Elsevier

Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta

Volume 133, 15 May 2014, Pages 479-522
Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta

Presolar graphite from the Murchison meteorite: An isotopic study

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2014.01.006Get rights and content

Abstract

We studied presolar graphite grains from four density fractions, KE3 (1.65–1.72 g/cm3), KFA1 (2.05–2.10 g/cm3), KFB1 (2.10–2.15 g/cm3), and KFC1 (2.15–2.20 g/cm3), extracted from the Murchison (CM2) meteorite, with the ion microprobe. One of the most interesting features of presolar graphite is that isotopic features depend on density. There are grains with 15N and 18O excesses, Si isotopic anomalies, high 26Al/27Al ratios (∼0.1), and Ca and Ti isotopic anomalies, including the initial presence of short-lived 41Ca and 44Ti. These isotopic features are qualitatively explained by nucleosynthesis in core collapse supernovae. We estimate that 76%, 50%, 7% and 1% of the KE3, KFA1, KFB1 and KFC1 grains, respectively, are supernova grains. We performed 3- and 4-zone supernova mixing calculations to reproduce the C, O (18O/16O) and Al isotopic ratios of the KE3 grains, using 15 M model calculations by Rauscher et al. (2002). Isotopic ratios of grains with high 12C/13C ratios (>200) can be reproduced, whereas those of grains with ratios ⩽200 are hard to explain if we assume that graphite grains form in C-rich conditions.

We compared the distributions of the 12C/13C ratios of KFB1 and KFC1 grains and their s-process 86Kr/82Kr ratios inferred from bulk noble gas analysis to model calculations of asymptotic giant branch (AGB) stars with a range of mass and metallicity. We conclude that KFB1 grains with 12C/13C  100 formed in the outflow of low-mass (1.5, 2 and 3 M) low-metallicity (Z = 3 × 10−3 for 1.5, 2 and 3 M, Z = 6 × 10−3 for 3 M only) AGB stars and that KFC1 grains with 12C/13C  60 formed in those stars as well as in 5 M stars of solar and/or half-solar metallicities. Grains with 12C/13C < 20 in all the fractions seem to have multiple origins. Some of them formed in the ejecta of core-collapse supernovae. J stars and born-again AGB stars are also possible stellar sources.

We calculated the abundances of graphite grains from supernovae and AGB stars in the Murchison meteorite to be 0.24 ppm and 0.44 ppm, respectively, whereas those of SiC grains from supernovae and AGB stars are 0.063 ppm and 5.6 ppm, respectively. In contrast to graphite, AGB stars are a dominant source of SiC grains.

Since different mineral types have different residence times in the interstellar medium, their abundances in meteorites may not reflect original yields in stellar sources. Even if graphite grains are more easily destroyed than SiC grains, graphite grains from supernovae are more abundant than SiC grains from supernovae (0.24 ppm vs. 0.063 ppm), indicating that supernovae are a prolific producer of graphite grains. Graphite grains from AGB stars are less abundant than SiC grains from AGB stars (0.44 ppm vs. 5.6 ppm). This difference may reflect the difference in their parent stars: graphite grains formed in low-metallicity stars, while SiC grains formed in close-to-solar metallicity stars.

Introduction

Elemental and isotopic abundances of the Galaxy change with time. When stars reach the later stages of their lives, their nucleosynthetic products are expelled into space as gas and dust. Stars with masses less than 8 M become asymptotic giant branch (AGB) stars and lose significant material as stellar wind during the thermally-pulsing AGB phase. Stars with masses  8 M become core-collapse supernovae and the nucleosynthetic products in these stars are distributed into space through explosion. Gas and dust expelled from these stars are eventually incorporated into molecular clouds. Our solar system, located at 8.5 kpc from the center of the Galaxy, formed from such a molecular cloud ∼4.6 billion years ago. The parent molecular cloud of the solar system was believed to have been completely homogenized during solar system formation (Cameron, 1962). This idea of an isotopically uniform solar system was reinforced by analyses of meteorites in the 50’s and 60’s, which showed uniform isotopic ratios (e.g., Podosek, 1978).

However, when Black and Pepin (1969) analyzed Ne in primitive meteorites by step-wise heating, they found a new 22Ne-rich component (see Fig. 4 in Black and Pepin, 1969), which later was named Ne-E (Black, 1972). The lowest 20Ne/22Ne ratio (3.4, air: 9.8) observed in their experiment was such that it was difficult to explain the 22Ne enrichment by processes that occurred in the solar system, thus a nucleosynthetic origin was proposed (Clayton, 1975). Subsequent studies indicated the presence of two kinds of Ne-E: Ne-E(H), released at high temperature (1200–1400 °C) and concentrated in high-density mineral separates (3–3.5 g/cm3), and Ne-E(L), released at low temperature (500–700 °C) and concentrated in low-density separates (<2.3 g/cm3) (Jungck, 1982).

Isotopically distinct components were identified also in heavy noble gases. Xe-HL is characterized by excesses in both light and p-process-only isotopes, 124 and 126, and heavy and r-process-only isotopes, 134 and 136 relative to solar (Lewis et al., 1975). Xe-S and Kr-S, with excesses in even-numbered isotopes, are components that show the signature of the slow neutron-capture process (the s-process) (Srinivasan and Anders, 1978). These Kr and Xe components were well hidden in bulk meteorites and their presence was detected only in chemically processed residues, after more than 99 percent of bulk meteorites had been dissolved. This indicates that minerals containing these noble gases have extremely low abundances in meteorites.

Edward Anders, Roy S. Lewis and their colleagues at The University of Chicago undertook the task to identify and isolate the minerals with the anomalous noble gas components (≡carriers). Without knowing the mineral types of these carriers, they used the anomalous noble gas components as a navigator. They separated small portions of meteorites from bulk meteorites by chemical and physical methods and analyzed noble gases in these fractions. Fractions enriched in anomalous noble gas components would be further processed to achieve a greater enrichment. This effort, on and off but spanning more than a decade, finally bore fruit when diamond, the carrier of Xe-HL, was isolated and identified from the Allende meteorite (Lewis et al., 1987). Soon the identification and isolation of silicon carbide (SiC), the carrier of Xe-S, Kr-S and Ne-E(H), followed (Bernatowicz et al., 1987, Tang and Anders, 1988), as did the isolation of graphite (Amari et al., 1990). Interestingly, all carriers of these anomalous noble gas components are carbonaceous and fairly resistant to chemicals. Otherwise, this method, “burning a haystack to find the needle” as Edward Anders once phrased it, would not have worked. A historical account of the discoveries of those noble gas components and their carriers has been given by Anders (1988).

Presolar grains identified to date include diamond (Lewis et al., 1987), SiC (Bernatowicz et al., 1987, Tang and Anders, 1988), graphite (Amari et al., 1990), oxides (Hutcheon et al., 1994, Huss et al., 1994, Nittler et al., 1994, Choi et al., 1999, Floss et al., 2008), silicon nitride (Si3N4) (Nittler et al., 1995), refractory carbides in SiC (Bernatowicz et al., 1992, Hynes et al., 2010) and graphite (Bernatowicz et al., 1991, Bernatowicz et al., 1996, Croat et al., 2003, Croat et al., 2010), and silicates (Messenger et al., 2003, Nguyen and Zinner, 2004, Nagashima et al., 2004, Mostefaoui and Hoppe, 2004, Haenecour et al., 2013). In addition, a variety of metal, carbide, oxide, sulfide and silicide subgrains were identified inside of SiC and graphite grains (Bernatowicz et al., 1996, Croat et al., 2003, Croat et al., 2008, Croat et al., 2013, Hynes et al., 2010, Hynes et al., 2011). Except for the three carbonaceous presolar grain types, they were identified by secondary ion mass spectrometry (SIMS) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). Abundances of presolar grains in meteorites range from ∼1000 ppm (diamond) to a few ppb (Si3N4). The isolation and identification of presolar grains have opened a new field of astronomy: we are able to study stardust in great detail with unprecedented precisions in the laboratory. Analyses of presolar grains have provided a wealth of information about nucleosynthesis in stars, mixing in stellar ejecta, and Galactic chemical evolution. Reviews of presolar grains and related topics can be found in various papers and book chapters (Bernatowicz and Zinner, 1997, Hoppe and Zinner, 2000, Clayton and Nittler, 2004, Zinner, 2004, Lodders and Amari, 2005, Davis, 2011, Zinner, 2013).

In this paper, we report the results of a comprehensive study of presolar graphite from the Murchison meteorite by SIMS. We will describe experimental procedures in Section 2, and results in Section 3. We will discuss the results and their implications in Section 4 and summarize our work in Section 5. Part of the data have already been reported by Amari et al., 1993, Amari et al., 1995c, Amari et al., 1996, Hoppe et al., 1995, Nittler et al., 1996, Travaglio et al., 1999, Croat et al., 2003, Heck et al., 2009a and Meier et al. (2012).

Section snippets

Separation of presolar graphite from the Murchison meteorite

The separation procedure of carbonaceous presolar grains is described in detail by Amari et al. (1994); we briefly summarize it here with emphasis on presolar graphite. The separation of presolar graphite is more complicated than those of diamond and SiC because graphite is less resistant to chemicals than the other carbonaceous presolar minerals. Moreover, presolar graphite is found only in primitive meteorites which also contain abundant organic matter that has similar characteristics as

Grain size

Grain sizes and grain size distributions are shown in Table 3 and Fig. 2. The uncertainties for the average grain sizes in the table are standard deviations. KFA1, KFB1 and KFC1 are nominally the fractions larger than 1 μm and KE3 is the fraction larger than 2 μm. Although there were grains smaller than these cutoffs in these fractions, we tended to select larger grains (⩾1 μm) to analyze isotopic ratios of as many elements as possible in a given grain. Therefore, grain selection was biased toward

Stellar evolution

Before we discuss the isotopic signatures of the graphite grains and their stellar sources, we will briefly summarize the evolution of stars, with emphasis of relevant aspects for the graphite grains. Detailed reviews of stellar evolution can be found elsewhere (e.g., Lattanzio and Boothroyd, 1997, Busso et al., 1999, Woosley et al., 2002, Herwig, 2005).

Stars spend most of their lives on the Main Sequence, burning H in the core. When H is exhausted in the core, stars ascend the Giant Branch and

Summary

We studied presolar graphite grains from the density-separated Murchison fractions KE3 (1.65–1.72 g/cm3), KFA1 (2.05–2.10 g/cm3), KFB1 (2.10–2.15 g/cm3) and KFC1 (2.15–2.20 g/cm3) with SIMS. Isotopic features of graphite grains depend on density.

KE3 and KFA1 have broad distributions in the 12C/13C ratio, while KFB1 and KFC1 show two distinct peaks, one around 10 and the other around 400–630. We estimated abundances of presolar graphite grains and solar system grains in these fractions, assuming

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Edward Anders and Roy S. Lewis at The University of Chicago for their roles in sample preparation of the Murchison K-series graphite and SiC grains. We thank Sara Russell and the anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments. This work was supported by a grant from McDonnell Center for the Space Sciences (S.A), as well as NASA grants NNX08AG56G (S.A), NNX10AI45G (S.A) and NNX11AH14G (S.A. and E.Z.).

References (147)

  • K. Lodders et al.

    Presolar grains from meteorites: Remnants from the early times of the solar system

    Chem. Erde

    (2005)
  • M.M.M. Meier et al.

    Graphite grains in supernova ejecta – Insights from a noble gas study of 91 individual KFC1 presolar graphite grains from the Murchison meteorite

    Geochem. Cosmochim. Acta

    (2012)
  • C. Abia et al.

    The chemical composition of carbon stars II: The J-type stars

    Astrophys. J.

    (2000)
  • S. Amari et al.

    Interstellar graphite in meteorites

    Nature

    (1990)
  • S. Amari et al.

    Interstellar SiC with unusual isotopic compositions: Grains from a supernova?

    Astrophys. J.

    (1992)
  • S. Amari et al.

    The isotopic compositions and stellar sources of meteoritic graphite grains

    Nature

    (1993)
  • S. Amari et al.

    Interstellar graphite from the Murchison meteorite

  • S. Amari et al.

    Large 18O excesses in circumstellar graphite grains from the Murchison meteorite: Indication of a massive star-origin

    Astrophys. J.

    (1995)
  • S. Amari et al.

    41Ca in presolar graphite of supernova origin

    Astrophys. J.

    (1996)
  • S. Amari et al.

    A singular presolar SiC grain with extreme 29Si and 30Si excesses

    Astrophys. J.

    (1999)
  • S. Amari et al.

    Presolar grains from novae

    Astrophys. J.

    (2001)
  • S. Amari et al.

    Presolar SiC grains of type Y: Origin from low-metallicity asymptotic giant branch stars

    Astrophys. J.

    (2001)
  • S. Amari et al.

    Presolar SiC grains of type A and B: Their isotopic compositions and stellar origins

    Astrophys. J.

    (2001)
  • S. Amari et al.

    Presolar graphite from the Murchison meteorite: Imprint of nucleosynthesis and grain formation

  • S. Amari

    Sodium-22 from supernovae: A meteorite connection

    Astrophys. J.

    (2009)
  • E. Anders

    Circumstellar material in meteorites: Noble gases, carbon and nitrogen

  • C. Arlandini et al.

    Neutron capture in low-mass asymptotic giant branch stars: Cross sections and abundance signatures

    Astrophys. J.

    (1999)
  • M. Asplund et al.

    The rapid evolution of the born-again giant Sakurai’s object

    Astron. Astrophys.

    (1999)
  • T. Bernatowicz et al.

    Evidence for interstellar SiC in the Murray carbonaceous meteorite

    Nature

    (1987)
  • T.J. Bernatowicz et al.

    Interstellar grains within interstellar grains

    Astrophys. J.

    (1991)
  • T.J. Bernatowicz et al.

    TEM studies of a circumstellar rock

    Lunar Planet. Sci.

    (1992)
  • T.J. Bernatowicz et al.

    Constraints on stellar grain formation from presolar graphite in the Murchison meteorite

    Astrophys. J.

    (1996)
  • T.J. Bernatowicz et al.

    Astrophysical implications of the laboratory study of presolar materials

  • S. Bianchi et al.

    Dust formation and survival in supernova ejecta

    Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.

    (2007)
  • S. Bisterzo et al.

    s-Process in low metallicity stars – I. Theoretical predictions

    Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.

    (2010)
  • A.I. Boothroyd et al.

    The CNO isotopes: deep circulation in red giants and first and second dredge-up

    Astrophys. J.

    (1999)
  • M. Busso et al.

    Nucleosynthesis in asymptotic giant branch stars: relevance for Galactic enrichment and solar system formation

    Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys.

    (1999)
  • B.-G. Choi et al.

    Presolar corundum and spinel in ordinary chondrites: Origins from AGB stars and a supernova

    Science

    (1998)
  • B.-G. Choi et al.

    Circumstellar hibonite and corundum and nucleosynthesis in asymptotic giant branch stars

    Astrophys. J.

    (1999)
  • D.D. Clayton

    Principles of Stellar Evolution and Nucleosynthesis

    (1968)
  • D.D. Clayton

    Na-22, Ne-E, extinct radioactive anomalies and unsupported Ar-40

    Nature

    (1975)
  • D.D. Clayton et al.

    Grains of anomalous isotopic composition from novae

    Astrophys. J.

    (1976)
  • D.D. Clayton et al.

    Condensation of carbon in radioactive supernova gas

    Science

    (1999)
  • D.D. Clayton et al.

    Condensation of carbon in radioactive supernova gas

    Astrophys. J.

    (2001)
  • D.D. Clayton et al.

    Astrophysics with presolar stardust

    Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys.

    (2004)
  • T.K. Croat et al.

    Presolar graphite from AGB stars: Microstructure and s-process enrichment

    Astrophys. J.

    (2005)
  • T.K. Croat et al.

    Correlated isotopic and microstructural studies of turbostratic presolar graphites from the Murchison meteorite

    Meteorit. Planet. Sci.

    (2008)
  • T.K. Croat et al.

    Unusual 29,30Si-rich SiCs of massive star origin found within graphites from the Murchison meteorite

    Astronom. J.

    (2010)
  • T.K. Croat et al.

    Refractory metal nuggets within presolar graphite: First condensates from a circumstellar environment

    Meteorit. Planet. Sci.

    (2013)
  • A.M. Davis

    Stardust in meteorites

    Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA

    (2011)
  • Cited by (35)

    • Cosmic nucleosynthesis: A multi-messenger challenge

      2022, Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics
    • Oxygen and aluminum-magnesium isotopic systematics of presolar nanospinel grains from CI chondrite Orgueil

      2022, Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta
      Citation Excerpt :

      Such disparate origins are indeed expected. For example, presolar SiC grains consist of up to ∼5–7% supernova grains (AB and X grains; Liu et al. 2017a; Hoppe et al. 2019), while 1/3 of presolar graphite grains likely originated from CCSNe (Amari et al. 2014). The more significant production of graphite relative to SiC by CCSNe has been confirmed by astronomical observations, in the form of abundant amorphous carbon dust but undetectable amount of SiC in supernova remnants (e.g., Gall et al. 2014).

    • Calcite and dolomite formation in the CM parent body: Insight from in situ C and O isotope analyses

      2019, Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta
      Citation Excerpt :

      Presolar grains and organic matter are potential sources of C for carbonate formation. They exhibit a wide range of δ13C values (Amari et al., 2014), but the abundances of presolar grains in CMs are low (Leitner et al., 2015) and most of the C-rich presolar grains (SiC, graphite, and diamond) are fairly resistant to low temperature alteration. The δ13C of −15‰ for insoluble organic matter in CM chondrites is inconsistent with the carbonate compositions (Alexander et al., 1998).

    • The neutron capture process in the He shell in core-collapse supernovae: Presolar silicon carbide grains as a diagnostic tool for nuclear astrophysics

      2018, Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta
      Citation Excerpt :

      Nicolussi et al. (1998) measured Zr and Mo in single high-density (HD) graphites, finding two of them with anomalous high 96Zr. While most of presolar HD graphites are considered to condense around low-mass asymptotic giant branch (AGB) stars, some of them may have condensed in CCSN ejecta (Amari et al., 2014), which would be consistent with the 96Zr-excess. The anomalous Mo isotopic abundances measured in five SiC X grains generated a particular interest.

    • Origin of nanodiamonds from Allende constrained by statistical analysis of C isotopes from small clusters of acid residue by NanoSIMS

      2018, Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta
      Citation Excerpt :

      For standards, we used 4–7 nm diameter nanodiamonds created by detonation (Greiner et al., 1988) that were separated and prepared similarly to the Allende deposit (Fig. 1b). Additional standards included DAG carbon paint, δ13C = (−29.3 to −24.6) ± 1.7‰ relative to PDB (Amari et al., 2014), and a polished graphite planchette (Fig. 1c). We observed much lower count rates for the detonation nanodiamond standards than the Allende nanodiamonds.

    • Petrographic and C &amp; O isotopic characteristics of the earliest stages of aqueous alteration of CM chondrites

      2017, Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta
      Citation Excerpt :

      The dissolution of presolar grains could also be responsible for 13C-enrichment in CM carbonates (Grady et al., 1988). However, presolar grains (i) show a wide range of δ13C with extreme values of up to tens of thousands per mil (Fig. 9; Amari et al., 2014; Davidson et al., 2014), (ii) are present in low abundance (i.e., tens of ppm; Huss and Lewis, 1995) and (iii) show a strong resistance to corrosion by fluids (Amari et al., 1994; Huss and Lewis, 1995). Together, these characteristics make presolar grains an unlikely candidate for the source of the 13C-enrichment of altering fluids (Amari et al., 2014; Davidson et al., 2014).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text