Elsevier

Fungal Ecology

Volume 10, August 2014, Pages 70-80
Fungal Ecology

Aspen-associated mycorrhizal fungal production and respiration as a function of changing CO2, O3 and climatic variables

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.funeco.2013.10.005Get rights and content

Highlights

  • We quantify mycorrhizal respiration & hyphal production with elevated CO2 and O3.

  • We characterize temperature and moisture variability related to respiration.

  • Sporocarp respiration was strongly affected by temperature and moisture content.

  • Hyphal respiration comprised 31 % of soil respiration.

  • The ratio of hyphal respiration to soil respiration declined with elevated CO2.

Abstract

The relationships of mycorrhizal fungal respiration and productivity to climate and atmospheric chemistry remain under characterized. We quantified mycorrhizal sporocarp and hyphal respiration, as well as growing season net hyphal production, under ambient and elevated carbon dioxide (CO2) and ozone (O3) in relation to natural temperature and moisture variation. Hyphal respiration did not respond significantly to elevated CO2 and O3. Sporocarp respiration was affected by temperature and moisture content while hyphal respiratory response to temperature was undetected over the narrower range of soil temperatures captured. Hyphal respiration comprised 31 % of soil respiration, and the ratio of hyphal respiration to soil respiration declined with elevated CO2. Hyphal biomass was reduced under all treatments though not statistically significant. Given the large fraction of soil respiration represented by mycorrhizal fungi and its sensitivity to climate, a small change in fungal respiration could strongly affect carbon budgets and cycling under climate change.

Introduction

Understanding the regulators of soil respiration is critical for our ability to model ecosystem carbon (C) cycling within a global change context. Although traditionally not executed, the components of soil respiration should be partitioned into autotrophic and heterotrophic sources, with the latter encompassing organisms directly associated with autotrophs (such as rhizosphere-associated organisms, including mycorrhizal fungi) as well as free-living heterotrophic organisms (such as saprotrophs). Partitioning the heterotrophic and autotrophic components of soil respiration in field studies can be quite challenging (Ekblad et al., 2013, Hanson et al., 2000, Heinemeyer et al., 2011), with the fungal component of soil respiration rarely quantified (but see Heinemeyer et al., 2007, Heinemeyer et al., 2012).

Fungal respiration by different tissue types (e.g., hypha, mycorrhiza and sporocarp) is even less quantified, even though mycorrhizal fungi comprise a significant portion of microbial biomass within forest soils (Cairney, 2012, Ekblad et al., 2013, Högberg and Högberg, 2002, Wallander et al., 2001). Net primary production (NPP) allocated to the fungal components of mycorrhizal fungi ranges from less than 5 % to, more commonly, around 20 % (Hobbie, 2006, Smith and Read, 2008 and references within). Considering that 27–67 % of NPP is partitioned as belowground NPP (BNPP) (Hobbie, 2006), mycorrhizal fungi clearly represent a large fraction of BNPP. Hence, their growth and activities should represent a significant source of CO2 flux from ecosystems.

Atmospheric change, whether physical or chemical, can affect carbon cycling by altering production, storage, allocation, or respiration (Comstedt et al., 2006, Karnosky, 2003, Karnosky et al., 2005, King et al., 2001, Loya et al., 2003, Miller and Fitzsimmons, 2011, Podila et al., 2011, Pregitzer et al., 2008, Schlesinger and Lichter, 2001). If elevated levels of CO2 or O3 influence how primary producers gain and allocate photosynthate to belowground structures, including the supply of carbon to their fungal symbionts, then the end result could be a change in ecosystem C storage. While increased CO2 typically amplifies NPP, O3 acts in an opposing manner and will, at least initially, dampen such effects (Karnosky et al., 2003). Studies of enhanced CO2 and O3 concentrations within Free-Air Carbon dioxide Enrichment (FACE) systems have already found effects on mycorrhizal fungi, especially at the community level and in the production of sporocarps (Andrew and Lilleskov, 2009, Parrent et al., 2006, Parrent and Vilgalys, 2007, Podila et al., 2011). Consequently, any change in mycelial production and respiration due to altered CO2 or O3 concentrations could affect future soil C sequestration (Alberton et al., 2005, Andersen, 2003, Fransson, 2012, Pickles et al., 2012, Rygiewicz and Andersen, 1994, Treseder and Allen, 2000, Schlesinger and Andrews, 2000) as well as the retention of fungal derived C in the soil.

It is important to note that respiration rates are strongly affected by both temperature and moisture (Heinemeyer et al., 2007, Heinemeyer et al., 2012, Koch et al., 2007, López-Gutiérrez et al., 2008, Malcolm et al., 2008). While the effect of temperature is broadly captured in Q10 values, reviews of soil respiration literature have indicated that Q10 values are not constant with changing temperature. This limits the conceptual adequacy of a single Q10 for modeling respiration (Davidson et al., 2006, Lloyd and Taylor, 1994). A variety of factors, such as biochemical reaction rates, physiological acclimation, substrate limitation, thermal stress and moisture stress can alter temperature respiration relationships (Davidson et al., 2006). Although much effort has been applied to characterizing temperature–respiration relationships of soils (Boone et al., 1998, Davidson et al., 2006, Kätterer et al., 1998, Lloyd and Taylor, 1994, Winkler et al., 1996), much less has been applied to field studies of fungal temperature–respiration relationships.

Water availability additionally affects soil respiration and can confound estimates of temperature effects (Davidson et al., 2006). Surprisingly, very little is known about moisture impacts on field respiration rates of fungi, although they appear to be physiologically active, albeit at very low rates, at lower water potentials than bacteria (Wilson and Griffin, 1975). It is important to quantify field respiration rates in order to better understand how site variables, such as temperature and moisture, can interact to affect fungal contributions to ecosystem respiration.

The objectives of this study were to: (1) quantify the effects of changes in atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) and ozone (O3) concentrations on mycorrhizal fungal sporocarp and hyphal respiration in vivo; while (2) simultaneously quantifying the effect of natural variation in temperature and water availability on fungal respiration; and to (3) determine treatment effects on net hyphal biomass production. We hypothesized that: (1) fungal respiration would increase under elevated CO2 and decrease under elevated O3; (2) fungal respiration would increase under higher temperatures, and decrease as a result of lower water availability; and (3) high CO2 treatments would increase hyphal biomass production, and elevated O3 would decrease hyphal biomass production.

Section snippets

Study area

The Aspen FACE study began in 1997 with the trees planted from seedling stage. It was located on the Harshaw Experimental Farm of the USDA Forest Service, Wisconsin, USA (45° 40′ 48″ N, 89° 37′ 48″ W). The climate is cool continental with summer temperatures averaging 18.3 °C and an average of 106.7 mm of precipitation falling per month from Jul. to Sep.. Prior to the implementation of a forestry research site in the early 1970's, the land was a potato farm. Hybrid poplar and larch trees were

Hyphal production

Net hyphal biomass production over the growing season averaged 9.33 (SE ± 0.46) g m−2. Treatment and block effects on mean production were not significant (CO2 p = 0.146; O3 p = 0.235; CO2xO3 p = 0.805; block p = 0.712). Mean (±SE) hyphal production was 10.79 (±1.73), 9.29 (±0.44), 9.66 (±0.73) and 7.60 (±0.31) g m−2 within control, CO2, O3, and CO2 + O3 plots, respectively. Production was 86 %, 90 %, and 70 % of the control plots under elevated CO2, O3 and CO2 + O3, respectively.

Hyphal respiration per unit area

CO2 and O3

Mycorrhizal respiration and production with elevated CO2 and O3

The lack of a hyphal production response to the CO2 and O3 treatment contrasts with our earlier finding of significantly increased sporocarp production under elevated CO2 (Andrew and Lilleskov, 2009). Whether this is due to better sampling of sporocarp than hyphal production, interannual variation, or real differences between sporocarps and hyphae in production responses to the treatments is not certain. We can say that interannual variation in sporocarp production effects can be quite large (

Conclusions

Whereas studies of sporocarp production indicated that the transfer of carbon to the fungus is increased under elevated CO2 and, at least initially, decreased under elevated O3 (Andrew and Lilleskov, 2009), this pattern does not hold true for mycelial production within the same study system. This suggests that sporocarp production may be more sensitive to changing atmospheric chemistry than is hyphal production.

There is potential for C cycling within forest ecosystems to be affected by

Acknowledgments

We extend our gratitude to AJ Burton for advice on past manuscripts and study designs, to both AJ Burton & KS Pregitzer for sharing Aspen FACE soil respiration data, and to anonymous reviewers of this manuscript. We appreciate field help contributed by Bob Andrew and Joy Andrew. Funding was provided by the USDA Forest Service, Northern Research Station, an Ecosystem Science Center (MTU) research grant awarded to C Andrew in 2006, and a Finishing Fellowship Grant awarded to C Andrew through the

References (87)

  • A. Wilkinson et al.

    Species richness and nitrogen supply regulate the productivity and respiration of ectomycorrhizal fungi in pure culture

    Fungal Ecology

    (2012)
  • J.M. Wilson et al.

    Water potential and the respiration of microorganisms in the soil

    Soil Biology and Biochemistry

    (1975)
  • J.P. Winkler et al.

    The Q10 relationship of microbial respiration in a temperate forest soil

    Soil Biology & Biochemistry

    (1996)
  • O. Alberton et al.

    Taking mycocentrism seriously: mycorrhizal fungal and plant responses to elevated CO2

    New Phytologist

    (2005)
  • C.P. Andersen

    Source-sink balance and carbon allocation below ground in plants exposed to ozone

    New Phytologist

    (2003)
  • C. Andrew et al.

    Productivity and community structure of ectomycorrhizal fungal sporocarps under increased atmospheric CO2 and O3

    Ecology Letters

    (2009)
  • O.K. Atkin et al.

    Response of root respiration to changes in temperature and its relevance to global warming

    New Phytologist

    (2000)
  • B. Bond-Lamberty et al.

    A global relationship between the heterotrophic and autotrophic components of soil respiration?

    Global Change Biology

    (2004)
  • R.D. Boone et al.

    Roots exert a strong influence on the temperature sensitivity of soil respiration

    Nature

    (1998)
  • B. Boström et al.

    Can isotopic fractionation during respiration explain the 13C-enriched sporocarps of ectomycorrhizal and saprotrophic fungi?

    New Phytologist

    (2008)
  • A. Boufalis et al.

    Allelopathic effects of phenolic mixtures on respiration of two spruce mycorrhizal fungi

    Journal of Chemical Ecology

    (1994)
  • D.R. Bryla et al.

    Respiratory costs of mycorrhizal associations

  • H. Chung et al.

    Fungal community composition and metabolism under elevated CO2 and O3

    Oecologia

    (2006)
  • D. Comstedt et al.

    Effects of elevated atmospheric carbon dioxide and temperature on soil respiration in a boreal forest using δ13C as a labeling tool

    Ecosystems

    (2006)
  • E.A. Davidson et al.

    On the variability of respiration in terrestrial ecosystems: moving beyond Q10

    Global Change Biology

    (2006)
  • R.A. Dejardin et al.

    Growth and respiration of psychrophilic species of the genus Typhula

    Canadian Journal of Botany

    (1971)
  • A. DesRochers et al.

    Coarse and fine root respiration in aspen (Populus tremuloides)

    Tree Physiology

    (2002)
  • R.E. Dickson et al.

    Forest Atmosphere Carbon Transfer and Storage (FACTS-II) the Aspen Free-air CO2 and O3 Enrichment (FACE) Project: an Overview

    (2000)
  • H. Ek

    The influence of nitrogen fertilization on the carbon economy of Paxillus involutus in ectomycorrhizal association with Betula pendula

    New Phytologist

    (1997)
  • A. Ekblad et al.

    The production and turnover of extramatrical mycelium of ectomycorrhizal fungi in forest soils: role in carbon cycling

    Plant Soil

    (2013)
  • L. Eltrop et al.

    Growth and mineral nutrition of non-mycorrhizal and mycorrhizal Norway spruce (Picea abies) seedlings grown in semi-hydroponic sand culture

    New Phytologist

    (1996)
  • D.L. Godbold et al.

    Mycorrhizal hyphal turnover as a dominant process for carbon input into soil organic matter

    Plant and Soil

    (2006)
  • J.B.W. Hammond et al.

    Changes in respiration and soluble carbohydrates during the post-harvest storage of mushrooms (Agaricus bisporus)

    Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture

    (1975)
  • P.J. Hanson et al.

    Separating root and soil microbial contributions to soil respiration: a review of methods and observations

    Biogeochemistry

    (2000)
  • P.J. Hanson et al.

    A six-year study of sapling and large-tree growth and mortality responses to natural and induced variability in precipitation and throughfall

    Tree Physiology

    (2001)
  • S.C. Hart et al.

    Carbon and nitrogen elemental and isotopic patterns in macrofungal sporocarps and trees in semiarid forests of the south-western USA

    Functional Ecology

    (2006)
  • N.J. Hasselquist et al.

    Contrasting effects of low and high nitrogen additions on soil CO2 flux components and ectomycorrhizal fungal sporocarp production in a boreal forest

    Global Change Biology

    (2012)
  • A. Heinemeyer et al.

    Respiration of the external mycelium in the arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis shows a strong dependence on recent photosynthates and acclimation to temperature

    New Phytologist

    (2006)
  • A. Heinemeyer et al.

    Forest soil CO2 flux: uncovering the contribution and environmental responses of ectomycorrhizas

    Global Change Biology

    (2007)
  • A. Heinemeyer et al.

    Soil respiration: implications of the plant-soil continuum and respiration chamber collar-insertion depth on measurement and modeling of soil CO2 efflux rates in three ecosystems

    European Journal of Soil Science

    (2011)
  • A. Heinemeyer et al.

    Exploring the “overflow tap” theory: linking forest soil CO2 fluxes and individual mycorrhizosphere components to photosynthesis

    Biogeosciences

    (2012)
  • E.A. Hobbie et al.

    Mycorrhizal vs saprotrophic status of fungi: the isotopic evidence

    New Phytologist

    (2001)
  • E.A. Hobbie

    Carbon allocation to ectomycorrhizal fungi correlates with belowground allocation in culture studies

    Ecology

    (2006)
  • Cited by (9)

    • Do local-scale context dependencies shape how ectomycorrhizal fungal diversity structures with reduced or sustained experimental N addition?

      2022, Pedobiologia
      Citation Excerpt :

      They were allowed five months for active hyphae to grow into them prior to harvest in mid- October of 2013. The mesh bags (6 × 6 cm) were filled with 30−35 g of washed, neutral sand lacking any fungi that, by limiting the carbon sources which saprotrophic fungi utilize for growth, selects primarily for EcM fungal growth (Wallander et al., 2004; Andrew et al., 2014; Phillips et al., 2013; Wallander et al., 2013). Once harvested, the bags were gently removed from the soil, adhering debris brushed off, and stored at 4 degrees C before, within days, extracting the hyphae.

    • How does temperature affect forest “fungus breath”? Diurnal non-exponential temperature-respiration relationship, and possible longer-term acclimation in fungal sporocarps

      2017, Fungal Ecology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Although less commonly discussed, ‘plant’ respiration also contains fungal respiration, especially in roots because of mycorrhizal associations, but also other plant tissues because of the pervasive presence of fungal endophytes. Given the large differences noted between plant and fungal respiration rates (e.g., Andrew et al., 2014) even a small fungal component could contribute a significant fraction of empirical measurements of plant respiration. In addition it is likely that patterns of plant and fungal respiration respond differently to environmental cues such as temperature and moisture.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text