Petrological and geochemical Highlights in the floating fragments of the October 2011 submarine eruption offshore El Hierro (Canary Islands): Relevance of submarine hydrothermal processes
Introduction
In early October 2011, a submarine eruption started offshore the island of El Hierro (Canary Islands, Spain), 380 km WNW from the closest point of the Northwestern African Coast. This submarine eruption shows similar features to the one occurred between 1998 and 2001 in the Serreta Submarine Eruption, west of Terceira Island, in the Azores Archipelago (Gaspar et al., 2013).
The El Hierro eruption followed the migration to the south of the island of a seismic swarm (roughly 12,000 earthquakes of Richter Magnitude equal to or greater than 2.0, detected by the Spanish National Geographic Institute, IGN) that began on 17 July 2011, approximately 30 km northwards. On October 10, the signal of volcanic tremors appeared in the seismic records, indicating the likely onset of an eruption. Some authors point that the eruption started on October 10 (e.g. Marti et al., 2013a, Marti et al., 2013b). However, the first visible evidences of the eruption, specifically greenish and brownish colored spots, appeared on the ocean surface was on October 12 with the emergence of the first plumes reaching the surface (Troll et al., 2012, Meletlidis et al., 2012). The emission center was located at approximately 360 m below sea level and 3 km SSW from the most southerly point of the coast of the island. The evidences of the submarine eruption, namely the tremor signal and the emission of volcanic materials on the ocean surface, disappeared by March 2012 and on 5 March 2012, the eruption was officially declared stopped. Nevertheless, visual evidences point to the persistence, until today, of continued emissions of gas bubbles from the seafloor in the eruptive area. This eruptive process caused a significant impact on the marine ecosystem resulting in relevant changes among them, thermal increase of the seawater, acidification, deoxygenation and metal-enrichment (Fraile-Nuez et al., 2012).
Following the onset of the submarine eruption, abundant dark fragments resembling volcanic bombs appeared floating on the ocean surface. Previous works have already established the dual nature of such bombs (Troll et al., 2012, Carracedo et al., 2012, Rodriguez-Losada et al., 2012a, Rodriguez-Losada et al., 2012b, Rodriguez-Losada et al., 2012c). These fragments, popularly known as “restingolitas” after being named by the amateur association “Actualidad Volcanica de Canarias (AVCAN)”, were first seen at approximately 3 km SSW of the coastal village of La Restinga, located in the southern tip of the island. The fragments (Fig. 1) are 10–20 cm long in its major axis, having a low bulk density (roughly 0.6 MG/m3), and being composed of two different materials: a grayish-white to white glass, hereafter referred to as White Foamy Core (WFC) and a thin (1 cm or less) glassy Dark Crust (hereafter DC) that covers WFC. Mingling between both materials, with very net limits, can be observed. Ductile deformations are clearly seen in WFC with strong convolutions, engulfing part of DC in ductile conditions (Fig. 1). Regarding the WFC, there is an antecedent in the previous subaerial volcanic eruption of Teneguía volcano (La Palma Island) in October 1971. In that eruption, fragments of rhyolite–trachyte pumice were found among the basaltic pyroclastics thrown out during the explosive phases of the Teneguia volcano. It was proposed that these pumices were produced by remelting of an acid phase in a subvolcanic complex extended underneath the La Palma Island (Araña and Ibarrola, 1973).
In the case described in this paper and after approximately three weeks of eruptive activity, the floating fragments did not longer contain the WFC, being entirely basanitic “lava balloons”, some exceeding 1 m in size. Studies on the volatile content of the mafic magmas emitted in this eruption have revealed that in this submarine eruption the volatile concentrations were among the highest ever measured in magmas of oceanic islands (Longpré et al., 2013).
In this work, we attempt to evaluate the intriguing differences between WFC and DC, both constituents of the floating fragments appeared in the early stages of the eruption and previous to the late appearance of the basanitic lava balloons not studied in this work. Additionally, we analyze the concentration of uranium (U) and thorium (Th) in the fragments relative to those obtained for a large set of Canarian volcanic rocks (Aparicio et al., 2003, Hernandez et al., 2011).
There are experimental, geochemical, and field evidences associating U and Th contents with the type of igneous rock. Both uranium and thorium are incompatible elements (low partition coefficients); hence they remain in the melt relative to exsolved magmatic fluids (Brenan et al., 1995, Keppler and Wyllie, 1990, Peiffert et al., 1996). The partition coefficient is typically lower in U than in Th and consequently, its degree of incompatibility greater (Ahrens, 1995, LaTourrette and Burnett, 1992, Feigenson et al., 1996, among others). Since U has more tendency than Th to remain in the melt, it may be expected a differential enrichment of U over Th in the glass resulting from the cooling of the melt (Zielinsky, 1981, Leroy and George-Aniel, 1992, Cuney and Kyser, 2009, Dostal and Capedri, 1975).
Studies of many volcanic systems (e.g. Castor and Henry, 2000) show that U and Th concentrations in volcanic rocks increase with differentiation to more felsic compositions. High U concentrations in felsic rocks exceed 9 ppm, with some exceeding 20 ppm; high Th concentrations are above 20 ppm, and some more than 40 ppm. In this regard, the felsic rocks constitute potential sources of uranium (Maithani and Srinivasan, 2011). Other studies (Cuney and Kyser, 2009) point to high U concentrations in peralkaline volcanic rocks, but high values are also found in alkali rhyolites, metaluminous rhyolites, and some calc-alkaline tuffs (Castor and Henry, 2000). On the contrary, midocean ridge basalts typically contain 0.2 ppm of U (Kelemen et al., 2004).
Section snippets
Geological setting
As the magma extruded on the seafloor, it is likely that this magma interacted with volcano-sedimentary layers beneath the volcano (Troll et al., 2012). This interaction might be responsible of the special characteristics of the “restingolitas”, and hence it is important to understand the geological evolution of the island of El Hierro, but also the ocean floor underneath.
The island of El Hierro has a surface of 278 km2 and a maximum altitude of 1501 amsl, being the youngest and situated most
Data analysis and results
Basic physical properties, as well as geochemical major and trace elements were analyzed on six samples collected from the eruptive episodes occurred in the last week of October 2011. Many of the floating pieces were taken from the seasurface by fishermen. Occasionally, these fishermen sold the pieces for the price of several hundred euros. The Spanish oceanographic vessel Ramon Margalef reached the eruptive area long after the appearance of the first floating fragments. This restricted number
Isotopic geochemistry
One of the most controversial aspects of the restingolites concerns the origin of its rhyolitic portion (WFC). In this regard, we have focused the isotopic study of the WFC samples in order to estimate the origin of this part of the restingolite and contribute to clarify their relationship with the dark crust (DC). Consequently, the analysis has been carried out to try to discriminate between rhyolitic magma type S or type I. To this goal, It has been emphasized the importance of oxygen isotope
Discussion and conclusions
Despite the volcanic tremor onset on October 10th, we strongly disagree with this date as the one for the onset of the submarine volcanic eruption. The indirect inference for the beginning of the eruption on October 10 is not well supported by the visual evidences that occurred on October 12. The conclusion that the eruption began on October 10 is, in our opinion, a hasty and poorly evidenced conclusion. The only direct evidence of eruption was visible on October 12, two day after the tremor
Acknowledgements
This work was partly funded by the Spanish Nuclear Safety Council through the Project PR 32960 and the Canarian Government projects SolSubC200801000243 and geologic stability. We are also grateful to Antonio Álvarez Diaz for providing rock samples.
References (46)
- et al.
Volcanic complexes in the eastern ridge of the Canary Islands: the Miocene activity of the island of Fuerteventura
J. Volcanol. Geoth. Res.
(1996) - et al.
Rhyolitic pumice in the basaltic pyroclasts from the 1971 eruption of Teneguía volcano, Canary Islands
Lithos
(1973) - et al.
Mineral-aqueous fluid partitioning of trace-elements at 900 °C and 2.0 gPa – constraints on the trace-element chemistry of mantle and deep-crustal fluids
Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta
(1995) - et al.
Geology, geochemistry, and origin of volcanic rock-hosted uranium deposits in northwestern Nevada and southeastern Oregon, USA
Ore Geol. Rev.
(2000) - et al.
Partition coefficients of uranium for some rock-forming minerals
Chem. Geol.
(1975) - et al.
Offshore continuation of volcanic rift zones, El Hierro, Canary Islands
J. Volcanol. Geoth. Res.
(2001) - et al.
Crustal structure of northern Gran Canaria, Canary Islands, deduced from active seismic tomography
J. Volcanol. Geoth. Res.
(2002) - et al.
Experimental determination of U and Th partitioning between clinopyroxene and natural and synthetic basaltic liquid
Earth Planet. Sci. Lett.
(1992) - et al.
Volcanism and uranium mineralizations: the concept of source rock and concentration mechanism
J. Volcanol. Geoth. Res.
(1992) - et al.
Felsic volcanic rocks, a potential source of uranium – an Indian overview
Energy Proc.
(2011)
Uranium in granitic magmas: Part 2. Experimental determination of uranium solubility and fluid-melt partition coefficients in the uranium oxide-haplogranite-H2O-NaX (X = Cl, F) system at 770 °C, 2 kbar
Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta
The hydrothermally altered ankaramite basalts of Punta Poyata (Tenerife, Canary Islands)
J. Volcanol. Geoth. Res.
Fuentes mantélicas y evolución del volcanismo canario
Estud. Geol.
Geology and volcanology of La Palma and El Hierro, Western Canaries
Estud. Geol.
The ongoing volcanic eruption of El Hierro, Canary Islands
Eos Trans. AGU
Constraints on partial melting imposed by rare earth element variations in Manna Kea basalts
J. Geophys. Res.
The submarine volcano eruption at the island of El Hierro: physical–chemical perturbation and biological response
Sci. Rep.
Cited by (11)
Silicic frothy xenoliths (xeno-pumice) in recent volcanics from Gran Canaria, Canary Islands
2023, Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal ResearchA micro-Raman and X-ray study of erupted submarine pyroclasts from El Hierro (Spain) and its' astrobiological implications
2019, Life Sciences in Space ResearchCitation Excerpt :The existence of the quartz on the sample has to be cautiously addressed given the several relevant hypotheses that need to be considered. On one hand, Rodriguez-Losada et al. (2015) proposed that it is possible to find examples of Canarian volcanic rocks that contain quartz and jasper. The jasper veins inside the small quartz cavities were found in other eruptions from the Canary Islands, where the mineralization was the result of hydrothermal mineralization from the interaction of hydrothermal fluids, ambient sea water and different cooling rates (Rodrı́guez-Losada et al., 2000).
Ambient noise tomography of El Hierro island (Canary Islands)
2023, Frontiers in Earth SciencePast, Present and Future Volcanic Activity on El Hierro
2023, Active Volcanoes of the WorldCharacterizing regional radon-in-air levels in rocks of the Canary Islands (Spain): new data and results
2022, Environmental Geochemistry and Health