Integration of logistics outsourcing decisions in a green supply chain design: A stochastic multi-objective multi-period multi-product programming model

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2016.08.031Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Integration of some critical Supply Chain Management issues in the green supply chain design.

  • Suggestion of constructive models to roughly estimate logistics costs and carbon emissions.

  • An example of stochastic plan is provided to capture different business uncertainties.

  • An Epsilon-constraint algorithm leads to a set of Pareto optimal green configurations, with optimal levels of logistics outsourcing.

Abstract

This paper develops a programming model, which combines logistics outsourcing decisions with some strategic Supply Chains’ planning issues, such as the Security of supplies, the customer Segmentation, and the Extended Producer Responsibility. The purpose is to minimize both the expected logistics cost and the Green House Gas (GHG) emissions of the Supply Chain (SC) network, in the context of business environment uncertainty. First, we define a general structure of the closed-loop SC. Second, we provide constructive models to roughly estimate the insourcing and outsourcing logistics costs, and their corresponding GHG emissions. Third, we establish a stochastic plan based on a scenarios approach to capture the uncertainty od demand, capacity of facilities, quantity and quality of returns of used products, and the transportation, warehousing, and reprocessing costs. Fourth, we suggest a programming model, and an algorithm based on the Epsilon-constraint method to solve it. The result is a set of optimal non-dominant green SC configurations, which provide the decision’ makers with optimal levels of logistics outsourcing integration within a decarbonized Supply Chain, before any further low-carbon investment.

Introduction

Supply Chains (SCs) involve Suppliers, Manufacturers, Distributors & Retailers, Consumers, and other partners such as Third-Party Logistics providers (3PLs) and Recyclers. Each link in a SC while adding value to the products, contributes to degradation of the natural environment; particularly by the climate change problem involvement (Dasaklis and Pappis, 2013). Therefore, the decisions regarding the activities performed by the mentioned actors will determine both the environmental and the economic performances of the SCs (Wang et al., 2011):

Concerning the environmental performance, Huang et al. (2009) have reported that more than 75% of the Green House Gases (GHG) emissions of many industry sectors come from their SCs. So, reducing those indirect GHG emissions may be more cost-effective for an industrial company, than reducing its direct GHG emissions (Montoya-Torres et al., 2015). In Browne et al. (2009), the World Economic Forum suggests thirteen effective strategies to decarbonize the SCs, and among the most effective ones: Improving the network logistics planning, through global optimization.

Concerning the economic performance, and according to 19th, and 17th annual 3PL studies of Langley & Capgemini (2015; 2013) the total of logistics expenditure of the eight largest industry sectors in the world is between 12% and 15% of the sale revenue, and about 40% of the global logistics activities is outsourced to the 3PLs. The most important logistics activities outsourced are freight transportation, warehousing, and reverse logistics. According to the authors, the logistics outsourcing, as a flexible strategy can reduce logistics costs by 10%, logistics fixed-asset by 15%, and inventory by 25%, if it is well defined by the focal company (FC). So, considering the possibility of 3PL integration within the SC is of great importance to minimize the costs, and reduce the business risks (Jayaram and Tan, 2010).

However, the 3PLs seem not undertake concrete sustainable initiatives vis-à-vis the energy efficiency, the GHG emissions, and the traffic congestion (Evangelistia et al. 2011; Blanco and Craig, 2009). For instance, the 3PLs tend to use a flexible routing network strategy, rather than a point-to-point strategy, to consolidate the freight of different customers (Hesse and Rodrigue, 2004). This can generate a lot of stops between different origins and destinations, hardly provoke traffic congestion, increase relatively the distances, and therefore raise the GHG emissions.

So, considering the potential economic efficiency of 3PLs, and their presumed environmental inefficiency, two main questions are raised in this paper:

  • Given that the freight transportation, warehousing, and reprocessing of reused product for the purpose of remanufacturing are not the FC's core activities, one of the most important decisions to be taken is whether or not outsourcing totally or partially such logistics activities to 3PLs, in the context of a green SC.

  • How does the optimality of GHG emissions of logistics activities, and corresponding logistics costs affect the configurations of a closed-loop SC network integrating 3PLs, in the context of business uncertainty?

The main contribution of the present paper is the suggestion of a more realistic programming model, which integrates logistics outsourcing decision within the closed-loop SC design network problem, in the context of business uncertainty. The model captures three important issues of the SC management: (1) The security of supplies, by considering the portfolio model of supplies (Kraljic, 1983); (2) the segmentation of market, for meeting the heterogeneous requirements of customers (Lee, 2002); and (3) the Extended Producer Responsibility for managing effectively the End of Life phase of products (Lindhqvist, 2000).

The objective is to minimize both the expected total logistics cost (e.g. Freight transportation; Warehousing; and Processing returns of used products), and the corresponding expected total GHG emissions, under the constraints of: (a) flow conservation, (b) fleet & facilities capacities, (c) opening of facilities, and (d) installing hybrid facilities, which may be leased and operated by FC, or owned and operated by 3PLs.

  • We provide three constructive models to make rough estimate of logistics costs and GHG emissions of logistics operations to be insourced or outsourced;

  • We suggest a stochastic plan, based on a scenarios approach (Pishvaee et al., 2008) to capture the uncertainty of demand, quantity and quality of returned products, and the variable costs of logistics operations; and

  • We suggest an algorithm based on Epsilon- Constraint method (Mavrotas, 2009), to solve the stochastic bi-objective, multi product, multi-period, and multi-echelon programming problem;

The solutions represent a set of non-dominant green SC configurations; which distinguish the logistics activities that should be performed in-house from those that should be outsourced.

The remainder of this paper is organized as follows. In Section 2, we provide a literature overview on the 3PL’ integration within SCs; and on the Green SC network design problem. In Section 3, we define the general structure of a closed-loop SC, and provide three constructive models to roughly estimate the fixed and variable costs, and the fixed and variable GHG emissions of different logistics operations. In Section 4, we present the modelling and solving approaches of the closed-loop SC design problem. Then, we discuss some managerial insights, which can be deducted from the implementation of an example of the model. Finally, in the Section 5 we draw the conclusion.

Section snippets

2.1. Logistics outsourcing

Third-Party logistics (3PL), is a company that works with shippers to manage their logistics operations. According to Bask (2001), it may offer three distinguished services:

  • Routine services which include all types of basic transportation and warehousing;

  • Standard services which contain some easy customized operations like special transportation where products need to be cooled, heated or moved in tanker trucks; and

  • Customized services which consist of different postponement services like light

3.1. General structure of the Closed-loop SC

The SC considered in this paper is an integrated forward/reverse logistics network, which organizes the upstream and downstream into specific subnetworks, according to the characteristics of supplies, the ownership of facilities, and the segmentation of deliveries and pickups. It is structured into 6 echelons:

Echelon1: Referring to the Bill of Materials (BOM), raw materials, components, packages, and accessories required to manufacture different products are categorized into four types of

4.1. Problem formulation

During a set of periods T (indexed tT), the focal company FC, which controls the whole closed loop SC described in the Section 3, desires optimizing its SC, by minimizing two objective functions:

  • Total expected logistics cost OBJ1 (1), and

  • Total expected logistics GHG emissions OBJ2 (2).

** Objective functions:

OBJ1: minimize Z

Z: Expected total logistics cost ($ US)
Z=Z1+Z2+Z3+Z4+Z5+Z6+Z7+Z8+Z9
Z1: Freight transport cost from suppliers to plants
Z2: Freight transport cost from plants to

5. Conclusion

The effective integration of 3PLs within a Supply Chain (SC) goes through the determination of an optimum level of logistics outsourcing, that results in high performances. In this paper, we integrate the logistics outsourcing decisions within the green SC network design, in the context of business environment uncertainty. Following a Scenarios-based approach, we suggest a stochastic, bi-objective, multi-period, and multi-product programming model, which integrates logistics outsourcing

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the comments of two anonym reviewers. The paper was supported financially by FiMIS laboratory of Laval university, Provincial government of Quebec, and LGIPM-Metz.

Lhoussaine Ameknassi, Bachelor in Mining Engineering from École Nationale de l′Industrie Minérale- Rabat/Morocco. He used to be a Production & Operations manager in a Ceramic tiles company for many years. He received his M.Sc. in Mechanical Engineering from Laval University of Quebec, and he is now a Ph.D. Candidate in Industrial Engineering. His interests of research are Mineral Processing Design & Optimization; Mine Design & Planning; Life Cycle Design; and Modelling & Solving Approaches in

References (69)

  • A. Hamdan et al.

    Evaluating the efficiency of 3PL logistics operations

    Int. J. Prod. Econ.

    (2008)
  • J. Hätönen et al.

    30+ years of research and practice of outsourcing–Exploring the past and anticipating the future

    Int. J. Manag.

    (2009)
  • M. Hesse et al.

    The transport geography of logistics and freight distribution

    J. Transp. Geogr.

    (2004)
  • A. Hoff et al.

    Industrial aspects and literature survey: Fleet composition and routing

    Comput. Oper. Res.

    (2010)
  • H.I. Hsiao et al.

    Classification of logistics outsourcing levels and their impact on service performance: Evidence from the food processing industry

    Int. J. Prod. Econ.

    (2010)
  • S.C.H. Leung et al.

    A robust optimization model for a cross-border logistics problem with fleet composition in an uncertain environment

    Math. Comput. Model.

    (2002)
  • G. Mavrotas

    Effective implementation of the epsilon-constraint method in Multi-Objective Mathematical Programming problems

    Appl. Math. Comput.

    (2009)
  • H. Min et al.

    The dynamic design of a reverse logistics network from the perspective of third-party logistics service providers

    Int. J. Prod. Econ.

    (2008)
  • S.M.J. Mirzapour Al-e-hashem et al.

    A stochastic aggregate production planning model in a green supply chain: Considering flexible lead times, nonlinear purchase and shortage cost functions

    Eur. J. Oper. Res.

    (2013)
  • I. Nouira et al.

    Design of forward supply chains: Impact of a carbon emissions-sensitive demand

    Int. J. Prod. Econ.

    (2016)
  • M.S. Pishvaee et al.

    A stochastic optimization model for integrated forward/ reverse logistics network design

    J. Manuf. Syst.

    (2009)
  • M. Ramezani et al.

    A new multi-objective stochastic model for a forward/reverse logistic network design with responsiveness and quality level

    Appl. Math. Model.

    (2013)
  • Z. Sazvar et al.

    A bi-objective stochastic programming model for a centralized green supply chain with deteriorating products

    Int. J. Prod. Econ.

    (2014)
  • P.K. Shukla et al.

    On finding multiple Pareto-optimal solutions using classical and evolutionary generating methods

    Eur. J. Oper. Res.

    (2007)
  • M.A. Vonderembse et al.

    Designing Supply Chains: Towards theory development

    Int. J. Prod. Econ.

    (2006)
  • F. Wang et al.

    A Multi objective Optimization for Green Supply Chain Network Design

    Decis. Support Syst.

    (2011)
  • S. Webster et al.

    Competitive strategy in remanufacturing and the impact of take-back laws

    J. Oper. Manag.

    (2007)
  • Q. Yang et al.

    Are logistics outsourcing partners more integrated in a more volatile environment?

    Int. J. Prod. Econ.

    (2016)
  • A. Zakeri et al.

    Carbon pricing versus emission trading: A Supply Chain Planning Perspective

    Int. J. Prod. Econ.

    (2015)
  • H. Allaoui et al.

    Green Supply Chain: Challenges and opportunities

    Supply Chain Forum.: Int. J.

    (2013)
  • E.J. Anderson et al.

    What Drives the Choice of a Third-Party Logistics Provider?

    J. Supply Chain Manag.

    (2011)
  • M. Aravendan et al.

    Development and Comparison of Hybrid Genetic Algorithms for Network Design Problem in Closed Loop Supply Chain

    Intell. Inf. Manag.

    (2015)
  • T. Bäck et al.

    Evolutionary computation: Comments on the history and current state

    IEEE Trans. Evolut. Comput.

    (1997)
  • A.H. Bask

    Relationships among TPL providers and members of supply chains: A Strategic Perspective

    J. Bus. Ind. Mark.

    (2001)
  • Cited by (77)

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Lhoussaine Ameknassi, Bachelor in Mining Engineering from École Nationale de l′Industrie Minérale- Rabat/Morocco. He used to be a Production & Operations manager in a Ceramic tiles company for many years. He received his M.Sc. in Mechanical Engineering from Laval University of Quebec, and he is now a Ph.D. Candidate in Industrial Engineering. His interests of research are Mineral Processing Design & Optimization; Mine Design & Planning; Life Cycle Design; and Modelling & Solving Approaches in the context of Uncertainty.

    Daoud Ait-Kadi, Ph.D., M.Sc., Eng., is a full Professor in the department of Mechanical Engineering at Laval University of Quebec. He is the director of DESS program of Industrial Engineering at the university, and a founding member of several Consortia and Laboratories such as CIRRELET, CIRROD, FoRAC, and FiMIS. His research activities encompass Maintenance & Reliability of Systems; Reverse Engineering & Design for X; and Production & Operations Management in the context of Sustainable Development.

    Nidhal Rezg. Ph.D. in Industrial Automation from INSA-Lyon. He used to be an associate professor in School of Industrial Engineering at the University of Moncton in Canada. He is now a lecturer at the University of Paul Verlaine in Metz, and the director laboratory of Industrial Engineering & Production of Metz (LGIPM). His research activities focus on Maintenance and Reliability of systems; Management of Air Traffic & Hospital Systems, and Supply Chains Optimization.

    View full text