Influence of tip defect and indenter shape on the mechanical properties determination by indentation of a TiB2–60%B4C ceramic composite
Highlights
► Instrumented indentation is used for determining the mechanical properties of TiB2–60%B4C. ► Berkovich, Vickers, Knoop and spherical indenters are employed. ► Methodology of Oliver and Pharr is applied considering the tip defect and the frame compliance. ► The tip defect is responsible of the indentation size effect (ISE) and connected to the magnitude of the ISE parameter. ► The elastic modulus and the Meyer hardness are 500 GPa and 20 GPa, respectively.
Introduction
Nowadays, the evaluation of the mechanical properties of materials is widely carried out by means of nanoindentation techniques, which allow a local determination of the elastic modulus and hardness in various types of materials, like metals [1], hard materials [2], cement [3] or biological samples such as bones [4]. However, to obtain consistent and exploitable values for the mechanical properties of these materials, very cautious calibrations of the instrument and of the displacement measurements are required. These mainly concern the adjustment of the frame compliance of the instrument [5], [6] and the correction of the contact area calculation [7], [8], [9].
With the objective of determining the mechanical behavior of a material at a macroscopic scale, nanoindentation is very useful and appropriate for homogeneous materials. However when the material is heterogeneous from a microstructural point of view or when it presents some defects like porosity or microcracks, nanoindentation could give results, which can vary to a large extent depending on the location of the indentation experiment [10], [11]. One way to avoid such a problem and reduce the standard deviation of the mechanical parameters values could be the application of higher loads, which can lead to the development of a plastic deformation volume large enough to represent the microstructure of the material.
For example, this can be achieved by instrumented indentation at a micrometric scale for which the load ranges between 1 and 20 N. But, at such scale of measurement under indentation, the problems related to the instrument calibration differ in comparison with nanoindentation. Indeed, the frame compliance term used to correct the indenter displacement by separating the contributions that arise from the material and from the deflection of the instrument, has no constant value [12], [13]. This could be due to the sample mounting system, indentation testing conditions, e.g. loading and unloading rate, dwell-time, multi-cycling test or simply it could result from the magnitude of the indentation loads [13].
As a consequence, the frame compliance must be taken into account as a free-parameter for each microindentation data analysis. On the contrary, at a microscopic scale, the indenter tip defect responsible of the variation of the contact area has been often and probably wrongly neglected regarding its size, in comparison with the indenter displacement values.
Thus, the objective of this work is the determination of consistent values of the elastic modulus and hardness of a TiB2–60% B4C massive ceramic material, which has a large volume fraction of pores. For this reason, microindentation tests using various indenter shapes have been conducted, in order to verify the convergence of the results obtained for the mechanical properties and to analyze the influence of the tip defect, since the indenters employed have different bluntness levels. Particularly, a Vickers indenter with a highly pronounced rounded tip, commonly used in this kind of experiments, is employed. For this indenter, the objective is twofold: on the one hand, it is important to show that, even if the indenter tip is highly blunted, it can be used to obtain consistent results. On the other hand, it is also important to demonstrate that the appropriate determination of both the elastic modulus and hardness requires the consideration of the tip defect.
The second indenter employed is a Berkovich type, which is the most widely used in nanoindentation. It has the advantage of being similar to the Vickers indenter, in the sense that the tip angle of the equivalent or effective conical indenter has the same value. The Berkovich indenter employed for this purpose has an indenter tip bluntness less than that of the Vickers indenter.
To confirm the methodology proposed in the present work, a low tip bluntness Knoop indenter is also used. In addition, the Knoop indenter presents some relevant differences in comparison with the Vickers and Berkovich ones. For example, the tip angle of the equivalent conical indenter has a higher value [14]. Moreover, it is recognized that under the same applied load, both the indenter displacement and plastic deformation zone size obtained with the Knoop indenter are significantly less than those obtained with the Vickers and Berkovich indenters [15]. These three types of indenters are classified as pyramidal indenters. For this reason, a WC spherical indenter was also employed. For this indenter, the contact theory and associated mathematical development for the determination of the elastic modulus and hardness are totally different in comparison with the diamond pyramidal indenters.
As a main result, it has been confirmed that, independently of the indenter shape and magnitude of the tip defect, the consideration of the latter as well as the frame compliance of the instrument, into the indentation data analysis is absolutely necessary for determining reliable values of the elastic modulus and hardness of the massive TiB2–60% B4C ceramic material, i.e. 490 GPa and 20 GPa, respectively.
Section snippets
Instrumented indentation analysis
By analyzing the unloading part of a load–depth curve obtained by instrumented indentation, Oliver and Pharr [16] proposed the determination of the reduced modulus, ER, from the computation of the contact area, AC, and the compliance term of the sample, C, as follows:where ER is expressed as a function of the elastic modulus and Poisson's ratio of the material and of the indenter, Em, Ei, νm and νi, respectively. For a diamond indenter, Ei = 1140 GPa and νi = 0.07 [17]. Therefore, the
Material
The TiB2–60% B4C particulate composite material investigated in the present work was made by pulsed electric current sintering (PECS). The detailed description of the experiments has been presented elsewhere [32]. The sintered discs produced by PECS were sand blasted and had a thickness of 4 mm and a diameter of 30 mm. After a careful metallographic preparation, the average roughness of the sample achieved a value of ~ 0.1 μm. The complete characterization was performed using different methods such
Results and discussion
From an experimental point of view, the lowest maximum indentation load of 100 mN gives rise to Vickers and Berkovich indenters' displacements of around 300 nm. On the basis of the indent geometrical diagonal to depth ratio, which can be calculated from the half-angle of the tip indenters and based on the plastic zone radius to the indent diagonal ratio [35], the lowest diameter of the plastic deformation zone formed by a sharp indentation is found to be around 5 μm. This value is higher than the
Conclusions
As a main conclusion, the instrumented indentation at a microscopic scale is a valuable tool for determining the elastic modulus and hardness of a material if the frame compliance term is considered as a free-parameter and if the calculation of the contact area takes into account the tip defect. It has been shown that the same values for the mechanical properties can be obtained independently on the indenter shape. However, for the Knoop indenter, the maximum indenter displacement must be
Acknowledgements
Professor Puchi-Cabrera gratefully acknowledges the financial support of the Conseil Régional Nord-Pas de Calais, France, through the International Chair program 2011 and Professor Staia acknowledges the financial support from Ghent University (BOF).
References (42)
- et al.
Hardness and elastic modulus gradients in plasma-nitrided 316 L polycrystalline stainless steel investigated by nanoindentation tomography
Acta Mater
(2012) - et al.
Modeling to evaluate the contact areas of hard materials during the nano-indentation tests
Sens Actuator A Phys
(2008) - et al.
Determination by nanoindentation of elastic modulus and hardness of pure constituents of Portland cement clinker
Cement Concr Res
(2001) - et al.
Nanoindentation discriminates the elastic properties of individual human bone lamellae under dry and physiological conditions
Bone
(2002) - et al.
Improvement in depth-sensing indentation to calculate the universal hardness on the entire loading curve
Mech Mater
(2008) - et al.
Effect and measurement of the machine compliance in the macro range of instrumented indentation test
Measurement
(2010) - et al.
Single crystal bulk material micro/nano indentation hardness testing by nanoindentation instrument and AFM
Mater Sci Eng A
(2007) - et al.
The effect of tip radius on nano-indentation hardness tests
Int J Solids Struct
(1995) - et al.
Influence of porosity on the mechanical properties of microporous β-TCP bioceramics by usual and instrumented Vickers microindentation
J Eur Ceram Soc
(2011) - et al.
Effects of intra-crystalline microcracks on the mechanical behavior of a marble under indentation
Int J Rock Mech Min Sci
(2012)
Critical review of analysis and interpretation of nano-indentation test data
Surf CoatTechnol
Influence of visco-elasto-plastic properties of magnetite on the elastic modulus: multicyclic indentation and theoretical studies
Mater Chem Phys
Analysis of data from various indentation techniques for thin films intrinsic hardness modelling
Thin Solid Films
Elastic analysis of some punch problems for layered medium
Int J Solids Struct
Computational modeling of the forward reverse problems in instrumented sharp indentation
Acta Mater
Three-dimensional numerical simulation of Vickers indentation tests
Int J Solids Struct
On the contact area for nanoindentation tests with Berkovich indenter: case study on soda-lime glass
Mater Lett
Prediction of bluntness for pyramidal indenters from nanoindentation curves
Surf Coat Techno
Microstructure and mechanical properties of pulsed electric current sintered B4C–TiB2composites
Mater Sci Eng A
Nanoindentation with a Knoop indenter
Thin Solid Films
A dual conical indentation technique based on FEA solutions for property evaluation
Mech Mater
Cited by (27)
On the efficiency of the “effective truncation length” of indenter tip in mechanical property determination with nanoindentation tests
2020, Materials Today CommunicationsA universal function for the description of nanoindentation unloading data: Case study on soda-lime glass
2020, Journal of Non-Crystalline SolidsElasto – Plastic materials behavior evaluation according to different models applied in indentation hardness tests
2019, Measurement: Journal of the International Measurement ConfederationInstrumented indentation study of slag in view of a better valorization
2019, Construction and Building MaterialsCitation Excerpt :It is also interesting to point out that the drop of HM observed around 50 μm in Fig. 11b, is obviously related to the pop-in observed at the same penetration depth (Fig. 11a). Between 0 and 5 μm, the hardness variation is connected to a rough approximation of the contact area due to the influence of the indenter tip defect [7]. Between 5 and 20 μm, the high hardness values and succeeding decrease are linked to different phenomena.