Review
Systematic Review of Interdisciplinary Interventions in Nursing Homes

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2013.02.005Get rights and content

Abstract

Background

The role of interdisciplinary interventions in the nursing home (NH) setting remains unclear. We conducted a systematic evidence review to study the benefits of interdisciplinary interventions on outcomes of NH residents. We also examined the interdisciplinary features of successful trials, including those that used formal teams.

Data Sources

Medline was searched from January 1990 to August 2011. Search terms included residential facilities, long term care, clinical trial, epidemiologic studies, epidemiologic research design, comparative study, evaluation studies, meta-analysis and guideline.

Study Selection

We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the efficacy of interdisciplinary interventions conducted in the NH setting.

Measurements

We used the Cochrane Collaboration tools to appraise each RCT, and an RCT was considered positive if its selected intervention had a significant positive effect on the primary outcome regardless of its effect on any secondary outcome. We also extracted data from each trial regarding the participating disciplines; for trials that used teams, we studied the reporting of various team elements, including leadership, communication, coordination, and conflict resolution.

Results

We identified 27 RCTs: 7 had no statistically significant effect on the targeted primary outcome, 2 had a statistically negative effect, and 18 demonstrated a statistically positive effect. Participation of residents’ own primary physicians (all 6 trials were positive) and/or a pharmacist (all 4 trials were positive) in the intervention were common elements of successful trials. For interventions that used formal team meetings, presence of communication and coordination among team members were the most commonly observed elements.

Conclusion

Overall interdisciplinary interventions had a positive impact on resident outcomes in the NH setting. Participation of the residents’ primary physician and/or a pharmacist in the intervention, as well as team communication and coordination, were consistent features of successful interventions.

Section snippets

Search Strategies

A comprehensive MEDLINE search was performed for articles published between January 1990 and August 2011. MeSH search terms included residential facilities, long term care, clinical trial, epidemiologic studies, epidemiologic research design, comparative study, evaluation studies, meta-analysis, and guideline. Two reviewers (A.N. and M.T.) reviewed the titles and abstracts to exclude irrelevant studies. The remaining articles were retrieved, and those not meeting the inclusion criteria were

Results

The initial search led to a total of 4841 citations. Figure 1 describes the detailed process for selecting the final pool of 27 articles.

Table 1 describes basic characteristics of these trials, various disciplines that were included in the intervention, and the outcomes of these trials. Only RCTs were included, and among these, cluster randomization was the most common design. Fourteen studies received an A and others received a B quality rating. Ten trials were performed in the United States,

Discussion

This review summarizes the trials that used interdisciplinary interventions in the NH setting and documents team elements in trials that used team care. The overall success rate for the NH trials included in this review was positive, with 66% of the trials successfully affecting the primary outcome. Interdisciplinary interventions have also yielded convincing outcomes in other health care settings, in acute care, for example, team assessments have been shown to shorten the length of patient

Conclusion

This review provides an overview of NH RCTs that used interdisciplinary interventions, 12 of which used formal team meetings. Most of the studied trials were positive. All interventions that included residents’ primary PCPs and/or a pharmacist had positive outcomes. For trials that used formal team-based care, communication, coordination, and leadership were consistent features of successful interventions. This review identifies future areas of research for enhancing impact of interdisciplinary

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge the assistance of Thomas W. Emmett, MD, MLS, at the Ruth Lilly Medical Library, Indiana University School of Medicine for his assistance with devising and executing the search strategy for this review.

References (57)

  • M.J. Rantz et al.

    Getting the basics right. Care delivery in nursing homes

    J Gerontol Nurs

    (2003)
  • S.R. Counsell et al.

    Geriatric Resources for Assessment and Care of Elders (GRACE): A new model of primary care for low-income seniors

    J Am Geriatr Soc

    (2006)
  • M.A. Boustani et al.

    Implementing innovative models of dementia care: The Healthy Aging Brain Center

    Aging Ment Health

    (2011)
  • S.R. Counsell et al.

    Effects of a multicomponent intervention on functional outcomes and process of care in hospitalized older patients: A randomized controlled trial of Acute Care for Elders (ACE) in a community hospital

    J Am Geriatr Soc

    (2000)
  • G. Ellis et al.

    Comprehensive geriatric assessment for older adults admitted to hospital: Meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

    BMJ

    (2011)
  • D.E. Yeatts et al.

    Self-managed work teams in nursing homes: Implementing and empowering nurse aide teams

    Gerontologist

    (2004)
  • S.M. Shortell et al.

    Organizational assessment in intensive care units (ICUs): Construct development, reliability, and validity of the ICU nurse-physician questionnaire

    Med Care

    (1991)
  • H. Temkin-Greener et al.

    Measuring interdisciplinary team performance in a long-term care setting

    Med Care

    (2004)
  • R.A. Anderson et al.

    Nursing homes as complex adaptive systems: Relationship between management practice and resident outcomes

    Nurs Res

    (2003)
  • M. Ouwens et al.

    Integrated care programmes for chronically ill patients: A review of systematic reviews

    Int J Qual Health Care

    (2005)
  • S.G. Leggat

    Effective healthcare teams require effective team members: Defining teamwork competencies

    BMC Health Serv Res

    (2007)
  • J.P. Higgins et al.

    The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials

    BMJ

    (2011)
  • W.A. Ray et al.

    Prevention of fall-related injuries in long-term care: A randomized controlled trial of staff education

    Arch Intern Med

    (2005)
  • N. Kerse et al.

    Fall prevention in residential care: A cluster, randomized, controlled trial

    J Am Geriatr Soc

    (2004)
  • A.R. Huizing et al.

    A cluster-randomized trial of an educational intervention to reduce the use of physical restraints with psychogeriatric nursing home residents

    J Am Geriatr Soc

    (2009)
  • M.E. McMurdo et al.

    A randomized controlled trial of fall prevention strategies in old peoples' homes

    Gerontology

    (2000)
  • C.A. Dyer et al.

    Falls prevention in residential care homes: A randomised controlled trial

    Age Ageing

    (2004)
  • B.W. Rovner et al.

    A randomized trial of dementia care in nursing homes

    J Am Geriatr Soc

    (1996)
  • Cited by (83)

    • A Local COVID-19 Support Platform for Nursing Homes: Feedback and Perspectives

      2021, Journal of the American Medical Directors Association
    View all citing articles on Scopus

    A.N. was supported by a Health Resources and Services Administration, Geriatric Academic Career Award, Grant No. K01HP20517. A.N. acted independently in producing this manuscript and the sponsor had no impact on the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; and preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript. The sponsor did not influence the study design or analysis or the study conclusions.

    None of the authors have reported any conflicts of interest relevant to this manuscript. A.N., M.T., and M.B. participated in review of the selected titles and data extraction. K.U. and M.T. performed the study appraisals. All authors equally participated in the conception of the study design, methodology, analysis of results and manuscript preparation.

    View full text