Elsevier

Eating Behaviors

Volume 13, Issue 2, April 2012, Pages 150-153
Eating Behaviors

Do parental feeding practices moderate the relationships between impulsivity and eating in children?

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eatbeh.2011.11.015Get rights and content

Abstract

This study examines the relationships between children's impulsivity, their eating behaviours, and their perceptions of their parent's feeding practices. 153 10–13 year old children completed questionnaires assessing their eating behaviours, their impulsiveness and their perception of their parent's feeding practices. Children's reports of dysfunctional eating behaviours were significantly correlated with their perceptions of their parents feeding practices and with their levels of impulsivity. Children's reports of parental monitoring of their food intake significantly moderated the influence of child impulsiveness upon emotional eating. Children's perceptions of parental monitoring of their food intake may potentially have a protective effect at preventing more impulsive children from eating in response to emotional feelings.

Highlights

► Impulsivity in children is associated with more external eating behaviour. ► Impulsivity in children is associated with more emotional eating behaviour. ► Greater parental monitoring may help protect impulsive children from emotional eating.

Introduction

People who are impulsive are often more sensitive to, and more likely to approach, rewarding stimuli and they also tend to be worse at inhibiting and controlling their responses to signals, one of which is the tendency to eat. Previous research has found that impulsivity is higher in obese children relative to controls, and particularly in children who binge eat (Braet et al., 2007, Nederkoorn et al., 2006). Impulsivity has also been associated with bulimia nervosa, with binge eating disorder (Fischer, Smith, & Cyders, 2008), and predicts lower weight loss in treatment programmes for obesity (Nederkoorn, Jansen, Mulkens, & Jansen, 2007).

There are a range of environmental and societal influences that will moderate the relationships between a child's personality and their behaviour (e.g. Belsky, 1984). For example, overly-controlling parental feeding practices can disrupt the child's ability to attend to their hunger and satiety (Birch et al., 2003, Farrow and Blissett, 2006). Parental pressure to eat predicts more negative comments about food, greater subsequent refusal of food (Batsell et al., 2002, Galloway et al., 2006), slower weight gain and weight loss in children over time (Faith et al., 2004a, Farrow and Blissett, 2008). Conversely, restricting children's food intake predicts a greater desire to eat restricted food (Fisher & Birch, 1999), eating in the absence of hunger, emotional eating and weight gain in longitudinal research (Birch et al., 2003, Faith et al., 2004a, Galloway et al., 2010). Although the relationships between parental monitoring child food intake and child BMI are mixed (e.g. Brann and Skinner, 2005, Roemmich et al., 2010), monitoring appears to have a protective effect in reducing the likelihood of child overweight and weight gain (Brann and Skinner, 2005, Faith et al., 2004b).

Given that impulsivity is assumed to predict weight gain because impulsive children struggle to control the tendency to overeat, it is quite likely that the relationship between impulsivity and eating would be impacted upon by over-controlling parental feeding practices. Experimental research has found that child food intake can be predicted child impulsivity in interaction with the amount of variety in their food environment: with impulsive children who are exposed to high variety being most susceptible to overeating (Guerrieri, Nederkoorn, & Jansen, 2008). This research aims to extend these findings by exploring whether children's experiences of controlling parental feeding practices interact with their levels of impulsivity in predicting their emotional and external eating. It was hypothesised that more impulsive children who are additionally exposed to greater pressure to eat, greater restriction of food, and to less monitoring of their food intake would be the most likely to report emotional and external eating.

Section snippets

Participants

Participants included 153 pupils (61 male, 92 female) from 3 UK secondary schools (one being single sex) aged 10–13 years (mean 11 years, SD = 1.09). 143 participants were White; 3 Black or Black British; 2 Asian or Asian British; 3 Mixed Race and 1 ‘Other’. This research was approved by the University Research Ethics Committee. Parental consent was gained for all participants, and all children verbally assented to participate.

Dutch Eating Behaviour Questionnaire

DEBQ (Van Strien, Frijters, Bergers, & Defares, 1986)to assess emotional

Descriptive statistics and relationships with demographic variables

Means and standard deviations (Table 1) are similar to other published data (Carper et al., 2000, Stadler and Janke, 2003, Wardle et al., 1992). In terms of self-reported student weight (using age and gender appropriate cut off scores); 83% of the sample was classified as healthy-weight or underweight, 13% as overweight and 4% as obese (Cole, Bellizzi, Flegal, & Dietz; 2000). These data are similar to other published data from children of this age, suggesting that the sample was representative

Discussion

Children who reported greater levels of impulsiveness also reported more external and emotional eating. These relationships support previous research suggesting that an impulsive temperament can influence dysfunctional eating related behaviours (Braet et al., 2007, Guerrieri et al., 2008). The results also demonstrate that children who reported higher levels of parental restriction reported lower levels of external eating. Whilst it is unclear how parental restriction is related to external

Role of funding sources

There was no external funding for this research.

Contributors

Claire Farrow developed, collected data for, analysed and wrote this manuscript.

Conflict of interest

There is no conflict of interest to declare.

References (34)

Cited by (33)

  • Life-course effects of early life adversity exposure on eating behavior and metabolism

    2021, Advances in Food and Nutrition Research
    Citation Excerpt :

    Furthermore, impulsivity problems also influence unhealthy eating behavior. Studies have observed that impulsive children exhibit high scores of emotional overeating, and impulsive adolescents appear to be prone to the consumption of soft drinks (Farrow, 2012; Melbye et al., 2016). In this context, ELS have been associated with susceptibility to development of ADHD as well as impulsivity problems, both in animal models and in humans (Bock, Breuer, Poeggel, & Braun, 2017; Colorado et al., 2006; de Lima, Barth, et al., 2020; Gondre-Lewis et al., 2016; Miguel et al., 2019).

  • Parental restrictive feeding with Latinx adolescents: Examining the role of adolescent effortful control

    2019, Appetite
    Citation Excerpt :

    However, there is a dearth of research investigating how domain-general self-regulation may be related to parental restrictive feeding with adolescents. One exception is Farrow (2012), who tested if adolescents’ perceptions of parental restrictive feeding moderated the effect of impulsivity (a breakdown in self-regulation; Nigg, 2017) on eating behavior. However, no significant effect emerged.

  • Toddlers’ impulsivity, inhibitory control, and maternal eating-related supervision in relation to toddler body mass index: Direct and interactive effects

    2019, Appetite
    Citation Excerpt :

    To address the gap in existing science noted above, the current study examines children's self-regulation as a moderating influence of the association between maternal feeding practices and child BMI. Most prior studies (see Farrow, 2012 for an exception) have considered children's self-regulation and maternal practices involved in the supervision of children's eating separately, and few have considered the interactive effects of these correlates of children's weight-related outcomes in relation to children's BMI. Additionally, previous research has separately considered impulsivity or inhibitory control, but not both, in regards to their influence on children's BMI.

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text