Do parental feeding practices moderate the relationships between impulsivity and eating in children?
Highlights
► Impulsivity in children is associated with more external eating behaviour. ► Impulsivity in children is associated with more emotional eating behaviour. ► Greater parental monitoring may help protect impulsive children from emotional eating.
Introduction
People who are impulsive are often more sensitive to, and more likely to approach, rewarding stimuli and they also tend to be worse at inhibiting and controlling their responses to signals, one of which is the tendency to eat. Previous research has found that impulsivity is higher in obese children relative to controls, and particularly in children who binge eat (Braet et al., 2007, Nederkoorn et al., 2006). Impulsivity has also been associated with bulimia nervosa, with binge eating disorder (Fischer, Smith, & Cyders, 2008), and predicts lower weight loss in treatment programmes for obesity (Nederkoorn, Jansen, Mulkens, & Jansen, 2007).
There are a range of environmental and societal influences that will moderate the relationships between a child's personality and their behaviour (e.g. Belsky, 1984). For example, overly-controlling parental feeding practices can disrupt the child's ability to attend to their hunger and satiety (Birch et al., 2003, Farrow and Blissett, 2006). Parental pressure to eat predicts more negative comments about food, greater subsequent refusal of food (Batsell et al., 2002, Galloway et al., 2006), slower weight gain and weight loss in children over time (Faith et al., 2004a, Farrow and Blissett, 2008). Conversely, restricting children's food intake predicts a greater desire to eat restricted food (Fisher & Birch, 1999), eating in the absence of hunger, emotional eating and weight gain in longitudinal research (Birch et al., 2003, Faith et al., 2004a, Galloway et al., 2010). Although the relationships between parental monitoring child food intake and child BMI are mixed (e.g. Brann and Skinner, 2005, Roemmich et al., 2010), monitoring appears to have a protective effect in reducing the likelihood of child overweight and weight gain (Brann and Skinner, 2005, Faith et al., 2004b).
Given that impulsivity is assumed to predict weight gain because impulsive children struggle to control the tendency to overeat, it is quite likely that the relationship between impulsivity and eating would be impacted upon by over-controlling parental feeding practices. Experimental research has found that child food intake can be predicted child impulsivity in interaction with the amount of variety in their food environment: with impulsive children who are exposed to high variety being most susceptible to overeating (Guerrieri, Nederkoorn, & Jansen, 2008). This research aims to extend these findings by exploring whether children's experiences of controlling parental feeding practices interact with their levels of impulsivity in predicting their emotional and external eating. It was hypothesised that more impulsive children who are additionally exposed to greater pressure to eat, greater restriction of food, and to less monitoring of their food intake would be the most likely to report emotional and external eating.
Section snippets
Participants
Participants included 153 pupils (61 male, 92 female) from 3 UK secondary schools (one being single sex) aged 10–13 years (mean 11 years, SD = 1.09). 143 participants were White; 3 Black or Black British; 2 Asian or Asian British; 3 Mixed Race and 1 ‘Other’. This research was approved by the University Research Ethics Committee. Parental consent was gained for all participants, and all children verbally assented to participate.
Dutch Eating Behaviour Questionnaire
DEBQ (Van Strien, Frijters, Bergers, & Defares, 1986)to assess emotional
Descriptive statistics and relationships with demographic variables
Means and standard deviations (Table 1) are similar to other published data (Carper et al., 2000, Stadler and Janke, 2003, Wardle et al., 1992). In terms of self-reported student weight (using age and gender appropriate cut off scores); 83% of the sample was classified as healthy-weight or underweight, 13% as overweight and 4% as obese (Cole, Bellizzi, Flegal, & Dietz; 2000). These data are similar to other published data from children of this age, suggesting that the sample was representative
Discussion
Children who reported greater levels of impulsiveness also reported more external and emotional eating. These relationships support previous research suggesting that an impulsive temperament can influence dysfunctional eating related behaviours (Braet et al., 2007, Guerrieri et al., 2008). The results also demonstrate that children who reported higher levels of parental restriction reported lower levels of external eating. Whilst it is unclear how parental restriction is related to external
Role of funding sources
There was no external funding for this research.
Contributors
Claire Farrow developed, collected data for, analysed and wrote this manuscript.
Conflict of interest
There is no conflict of interest to declare.
References (34)
- et al.
Learning to overeat: Maternal use of restrictive feeding practices promotes girls' eating in the absence of hunger
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
(2003) - et al.
Confirmatory factor analysis of the Child Feeding Questionnaire: A measure of parental attitudes, beliefs and practices about child feeding and obesity proneness
Appetite
(2001) - et al.
More controlling child-feeding practices are found among parents of boys with an average body mass index compared with parents of boys with a high body mass index
Journal of the American Dietetic Association
(2005) - et al.
Functional and dysfunctional impulsivity in children and their relationship to Eysenck's impulsiveness and venturesomeness dimensions
Personality and Individual Differences
(1997) - et al.
Parental use of restrictive feeding practices and child BMI z-score. A 3-year prospective cohort study
Appetite
(2010) - et al.
Young girls' emerging dietary restraint and disinhibition are related to parental control in child feeding
Appetite
(2000) - et al.
Age norms for impulsiveness, venturesomeness and empathy in adults
Personality and Individual Differences
(1985) - et al.
Restricting access to palatable foods affects children's behaviours response, food selection, and intake
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
(1999) - et al.
Another look at impulsivity: A meta-analytic review comparing specific dispositions to rash action in their relationship to bulimic symptoms
Clinical Psychology Review
(2008) - et al.
Global and physical self-esteem and body dissatisfaction as mediators of the relationship between weight status and being a victim of bullying
Journal of Adolescence
(2009)
‘Finish your soup’: Counterproductive effects of pressuring children to eat on intake and affect
Appetite
Why obese children cannot resist food: the role of impulsivity
Eating Behavior
Impulsivity predicts treatment outcome in obese children
Behaviour Research and Therapy
Energy intake, parental control of children's eating, and physical activity in siblings discordant for adiposity
Appetite
Concurrent validity of the German version of S.B. Eysenck's impulsiveness questionnaire for children
Personality and Individual Differences
Increased restrictive feeding practices are associated with reduced energy density in 4–6-year-old, multi-ethnic children at ad libitum laboratory test-meals
Appetite
Eating style: a validation study of the Dutch Eating Behaviour Questionnaire in normal subjects and women with eating disorders
Journal of Psychosomatic Research
Cited by (33)
Life-course effects of early life adversity exposure on eating behavior and metabolism
2021, Advances in Food and Nutrition ResearchCitation Excerpt :Furthermore, impulsivity problems also influence unhealthy eating behavior. Studies have observed that impulsive children exhibit high scores of emotional overeating, and impulsive adolescents appear to be prone to the consumption of soft drinks (Farrow, 2012; Melbye et al., 2016). In this context, ELS have been associated with susceptibility to development of ADHD as well as impulsivity problems, both in animal models and in humans (Bock, Breuer, Poeggel, & Braun, 2017; Colorado et al., 2006; de Lima, Barth, et al., 2020; Gondre-Lewis et al., 2016; Miguel et al., 2019).
Parental restrictive feeding with Latinx adolescents: Examining the role of adolescent effortful control
2019, AppetiteCitation Excerpt :However, there is a dearth of research investigating how domain-general self-regulation may be related to parental restrictive feeding with adolescents. One exception is Farrow (2012), who tested if adolescents’ perceptions of parental restrictive feeding moderated the effect of impulsivity (a breakdown in self-regulation; Nigg, 2017) on eating behavior. However, no significant effect emerged.
Toddlers’ impulsivity, inhibitory control, and maternal eating-related supervision in relation to toddler body mass index: Direct and interactive effects
2019, AppetiteCitation Excerpt :To address the gap in existing science noted above, the current study examines children's self-regulation as a moderating influence of the association between maternal feeding practices and child BMI. Most prior studies (see Farrow, 2012 for an exception) have considered children's self-regulation and maternal practices involved in the supervision of children's eating separately, and few have considered the interactive effects of these correlates of children's weight-related outcomes in relation to children's BMI. Additionally, previous research has separately considered impulsivity or inhibitory control, but not both, in regards to their influence on children's BMI.