Elsevier

European Journal of Agronomy

Volume 53, February 2014, Pages 38-44
European Journal of Agronomy

Impact of biochar application on plant water relations in Vitis vinifera (L.)

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2013.11.003Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Crop management strategies play an important role in the soil water content.

  • The impact of biochar application on soil–water relations and on Vitis vinifera water status was assessed.

  • Two rates of biochar application in two years were considered.

  • Biochar addition increases the soil water-holding capacity and plant available water content.

  • Biochar addition substantially affected ecophysiological parameters of V. vinifera.

Abstract

Soil water status plays an important role in growth-yield and grape quality of Vitis vinifera (L.). In some cases, periods of moderate water stress have been indicated to exert a positive effect on the quality of grape production. However, prolonged water stress may have a strong negative affect grapevine photosynthesis and grape yield, especially in dry Mediterranean environments. Biochar is a co-product of a thermochemical conversion of biomass that is recognized to be a beneficial soil amendment, which when incorporated into the soil increases soil water retention. We investigated the effect of two rates of biochar application (22 and 44 ton ha−1) on plant water relations of V. vinifera in a field experiment in central Italy. Biochar obtained from the carbonization of orchard pruning waste was applied to the soil over two consecutive growing seasons. The treatments did not show a significant increase in soil hydrophobicity. Moreover, soil analysis and ecophysiological measurements indicated a substantial relative increases in available soil water content compared to control soils (from 3.2% to 45% in the 22 and 44 ton ha−1 application rates, respectively) and in leaf water potential (24–37%) during droughts.

Introduction

In the Mediterranean area water scarcity is a major limiting factor for agriculture that currently accounts for the consumption of roughly 65% of available freshwater (Plan Bleu, 2011). According to the IPCC (2007), the vulnerability of Mediterranean systems to water scarcity is predicted to increase in the near future as a consequence of larger inter-annual rainfall variability and higher frequency and intensity of extreme events such as droughts and heat waves. In this context, the identification and implementation of adaptation measures aimed at enhancing the resilience of the agroecosystems to water scarcity is a key priority to maintain both the quality and quantity of crop productions and protect water resources.

Crop management strategies play an important role in the capability of soils to hold nutrients and water. The depletion of soil organic matter in agricultural soils over the last century due to the management intensification, the sustained removal of crop residues and the use of chemical fertilizers (Das et al., 2005, Lal, 2009, Lal, 2004, Sharma et al., 2005), has had dramatic effects on the water holding capacity of soils (Blanco-Canqui and Lal, 2009), and on the capacity of plants to adapt to a changing climate.

In recent years, the addition of biochar to agricultural soils has emerged as a feasible strategy to simultaneously enhance crop productivity and soil fertility (Major et al., 2010, Vaccari et al., 2011), decrease nutrient leaching (Laird et al., 2010), sequester organic carbon (Ventura et al., 2013, Woolf et al., 2010), reduce non-CO2 green house gases emissions (Castaldi et al., 2011, Stewart et al., 2013, Zheng et al., 2012) and to increase soil water-holding capacity (Basso et al., 2013, Case et al., 2012, Kammann et al., 2011).

Potential soil improvements depend on the physical and chemical structure of the biochar, and on the rate of application to the soil (Novak et al., 2009, Van Zwieten et al., 2010). The increase of soil water-holding capacity that follows biochar addition (Case et al., 2012, Kammann et al., 2011) is related to the porosity and high specific surface area (Verheijen et al., 2010), and the magnitude of this effect depends on feedstock type and pyrolysis conditions (Uzoma et al., 2011). Glaser et al. (2002) reported an increased in field capacity of 18% in Anthrosols rich in charcoal; a similar increase was reported in sandy soils by Lehmann et al. (2011).

Due to the mechanical stability and recalcitrance of biochar in soils (Verheijen et al., 2010), its application is expected to have a long term effect on water holding capacity and soil structure.

Water scarcity is recognized as one of the major environmental limitations for the expansion viticulture in new territories (Morison et al., 2008, Schultz and Stoll, 2010), and for quantitative and qualitative stability of grape production in current viticultural areas (García-García et al., 2008). About two-thirds of the viticultural areas of the world have an annual total precipitation below 700 mm, while a large part is located in regions where a seasonal drought often coincides with the grapevine growing season. The predicted increase in the occurrence of extreme weather events, in particular droughts and heat waves, is expected to have negative impacts on Mediterranean viticulture (Hannah et al., 2013, Moriondo et al., 2011). The area of viticulture subject to water deficit are expected to further increase in the near future (Flexas et al., 2010), and despite its drought tolerance grapevine could be affected by limitations to growth, abnormal ripening and reduced berry quality (Flexas et al., 2002). This will significantly affect viticulture, leading to changes in the geographical ranges of varieties (Schultz, 2000) and forcing winegrowers to increasingly rely upon irrigation (Chaves et al., 2007). While it has been demonstrated that biochar increases total soil water content and holding capacity, little is known regarding the water available to plants, although this is expected to be higher during dry periods (Atkinson et al., 2010). The additional volume of water (and soluble nutrients) stored in the biochar micropores is hypothesized to become available for plants as the soil dries and the matric potential decreases (Uzoma et al., 2011), but few data is available to confirm this behaviour.

The molecular structure of biochar is highly hydrophobic and could theoretically enhance the water repellency of soil surface with potential impacts upon soil erosion; nevertheless, few studies have been conducted on the hydrophobicity of the soil–biochar mixture (Kinney et al., 2012, Verheijen et al., 2010).

A field experiment was therefore conducted in a vineyard in central Italy to evaluate the impacts of two rates of biochar addition on soil–water relations, one and two years after application, and to verify any associated effects on plant water status and photosynthetic rates.

Section snippets

Experimental site

The field experiment was established in a vineyard at the “Marchesi Antinori – La Braccesca Estate” (Lat. 43°10′15″N; Long. 11°57′ 43″E; 290 m a.s.l.), located few kilometres away from Montepulciano (Tuscany, central-Italy). The vineyard was planted in 1995 (cv. Merlot, clone 181; rootstock 3309 Couderc), the trellis system is a single curtain with plant-row spacing of 0.8 m and 2.5 m; rows orientation is east–west. The vineyard is not irrigated.

Meteorological parameters were collected hourly by

Physical and chemical effects

The chemical and physical characteristics of the biochar used for the experiment are reported in Table 2, Table 3. The total porosity of the biochar is 2722 mm3 g−1 (Table 3); the pore distribution curve shows a bimodal pattern, with the maximum peak around 30 μm and the second peak around 3 μm (Fig. 2). Pore size classes were grouped according to Greenland's (1977) terminology, which defines transmission pores (≥50 μm), storage pores (0.5–50 μm) and residual pores (<0.5 μm). Storage pores are 75% of

Discussion

The addition of biochar to soil caused a substantial and significant change in soil physical characteristics. This was undoubtedly associated to the peculiar properties of biochar and in particular to its high SSA and low bulk density.

The analysis of pore size distribution suggests that these changes were related to pores function as increasing values of pore diameter corresponded to decreasing values of water tension (i.e. 1 mm = pF 3.5, 3 mm = pF 3; 10 mm = pF 2.5 and so on). Transmission pores, in

Conclusion

In this study we assessed the impact of biochar amendment on selected soil physical properties and ecophysiological parameters of Vitis vinifera. The results reported here offer new information regarding the impact of biochar on soil–plant water status in a perennial crop, demonstrating that biochar could effectively be used to improve soil water content, reduce plant water stress and increase photosynthetic activity without affecting soil hydrophobicity.

Our results do not support the existence

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the staff of “Marchesi Antinori - La Braccesca Estate” for their technical support and for hosting the experiment and in particular Giancarlo Certini, Samuele Collini and Adriano Giuliarini. Lorenzo Albanese, Filippo Di Gennaro, Sara Di Lonardo, Alessandro Matese, Jacopo Primicerio, Francesco Sabatini (IBIMET-CNR), Manuele Scatena (ISE-CNR) are acknowledged for their valuable technical assistance during the field experiments and during ecophysiological measurements. A

References (69)

  • K.A. Nicholas et al.

    Farm-scale adaptation and vulnerability to environmental stresses: Insights from winegrowing in Northern California

    Global Environ. Change

    (2012)
  • S. Poni et al.

    Performance and water-use efficiency (single-leaf vs. whole-canopy) of well-watered and half-stressed split-root lambrusco grapevines grown in Po Valley (Italy)

    Agric. Ecosyst. Environ.

    (2009)
  • C.J. Ritsema et al.

    Preferential flow in water repellent sandy soils: principles and modeling implications

    J. Hydrol.

    (2000)
  • R.A. Shakesby et al.

    The erosional impact of soil hydrophobicity: current problems and future research directions

    J. Hydrol.

    (2000)
  • R.A. Shakesby et al.

    Wildfire as a hydrological and geomorphological agent

    Earth-Sci. Rev.

    (2006)
  • K.L. Sharma et al.

    Long-term soil management effects on crop yields and soil quality in a dryland Alfisol

    Soil Till. Res.

    (2005)
  • A. Sofo et al.

    Berry morphology and composition in irrigated and non-irrigated grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.)

    J. Plant Physiol.

    (2012)
  • S.P. Sohi et al.

    A review of biochar and its use and function in soil

    Adv. Agron.

    (2010)
  • F.P. Vaccari et al.

    Biochar as a strategy to sequester carbon and increase yield in durum wheat

    Eur. J. Agron.

    (2011)
  • C.J. Atkinson et al.

    Potential mechanisms for achieving agricultural benefits from biochar application to temperate soils: a review

    Plant Soil

    (2010)
  • A. Bagreev et al.

    H2S adsorption/oxidation on adsorbents obtained from pyrolysis of sewage–sludge-derived fertilizer using zinc chloride activation

    Ind. Eng. Chem. Res.

    (2001)
  • A.S. Basso et al.

    Assessing potential of biochar for increasing water-holding capacity of sandy soils

    Global Change Biol. Bioenergy

    (2013)
  • K. Bindon et al.

    Influence of partial root zone drying on the composition and accumulation of anthocyanins in grape berries (Vitis vinifera cv Cabernet Sauvignon)

    Aust. J. Grape Wine Res.

    (2008)
  • H. Blanco-Canqui et al.

    Crop residue removal impacts on soil productivity and environmental quality

    Crit. Rev. Plant Sci.

    (2009)
  • S.R. Brockhoff et al.

    Physical and mineral-nutrition properties of sand-based turfgrass root zones amended with biochar

    Agron. J.

    (2010)
  • M.A. Carbonneau et al.

    Improvement in the antioxidant status of plasma and low-density lipoprotein in subjects receiving a red wine phenolics mixture

    J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc.

    (1998)
  • M.M. Chaves et al.

    Deficit irrigation in grapevine improves water-use efficiency while controlling vigour and production quality

    Ann. Appl. Biol.

    (2007)
  • H.P. Cresswell et al.

    The adequacy of pressure plate apparatus for determining soil water retention

    Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J.

    (2008)
  • T.K. Das et al.

    Impacts of conservation agriculture on total soil organic carbon retention potential under an irrigated agro-ecosystem of the western Indo-Gangetic Plains

    Eur. J. Agron.

    (2005)
  • A. Deloire et al.

    Vine and water a short review

    J. Int. des Sci. de la Vigne et du Vin.

    (2004)
  • S.H. Doerr

    Short communication on standardizing the ‘Water Drop Penetration Time’ and the ‘molarity of an ethanol droplet’ techniques to classify soil hydrophobicity: a case study using medium textured soils

    Earth Surf. Process. Landf.

    (1998)
  • J. Flexas et al.

    Effects of drought on photosynthesis in grapevines under field conditions: an evaluation of stomatal and mesophyll limitations

    Funct. Plant Biol.

    (2002)
  • J. Flexas et al.

    Improving water use efficiency in grapevines: potential physiological targets for biotechnological improvement

    Aust. J. Grape Wine Res.

    (2010)
  • J. García-García et al.

    Contabilidad de costes del cultivo de uva de viniWcación de secano en la región de Murcia

    Vitic y enología

    (2008)
  • Cited by (264)

    • Biochar modulating soil biological health: A review

      2024, Science of the Total Environment
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text