Original Study
The 4-DSD: A New Tool to Assess Delirium Superimposed on Moderate to Severe Dementia

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2021.02.029Get rights and content

Abstract

Objectives

The purpose of this study was to create, standardize, and validate a new instrument, named 4-DSD, and determine its diagnostic accuracy in the diagnosis of delirium in subjects with moderate to severe dementia.

Design

Multicenter cross-sectional observational study.

Setting and Participants

Older patients consecutively admitted to acute and rehabilitation hospital wards.

Measures

The DSM-5 was used as the reference standard delirium assessment. The presence and severity of dementia was defined using the AD8 and the Global Deterioration Scale (GDS). The 4-DSD is a 4-item tool that ranges from 0 to 12. Item 1 measures alertness, item 2 altered function, item 3 attention, and item 4 acute change or fluctuation in mental status.

Results

A total of 134 patients were included in the study. Most of the patients were enrolled in acute hospital wards (60%), with 40% in rehabilitation settings. A minority of the patients were categorized with moderate dementia, with a GDS score of 5 (4%). Most of the patients were in the moderate-severe stage with a GDS score ≤6 (77%); 19% were classed as severe, with a GDS score of 7. A 4-DSD cutoff score ≥5 had a sensitivity of 80% and specificity of 80% with a positive predictive value (PPV) of 67% and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 89%. In the subgroup with moderate-severe dementia (n = 108), the sensitivity and the specificity were 79% and 82%, respectively, with a PPV and NPV of 62% and 92%. In the subgroup with severe dementia (n = 26) the sensitivity was 82% and the specificity 56% with a PPV of 78% and a NPV of 63%.

Conclusions and Implications

The availability of a specific tool to detect delirium in patients with moderate-severe dementia has important clinical and research implications, allowing all health care providers to improve their ability to identify it.

Section snippets

Methods

This study was a multicenter cross-sectional study carried out from January 2017 to September 2019 in Italy. The local ethical committee approved the study (Protocol N: 32595–16). Patients consecutively admitted between Monday and Thursday to one rehabilitation setting and to 3 acute hospital wards were included in the study. Patients eligible for inclusion were aged 65 years and older, with moderate to severe dementia or suspected dementia, according to a Dementia Screening Interview (AD8)23

Results

A total of 134 patients were included in the study (Supplementary Table 1). The mean age was 85.32 ± 5.79 years and 60.45% were women (Table 1). Most patients were enrolled in the acute hospital wards (60%) and 40% in rehabilitation settings. A minority of the patients were categorized with moderate dementia, with a GDS score of 5 (3%). Most of the patients were in the moderate-severe stage with a GDS score of 6 (76.87%), and 26% were in the severe stage of dementia with a GDS score of 7. Most

Discussion

This study reports the performance of the 4-DSD, a new tool specifically designed to diagnose delirium in patients with moderate-severe dementia. A 4-DSD cutoff ≥5 had an overall good sensitivity and specificity. The performances of the 4-DSD in the subgroup with severe dementia showed a similar sensitivity but a lower specificity. The 4-DSD takes approximately 3 minutes to be administered.

To our knowledge, there are no tools specifically designed for the diagnosis of delirium in patients with

Conclusion and Implications

The present findings provide initial support for the use the 4-DSD, a new tool that might be used to assess delirium in patients with moderate to severe dementia admitted to acute medical and rehabilitation wards. The tool is relatively rapid to administer (approximately 3 minutes) and has good sensitivity and specificity to detect delirium in this group of patients. The availability of a specific tool to detect delirium in patients with preexisting dementia has important clinical and research

References (39)

  • A.B. Morandi et al.

    Delirium superimposed on dementia

    Eur Geriatr Med

    (2020)
  • K. Gibb et al.

    The consistent burden in published estimates of delirium occurrence in medical inpatients over four decades: A systematic review and meta-analysis study

    Age Ageing

    (2020)
  • D.M. Fick et al.

    Delirium superimposed on dementia: A systematic review

    J Am Geriatr Soc

    (2002)
  • A. Morandi et al.

    Delirium, dementia and in-hospital mortality: The results from the Italian Delirium Day 2016, a national multicenter study

    J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci

    (2019)
  • E. Grossi et al.

    Preliminary investigation of predictors of distress in informal caregivers of patients with delirium superimposed on dementia

    Aging Clin Exp Res

    (2020)
  • A. Morandi et al.

    Tools to detect delirium superimposed on dementia: A systematic review

    J Am Geriatr Soc

    (2012)
  • S.J. Richardson et al.

    Detecting delirium superimposed on dementia: Diagnostic accuracy of a simple combined arousal and attention testing procedure

    Int Psychogeriatr

    (2017)
  • The management of persistent pain in older persons

    J Am Geriatr Soc

    (2002)
  • H.A. Smith et al.

    The preschool confusion assessment method for the ICU: Valid and reliable delirium monitoring for critically ill infants and children

    Crit Care Med

    (2016)
  • Cited by (15)

    • Feasibility and potential of a bedside mini-EEG for diagnosing delirium superimposed on dementia

      2022, Clinical Neurophysiology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Because of this fluctuating clinical picture of a delirium in future studies, more extensive clinical examinations on the day of the EEG session, weighed by a multidisciplinary team, may improve the diagnostic classification of DSD. For instance, a recent study on the validation of the 4-DSD instrument (Morandi et al., 2021) used a more comprehensive approach as a reference standard for delirium, see also Table 1 in Richardson et al. (2017). To investigate the exact relation between disturbances in EEG and delirium as a fluctuating syndrome, a future research design should include both the general clinical picture of a DSD patient as well as the fluctuations in the behavioral symptoms of the delirium.

    • Knowing the Older Adult With Delirium Superimposed on Dementia

      2022, American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry
    • Identifying Delirium in Persons With Moderate or Severe Dementia: Review of Challenges and an Illustrative Approach

      2022, American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry
      Citation Excerpt :

      However, the psychometric properties of the 4-DSD varied by the severity of the cognitive impairment. For example sensitivity and specificity were 79% and 82%, respectively, in persons with moderate-severe dementia (n = 108), and a sensitivity of 82% and a specificity of 56% were observed in a group of older adults with severe dementia (n = 26).22 The 4-DSD has a relatively brief administration time (3 minutes).

    • Prevalence, Risk Factors, and Impact of Delirium on Hospitalized Older Adults With Dementia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

      2022, Journal of the American Medical Directors Association
      Citation Excerpt :

      Training regarding DSD diagnosis and care should be provided. Recent research evaluated good sensitivity and specificity for a new tool specific in DSD diagnosis.75 Although further research is needed to refine the tool, this may help improve and standardize DSD diagnosis.

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

    Author Contributions: Design (Morandi, Grossi, Lucchi, Cherubini, Mossello, Zambon); methods (all authors), subject recruitment (all), data collections (all authors), analysis and preparation of paper (all authors).

    Funding source: none.

    View full text