Short communicationUsing acoustics to investigate changes in efficiency of a sandeel dredge
Introduction
With the exception of spawning in December and January (Gauld and Hutcheon, 1990), observations on sandeels (Ammodytes marinus) in the North Sea suggest they rarely emerge from being buried in the sea-bed during the September to March over-wintering period (Cameron, 1958, Macer, 1966, Wright and Bailey, 1993). Emergence in the spring corresponds closely with the increasing abundance of zooplankton and is triggered by temperature, photoperiod and food availability (Winslade, 1971). During peak occurrence in May–July, sandeels exhibit strong diel behaviour. At night, they bury in sandy sediments, whilst during daylight hours they form shoals in the water column and forage (Winslade, 1971, Winslade, 1974, Robards et al., 1999) over the shallow (<150 m), turbulent, sandy areas they inhabit (Macer, 1966, Reay, 1970, Wright and Bailey, 1993, Wright et al., 2000, Freeman et al., 2004). Preliminary feeding experiments (Cude, 2002 unpublished data) show that sandeels feeding on the Dogger bank, take 9–13 h to digest 50 wt.% of their stomach contents, thus lending the support to the belief that sandeels emerge from the sediment each day to feed in the water column. Such dynamic behaviour means that sandeels vary in their availability to different sampling gears, and consequently, more than one approach is required to effectively assess their abundance and distribution at different times of the year, and even at different times of day. Two approaches that can be put to use are fishing and acoustics. During April, May, June and November, we surveyed sandeels on the Dogger Bank, North Sea, using a sandeel dredge (modified scallop dredge) at night and acoustics during daytime. The purpose of this short communication is to present preliminary results of an approach that uses the acoustic data to provide insight to the efficiency of the sandeel dredge.
Continuous acoustic surveys are characterised by their ability to provide rapid coverage of survey areas with undisturbed observations (e.g. Fernandes et al., 2002). Acoustics can be used to estimate absolute abundance, provided that the acoustic target can be positively identified and a species-specific value for target strength is available for a given acoustic operating frequency (MacLennan and Simmonds, 1992, MacLennan et al., 2002). However, the uncertainty associated with absolute abundance estimates is often large, since many factors contribute to the variability in acoustic assessments (MacLennan and Simmonds, 1992, Simmonds et al., 1992, Arnold, 1996, ICES, 1997, Fréon and Misund, 1999, Rose and Gauthier, 2000). Because of such large uncertainties, acoustic abundance estimates are in practice more appropriately considered as relative abundances that may, in some circumstances, come close to true values. With particular regard to sandeels, acoustics can only provide a usefully close estimate of abundance if all the stock in a survey area is present in the water column during the survey period. In contrast, dredge sampling offers the opportunity to confirm the identity of the species (and the lengths and weights of individuals) and can be used to catch sandeels at times when they are buried in the sediment. However, since the practicalities of available survey time generally dictate that only a limited number of dredges can be taken, overall coverage of a survey area is poorer than that provided by acoustics. The dredge catch rate is a relative index of abundance. Only if we know what the dredge catch represents as a proportion of the fish available to be caught, can we derive an estimate of actual abundance. This proportion is known as the dredge efficiency and is a function of fish behaviour and selectivity of the sampling gear.
On the basis of the knowledge of sandeel behaviour documented above, we assume herein that the overwhelming majority of sandeels in our survey area are present in the water column during the daytime in May and June, and hence are completely available to acoustic gear. Using standard methods, we calculate estimates of acoustic biomass and use this to derive estimates of apparent dredge efficiency for our sandeel dredge. Note that we choose to convert sandeel numbers to biomass since this is the unit of assessment upon which fishing quotas (tonnage) are based. In addition, we performed Monte Carlo style simulations of the acoustic biomass calculations to explicitly consider the impacts of major sources of variability on our estimates of apparent dredge efficiency. Estimates of the ‘acoustically derived’ apparent dredge efficiency are tentatively used to provide biomass estimates from dredge surveys performed at times when sandeels are not fully available to acoustic sampling. Key requirements for improving the method are discussed.
Section snippets
Survey methods and biomass estimation
Systematic acoustic and dredge surveys were conducted over an area at the southwestern end of the Dogger Bank, North Sea. Surveys were repeated in April and June 2000, May and June 2001, June and November 2002. Concerted effort was made to reduce sources of systematic bias in the surveys as detailed below.
The acoustic survey design consisted of nine 27 nm-long north–south parallel transects spaced 6.75 nm apart. Starting at dawn, a single transect was surveyed each day using a calibrated (Foote
Results
Fig. 1 shows distributions for estimated values of acoustic biomass and corresponding apparent dredge efficiencies. Whilst the range of biomass values estimated by acoustics was similar in all four surveys, there was a notable divergence in the predicted distribution of dredge efficiency in June 2002, where estimated mean efficiency was only 1.5% (Table 1). Re-examination of our individual dredge catch records for the June 2002 survey revealed that the dredge performed poorly throughout the
Discussion
The behaviour of sandeels makes them an interesting and challenging subject to assess using field-based methods. We have presented a novel approach that uses acoustic recordings taken during daytime to investigate the performance of a sandeel dredge fished at night. The effects of variability associated with the acoustics-based biomass estimates of sandeels were taken in to consideration through Monte Carlo style simulations.
Our results from the four different May/June surveys, revealed similar
Acknowledgements
This work was funded by the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs under contract MF0317. We would like to thank the crew of RV Corystes for their help during the surveys, and three anonymous referees for their helpful comments on previous drafts.
References (28)
- et al.
Diel patterns in the habitat utilisation of sandeels revealed using integrated acoustic surveys
J. Exp. Biol. Mar. Ecol.
(2004) - et al.
Acoustic surveys in the full monte: simulating uncertainty
Aquat. Liv. Res.
(2000) - et al.
The influence of sediment type on the distribution of the lesser sandeel, Ammodytes marinus
J. Sea Res.
(2000) - Armstrong, E., 1986. Target strength of sandeels. ICES CM 1986/B:5, 5...
- Armstrong, E., Edwards, J.I., 1985. Target strength of sandeels. ICES CM 1985/B:20, 5...
- Arnold, G.P., 1996. Fish behaviour as a source of error for sampling gears: evidence for systematic patterns of...
- et al.
The efficiency and selectivity of spring-toothed scallop dredges: A comparison of direct and indirect methods of assessment
J. Shell. Res.
(2001) - Cameron, J., 1958. Studies on the Ammodytidae of Isle of Man waters. PhD Thesis. University of...
- Cude, S.H., 2002. Preliminary gut evacuation experiment on the lesser sandeel, Ammodytes marinus. Centre for...
- Dare, P.J., Key, D., Connor, P.M., 1993. The efficiency of spring-loaded dredges used in the Western English Channel...
Fish do not avoid survey vessels
Nature
Cited by (15)
Use of manned submersible and autonomous stereo-camera array to assess forage fish and associated subtidal habitat
2021, Fisheries ResearchCitation Excerpt :In the Northeast Atlantic, where sand eel support one of the most important commercial fisheries by volume (ICES, 2018), pelagic trawls and dredges are used to measure relative densities of these fish in the seabed (Jensen, 2001; van der Kooij et al., 2008). Here too, there are issues of catchability, both in survey trawls (Fraser et al., 2007) and dredge tows (Mackinson et al., 2005; van Deurs et al., 2012). There is international demand for fishery-independent data to improve abundance estimation (Kubilius and Ona, 2012) and to inform management of forage species (ICES, 2008).
The effects of environmental factors on daytime sandeel distribution and abundance on the Dogger Bank
2008, Journal of Sea ResearchHabitat characteristics and diel patterns of sand lance (Ammodytes spp) in coastal Newfoundland
2024, Environmental Biology of FishesCombining data from bottom-trawl and acoustic-trawl surveys to estimate an index of abundance for semipelagic species
2018, Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences