We sought to determine the usefulness of brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) measurements to differentiate constrictive pericarditis (CP) from restrictive cardiomyopathy (RCMP).
Background
The differentiation of CP from RCMP may be clinically difficult and often requires hemodynamic assessment. No laboratory marker has been shown to differentiate the two conditions.
Methods
We measured BNP levels in 11 patients suspected of having either CP or RCMP. All patients had hemodynamic assessment the day of BNP measurements.
Results
Six patients had CP and five patients had RCMP based on established hemodynamic criteria. Both CP and RCMP patients had similar elevation in intracardiac pressures. Despite similar pressures, the mean plasma BNP levels were significantly higher in RCMP compared to CP (825.8 ± 172.2 pg/ml vs. 128.0 ± 52.7 pg/ml, p < 0.001, respectively).
Conclusions
The BNP levels are significantly elevated in RCMP compared to CP patients; BNP may prove to be a useful noninvasive marker for the differentiation of the two conditions.
Abbreviations and Acronyms
BNP
brain natriuretic peptide
CP
constrictive pericarditis
LAP
left atrial pressure
LVEDP
left ventricular end-diastolic pressure
PAP
pulmonary artery pressure
PCWP
pulmonary capillary wedge pressure
RAP
right atrial pressure
RCMP
restrictive cardiomyopathy
Cited by (0)
This study was supported by a generous donation from the Charles and Lee Finkl Amyloidosis Foundation.