CsA is indicated for prohibiting rejection of transplanted organs, graft versus host disease and severe psoriasis. Because of its major side-effects such as nefrotoxicity, disruption of liver function and convulsions, and its variance in inter- and intra-individual bio-availability Therapeutic Drug Monitoring (TDM) of CsA is necessary [1]. Dosage of CsA is due to the different bio-availability. Therapeutic drug ranges vary per transplant clinic and type of transplantation. The minimum therapeutic drug range in bone marrow transplantation is 200–350 μg/L.

As published earlier for tacrolimus, dried blood spot (DBS) sampling is a promising and patient friendly alternative for venous sampling [2], [3], [4]. DBS samples are made with capillary blood, obtained from a fingerprick with an automatic lancet. Blood drops are applied to the sampling paper which is, after drying at ambient temperature, mailed by postal service to our laboratory. At our laboratory a disk is punched out from the blood spot for further sample preparation and analysis.

A transition from immunoassay to liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC–MS/MS) was recently made for analyzing CsA in venous blood [5]. LC–MS/MS is more specific and sensitive compared to immunoassays and does not require the use of radio-activity in comparison to radioimmunoassays [6]. Usage of the DBS sampling method for CsA has been described earlier for radioimmunoassay and monoclonal antibody techniques [7], [8], however no method for analyzing DBS samples with LC–MS/MS was described earlier. We developed a simple, precise and accurate method for analyzing CsA DBS samples with LC–MS/MS.

Section snippets

Chemicals

Two different batches cyclosporin A (Biochemika ≥98.5%) were purchased from Sigma–Aldrich (Zwijndrecht, The Netherlands). Internal standard cyclosporin D (CsD) (>99%) was purchased from Eton Bioscience Inc. (San-Diego, USA). Methanol (HPLC-grade) was purchased from Biosolve (Valkenswaard, the Netherlands). Formic acid (pro analysi), zincsulfate (Titrisol) and ammonium acetate (pro analysi) were purchased from Meck BV (Darmstadt, Germany). Sampling paper (903 Protein Saver Card) was purchased

Matrix-effect and recovery

As matrix-effects in LC–MS/MS analysis can be of major influence [9], [10] sample preparation should be as clean as possible. Therefore acetonitrile and methanol were tested as extraction solution, these tests showed recoveries of 20–50% (data not shown). Although there is no clear minimal recovery described [9], [10], [11] it is suggested to be at least 70%. In literature a sample preparation procedure with recoveries of ≥90% was found [8]. In the described sample preparation procedure blood

Discussion and conclusion

As shown in Table 1 all validated parameters are within limits. The developed sample pretreatment procedure has a small, negligible matrix-effect and high extraction recovery which is, more importantly, consistent. The within and between run accuracy is sufficient for LLOQ, low, medium and high quality controls. The within and between run precision was well within limits for all quality controls.

We did not detect an influence of HT on CsA concentrations in the range of 0.30 HT to 0.59 HT.

The

Acknowledgment

We would like to thank Dr. P.M. Edelbroek from the Epilepsy Institute SEIN for his support and advice.

References (15)

  • B.D. Kahan et al.

    Clin. Ther.

    (2002)
  • Z. Yang et al.

    J. Immunol. Methods

    (2008)
  • B.K. Matuszewski

    J. Chromatogr. B Anal. Technol. Biomed. Life Sci.

    (2006)
  • M. Holub et al.

    Clin. Chim. Acta

    (2006)
  • K. Hoogtanders et al.

    Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol.

    (2006)
  • K. Hoogtanders et al.

    Transplantation

    (2007)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (68)

  • Dried blood microsampling-assisted therapeutic drug monitoring of immunosuppressants: An overview

    2023, Journal of Chromatography A
    Citation Excerpt :

    For most TDM applications, including immunosuppressant drug monitoring, cellulose type filter papers are used, either untreated or treated. For immunosuppressants monitoring, Whatman 903 [9,30,32,39,41,42,46,48,50–52,54–63,68,74] is most commonly used, followed by Whatman FTA DMPK-C [20,64–66], Whatman 10535097 [8,45,51,67,103] and Perkin Elmer 226 filter paper [40,69,70]. The influence of the type of filter paper was illustrated in a study by Koster et al., who performed an in-depth investigation of the effect of different filter papers on the quantification of immunosuppressants [71].

  • Clinical feasibility of dried blood spots: Analytics, validation, and applications

    2016, Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis
View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text