Synthesis, characterization and photoelectrochemical properties of poly(3,4-dioctyloxythiophene)–CdS hybrid electrodes
Introduction
Conducting polymer–semiconductor hybrids represent a novel class of materials for low-cost photovoltaic devices. Combining of p-type conducting polymers and n-type semiconductors is advantageous for separation of the charges generated under illumination due to a high electron affinity of inorganic semiconductor and relatively low ionization potential of the polymer [1], [2]. This allows for transport of the charge carriers in the separate materials with a low probability of recombination.
The polymer–semiconductor composites are usually prepared in the form of bilayers of the type ITO (or Au)/conducting polymer/semiconductor/metal. The ITO or Au substrates may be covered with the conducting polymer by electropolymerization or spin-casting a solution of the polymer soluble in chloroform. Semiconductor can be synthesized as a film by chemical bath deposition [3], self-assembling [4] or deposited in the form of dispersion of nanoparticles in soluble conducting polymer [2], [5], [6], [7]. The latter method is advantageous because of the increase of p–n junction interface and in effect the increase of photovoltaic efficiency. However, the semiconductor nanocrystals are not easily dispersed in conjugated polymer. A high surface energy of nanocrystals leads to their aggregation. The most efficient method of avoiding this effect is stabilization of nanocrystals by surrounding surfactant. According to the literature, the hybrid device consisting of a polymer layer and monodispersed CdS capped with thioglycerol, spin coated on the polymer film possesses a dual properties of photocurrent generation and electroluminescence [8]. However, the surfactant usually tends to isolate the semiconductor from conducting polymer phase leading to enhanced electron–hole recombination and decrease of quantum efficiency of the light energy conversion.
Another way of fabrication of semiconductor nanocluster–polymer composites is co-deposition of the two components [9]. The semiconductor nanoparticles may be also covalently linked to the monolayer assembled on Au electrode [10], [11], [12].
Preparation of the polymer–semiconductor blends is relatively easy but control of amount of two composites is problematical. In the present work we demonstrate a simple method of preparation of poly(3,4-dioctyloxythiophene)–CdS composite for photovoltaic cells. Polymer is obtained by electrodeposition, whereas CdS is formed by electrochemical/chemical synthesis. Electrochemical methods offer a wide range of control of the polymer and CdS amounts. In this work we optimize the conditions to obtain the hybrid electrode of enhanced photoactivity in comparison with that of pure CdS.
Section snippets
Experimental
All electrochemical measurements reported in this paper were performed by means of Autolab (EcoChemie, The Netherlands) in a three electrode cell with a platinum gauze counter electrode, Ag/AgCl, Cl− (std., aq.) reference electrode and Au working electrode. The Au substrate was polished to a mirror finish with alumina slurry and washed in an ultrasonic bath.
Procedure of synthesis and characterisation 3,4-dioctyloxythiophene (DOT) have been described elsewhere [13]. All other chemicals, LiClO4
Electrochemical behavior of Au/PDOT electrodes in aqueous solutions of 0.1 M LiClO4 and in 0.1 M Na2S
Poly(3,4-dioctyloxythiophene) (PDOT) was deposited on Au electrode from acetonitrile solution of 10 mM monomer + 0.1 M LiClO4 by cycling within the potential range from 0 to 1.34 V at the scan rate 100 mV s−1. Exemplary electropolymerization curves are presented in Fig. 1.
As visible in the inset in Fig. 1, the PDOT is electroactive not only in acetonitrile (as most of polythiophenes) but also in aqueous solution, owing to the presence of oxygen in the side groups [13]. This feature is promising in
Conclusions
Au/poly(3,4-dioctyloxythiophene)–CdS hybrid electrodes have been prepared by means of four-step electrochemical/chemical method. Au was firstly decorated with the polymer by cyclic voltammetry and then, CdS was formed by potentiostatic deposition of Cd followed by its chemical transformation into Cd(OH)2 in NaOH and finally to CdS by immersion in Na2S. The CdS crystals obtained by this procedure are cadmium rich with Cd/S ratio from 2.5 to 3.
CdS and PDOT are deposited in the form of
Acknowledgements
Support for this work by the Polish Ministry of Education and Science under grants 3T08A04128 and N20409131/2142 is gratefully acknowledged.
References (29)
- et al.
Solar Energy Mater.
(1998) - et al.
Thin Solid Films
(2004) - et al.
Thin Solid Films
(1999) - et al.
Electrochim. Acta
(2003) - et al.
J. Electroanal. Chem.
(1990) - et al.
J. Electroanal. Chem.
(1987) - et al.
J. Electroanal. Chem.
(2005) - et al.
J. Electroanal. Chem.
(2005) - et al.
Electrochim. Acta
(1998) - et al.
J. Electroanal. Chem.
(1988)
Solar Energy Mater. Solar Cells
Phys. Rev. B
Phys. Rev. B
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
Cited by (8)
The role of (photo)electrochemistry in the rational design of hybrid conducting polymer/semiconductor assemblies: From fundamental concepts to practical applications
2015, Progress in Polymer ScienceCitation Excerpt :CdS formation was achieved in the opposite order as well, namely exposing the bisulfide ion-doped PPy to Cd2+ containing solutions [255]. Alternatively, Cd was electrodeposited onto poly(3,4-dioctyloxythiophene) (PDOT) and subsequently chemically transformed into CdS [256]. Finally, direct electrodeposition of CdS from its precursors (cadmium acetate and sodium thiosulfate) in an ionic liquid was also achieved, under galvanostatic conditions at elevated temperatures (120 °C).
Hybrid conjugated polymer/semiconductor photovoltaic cells
2010, Synthetic MetalsPolymer solar cells
2011, Polimery/Polymers