The impact of object size and rigidity on infant reaching

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infbeh.2005.12.007Get rights and content

Abstract

Although the changes in kinematics of infant reaching have been studied, few researchers have investigated the improvement of reaching regarding objects of distinct physical properties. The aim of this longitudinal study was to verify the impact of object size and rigidity on the development of reaching in 4–6-month-old infants. Four infants were observed with a motion capture system during trials with four objects of distinct sizes and rigidity. A total of 188 reaches were analyzed by using the 3D movement reconstruction. Our results showed that reaching frequency, mean velocity, and straightness index increased with age. The number of movement units decreased with age and increased for small objects. Rigidity was not shown to affect reaching trajectories. These findings suggest that infants are capable of perceiving the more relevant object properties, thus using their available motor capabilities to modify the essential variables so that they can reach the target more accurately.

Introduction

The emergence of reaching for objects is an important milestone in motor and cognitive development of infants during their first 6 months of life (Corbetta, 1998; Thelen, Corbetta, Spencer, Schneider, & Zernicke, 1993). From acquiring and improving this skill, infants learn to interact with the environment and consequently become capable of adjusting their movements so that they can reach the target more accurately.

Studies have shown that purposeful reaching emerge at around the third to fourth month of age in healthy infants, and once it is acquired, such skill is continuously improved (von Hofsten, 1979, von Hofsten, 1984, Thelen et al., 1996). This process involves many different changes in arm movements. For instance, infants begin to perform reaching movements followed by grasping (Newman, Atkinson, & Braddick, 2001; Savelsbergh & van Der Kamp, 1994; Thelen & Spencer, 1998), and their reaches become smoother, straighter and accurate (Fallang, Saugstad, & Hadders-Algra, 2000; von Hofsten, 1991; Konczak & Dichgans, 1997; Thelen et al., 1996).

To better understand the changes in reaching movements, it seems necessary to take account of the environmental factors, since they are essential to comprehend the complexity as well as the adaptability of infant organisms. According to Gibson (1986), hand movements toward the object are modulated by affordances, that is, action possibilities available in the environment to the organism. As motor skills develop, infants become capable of perceiving new affordances, which, in turn, make new actions possible (Adolph, Eppler, & Gibson, 1993; Gibson, 1995). This perception–action cycle is, therefore, essential to infants acquire and improve functional actions, such as reaching for objects (Barela, 2001, Gibson, 1986; Gibson & Pick, 2000; von Hofsten, 2004).

Some studies have investigated the improvement of reaching concerning the influences of object physical properties. Newell, Scully, McDonald, and Baillargeon (1989) and Newell, McDonald, and Baillargeon (1993) showed that 4–5-month-old infants performed one-handed reaching for small objects and two-handed reaching for large objects. Corbetta, Thelen, and Johnson (2000) verified that object size and rigidity affected adjustments of proximal (one-or-two handed reaching) as well as distal movements (grasping) in 8–9-month-old infants. Pryde et al. (1998) demonstrated that objects of different sizes influenced spatio-temporal variables of reaching in 9–10-year-olds, suggesting that small objects require more corrections at the end of the trajectory.

Although the literature presents data regarding the impact of object properties on infant reaching in different age groups, no research has investigated whether distinct physical properties can influence kinematic characteristics of reaching in young infants. The aim of the current study, therefore, was to verify how size and rigidity might affect spatio-temporal variables of reaching in 4–6-month-old infants and how this might change over age.

To meet the objectives of this study, two hypotheses were tested. First, given that infants can improve their abilities to act on affordances throughout their development, we predict that spatio-temporal variables of reaching will change between 4 and 6 months of age, when reaching trajectory will be straighter, faster, and with fewer corrections. Second, given that infants are capable of adjusting proximal and distal arm movements when reaching for objects of distinct physical properties, we predict that spatio-temporal variables will change according to size and rigidity. Moreover, reaching trajectory will be less straight, slower, and more corrections will be required for both small and rigid objects. This hypothesis is based on the assumption that reaching for small objects requires more accuracy, control and coordination of arms (Brandão, 1984; Pryde et al., 1998), and that young infants have difficulty grasping rigid objects (Corbetta et al., 2000). In summary, we believe that the infants will change spatio-temporal variables of their reaches as they perceive the object affordances and become able to coordinate their movements based upon perception–action coupling.

This study may provide further information about which factors might influence reaching, thus contributing towards a better understanding of the complexity and adaptability of infant movements concerning the manipulation of object physical properties. Moreover, our findings may be applied to the clinical practice of professionals who work in the field of infant development.

Section snippets

Participants

Four healthy fullterm infants (two boys and two girls) participated in this study. The infants were born at a mean gestational age of 39 weeks, range 38–41 weeks, and all of them had an Apgar score of at least 9 after 5 min. The birthweights of the infants were appropriate for gestational age with a mean weight of 3501 g (S.D. = 0.27). The infants were evaluated longitudinally at the ages of 4 (M = 4 months and 1 day; S.D. = 4 days), 5 (M = 5 months and 1 day; S.D. = 1 day), and 6 months (M = 5 months and 29

Results

Out of 214 reaching movements collected, seven were excluded because of crying, and 19 due to experimental errors (when infant began the arm movement with the hand close to the object, or when one of the markers was not picked up by one of the cameras for more than 10% of the total duration of the movement). Thus, 188 reaching movements were included in the analysis.

The effect of age on spatio-temporal variables and frequency of reaching

One of the objectives of this study was to investigate how spatio-temporal variables of reaching might change between 4 and 6 months of age. Our results indicated many different changes in reaching, which were reflected by the increase in linearity and movement velocity, the decrease in trajectory corrections, and the increase in frequency of reaching in relation to the number of times the objects were presented. These findings suggest that the infants improved their abilities to reach for

References (38)

  • J.S. Brandão

    Desenvolvimento psicomotor da mão

    (1984)
  • R.P. Carvalho et al.

    Utilização do sistema Dvideow na análise cinemática do alcance manual de lactentes [Utilization of the Dvideow system in kinematic analysis of infants’ reaching movements]

    Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy

    (2005)
  • Coelho, Z. A. (2004). O impacto da informação ambiental no desenvolvimento do alcance em crianças nascidas a termo na...
  • D. Corbetta et al.

    The developmental origins of bimanual coordination: A dynamic Perspective

    Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

    (1996)
  • J. Fagard et al.

    Age changes in interlimb coupling and the development of bimanual coordination

    Journal of Motor Behavior

    (1997)
  • B. Fallang et al.

    Goal directed reaching and postural control in supine position in healthy infants

    Behavioural Brain Reseach

    (2000)
  • I.B.M. van der Fits et al.

    The development of postural adjustments during reaching in 6 to 8 month-old infants

    Experimental Brain Research

    (1999)
  • J.E. Gibson

    Principles of perceptual learning and development

    (1969)
  • J.J. Gibson

    The ecological approach to visual perception

    (1986)
  • Cited by (46)

    • Effects of visual and visual-haptic perception of material rigidity on reaching and grasping in the course of development

      2021, Acta Psychologica
      Citation Excerpt :

      It remains unclear whether this difference was due to more practice (as they made more such reaches) or whether it was driven by the material per se; however, it indicates that the infants did not understand the easier lifting of the object by the rigid handle. No other kinematic parameter was affected by material rigidity, which is comparable to the results of Rocha et al. (2006), who showed no influence of rigidity on reaching trajectories in 4- to 6-month-old infants. If significant differences in reaching kinematics between soft and rigid handles had occurred, it would have been likely that task difficulty would also differ between the materials.

    • Brief reaching training with “sticky mittens” in preterm infants: Randomized controlled trial

      2019, Human Movement Science
      Citation Excerpt :

      Proximal adjustments were coded as unimanual reach, when the infant reached for the toy with one hand, resulting in touch (Corbetta & Thelen, 1996; Cunha et al., 2013; Toledo et al., 2011), or bimanual reach, when the infant moved both hands simultaneously toward the toy, for at least 50% of the trajectory, with a difference less than or equal to 20 frames, resulting in touch. Only the hand that first touched the toy was considered for the analysis (Corbetta & Thelen, 1996; Cunha et al., 2013; Rocha, Silva, & Tudella, 2006; Toledo et al., 2011). Distal adjustments were coded considering hand opening at touch: open hand, when fingers were completely extended or slightly flexed; closed hand, when all fingers were completely flexed, or all fingers were completely flexed but one was extended regardless of extension degree; or semi-open hand, when the fingers were in an intermediate position in relation to open and closed hands (Soares et al., 2013).

    • Effect of the severity of manual impairment and hand dominance on anticipatory and compensatory postural adjustments during manual reaching in children with cerebral palsy

      2018, Research in Developmental Disabilities
      Citation Excerpt :

      The beginning of the reaching was determined as the first displacement of the wrist marker towards the pen. The end of the reaching was determined as the frame that the hand touched the pen (Out, Van Soest, Savelsbergh, & Hopkins, 1998; Rocha et al., 2006). Subsequently, the synchronization frame of the beginning and end of the movement of reach was manually informed to a Matlab® script.

    • The Development of the Motor System

      2018, The Neurobiology of Brain and Behavioral Development
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text