Hydrocolloids with emulsifying capacity. Part 3 – Adsorption and structural properties at the air–water surface
Graphical abstract
The air–water spreading capacity and surface layer characteristics (morphology and mechanical properties) of conventional and matured hydrocolloids emulsifiers (Acacia senegal, Acacia seyal and Sugar Beet Pectin) were compared at pH 4.5 using the Langmuir trough. Maturation process improved the spreading capacity of A. senegal and Sugar Beet Pectin. Coventional Ghatti gum behaved similar to these matured hydrocolloids. AGP component from matured A. senegal dominates its surface behaviour. At pH 3.1 the surface properties of almost all hydrocolloids were improved. AFM and ellipsometry analysis of interfacial films from A. senegal revealed different surface morphology between the non-matured and matured gums and the ability, of both samples, to form a thicker film at pH 3.1.
Introduction
In the previous papers of this Series (Parts 1 and 2) we have described the influence of aggregated structures on the improvement of the emulsifying and interfacial properties of Acacia senegal gum exudates and other new emulsifying hydrocolloids. The aggregated structures were shown to increase the elasticity of the interfacial film and enhance both the emulsifying capability and the speed to lower the interfacial tension. Surface charge was found to be an important property in controlling their interfacial behaviour. Changes in the pH from 4.5 to 3.1 enhanced their adsorption properties and film elasticity. Although oil–water hydrocolloids-interfacial-properties have been widely studied, the morphology adopted by the components at the interface is still unknown. Structural aspects for A. senegal components in solution or hydrated conditions have been reported (Cowman et al., 2006, Dror et al., 2006, Wang et al., 2008), but no information has been presented about the morphology and the structure of the interfacial films formed by these molecules. Neither has the behaviour at the air–water interface for hydrocolloids such as the Acacia gums and sugar beet pectin been quantified. Fauconnier et al. (2000) showed that A. senegal gums exhibited better spreading properties and produced films which were more elastic than Acacia seyal gums.
Emulsification agents are generally characterised by their behaviour at the air–water interface, since their reactivity at the oil–water interface is not significantly different (Williams & Prins, 1996). Already we have shown that the film forming properties at the air–water interface of A. senegal in its conventional and matured forms parallel their emulsification effectiveness (Part 1 of this Series).
Natural hydrocolloids are usually highly polydispersed. For A. senegal and A. seyal three main components have been described: arabinogalactans (AG), arabinogalactan proteins (AGP), and glycoproteins (GP). Between them, it was well established that AGP is the main component which is active at the interface in dispersed systems.
Atomic force microscopy (AFM) has been applied successfully to visualise hydrocolloids and others soft material components at the molecular and supramolecular levels (Bottier et al., 2008, Gunning et al., 2004, Ikeda et al., 2005, Sanchez et al., 2008, Wang and Somasundaran, 2007). This technique has also been used to characterise the morphology of air–water interfacial films formed with egg yolk lipoproteins or β-casein proteins (Dauphas et al., 2007, Mackie et al., 1999, Martinet et al., 2003). We propose also to use this technique in the present investigation.
To extend our previous studies (Part 2 of this Series), which describe the interfacial properties at the n-hexadecane–water interface, we added Ghatti gum (GG), A. seyal (AcSey), and sugar beet pectin (SBP) to our investigation to get information about their behaviour at air–water interfaces. Our objective is to characterise the spreading capacity of these emulsifying hydrocolloids, and learn about the morphology of their films at air–water interfaces. To achieve this we have used ellipsometry, measured Langmuir trough pressure–area isotherms, and applied AFM to Langmuir–Blodgett films.
Section snippets
Materials
The hydrocolloids employed in this study were provided by San-Ei Gen F.F.I., Inc. (Osaka, Japan) and were:
- -
conventional gum arabic (A. senegal) (hand picked selected, lump form, GAc).
- -
matured A. senegal gum arabic, designated Acacia (sen) SUPER GUM™ (EM2).
- -
matured and conventional A. seyal gum arabic (AcSeym and AcSeyc respectively).
- -
Gum Ghatti (GATIFOLIA), obtained from Anogeissus Latifolia (shimla and refined grades: GATIFOLIA SD (GGsd) and GATIFOLIA RD (GGrd) respectively). GGsd and GGrd are
Surface spreading of A. senegal gums and other emulsifying hydrocolloids
The π – A isotherms obtained using A. senegal gums (matured and conventional) at air–water surface (pH 4.5), that have been shown in part 1 of this series, are analysed here to better compare with the other emulsifying hydrocolloids (Fig. 1a). During compression of GAc films (conventional A. senegal gum) the surface pressure is close to zero up to a specific area of 5.0 × 10−4 m2/mg, and then it increased monotonically up to 45 mN/m, which is the pressure obtained at the highest compression.
The effects of maturation on the surface properties at pH 4.5
The Langmuir study about the spread and film forming capacity of the two samples of A. senegal gums (GAc and EM2) at pH 4.5 indicated that the maturation process applied to EM2 was successful to improve these characteristics. The Langmuir measurements on the spreading and film forming capacity of GAc compared to EM2 show the nature of the change introduced by the maturation process. EM2 had a higher capacity to spread on the surface evidenced by its limiting area (0,0008 gum against 0,0005 m2
Conclusions
The hydrocolloids studied here spread well at an air–water surface. The qualitative hydrocolloid behaviour at air–water interface is comparable to the previously studied response at n-hexadecane–water interface. For the first time, examination of an acacia gum surface layer was possible using AFM and complementary ellipsometry. Changes in pH from 4.5 to 3.1 made hydrocolloids more compatible, with the surface generating a thicker layer. The surface behaviour described confirms previous
Acknowledgements
Authors wish to thank INRA (CEPIA Department) and San-Ei Gen F.F.I. Inc. for their financial support.
References (29)
- et al.
Characterization and properties of Acacia senegal (L.) Willd. Var. senegal with enhanced properties (Acacia (sen) SUPER GUM™): part 1 – controlled maturation of Acacia senegal var. senegal to increase viscoelasticity, produce a hydrogel form and convert a poor into a good emulsifier
Food Hydrocolloids
(2007) - et al.
Characterization and properties of Acacia senegal (L.) Willd. var. senegal with enhanced properties (Acacia (sen) SUPER GUM™): part 2-mechanism of the maturation process
Food Hydrocolloids
(2007) - et al.
Protein adsorption at the oil water interface: characterization of adsorption kinetics by dynamic interfacial tension measurements
Biophysical Chemistry
(1999) - et al.
Galactosyl headgroup interactions control the molecular packing of wheat lipids in Langmuir films and in hydrated liquid–crystalline mesophases
Biochimica et Biophysica Acta
(2007) - et al.
Structure modification in hen egg yolk low density lipoproteins layers between 30 and 45 mN/m observed by AFM
Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces
(2007) - et al.
Studies on Acacia exudate gums: Part VI. Interfacial rheology of Acacia senegal and Acacia seyal
Food Hydrocolloids
(2008) - et al.
The effect of surfactant type on protein displacement from the air–water interface
Food Hydrocolloids
(2004) - et al.
Studies on Acacia exudate gums: part III molecular weight characteristics of Acacia seyal var. seyal and Acacia seyal var. fistula
Food Hydrocolloids
(2005) - et al.
Short communication. Visualizing surface active hydrocolloids by atomic force microscopy
Carbohydrate Polymers
(2005) - et al.
Orogenic displacement of protein from the air/water interface by competitive adsorption
Journal of Colloid and Interface Science
(1999)
Surface properties of hen egg yolk low-density lipoproteins spread at the air–water interface
Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces
The role of the proteinaceous component on the emulsifying properties of gum arabic
Food Hydrocolloids
Functionality of gum arabic. Fractionation, characterization and evaluation of gum fractions in citrus oil emulsions and model beverages
Food Hydrocolloids
The acacia gum arabinogalactan fraction is a thin oblate ellipsoid: a new model based on small-angle neutron scattering and Ab Initio calculation
Biophysical Journal
Cited by (25)
Natural hyperbranched biopolymer at liquid interfaces differing in oil–water interaction energy
2023, Journal of Molecular LiquidsProtein/polysaccharide intramolecular electrostatic complex as superior food-grade foaming agent
2020, Food HydrocolloidsPreparation and emulsifying properties of trace elements fortified gum arabic
2019, Food HydrocolloidsCitation Excerpt :The needle was submerged in an optical glass cuvette containing MCT, which was located between a light source and a high-speed charge couple device (CCD) camera. The drop profile was recorded by the CCD camera and analyzed according to the Laplace equation (Castellani, Gaillard, et al., 2010; Castellani, Guibert, et al., 2010; Oscar, Saphwan, Monique, Glyno, & Marc, 2010). Each 5% (w/w) GA or GARTE (GA/Zn2+, GA/Fe3+, GA/Fe2+) solution was put on a roller mixer at 25±1 °C overnight.
Acacia gum: History of the future
2018, Food HydrocolloidsCitation Excerpt :In this case, the initial size of emulsion droplets was not impacted by Mw but emulsion stability was improved with high Mw. Similar results using matured gums were obtained in other studies (Aoki, Katayama, et al., 2007; Castellani, Al-Assaf, Axelos, Phillips, & Anton, 2010; Castellani, Gaillard, et al., 2010; Yao et al., 2013). In addition, it was shown that modified gums have the ability to decrease interfacial tension faster than unmodified gums, which is an important parameter in determining emulsifying capacity as noted above (Aoki, Katayama, et al., 2007; Castellani, Al-Assaf, et al., 2010a; Castellani, Guibert, et al., 2010; Yao et al., 2013).