Remodeled human skulls in Köşk Höyük (Neolithic age, Anatolia): a new appraisal in view of recent discoveries
Introduction
One of the most remarkable mortuary practices from the early agricultural villages of the Middle and Late Pre-Pottery Neolithic B period (MLPPNB) in the Near East was the spectacular remodeling of facial features on the skull removed from the rest of the skeleton (Kuijt, 2008: 959). Such examples have been reported from several sites such as Tel Ramad (Ferembach, 1969, Ferembach and Lechevalier, 1973) and Tel Aswad (Stordeur, 2003) in Syria; Jericho (Strouhal, 1973, Rollefson, 1985), Nahal Hemar (Yakar and Hershkovitz, 1988, Arensburg and Hershkovitz, 1988), Kfar Hahoresh (Goren et al., 2001, Simmons et al., 2007), Beisamoun in Israel; and Ain Ghazal (Butler, 1989, Simmons et al., 1990) in Jordan. Recent similar discoveries during the excavations in Çatal Höyük (Hodder, 2005) and Köşk Höyük (Öztan, 2002, Bonogofsky, 2004, Özbek, 2005a) allow us to infer that skull plastering extended beyond the Levant, well into Anatolia during the Pottery Neolithic period. Although the samples excavated in Central Anatolia did not arise due interest within the scientific community, the number of findings reflecting this behavioral pattern is rising significantly (Özbek, 2005a, Bonogofsky, 2005).
Archaeological researches on the Neolithic settlements of Anatolia have revealed a high degree of variation and also a marked regional similarity in funerary practices (Mellaart, 1967, Özbek, 1988a, Özbek, 1988b, Özbek, 2005a, Özbek, 2005b, Özdoğan and Özdoğan, 1990, LeMort et al., 2000, Molleson et al., 2005). Even if there is no direct evidence that would elucidate the motives behind these various mortuary practices, they can still be considered among the conceptual changes surrounding life and death during this new cultural period known as the Neolithic. With the founding of relatively large agricultural villages in Anatolia and other countries of the Near East, mortuary practices and household rituals changed dramatically (Özbek, 2005a).
The aim of this study is to open discussion about the practice of remodeling skulls revealed through the architectural levels II and III in Köşk Höyük, dating to the Late Neolithic, on the basis of new discoveries brought forth by the excavations of 2005, 2006 and 2007 and to make some comparisons with the similar findings from other sites of the Near East.
Köşk Höyük is situated within the borders of Bahçeli town of Bor, a district of the Niğde Province in Central Anatolia (Fig. 1). The archaeological excavations of Köşk Höyük are being carried out under the joint responsibility of the Museum of Niğde and Professor Aliye Öztan from the Major Branch of Protohistory and Western Asian Studies of the Faculty of Linguistics, History and Geography in Ankara. The author of this article has been participating in the excavations at Köşk Höyük since 2004. Radio-carbon dating of the site has yielded a calibrated date of 5211 ± 84 B.C., placing it in the Late Neolithic (Öztan et al., 2006). The plastered and unplastered skulls are stored at the Niğde Museum. Other skeletal remains of Late Neolithic and Chalcolithic ages unearthed at Köşk Höyük are being studied by M. Özbek and housed in the Department of Anthropology of Hacettepe University (Ankara).
Excavations at Köşk Höyük have produced important information about the prehistoric period of Central Anatolia. The architecture is predominantly Central Anatolian in plan and material. Pottery is monochrome or painted, and the vessels with relief decoration were produced by local potters. Relief decoration was used to render natural representations of local fauna, which must have been considered sacred (Öztan, 2002: 55). More details concerning the archaeological context of Köşk Höyük can be found in the publications of Silistreli, 1985, Silistreli, 1986, Silistreli, 1989 and Öztan et al., 2006, Öztan et al., 2007.
Section snippets
Materials and methods
Köşk Höyük, known to academic circles since the early 1980s (Silistreli, 1985, Silistreli, 1986, Silistreli, 1989, Silistreli, 1990, Özkan et al., 2001, Öztan, 2002, Öztan et al., 2006, Öztan et al., 2007), is particularly interesting due to its most extraordinary mortuary practice dating to the Late Neolithic period and corresponding to the levels I, II and III of the domestic residence (Silistreli, 1989, Öztan, 2002, Bonogofsky, 2004, Özbek, 2005a). The skulls of one child and 10 adults
Results
In 2006, five adult skulls (Kşk. M.1.00) were recovered from level II in area I/10. These plastered and unplastered skulls were originally located 30 cm deeper than the ones previously found. According to the excavators (Öztan et al., 2007), it can be suggested that all these skulls were recovered from the same building in the northeastern part of the settlement (Fig. 2). This part was disturbed by cuttings for a recent water reservoir. As a result, this activity severely damaged the state of
Discussion
These findings serve as a most interesting example of how the Neolithic people in the Near East recreated life through the portrayal of the body by remodeling the facial features on skulls of both sexes. Although all the plastered skulls are part of the same funerary tradition of remodeling the facial features of the dead, they differ in chronology, context, technique, manufacture, colour and style (Ferembach, 1970, Strouhal, 1973, Goren et al., 2001, Wright, 1988, Goring-Morris, 2005,
Acknowledgements
I would like to thank Prof. Aliye Öztan from the University of Ankara for permitting me to participate in the excavations of Köşk Höyük and to examine the human skeletal remains recovered in the site. I also thank four anonyms referees, especially reviewer number 2, whose criticisms helped me to bring the paper to its present form. I am grateful to Marin Pilloud, Department of Anthropology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, USA for reading and making some necessary changes on the English
References (50)
- et al.
The technology of skull modeling in the Pre-Pottery Neolithic B (PPNB); regional variability, the relation of technology and iconography and their archaeological implications
Journal of Archaeological Science
(2001) - et al.
Neolithic human remains in Nahal Hemar Cave
Human Osteology
(1987)Skull cult in the prehistoric Near East
Journal of Prehistoric Religion
(1991)- Bonogofsky, M., 2001. An Osteo-archaeological Examination of the Ancestor Cult during the Pre-pottery Neolithic B...
Neolithic plastered skulls and railroading epistemologies
BASOR
(2003)A bioarchaeological study of plastered skulls from Anatolia: new discoveries and interpretations
International Journal of Osteoarchaeology
(2004)- Bonogofsky, M., 2005. Anatolian plastered skulls in context: new discoveries and interpretations. 20, pp....
Digging Up Bones. British Museum (National History)
(1981)The plastered skulls of Ain Ghazal: preliminary findings
Etude anthropologique des ossements humains neolithiques de Tell Ramad (Syrie)
Annales Archaeologiques Arabes Syriennes
Etude anthropologique des ossements humains neolithiques de Tell Ramad (Syrie, Campagnes 1963–1966)
L'Anthropologie
Decouvertes de deux cranes surmodeles dans une habitation du VIIeme millenaire a Beisamoun (Israel)
Paleorient
Recommandations pour determiner l'âge et le sexe sur le squelette
Bulletins et Memoires de la Societe d'Anthropologie de Paris
Ritual burial of cultic objects: the earliest evidence
Cambridge Archaeological Journal
Life, death and the emergence of differential status in the Near Eastern Neolithic: evidence from Kfar Hahoresh, Lower Galilee, Israel
A Contribution to the Study of the Collective Representation of Death
New finds and new interpretations at Çatal Hüyük
Anatolian Archaeology
Excavations at Jericho, 1953
Palestine Exploration Quarterly
Digging Up Jericho
Keeping the peace: ritual, skull caching and community integration in the Levantine Neolithic
The regeneration of life. Neolithic structures of symbolic remembering and forgetting
Current Anthropology
Feu et archaeoanthropologie au Proche-Orient (Epipaleolithique et Neolithique). Le lien avec les pratiques funeraires. Donnees nouvelles de Çayönü
Paleorient
Çatal Huyuk
Cited by (28)
Multi-dimensional analyses of the plastered skulls from Neolithic Tepecik-Çiftlik, Central Anatolia (Türkiye)
2024, Journal of Archaeological Science: ReportsHandling dead bodies: Investigating the formation process of a collective burial from Neolithic Tepecik-Çiftlik, Central Anatolia (Turkey)
2019, Journal of Anthropological ArchaeologyCitation Excerpt :While others focus on the techniques and traces of postmortem treatments and taphonomical processes (e.g. traces of cut marks, dye/pigment) (Erdal, 2015; Haddow and Knüsel, 2017; Kanjou et al., 2013). However, generally, evaluations of Near Eastern Neolithic mortuary practices focus on regional similarities and are usually associated with a specific cultural background (Croucher, 2012; Kuijt, 1996; 2004; Özbek, 2009; Pilloud et al., 2016; Verhoeven, 2002). In some of this research, similarities within and between regions in mortuary practices, in the context of ancestral culture, collective memory, and common beliefs are discussed (Bonogofsky, 2011; Kuijt, 1996, 2001; Verhoeven, 2002).
A bioarchaeological and forensic re-assessment of vulture defleshing and mortuary practices at Neolithic Çatalhöyük
2016, Journal of Archaeological Science: ReportsFood and social complexity at çayÖnü Tepesi, southeastern Anatolia: Stable isotope evidence of differentiation in diet according to burial practice and sex in the early Neolithic
2013, Journal of Anthropological ArchaeologyCitation Excerpt :These practices are found frequently across the Levant at sites such as Jericho (Kurth and Rohrer-Ertl, 1981), ‘Ain Ghazal (Rollefson, 1986), Kfar Hahoresh (Goring-Morris, 2000) and Nahal Hemar (Bar-Yosef and Alon, 1988) to name a few. Some aspects of these practices, with the exception of cranial modification, are also found beyond the Levantine corridor (and beyond the PPNB) in Turkey at sites such Çatalhöyük (Hodder, 2004), Boncuklu Höyük (Baird, forthcoming; Pearson, forthcoming), Çayönü Tepesi (Özdoğan, 1999), Domuztepe (Carter et al., 2003), Köşk Höyük (Özbek, 2009; Silistreli, 1988), and in Syria at Abu Hureyra (Moore and Molleson, 2000) Bouqras (Meiklejohn et al., 1992) and Jerf al Ahmar (Stordeur et al., 2000). Practices at these sites most frequently involve cranial removal and the burial of isolated skulls.
Animals and inequality in Chalcolithic central Anatolia
2012, Journal of Anthropological ArchaeologyCitation Excerpt :The presence of infant burials with rich grave goods including multiple vessels, stamp seals, and elaborate jewelry, and others with only a single sherd indicates that some households had the ability to invest significant amounts of material goods in the context of funerary ritual, whereas others did not. Moreover, the presence of nineteen plastered and painted skulls, elaborate figurines and a recently discovered wall painting, indicate a prominent role for ritual within this community (Ozbek, 2009; Öztan, 2010). That several of the plastered skulls present evidence for trauma also suggests levels of interpersonal violence previously unidentified in the region but which are now being corroborated from other finds in EC Anatolian communities (Bonogofsky, 2005; Kansa, 2009).
Structural properties and electron spin resonance (ESR) dose estimations of fossil cow tooth enamel from Köşk Höyük, Turkey
2023, Radiation and Environmental Biophysics