Safety and danger in downtown Vancouver: Understandings of place among young people entrenched in an urban drug scene
Introduction
Popular imaginings of young, homeless drug users are often informed by their use of public space. Whether because they are viewed as children in need of protection or criminals bent on destruction, drug-using, street-dwelling young people are overwhelmingly considered ‘out-of-place’ in the public spaces of urban centers (Scheper-Hughes and Hoffman, 1998; Hecht, 1998; Mitchell, 2003). Accordingly, public health and policy efforts to address the ‘street youth problem’ have consistently aimed to exclude, relocate or forcibly remove ‘deviant’ youth from public space (Caldeira, 2000; Sandberg and Pedersen, 2008; Connell, 2003; Moore, 2004b). These strategies largely ignore the contextual factors – such as neighborhood deprivation and disadvantage, and ongoing experiences of social and economic suffering among youth (Rhodes et al., 2005) – that operate to rapidly isolate and push them towards harmful drug use practices and homelessness, until it becomes difficult or impossible for them to avoid ‘risking risk’ (Mayock, 2005; Lovell, 2002; Mitchell, 2003).
However, there is a growing body of work that focuses on how young people understand and experience place in their everyday lives (Gigengack, 2000; Beazley, 2002; Rhodes et al., 2007), where place is defined as the intersection between social and physical spaces (Massey, 1994). This research has illustrated that rather than being somehow ‘placeless,’ young people living on the margins of social and physical spaces may possess a heightened understanding of and attachment to the landscapes they inhabit. Survival on the streets often means navigating the ‘geographies of power’ (Caldeira, 2000) that limit these young people's uses of public space, and enacting ‘geographies of resistance’ (Beazley, 2002) in response to institutionalized spatial marginalization. A focus on how young people experience, understand and navigate urban space – how they may be simultaneously in-place as well as out-of-place on the streets of urban centers (Moyer, 2004; Scheper-Hughes and Hoffman, 1998) – has highlighted the problematic institutions and structures that contribute to their continued marginalization, as well as the strategies or spatial tactics (De Certeau, 1984) that they employ in order to appropriate public space according to their own needs, priorities and desires (Moyer, 2004; Eugene, 1999). For example, work with street-entrenched youth in Indonesia has illustrated how state ideological discourse about family values and gender roles has been used to justify ‘clean up’ efforts aimed at forcibly removing young people – and particularly young women – from the streets of Yogyakarta (Beazley, 2002). However, this research also illustrates the ways in which these young women have succeeded in rejecting conventional gender roles through spatial tactics (e.g., occupying a city park) aimed at carving out relatively safe, ‘girl-only’ geographical niches in the city center. Similarly, work from Tanzania has discussed the disjuncture between a state-sponsored project of modernization and the presence of hundreds of young men living and working on the streets of Dar es Salaam, which results in the frequent arrest of these informal street-based entrepreneurs and the destruction of their make-shift street stalls. At the same time, this research has shown how young people's appropriation of ‘nowhere places’ (such as street corners, abandoned lots or stretches of roadside) in the pursuit of financial gain in fact constitutes a spatial tactic aimed at securing a place in the very same modernizing project endorsed by the state (Moyer, 2004).
In downtown Vancouver, Canada, a growing number of street-entrenched and drug-using youth have emerged in a residential and business center of the city known as the Downtown South. While it is difficult to enumerate this highly transient population (The McCreary Centre Society, 2007), a local youth shelter reports that between 500 and 1000 youth are without housing each night in the Greater Vancouver area (Covenant House Vancouver, 2009). In addition to lacking shelter, intensive drug use – including the use of crystal methamphetamine, heroin, cocaine and crack – and alarming rates of HIV and hepatitis C infection have also been documented in this population (Lloyd-Smith et al., 2008; Werb et al., 2008; Wood et al., 2008; Miller et al., 2005). Although various youth services are now situated in the Downtown South (e.g., clinics and drop-in centers), decision makers and advocacy groups continue to struggle to address the ‘street youth problem’ in this setting (The McCreary Centre Society, 2002). To date, enforcement, arrest and removal of youth from public spaces have been the primary strategies aimed at this population, with a particular focus on ‘cracking down on’ the local drug scene.
Drug scenes have been described as inner-city areas characterized by high concentrations of drug users and drug dealing within a specific geographical area (Curtis and Wendel, 2000; Hough and Natarajan, 2000). These places vary considerably according to a number of factors, including the types of drugs available, who controls the sale of illicit substances, the specific locales in which drugs are sold and used, as well as the history of particular drug-use settings (Bourgois, 1996; Maher, 1997). Beyond drug procurement and dealing activities, everyday practices associated with securing basic necessities (e.g., meals, clean clothes, showers) as well as wider patterns of income generation activities are also embedded in the socio-spatial networks of these locales (Bourgois, 1996; Maher, 1997). As such, drug scenes powerfully shape drug use practices, the nature of social interactions between young people and range of social actors (including peers, older drug users, informal ‘street’ employers, police and service providers), as well as the formation of identity constructed and performed through spatial practices (De Certeau, 1984; Dovey et al., 2001; Butler, 1990; Robinson, 2000). Equally, these places are shaped by the practices and human interactions that take place within them.
In downtown Vancouver, the local drug scene (referred to by many youth as simply ‘down here’) is primarily comprised of two distinct neighborhoods: the Downtown South1 and the Downtown Eastside (Map 1). Although these areas are geographically adjacent (within 20–30 min walking distance of each other), they are generally conceptualized as two distinct urban neighborhoods. Among the general public, the boundary that exists between them is largely one of differential affluence; while the Downtown Eastside is widely recognized as Canada's poorest and most crime-ridden urban postal code (Strathdee et al., 1997; Wood et al., 2003), the Downtown South is a residential and entertainment district characterized by both high- and (limited) low-income housing and numerous thriving businesses. The respective drug-using populations within these neighborhoods are also distinct (although overlap exists); while the Downtown South is characterized by high rates of crystal methamphetamine sales and use primarily among youth (Bungay et al., 2006), the Downtown Eastside is characterized by a long-standing and well-established trade in crack cocaine, cocaine and heroin (Wood and Kerr, 2006). Furthermore, although the Downtown Eastside can accurately be characterized as a more ‘open’ drug scene in comparison to that of the Downtown South, in reality, a wide range of illicit substances are easily available on the streets of both locales. Both neighborhoods are characterized by thriving ‘shadow economies’ largely propelled by sex work activities, drug dealing and the exchange of stolen goods. The Downtown Eastside in particular has been subjected to intensive enforcement initiatives in recent years (Small et al., 2006), although police activities are also ongoing in the Downtown South (The McCreary Centre Society, 2002).
We undertook the present study in order to explore how youth who are currently ‘street-entrenched’ understand the physical and social landscape of the downtown drug scene in Vancouver's urban core. Given the geographical proximity of the Downtown South – a frequent destination for young people ‘at-risk’ – to the Downtown Eastside, there is a need to understand how young people experience and navigate these locales. Indeed, our observations indicate that many youth move frequently between the Downtown South and Downtown Eastside neighborhoods, whether on foot or via public bus (which they can often ride for free depending on the disposition of the driver). To date, however, the majority of research looking at the relationship between drug scene involvement and ‘risk’ among young people has largely focused on geographically confined inner-city areas characterized by ubiquitous ‘open’ drug use and crime – such as Vancouver's Downtown Eastside neighborhood (Bourgois et al., 2004; Bourgois, 1996; Small et al., 2005a, Small et al., 2005b, Small et al., 2006; Maher, 1997). The intersection between experiences of place and experiences of risk and harm among young people existing outside of or transcending the boundaries of these inner-city communities remains less well understood. Furthermore, the ways in which young people's ‘risk trajectories’ – the sequences of transitions experienced by young people in relation to drug use and risk over time (Hser et al., 2007; Elder, 1985) – are shaped by geographical transitions (whether across countries, regions or adjacent drug-using neighborhoods) have yet to be explored in-depth. Finally, a focus on the meanings attached to places – and how these meanings inform spatial practices – has important implications for the development of appropriate interventions for youth who experience significant vulnerability while trying to make their homes in Vancouver's urban core.
Section snippets
Methods
In order to explore how young people conceptualized the Downtown South and Downtown Eastside neighborhoods (as well as the relationship between them), we drew upon data from 38 in-depth individual interviews conducted from May to October 2008, as well as ongoing ethnographic fieldwork (e.g., observations and informal conversations with youth) conducted in both the Downtown South and Downtown Eastside.
Interviewees were recruited from within the At-Risk Youth Study (ARYS) cohort, a prospective
Results
Participants ranged from 16 to 26 years of age and included 18 women, 18 men and 2 transgender individuals. Sixty-seven percent of study participants were Caucasian, 28 percent self-identified as being of Aboriginal descent, and 5 percent were African Canadian. Half of interview participants reported being homeless at the time of the study, and the majority had experienced homelessness at some time over the course of their involvement with the local drug scene. The majority of participants
Evading danger: the Downtown Eastside as symbolic representation
Our results illustrate that, among study participants, a number of the perceived dangers that accompany prolonged drug scene involvement – including intensive involvement in the most problematic forms of drug use, risk of HIV and engagement in exploitative sex work – were all understood to be situated in Vancouver's Downtown Eastside neighborhood. Among youth, this neighborhood powerfully symbolized unsafety and the inevitable physical, psychological and moral ‘demise’ of young people who ‘end
Discussion
In sum, our results build on previous work to emphasize how marginal places like the Downtown Eastside can become symbols and how these symbolic representations inform the ongoing construction of identity among young drug users who reside in these places – or those in close proximity to them (Eugene, 1999; Ruddick, 1997). Participants went to great lengths to emphasize the social distance between themselves and the Downtown Eastside, most often by ‘demonizing’ (and thereby vehemently
Acknowledgements
We would particularly like to thank the ARYS participants for their willingness to be included in the study, as well as current and past ARYS investigators and staff. We would specifically like to thank Deborah Graham, Tricia Collingham, Caitlin Johnston, Steve Kain, and Calvin Lai for their research and administrative assistance. This study was made possible through financial contributions from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (HHP-67262, MOP-81171, RAA-79918) and the National
References (64)
- et al.
Place, discourse and vulnerability – a qualitative study of young adults living in a Swedish urban poverty zone
Health and Place
(2004) - et al.
Safety becomes danger: dilemmas of drug-use in public space
Health and Place
(2001) Risking risk: the influence of types of capital and social networks on the injection practices of drug users
Social Science and Medicine
(2002)Governing street-based injecting drug users: a critique of heroin overdose prevention in Australia
Social Science and Medicine
(2004)- et al.
The social structural production of HIV risk among injecting drug users
Social Science and Medicine
(2005) - et al.
Risk, shame and the public injector: a qualitative study of drug injecting in South Wales
Social Science and Medicine
(2007) - et al.
“A magnet for curious adolescents”: the perceived dangers of an open drug scene
International Journal of Drug Policy
(2008) - et al.
Social and structural violence and power relations in mitigating HIV risk of drug-using women in survival sex work
Social Science and Medicine
(2008) - et al.
Mapping violence and policing as an environmental-structural barrier to health service and syringe availability among substance-using women in street-level sex work
International Journal of Drug Policy
(2008) - et al.
“Around here, they roll up the sidewalks at night”: a qualitative study of youth living in a rural Canadian community
Health and Place
(2007)
Impacts of intensified police activity on injection drug users: evidence from an ethnographic investigation
International Journal of Drug Policy
Nonfatal overdose among a cohort of street-involved youth
Journal of Adolescent Health
What do you do when you hit rock bottom? Responding to drugs in the City of Vancouver
International Journal of Drug Policy
‘Vagrants wearing make-up’: negotiating spaces on the streets of Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Urban Studies
An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology
In Search of Respect: Selling Crack in El Barrio
The everyday violence of hepatitis C among young women who inject drugs in San Francisco
Human Organization
Intimate apartheid: ethnic dimensions of habitus among homeless heroin injectors
Ethnography
Life with jib: a snapshot of street youth's use of crystal methamphetamine
Addiction Research and Theory
Gender Trouble
City of Walls: Crime, Segregation, and Citizenship in Sao Paulo, Berkeley
Regulation of space in the contemporary postcolonial Pacific city: Port Moresby and Suva
Asia Pacific Viewpoint
A Profile of Vancouver's Street Youth
Toward the development of a typology of illegal drug markets
The Practice of Everyday Life
Perspectives on the life course
Race, protest, and public space: contextualizing Lefebvre in the US city
Antipode
Moments of Freedom: Anthropology and Popular Culture
Social circumstances of initiation of injection drug use and early shooting gallery attendance: implications for HIV intervention among adolescent and young adult injection drug users
Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome
La banda de gari: the street community as a bundle of contradictions and paradoxes
Focaal
At Home and in the Street: Street Children of Northeastern Brazil
Introduction: illegal drug markets, research and policy
Cited by (53)
The impact of recent homelessness on the provision of injection drug use initiation assistance among persons who inject drugs in Tijuana, Mexico and Vancouver, Canada
2021, Drug and Alcohol DependenceCitation Excerpt :While there are challenges in estimating the number of people who experience homelessness, estimates indicate that, at minimum, several thousand individuals experience homelessness each year in both Tijuana and Vancouver (British Columbia Non-Profit Housing Association, 2020; Guerrero, 2018). In Vancouver, homelessness and IDU are concentrated and highly visible in the Downtown Eastside neighborhood (Fast et al., 2010). This centralization reduces barriers to recruiting and providing resources to PWID.
Home and health among people living with HIV who use drugs: A qualitative study
2020, International Journal of Drug PolicyPrevalence and correlates of selling illicit cannabis among people who use drugs in Vancouver, Canada: A ten-year prospective cohort study
2019, International Journal of Drug Policy“I do my best to eat while I'm using”: Mapping the foodscapes of people living with HIV/AIDS who use drugs
2019, Social Science and Medicine