Influence of observer experience and training on proficiency in coronary CT angiography interpretation
Introduction
Contrast-enhanced ECG-synchronized coronary CT angiography (CCTA) is the most promising method for direct non-invasive detection of coronary artery stenosis [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6] and the use of this test for non-invasive evaluation of patients with atypical or acute chest pain has substantially risen in recent years. Consequently, results of CCTA increasingly direct patient management.
Because of the limited exposure of most practitioners to CCTA interpretation during their graduate medical education, several forays in recent years have aimed at establishing standards of proficiency and educational curricula for CCTA interpretation [7], [8], [9]. Guidelines and proficiency requirements differ between countries and between medical disciplines. Criteria for the demonstration of advanced proficiency diverge between specialties; however, a common entry requirement for initial certification of proficiency in CCTA interpretation, which is shared between radiology and cardiology pathways in the US and Europe, is the mentored review of 50 contrast medium-enhanced cardiac CT cases [10], [11].
There is a scarcity of evidence regarding the influence of experience and training of practitioners on their proficiency [12], i.e. their ability to independently render CCTA interpretations of a quality commensurate with the clinical use of this test to effectively, safely, and meaningfully contribute to patient management according to the current state of the art. Accordingly, the aim of this study was to assess the influence of observer experience and the effect of one-time limited training on 50 cardiac CT cases on the proficiency in CCTA interpretation of practitioners with different levels of experience.
Section snippets
Materials and methods
Our human research committee approved this study and all participating patients gave written informed consent.
Patient CCTA data sets
The final case series consisted of 100 CCTA data sets of 53 male and 47 female patients with a mean age of 65 years (range 48–75 years). The average heart rate was 66 bpm (range 45–89 bpm) at the time of CCTA acquisition, with an average scan time of 15.3 s (range: 13.2–17.8 s). Globally, all 100 CCTA studies were considered of diagnostic quality. In all patients, 64-slice CCTA and conventional coronary catheter angiography had been performed within 24 h. Mean time spent on each patient series was
Discussion
This investigation sought to quantify the influence of experience and training on the proficiency in CCTA interpretation of practitioners with different levels of experience. The results objectify in a systematic manner the intuitive notion that the level of experience is the strongest determinant of proficiency in CCTA interpretation. The results also show that limited one-time training improves proficiency - particularly in less-experienced readers -, but not to clinically satisfactory levels.
References (30)
- et al.
Coronary CT angiography with dual source computed tomography in 170 patients
European Journal of Radiology
(2010) - et al.
ACCF 2008 training statement on multimodality noninvasive cardiovascular imaging
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
(2009) - et al.
Task force 13: training in advanced cardiovascular imaging (computed tomography) endorsed by the American society of nuclear cardiology, society of atherosclerosis imaging and prevention. Society for cardiovascular angiography and interventions, and society of cardiovascular computed tomography
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
(2008) - et al.
Relationship between previous training and experience and results of the certification examination in cardiovascular computed tomography
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging
(2010) - et al.
Coronary computed tomographic angiography in patients suspected of coronary artery disease: impact of observer experience on diagnostic performance and interobserver reproducibility
Journal of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography
(2010) - et al.
Usefulness of computed tomographic coronary angiography in patients with acute chest pain with and without high-risk features
American Journal of Cardiology
(2010) - et al.
Detection of coronary artery stenoses by low-dose, prospectively ECG-triggered, high-pitch spiral coronary CT angiography
JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging
(2011) - et al.
Coronary computed tomography angiography for early triage of patients with acute chest pain: the ROMICAT (rule out myocardial infarction using computer assisted tomography) trial
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
(2009) - et al.
Detection of coronary artery stenoses with multislice helical CT angiography
Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography
(2002) - et al.
Significant coronary artery stenosis: comparison on per-patient and per-vessel or per-segment basis at 64-section CT angiography
Radiology
(2007)
Noninvasive coronary angiography with 16-detector row CT: effect of heart rate
Radiology
Diagnostic accuracy of dual-source computed tomography in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease
Investigative Radiology
Reliable noninvasive coronary angiography with fast submillimeter multislice spiral computed tomography
Circulation
ACCF/AHA 2007 clinical competence statement on vascular imaging with computed tomography and magnetic resonance
Vascular Medicine
Cardiac computed tomography: indications, applications, limitations, and training requirements: report of a writing group deployed by the working group nuclear cardiology and cardiac CT of the European society of cardiology and the European council of nuclear cardiology
European Heart Journal
Cited by (0)
- 1
Tel.: +1 843 876 7146.
- 2
Tel.: +49 69 6301 7277.
- 3
Tel.: +49 89 212 196 0.
- 4
Tel.: +49 69 6301 7277.
- 5
Tel.: +49 99 71/482 701.
- 6
Tel.: +49 89/16 19 41.
- 7
Tel.: +1 843 792 2200.
- 8
Tel.: +49 69 6301 7277.
- 9
These authors contributed equally to this work and would like to share first-authorship.