Textual inference for eligibility criteria resolution in clinical trials

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2015.09.008Get rights and content
Under a Creative Commons license
open access

Highlights

  • Manual chart review for clinical trial screening is a laborious process.

  • We present the task of identifying criteria relevant sentences in clinical notes.

  • This is formulated as a search-based textual entailment problem.

  • We describe creation of a dataset and implementation of four baseline methods.

  • Method using similarity between UMLS concept pairs performs the best.

Abstract

Clinical trials are essential for determining whether new interventions are effective. In order to determine the eligibility of patients to enroll into these trials, clinical trial coordinators often perform a manual review of clinical notes in the electronic health record of patients. This is a very time-consuming and exhausting task. Efforts in this process can be expedited if these coordinators are directed toward specific parts of the text that are relevant for eligibility determination. In this study, we describe the creation of a dataset that can be used to evaluate automated methods capable of identifying sentences in a note that are relevant for screening a patient’s eligibility in clinical trials. Using this dataset, we also present results for four simple methods in natural language processing that can be used to automate this task. We found that this is a challenging task (maximum F-score = 26.25), but it is a promising direction for further research.

Keywords

Natural language processing
Electronic health records
Textual inference
Clinical trials

Cited by (0)