A high cannabinoid CB1 receptor immunoreactivity is associated with disease severity and outcome in prostate cancer

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2008.10.010Get rights and content

Abstract

In the light of findings indicating that cannabinoids can affect the proliferation of a number of cancer cell types and that cannabinoid receptor expression is higher in prostate cancer cell lines than in non-malignant cells, we investigated whether the level of cannabinoid 1 receptor immunoreactivity (CB1IR) in prostate cancer tissues is associated with disease severity and outcome. Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded non-malignant and tumour tissue samples from patients who were diagnosed with prostate cancer at a transurethral resection for voiding problems were used. CB1IR, which was scored in a total of 399 cases, was associated with the epithelial cell membranes, with little staining in the stroma. Patients with a tumour CB1IR score greater or equal to the median (2) had a significantly higher proportion of Gleason scores 8–10, metastases at diagnosis, tumour size and rate of cell proliferation at diagnosis than patients with a score < 2. For 269 cases, tumour CB1IR was measured for patients who only received palliative therapy at the end stages of the disease, allowing the influence of CB1IR upon the disease outcome to be determined. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves showed an area under the curve of 0.67 (95% confidence limits 0.59–0.74) for CB1IR in the tumour. CB1IR in non-malignant tissue was not associated with disease outcome. A tumour CB1IR score  2 was associated with a significantly lower disease specific survival. A Cox proportional hazards regression indicated that the tumour CB1IR score and the Gleason score were independent prognostic variables. It is concluded that a high tumour CB1IR score is associated with prostate cancer severity and outcome.

Introduction

Prostate cancer is the major cancer form afflicting males. In the United States of America (USA), for example, the American Cancer Society listed 218,219 new cancer cases in their estimates for 2007, a number approximately equal to the number of male cases for lung and bronchus, colon and rectum, and melanoma of the skin put together.1 There is a wide range of treatment options for prostate cancer depending on tumour characteristics, patient age and status. However, the curative treatments for localised prostate cancer (prostatectomy and radiation therapy) are associated with the risks of side-effects, including erectile dysfunction and incontinence,2, 3, 4 and both novel treatment strategies and prognostic markers (to avoid the overtreatment of patients who would better have been served by surveillance alone5) are much needed.

Δ9-Tetrahydrocannabinol (Δ9-THC), the main psychoactive ingredient of cannabis, produces most of its effects via the activation of two G-protein coupled cannabinoid (CB) receptors termed CB1 and CB2. CB1 receptors are among the most common of all receptor types in the brain, and are also located peripherally in both neurons and non-neuronal tissue, whilst CB2 receptors are mainly found in immune cells.6 The endogenous ligands for these receptors (‘endocannabinoids’) anandamide and 2-arachidonoylglycerol are synthesised on demand and mimic many of the actions of Δ9-THC, but have short-lived effects due to effective metabolic pathways.7, 8

Synthetic Δ9-THC (Marinol™) and its analogue nabilone (Cesamet™) are licensed in the USA, Canada and the United Kingdom (UK) for their palliative effects upon chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. However, cannabinoids also affect the viability, proliferation, adhesion and migration of cancer cells, including prostate cancer cells, and can reduce angiogenesis and the growth of tumour cells implanted into nude mice.9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18 In 2005, Sarfaraz and colleagues13 reported that CB1 receptor expression by the human prostate cancer cell lines, LNCaP (androgen-sensitive), DU145 and PC3 (androgen-independent), was higher than that seen in normal human prostate epithelial cells. Furthermore, the CB1 receptor expression was higher in CA-HPAV10 cells (virally transformed cells from the adenocarcinoma of human prostate tissue) than in the corresponding CA-HPV-7 cells, also virally transformed, but from normal human tissue.13 It is not known, however, whether the level of CB1 receptor immunoreactivity (CB1IR) is associated with disease severity and outcome in prostate cancer tissue samples from patients. This question has been addressed in the present study.

Section snippets

Patients

The formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded samples used in the present study were from a large series of cases diagnosed with prostate cancer at transurethral resection for micturation difficulties, as reported in detail previously.19 The samples were collected at the Central Hospital, Västerås, Sweden, between 1975 and 1991, i.e. before serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) was used in Sweden as a diagnostic tool. Evidence for metastases was undertaken using a bone scan shortly after the

Antibody characterisation in brain tissue

A recent study has indicated that the specificity of a number of commercially available CB1 receptor antibodies can be an issue.23 The antibody used in our investigation (AbCam antibody no. 23703, lot no. 280229) was not included in that study, but in a preliminary study we found that it produced the appropriate pattern of staining in paraffin-embedded, formalin-fixed sections from human cerebellum, where the CB1 receptor distribution is known (data not shown). The specificity of the antibody

Discussion

The present study was motivated by the studies done on cultured prostate cancer cells indicating that the levels of CB1 receptors are higher than those in non-malignant cells,13 and that cannabinoids affect the viability and/or invasivity of such cells.13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18 We have found that the level of CB1IR in tumour tissue, but not in non-malignant tissue, as determined by using the AbCam antibody no. 23703 (lot no. 280229) is associated with disease severity and outcome. The presence of

Conflict of interest statement

None declared.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Pernilla Andersson and Eva Hallin for their expert technical assistance. The authors are indebted to Dr. Thomas Brännström for providing us with the human cerebellum sample, and Drs. Michelle Glass, Scott Graham, Michael Elphick and Thomas Brännström for their help and advice concerning the assessment of CB1 receptor immunoreactivity in this sample. We are grateful to Dr. Hans Stenlund for his advice on the statistical treatment of the data. The authors also thank the Swedish

References (35)

  • K. Bylow et al.

    Does androgen-deprivation therapy accelerate the development of frailty in older men with prostate cancer? a conceptual review

    Cancer

    (2007)
  • L. Klotz

    Active surveillance for favorable-risk prostate cancer: who, how and why?

    Nat Clin Pract Oncol

    (2007)
  • A.C. Howlett et al.

    International Union of Pharmacology. XXVII. Classification of cannabinoid receptors

    Pharmacol Rev

    (2002)
  • C.J. Fowler

    The cannabinoid system and its pharmacological manipulation – a review, with emphasis upon the uptake and hydrolysis of anandamide

    Fundam Clin Pharmacol

    (2006)
  • M. Gómez-Ruiz et al.

    An overview on the biochemistry of the cannabinoid system

    Mol Neurobiol

    (2007)
  • M. Guzmán

    Cannabinoids: potential anticancer agents

    Nat Rev Cancer

    (2003)
  • M. Bifulco et al.

    Cannabinoids and cancer: pros and cons of an antitumour strategy

    Brit J Pharmacol

    (2006)
  • Cited by (101)

    • Anti-cancer activities of Schedule E1 drugs used in ayurvedic formulations

      2022, Journal of Ayurveda and Integrative Medicine
    • Diverse role of endocannabinoid system in mammalian male reproduction

      2021, Life Sciences
      Citation Excerpt :

      As discussed above FAAH is also expressed in prostate and its expression is upregulated in the cancerous conditions. Moreover, overexpression of CB1 and FAAH immunoreactivity is associated with poor disease survival [149]. The therapeutic potential of cannabinoids in prostate cancer is well documented [148,154,155].

    • CNR1 may reverse progesterone-resistance of endometrial cancer through the ERK pathway

      2021, Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications
      Citation Excerpt :

      On the contrary, CNR1 and cyclinD1 in the tumor tissues of shCNR1 +MPA group with the slowest growth were both at low level (Fig. 4D). In recent years, the research of endocannabinoid system in tumors [16–18] and metabolic diseases has become a hot spot [19]. And it is even expected to become a new marker for the prediction of EC [20].

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text