The impact of object size and rigidity on infant reaching
Introduction
The emergence of reaching for objects is an important milestone in motor and cognitive development of infants during their first 6 months of life (Corbetta, 1998; Thelen, Corbetta, Spencer, Schneider, & Zernicke, 1993). From acquiring and improving this skill, infants learn to interact with the environment and consequently become capable of adjusting their movements so that they can reach the target more accurately.
Studies have shown that purposeful reaching emerge at around the third to fourth month of age in healthy infants, and once it is acquired, such skill is continuously improved (von Hofsten, 1979, von Hofsten, 1984, Thelen et al., 1996). This process involves many different changes in arm movements. For instance, infants begin to perform reaching movements followed by grasping (Newman, Atkinson, & Braddick, 2001; Savelsbergh & van Der Kamp, 1994; Thelen & Spencer, 1998), and their reaches become smoother, straighter and accurate (Fallang, Saugstad, & Hadders-Algra, 2000; von Hofsten, 1991; Konczak & Dichgans, 1997; Thelen et al., 1996).
To better understand the changes in reaching movements, it seems necessary to take account of the environmental factors, since they are essential to comprehend the complexity as well as the adaptability of infant organisms. According to Gibson (1986), hand movements toward the object are modulated by affordances, that is, action possibilities available in the environment to the organism. As motor skills develop, infants become capable of perceiving new affordances, which, in turn, make new actions possible (Adolph, Eppler, & Gibson, 1993; Gibson, 1995). This perception–action cycle is, therefore, essential to infants acquire and improve functional actions, such as reaching for objects (Barela, 2001, Gibson, 1986; Gibson & Pick, 2000; von Hofsten, 2004).
Some studies have investigated the improvement of reaching concerning the influences of object physical properties. Newell, Scully, McDonald, and Baillargeon (1989) and Newell, McDonald, and Baillargeon (1993) showed that 4–5-month-old infants performed one-handed reaching for small objects and two-handed reaching for large objects. Corbetta, Thelen, and Johnson (2000) verified that object size and rigidity affected adjustments of proximal (one-or-two handed reaching) as well as distal movements (grasping) in 8–9-month-old infants. Pryde et al. (1998) demonstrated that objects of different sizes influenced spatio-temporal variables of reaching in 9–10-year-olds, suggesting that small objects require more corrections at the end of the trajectory.
Although the literature presents data regarding the impact of object properties on infant reaching in different age groups, no research has investigated whether distinct physical properties can influence kinematic characteristics of reaching in young infants. The aim of the current study, therefore, was to verify how size and rigidity might affect spatio-temporal variables of reaching in 4–6-month-old infants and how this might change over age.
To meet the objectives of this study, two hypotheses were tested. First, given that infants can improve their abilities to act on affordances throughout their development, we predict that spatio-temporal variables of reaching will change between 4 and 6 months of age, when reaching trajectory will be straighter, faster, and with fewer corrections. Second, given that infants are capable of adjusting proximal and distal arm movements when reaching for objects of distinct physical properties, we predict that spatio-temporal variables will change according to size and rigidity. Moreover, reaching trajectory will be less straight, slower, and more corrections will be required for both small and rigid objects. This hypothesis is based on the assumption that reaching for small objects requires more accuracy, control and coordination of arms (Brandão, 1984; Pryde et al., 1998), and that young infants have difficulty grasping rigid objects (Corbetta et al., 2000). In summary, we believe that the infants will change spatio-temporal variables of their reaches as they perceive the object affordances and become able to coordinate their movements based upon perception–action coupling.
This study may provide further information about which factors might influence reaching, thus contributing towards a better understanding of the complexity and adaptability of infant movements concerning the manipulation of object physical properties. Moreover, our findings may be applied to the clinical practice of professionals who work in the field of infant development.
Section snippets
Participants
Four healthy fullterm infants (two boys and two girls) participated in this study. The infants were born at a mean gestational age of 39 weeks, range 38–41 weeks, and all of them had an Apgar score of at least 9 after 5 min. The birthweights of the infants were appropriate for gestational age with a mean weight of 3501 g (S.D. = 0.27). The infants were evaluated longitudinally at the ages of 4 (M = 4 months and 1 day; S.D. = 4 days), 5 (M = 5 months and 1 day; S.D. = 1 day), and 6 months (M = 5 months and 29
Results
Out of 214 reaching movements collected, seven were excluded because of crying, and 19 due to experimental errors (when infant began the arm movement with the hand close to the object, or when one of the markers was not picked up by one of the cameras for more than 10% of the total duration of the movement). Thus, 188 reaching movements were included in the analysis.
The effect of age on spatio-temporal variables and frequency of reaching
One of the objectives of this study was to investigate how spatio-temporal variables of reaching might change between 4 and 6 months of age. Our results indicated many different changes in reaching, which were reflected by the increase in linearity and movement velocity, the decrease in trajectory corrections, and the increase in frequency of reaching in relation to the number of times the objects were presented. These findings suggest that the infants improved their abilities to reach for
References (38)
Why do infants regress to two-handed reaching at the end of the 1st year?
Infant Behavior and Development
(1998)- et al.
Motor constraints on the development of perception-action matching in infant reaching
Infant Behavior & Development
(2000) Linked proximal and distal changes in the reaching behavior of 5-to 12-month-old human infants grasping objects of different sizes
Infant Behavior & Development
(2000)- et al.
A flexible software for tracking of markers used in human motion analysis
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
(2003) - et al.
The development of postural response patterns during reaching in healthy infants
Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews
(1998) - et al.
Prehension in children and adults: The effects of object size
Human Movement Science
(1998) - et al.
The effect of body orientation to gravity on early infant reaching
Journal of Experimental Child Psychology
(1994) - et al.
Postural control during reaching in young infants: A dynamic systems approach
Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews
(1998) - Adolph, K. E., Eppler, M. A., & Gibson, E. J. (1993). Development of perception of affordances. Advances in infancy...
Ciclo de percepção-ação no desenvolvimento motor
Desenvolvimento psicomotor da mão
Utilização do sistema Dvideow na análise cinemática do alcance manual de lactentes [Utilization of the Dvideow system in kinematic analysis of infants’ reaching movements]
Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy
The developmental origins of bimanual coordination: A dynamic Perspective
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance
Age changes in interlimb coupling and the development of bimanual coordination
Journal of Motor Behavior
Goal directed reaching and postural control in supine position in healthy infants
Behavioural Brain Reseach
The development of postural adjustments during reaching in 6 to 8 month-old infants
Experimental Brain Research
Principles of perceptual learning and development
The ecological approach to visual perception
Cited by (46)
Effects of visual and visual-haptic perception of material rigidity on reaching and grasping in the course of development
2021, Acta PsychologicaCitation Excerpt :It remains unclear whether this difference was due to more practice (as they made more such reaches) or whether it was driven by the material per se; however, it indicates that the infants did not understand the easier lifting of the object by the rigid handle. No other kinematic parameter was affected by material rigidity, which is comparable to the results of Rocha et al. (2006), who showed no influence of rigidity on reaching trajectories in 4- to 6-month-old infants. If significant differences in reaching kinematics between soft and rigid handles had occurred, it would have been likely that task difficulty would also differ between the materials.
Does late preterm birth impact trunk control and early reaching behavior?
2021, Infant Behavior and DevelopmentBrief reaching training with “sticky mittens” in preterm infants: Randomized controlled trial
2019, Human Movement ScienceCitation Excerpt :Proximal adjustments were coded as unimanual reach, when the infant reached for the toy with one hand, resulting in touch (Corbetta & Thelen, 1996; Cunha et al., 2013; Toledo et al., 2011), or bimanual reach, when the infant moved both hands simultaneously toward the toy, for at least 50% of the trajectory, with a difference less than or equal to 20 frames, resulting in touch. Only the hand that first touched the toy was considered for the analysis (Corbetta & Thelen, 1996; Cunha et al., 2013; Rocha, Silva, & Tudella, 2006; Toledo et al., 2011). Distal adjustments were coded considering hand opening at touch: open hand, when fingers were completely extended or slightly flexed; closed hand, when all fingers were completely flexed, or all fingers were completely flexed but one was extended regardless of extension degree; or semi-open hand, when the fingers were in an intermediate position in relation to open and closed hands (Soares et al., 2013).
Effect of the severity of manual impairment and hand dominance on anticipatory and compensatory postural adjustments during manual reaching in children with cerebral palsy
2018, Research in Developmental DisabilitiesCitation Excerpt :The beginning of the reaching was determined as the first displacement of the wrist marker towards the pen. The end of the reaching was determined as the frame that the hand touched the pen (Out, Van Soest, Savelsbergh, & Hopkins, 1998; Rocha et al., 2006). Subsequently, the synchronization frame of the beginning and end of the movement of reach was manually informed to a Matlab® script.
The Development of the Motor System
2018, The Neurobiology of Brain and Behavioral DevelopmentMaturational and situational determinants of reaching at its onset
2015, Infant Behavior and Development