Milk proteins differentiation and competitive adsorption during spray-drying
Graphical abstract
A non invasive method was developed to differentiate casein and whey proteins at the surface of high milk protein powders by X-ray Photoelectron spectroscopy. Concurrently, milk protein mixes were spray-dried at different temperatures and the proteins were determined at the surface. These powders presented variable surfaces content and functional properties.
Introduction
Milk proteins are important proteins widely used as ingredient in the food and dairy industries. Their functional characteristics and nutritional qualities make them very interesting components (Bart & Schlimme, 1988). Milk proteins can be classified in two categories according to their structure: flexible proteins for caseins and globular proteins for whey proteins (Dickinson, 2001). Caseins present a disordered structure and include proteins α, β, κ-casein, the mixtures sodium caseinate, micellar casein…. Whey proteins contain disulphide bridges, tertiary structure, and preserve their globular molecular shape even after adsorption on an interface. Therefore, their very different molecular structure had a strong impact on their physicochemical and interfacial properties. Caseins are prompt to adsorb at liquid/air interfaces, whereas, whey proteins are less surface-active due to their close-packed globular organization (Fox & McSweeney, 1998). Moreover, whey proteins show important denaturation at temperatures above 70 °C, whereas caseins are not sensitive to temperature. As milk proteins are very perishable products, there are often converted by spray-drying into stable products such as powders. Milk proteins are also spray-dried to reduce transport cost and/or to facilitate handling. Nowadays, milk protein powders have achieved great economic importance and present a wide range of tailor-made applications.
During spray-drying, the liquid protein preparation is changed into a powder by removing almost all of its water content. The influence of the drying liquid composition on the powder surface composition has been extensively studied by X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS) (Fäldt and Bergenstahl, 1996a, Gaiani et al., 2006, Kim, 2008). All these authors show that the composition of the powder surface is highly different from the bulk composition. Indeed, when a surface-active component is present in the drying liquid (such as a protein, a phospholipid…) the powder surface was covered by this component to a large extent (Gaiani et al., 2007, Kim, 2008). From these results, some authors suggested that the powder surface reflects the air–water interface of the drying droplet (Fäldt, 1995, Landström et al., 2000, Landström et al., 2003). The spray-drying process causes also a range of structural and physicochemical transformations which in turn may influences some functional properties of the powders: the wettability (Fäldt and Bergenstahl, 1996b, Gaiani et al., 2009), caking (Nijdam & Langrish, 2006), flowability (Onwulata, Konstance, & Holsinger, 1996) or also oxidative stability (Hardas, Danviriyakul, Foley, Nawar, & Chinachoti, 2000). When a mixture of surface-active components (proteins) is mixed, competitive adsorption is a common phenomenon. It has been shown that caseins with a high surface activity and a flexible disordered structure absorb and spread at the air interface quickly in comparison with a more compact and globular protein like whey proteins (β-lactoglobulin). The adsorption process at the interfaces has been suggested to include three main steps. The transport of proteins toward the interface happened first, and then an attachment of the protein at the interface occurred. Finally, structural rearrangements in the adsorbed state may follow (Dickinson, 2001). This phenomenon is well documented and a rich amount of information is available in the field of emulsions (Dickinson et al., 1988, McClements, 2004) and foams (Marinova et al., 2009, Zhang and Goff, 2004). Commonly, when it is adsorbing at air–water and oil–water interfaces, casein has been found to be more competitive than a globular protein (whey proteins). However, it is complex to compare studies where the adsorption has reached equilibrium (emulsion, foam…) with results where the adsorption is interrupted (during spray-drying) after a fraction of a second (Fäldt, 1995). As a consequence, very little is known on competitive protein adsorption in the drying droplet (Landström et al., 2003). Some authors developed an original fluorescence quenching method to determine the fraction of protein at the powder surface (Landström et al., 1999, Landström et al., 2000, Landström et al., 2003). Nevertheless, the surface properties of the proteins may be modified by the quenching introducing a bias in the results.
The objectives of this paper are first to develop a non invasive method allowing the discrimination of caseins and whey proteins at the powder surface. Then, the influence of the spray-drying temperature on powder surface composition was investigated by analyzing mixes containing different ratios of casein and whey proteins. Concurrently, some physicochemical properties of the powders were determined in order to a better understanding of the mechanisms between casein and whey proteins competition at the powder surface.
Section snippets
Materials
Native micellar casein powder (NMC) was purchased to Ingredia (Arras, France). Native whey isolate powder (NWI – Prolacta 90) was provided by Lactalis (Laval, France). NMC was obtained from tangential membrane microfiltration of skimmed milk followed by purification through water diafiltration. NWI was obtained by membrane tangential ultrafiltration and diafiltration of microfiltrate collected during NMC production. Both powders are commercial products, freshly manufactured and packed.
In order
Characterization of the powders
Table 1 presents the chemical composition of the six powders studied. All the powders are high proteins content with more or less casein and/or whey proteins depending on the protein ratio studied. The experimental ratio (4.17, 1.01 and 0.26) agreed reasonably well with the theoretical ratio (4.00, 1.00 and 0.25) obtained from the different mixes realized respectively for 80/20, 50/50 and 20/80 (NMC/NWI). Lactose and lipids traces were found in all powders as already noticed by Gaiani et al.
Conclusions
This paper developed for the first time a non invasive and reliable method allowing proteins discrimination (between casein and whey proteins) at the surface of high proteins content powders. Furthermore, these results can be of interest to adjust the spray-drying temperature in accordance with the surface composition desired: more or less casein and/or whey proteins at the surface.
In the future, competitive surface adsorption between surface-active proteins in liquid formulations may be used
Acknowledgements
We thank C. Charbonnel (LIBio Engineer) for assistance during surface tension measurements. The authors thank also CNIEL (Paris) for initiating this work and its scientific committee is gratefully acknowledged for its scientific assistance.
References (33)
- et al.
Surface active and emulsifying properties of casein micelles compared to those of sodium caseinate
International Dairy Journal
(1999) Review: milk protein interfacial layers and the relationship to emulsion stability and rheology
Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces
(2001)- et al.
Spray-dried whey protein/lactose/soybean oil emulsion. 1. Surface composition and particle structure
Food Hydrocolloids
(1996) - et al.
Spray-dried whey protein/lactose/soybean oil emulsion. 2. Redispersability, wettability and particle structure
Food Hydrocolloids
(1996) - et al.
Surface composition of dairy powders observed by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy and effects on their rehydration properties
Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces
(2006) - et al.
Dairy powder rehydration: influence of protein state, incorporation mode and agglomeration
Journal of Dairy Science
(2007) - et al.
Native phosphocaseinate powder during storage: lipids released onto the surface
Journal of Food Engineering
(2009) - et al.
How surface composition of high milk proteins powders is influenced by spray-drying temperature
Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces
(2010) - et al.
Accelerated stability studies of microencapsulated anhydrous milk fat
LWT – Food Science and Technology
(2000) - et al.
Fluorescence method for quantitative measurements of specific protein at powder surface
Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces
(1999)
Competitive protein adsorption between bovine serum albumin and b-lactoglobulin during spray-drying
Food Hydrocolloids
Competitive protein adsorption between b-casein and b-lactoglobulin during spray-drying: effect of calcium induced association
Food Hydrocolloids
Proteins stabilized emulsions
Current Opinion in Colloids and Interface Sciences
Physico-chemical factors controlling the foamability and foam stability of milk proteins: sodium caseinate and whey protein concentrates
Food Hydrocolloids
Surface composition of spray-dried milk protein-stabilised emulsions in relation to pre-heat treatment of proteins
Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces
In-situ lecithination of dairy powders in spray-drying for confectionery applications
Food Hydrocolloids
Cited by (44)
Rationally designed bioactive milk-derived protein scaffolds enhanced new bone formation
2023, Bioactive MaterialsSpray drying of dairy and soy proteins
2023, Spray Drying for the Food Industry: Unit Operations and Processing Equipment in the Food IndustrySpray freeze drying of dairy products: Effect of formulation on dispersibility
2022, Journal of Food EngineeringDevelopment of a spray-dried conjugated whey protein hydrolysate powder with entrapped probiotics
2022, Journal of Dairy ScienceEffect of emulsification techniques on the distribution of components on the surface of microparticles obtained by spray drying
2021, Food and Bioproducts ProcessingEffect of pH on the physicochemical characteristics and the surface chemical composition of camel and bovine whey protein's powders
2020, Food ChemistryCitation Excerpt :The surface composition of acidic and sweet camel and bovine whey powders were estimated using X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. The XPS analyses were conducted using a Kratos Axis Ultra spectrometer (Kratos Analytical, Manchester, UK) working with a monochromatic AlKα X-ray source (E = 1486.6 eV; P = 90 W) as described by Gaiani et al. (2011). The analyzed powder area was about 300 × 600 µm with a depth of 6 to 10 nm.