Elsevier

European Journal of Cancer

Volume 50, Issue 15, October 2014, Pages 2550-2559
European Journal of Cancer

Original Research
Prognostic relevance of disseminated tumour cells from the bone marrow of early stage breast cancer patients – Results from a large single-centre analysis

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2014.06.025Get rights and content

Abstract

Background

This is the largest single-centre study to determine the prognostic relevance of disseminated tumour cells (DTCs) from the bone marrow (BM) of stage I-III breast cancer patients. Additionally, we aimed to analyse the impact of DTC detection on adjuvant bisphosphonate (BP) treatment efficacy.

Methods

BM aspirates were collected during primary surgery for early breast cancer (EBC; T1–4, N0–2, M0) at Tuebingen University, Germany, between January 2001 and January 2013. DTCs were identified by immunocytochemistry (pancytokeratin antibody A45/B-B3) and cytomorphology. We retrospectively estimated the influence of DTC detection and BP treatment on disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) using univariate (log-rank test) and multivariate (cox regression) analysis.

Findings

BM aspirates were available from 3141 patients. In 803 (26%) of these, DTCs were detectable. As compared to DTC-negative patients, DTC-positive patients more frequently had larger tumors (p < 0.001), lymph node involvement (p < 0.001), hormonal receptor positive tumours (p < 0.001) and HER2-positive tumours (p = 0.048). DTC-positive patients were at an increased risk of relapse (hazard ratio (HR) 1.74, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.34–2.25, p < 0.001) and death (HR 1.44 95% CI 1.13–1.86, p = 0.004). In the multivariate analysis DTCs were an independent predictor of DSF and OS. Additionally, BP treatment had no significant influence on DFS or OS in DTC-negative patients, while it was significantly associated with increased DFS (p < 0.001) and OS (p = 0.006) in DTC-positive patients.

Interpretation

These data confirm the clinical validity of DTCs from the BM for prognostication of early breast cancer patients. Further studies are warranted to determine whether DTCs are predictive for adjuvant treatment efficacy using bisphosphonates.

Introduction

Early breast cancer (EBC) can relapse even years after successful treatment of the primary tumour. It has therefore been hypothesised that individual tumour cells spread to secondary sites in the body where they can persist for long periods of time before initiating metastatic growth [1]. This phenomenon is termed minimal residual disease (MRD), and the aim of all adjuvant therapies is to eradicate MRD before it becomes clinically evident.

Evidence has been increasing that cytokeratin (CK)-positive disseminated tumour cells (DTCs) in the bone marrow (BM) of breast cancer patients may reflect the presence of MRD [2]. DTCs are detected in the BM of 30–40% of EBC patients and associated with a worsened prognosis [3], [4], [5], [6], [7]. The strong independent prognostic significance of DTCs at primary diagnosis was confirmed in a large pooled analysis of more than 4700 patients published by Braun and colleagues in 2005 [7].

Additionally, the persistence of DTCs during adjuvant treatment of stages I–III breast cancer predicts an increased risk of disease relapse and death [8], [9]. Thus, the detection of DTCs might serve as an indicator of systemic treatment efficacy, helping to identify patients in need of additional adjuvant treatment. However, chemotherapy regimes often fail to eliminate DTCs, which can persist in the BM in a dormant, non-proliferative state for years [10]. Another approach to eradicating DTCs from the BM might be the use of bisphosphonates (BPs), which primarily target the skeletal system [11]. However, the role of BPs in EBC treatment remains unclear. A large meta-analysis investigating the addition of BPs to adjuvant therapy in patients with EBC found that menopausal status was a predictor of BP treatment efficacy [12]. Additionally, recent findings indicate that successful eradication of DTCs with BP therapy improves prognosis in patients with EBC [11], [13].

Although the results highlighting the potential usefulness of DTC detection in the BM of patients with EBC have been encouraging, DTC determination has not thus far been recommended for routine clinical use by guidelines or expert panels due to a lack of consensus on certain methodological and institutional problems. The pooled analysis by Braun et al. [7] covered seven different techniques for DTC detection. Moreover, while patient enrolment in the largest published studies ended in 2002, the past decade has seen a number of significant changes in the treatment of patients with EBC, including primary systemic therapy and HER2-targeted therapy.

Against this background, we conducted the present large single-centre study to investigate the impact of DTCs on prognosis in patients with early stage I–III breast cancer. DTCs were determined according to a standardised method recommended by expert consensus [14]. We moreover determined the impact of DTC detection on adjuvant BP efficacy by analysing survival outcomes in DTC-negative and DTC-positive patients treated with or without BPs.

Section snippets

Study population, setting, design, and ethics

Women undergoing primary surgery for EBC (T1–4, N0–2, M0) at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology at Tuebingen University Hospital, Tuebingen, Germany, between January, 2001, and January, 2013, were eligible for this retrospective study. Patients with recurrent or metastatic disease, bilateral breast cancer, R1 resection or a previous history of secondary malignancy were excluded. All patients provided written informed consent for BM aspiration. The analysis was approved by the ethics

Patient characteristics

In total, 3141 EBC patients were eligible for inclusion. Patient characteristics are detailed in Table 1. Most patients had invasive ductal carcinoma (79%). Tumours were mostly grade 2 (67%), pT1 (61%) or pT2 (31%). Most patients were node-negative (65%) and oestrogen receptor (ER; 83%) or progesterone receptor (PR; 75%) positive. Epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) was overexpressed by the primary tumour in 470 (16%) patients. More than half of patients received neoadjuvant (12%) or

Discussion

Numerous studies have shown that EBC with DTCs in their BM have worse outcomes than those without DTCs [3], [4], [5], [16]. In a large pooled analysis, DTCs were found in 31% of 4703 patients with stage I–III breast cancer [7]. Detection of DTCs was associated with poor overall and poor breast-cancer–specific survival, with more than twofold increased HR. Multivariate analysis revealed positive DTC status to be the strongest independent prognostic factor. However, the pooled analysis included

Systematic review

Based on results from several trials that provided evidence on the prognostic validity of disseminated tumour cell (DTC) detection in early breast cancer, we started bone marrow sampling as a routine procedure at our department in January 2001. Before conducting this retrospective analysis, we searched PubMed with the following term: (‘disseminated tumour cells’ or ‘micrometastasis’) and ‘breast cancer’. Various methods were described to detect DTCs. Hence, our aim was to confirm the prognostic

Funding

None.

Contributors

ADH, FAT and DW conceived of the study and designed it. ADH and FAT wrote the draft manuscript. MW, MH, SB, EFS, SYB and TF participated in patient recruitment, patient management, clinical data collection and sample collection and analysis.

Conflict of interest statement

None declared.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Silke Duerr-Störzer, Ingrid Teufel, Sabine Hofmeister, Angelika Amman and Brigitte Neth for excellent technical assistance.

References (30)

  • G. Gebauer et al.

    Epithelial cells in bone marrow of breast cancer patients at time of primary surgery: clinical outcome during long-term follow-up

    J Clin Oncol

    (2001)
  • G. Wiedswang et al.

    Detection of isolated tumor cells in bone marrow is an independent prognostic factor in breast cancer

    J Clin Oncol

    (2003)
  • S. Braun et al.

    A pooled analysis of bone marrow micrometastasis in breast cancer

    N Engl J Med

    (2005)
  • W. Janni et al.

    Persistence of disseminated tumor cells in the bone marrow of breast cancer patients predicts increased risk for relapse–a European pooled analysis

    Clin Cancer Res

    (2011)
  • I. Gruber et al.

    Disseminated tumor cells as a monitoring tool for adjuvant therapy in patients with primary breast cancer

    Breast Cancer Res Treat

    (2014)
  • Cited by (54)

    • Comprehensive review of solid tumor bone marrow metastasis

      2024, Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology
    • Thorny ground, rocky soil: Tissue-specific mechanisms of tumor dormancy and relapse

      2022, Seminars in Cancer Biology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Bone metastasis results in the painful destruction of hard bone and nerves, soft tissue inflammation, risk of fracture, and debilitation of the hematopoietic stem cell pool. Tumor cell dissemination to the bone occurs frequently, as marrow aspirates reveal that 15.0–30.6 % of breast cancer patients [34–37], and 57 % of prostate cancer patients [38] who show no other evidence of disease harbor bone DTCs or micrometastases, and these correlate with worsened outcomes. The prevalence of DTCs in the bone has been attributed to two factors: 1) the low blood pressure system of the sinusoidal beds, which aids in DTC extravasation [39]; and 2) DTC homing to the bone marrow via chemoattractant gradients including CXCL12 (SDF-1) via CXCR4 [40,41].

    • Disseminated tumour cells from the bone marrow of early breast cancer patients: Results from an international pooled analysis

      2021, European Journal of Cancer
      Citation Excerpt :

      Patients were defined as DTC-positive if at least one DTC was detected. The respective immunocytochemical/immunofluorescence methods for cytokeratin staining have been described earlier and are briefly described in Supplementary Table S1 [5,7–10,12,17,23–26]. The primary endpoint was OS, defined as the time from BM sampling to death from any cause.

    • How much do we know about the metastatic process?

      2024, Clinical and Experimental Metastasis
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    1

    Equal contributors and joint first authors.

    View full text